
'Serious Questions' Over UK Secret Afghan Relocations: PM
Parliamentary Speaker Lindsay Hoyle said the affair raised significant constitutional issues" after it emerged that the previous government had obtained a court order banning media coverage and preventing any scrutiny by parliament.
Thousands of Afghans who worked with the UK and their families have been brought to Britain under the programme following the leak.
But the 2022 breach and the resettlement plan to protect those involved from potential repercussions only came to light on Tuesday after a court super-gag was lifted.
Defence Minister John Healey told parliament a UK official had accidentally leaked a spreadsheet containing the names and details of almost 19,000 Afghans who had asked to be relocated to Britain.
It happened in February 2022, just six months after Taliban fighters seized Kabul, he said.
In parliament Wednesday, Starmer said his government supported the principle of fulfilling "our obligations to Afghans who served alongside British forces" in the post 9/11 conflict in the South Asian country.
Healey had "set out the full extent of the failings that we inherited: a major data breach, a superinjunction, a secret route that has already cost hundreds of millions of pounds", he added.
"Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen," he said.
The nearly two-year-long court ban secured by the previous government prevented any media reporting of the leak.
In addition, parliament was not briefed and there was no public knowledge of the resettlement plan and the costs involved.
Speaker of Parliament Lindsay Hoyle, who is responsible for the proper administration of the House of Commons, also commented on the affair.
"This episode raises significant constitutional issues. I have therefore asked the clerks to consider whether any lessons need to be learned from this case," he told lawmakers.
Under the Conservatives the secret programme was put in place in April 2024 to help those "judged to be at the highest risk of reprisals by the Taliban", Healey said told parliament.
Some 900 Afghans and 3,600 family members have now been brought to Britain or are in transit under the programme known as the Afghan Response Route, at a cost of around GBP400 million ($535 million).
Applications from 600 more people have also been accepted, bringing the estimated total cost of the scheme to GBP850 million.
They are among some 36,000 Afghans accepted by Britain under different schemes since the August 2021 fall of Kabul.
Former defence minister Ben Wallace said he stood by his decision to seek secrecy from the court in August 2023 and rejected claims of a "cover-up".
"I make no apology for applying to the court for an injunction at the time," he said.
"If this leak was reported at the time, the existence of the list would put in peril those we needed to help," he told BBC radio.
When Labour came to power in July 2024, the scheme was up and running but Healey said he had been "deeply uncomfortable to be constrained from reporting" it to parliament.
He estimated the total cost of relocating people to Britain from Afghanistan under the various resettlement schemes at between GBP5.5 billion to GBP6 billion.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Justice Dept To Meet Epstein Accomplice Maxwell On Thursday: US Media
The Department of Justice was to interview Ghislaine Maxwell, the imprisoned accomplice of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, on Thursday, US media reported, as President Donald Trump struggles to quell fury over his handling of the notorious case. The former British socialite is serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted in 2021 of sex trafficking minors on behalf of Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial in his own pedophile trafficking case. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche -- Trump's former personal lawyer for his 2024 hush money trial -- was expected to meet Maxwell in Tallahassee, Florida, according to US media. "If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say," Blanche said in a statement on Tuesday. It marks another attempt by the Trump administration to defuse spiraling anger among the Republican president's own supporters over what they have long seen as a cover-up of Epstein's crimes and high-level connections. A Wall Street Journal report on Wednesday hiked up that pressure as it claimed Trump's name was among hundreds found during a review of DOJ documents on Epstein. The White House has denied this. The same paper claimed last week that Trump penned a sexually suggestive letter to Epstein, a former friend, for his birthday in 2003. Trump has sued for at least $10 billion over the story. Many of his core supporters want more transparency on the Epstein case, and Trump -- who has long fanned conspiracy theories -- had promised to deliver that on retaking the White House in January. But he has since dismissed the controversy as a "hoax," while the DOJ and FBI released a heavily-criticized memo this month claiming the so-called Epstein files did not contain evidence that would justify further investigation. Seeking to redirect public attention, the White House has promoted unfounded claims that former president Barack Obama led a "years-long coup" against Trump around his victorious 2016 election. The extraordinary narrative claims that Obama had ordered intelligence assessments to be manipulated to accuse Russia of election interference to help Trump. But it runs counter to four separate criminal, counterintelligence and watchdog probes between 2019 and 2023 -- each of them concluding that Russia did interfere and did, in various ways, help Trump.


Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
India's Modi And UK PM Starmer Ink Trade Deal
Prime Minister Keir Starmer praised Britain's "unique bonds" with India as he and his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi formally signed a recently announced UK-India trade deal during talks on Thursday. Starmer hailed the agreement as a "landmark moment" for both countries as he hosted India's leader at his Chequers country estate, northwest of London. "This is not the extent or the limit of our collaboration with India," added the British premier, whose year-old government is struggling to fire up an economy weakened by years of stagnant growth and high inflation. "We have unique bonds of history, of family and of culture and we want to strengthen our relationship further, so that it is even more ambitious, modern and focused on the long term," he said. Starmer and Modi announced in May they had struck a free trade agreement that the British government says will eventually add GBP4.8 billion ($6.5 billion) a year to the UK economy. The UK and India hope the accord will boost trade between the two countries by GBP25.5 billion, as well as bolstering the British economy and wages. Modi, standing alongside Starmer during a media appearance, described the deal as a "blueprint for our shared prosperity". Britain and India are the sixth and fifth largest global economies respectively, with a trade relationship worth around GBP41 billion and investment supporting more than 600,000 jobs across both countries. The accord slashes tariffs on imports of UK goods into India, including whisky, cosmetics and medical devices. In return, the United Kingdom will cut tariffs on clothes, footwear and food products including frozen prawns from India. Starmer and Modi were also likely to discuss last month's Air India disaster in which 241 people died when a London-bound flight crashed after taking off from Ahmedabad in western India. Some 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals were killed in the June 12 crash, one of the deadliest plane disasters in terms of the number of British fatalities. A lawyer for 20 British families said this week the repatriation of victims had been marred by errors with one relative finding that a returned coffin contained "co-mingled" remains. A different family was told a coffin contained the body of someone else entirely, not their loved one, he said, according to UK media. India's foreign ministry has said all remains "were handled with utmost professionalism" and that it is "continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue". Another tricky topic of discussion could be that of Scottish sikh blogger Jagtar Singh Johal, imprisoned in India since 2017 on accusations of being part of a terror plot against right-wing Hindu leaders. He has not been convicted of a crime and in March was cleared of one of the nine charges against him. His brother Gurpreet Singh Johal said in a statement the case "should be high on the agenda" during the two leaders' meeting. Starmer and Modi have met twice recently, at the G7 summit in Canada last month and at the G20 meeting in Brazil last year. Modi was also due to see King Charles III during his brief stay in Britain, his fourth visit since becoming India's leader in 2014. The accord slashes tariffs on imports of UK goods into India, including whisky, cosmetics and medical devices AFP


DW
6 hours ago
- DW
German-Afghan relations under scrutiny over deportations – DW – 07/24/2025
The German government's policy of deporting Afghan criminials to Afghanistan relies on cooperation with the Taliban government in Kabul. The Islamists are hoping this is the first step toward diplomatic recognition. "We have succeeded in organizing another deportation flight with convicted criminals to Afghanistan," Germany's Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said in a press release on July 18, following the departure of a plane from Leipzig to Kabul with 81 Afghan men with failed asylum applications and criminal convictions on board. As Dobrindt sees it, this flight means that the governing coalition of the center-right bloc of Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Christian Social Union (CSU), and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD) has made good on its promise. "We will start deporting people to Afghanistan and Syria, beginning with criminals and dangerous individuals," they wrote in their coalition agreement. Deportation flights had already been conducted under the previous center-left government, which lost the general election on February 23, 2025. Nevertheless, Dobrindt (CSU) spoke of a "policy shift" — with reference to the "repatriation offensive." The plan is to put more pressure on countries to take back their citizens. In the case of Afghanistan, this is particularly tricky and sensitive because Germany has not officially recognized the Taliban as a legitimate government. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Islamist Taliban returned to power in August 2021 following 20 years of struggle, after the US-led military mission ended in failure with the withdrawal of international troops. The humanitarian situation is dire and the radical Islamic fundamentalists have once again been systematically oppressing girls and women. An estimated 377,000 individuals of Afghan origin live in Germany. Many of them came as refugees. Many of them are permitted to stay although their individual asylum request has not been granted. In Germany, just under 11,500 Afghans are registered as required to leave the country, according to the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) in May this year. The BAMF was unable to say whether and how many criminals or dangerous individuals are among those required to leave the country. Deportations to Afghanistan were taking place even before the Taliban regained power. They were controversial at the time due to the precarious security situation and remain so today due to ongoing human rights violations. Interior Minister Dobrindt nevertheless intends to stick to his course: "Serious criminals have no right to reside in our country," he said and government spokesman Stefan Kornelius announced on Monday that more deportations are to follow: "This isn't resolved with one flight." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany is hoping to avoid the impression that it's boosting the Taliban's international standing. The German government speaks of "technical contacts." The recent deportations were facilitated by the Qatari government. As government spokesman Stefan Kornelius put it, Qatar's role is as a mediator: "We're in ongoing contact with the de facto government in Afghanistan to arrange technical aspects." He avoided using the word Taliban. An agreement had been reached for the current Afghan administration to send two representatives to Germany, who will be based in the embassy in Berlin. The new diplomats will be tasked with "supporting further planned repatriation flights." This is the first time that the regime, which is not recognized by Germany, sends its own personnel to Germany. Germany and Afghanistan are clearly entering a new phase. Nevertheless, following the latest deportation flight, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz was adamant: "Diplomatic recognition of the Taliban regime is not up for discussion. That is simply out of the question," Merz said at a press conference in Berlin. However, Conrad Schetter, an Afghanistan expert from the Bonn International Center for Conflict Studies (BICC), believes that other countries may follow Russia's lead and officially recognize the Taliban government. Schetter pointed to Afghanistan's close ties with other countries, including Pakistan and Qatar: if these countries follow Russia's example, it could put considerable political pressure on Western countries, he told DW. "And this is likely to spark the kind of diplomatic momentum that the Taliban are hoping will be triggered by Russia's latest move," said Schetter. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Peace and conflict researcher Nicole Deitelhoff from the University of Frankfurt am Main has strongly criticized Germany's policy on Afghanistan. In the newspaper, she wrote that deportations are inadmissible if those affected are at risk of torture or inhumane treatment in their country of origin. What's more, she predicts that the policy shift will negatively impact on Germany's reputation. Deitelhoff points to the German government's decision to end its admission program for former Afghan workers who aided the Bundeswehr during its military engagement. "Who can still trust a country that promises its civilian aid workers that it will ensure their safety in the future and then abandons them just like that?" Deitelhoff you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.