logo
Tshwane speaker faces motion of no confidence

Tshwane speaker faces motion of no confidence

The Citizena day ago

Discontent brews as Speaker Ndzwanana is accused of emotional rulings and bias against parties outside the governing coalition.
The speaker of Tshwane Mncedi Ndzwanana during the Tshwane Council Meeting on July 25, 2024 in Pretoria, South Africa. Photo by Gallo Images/Beeld/Deaan Vivier
The City of Tshwane speaker is denying the opposition's accusations that he protects the mayor and ignores the representatives elected by residents to serve the city.
DA Tshwane caucus chief whip Ofentse Madzebatela has announced the DA in Tshwane will bring a motion of no confidence against speaker of council Mncedi Ndzwanana on 26 June.
'Since 2023, Tshwane's council chamber, which is meant to serve as a beacon of democracy, has been subjected to the tyranny of a speaker of council who runs it like a dictator, who views councillors as his subjects.
Motion of no confidence against speaker Ndzwanana
'He makes his rulings based on emotion, not logic, nor the rules of council.
'Due to this attitude, councillors cannot participate in meetings as equal peers,' he said.
Madzebatela said the speaker's discriminatory behaviour has reached the point where parties outside the governing coalition do not have a fair say or hearing in council meetings.
ALSO READ: 'Sad situation': Eskom warns growing municipal debt seriously risks its sustainability
'The speaker has developed a disposition to dismiss all propositions of the DA caucus, as legally and rationally sound as they may be.
'These include points of order; requests for deliberation on reports and amendments to reports; recommendations and motions brought before council especially when they do not favour his coalition partners,' he said.
Madzebatela said the speaker has been at the helm of a new administration that brought oversight to a halt towards the end of 2024.
Oversight to halt at end of 2024
'At the council meeting of 29 May, the DA caucus expressed its dissent with a report tabled on the establishment of the economic growth advisory committee, which it argued, was replicating the work of many other committees already in existence.
'We requested a vote on the report, in terms of Section 39 of the Rules and Orders By-Laws (2012).
'The speaker denied the DA caucus the opportunity to exercise its right to vote.
ALSO READ: Tshwane cleansing levy 'unfair double tax on residents', AfriForum says
'Endorsing this report was not only unethical but an additional cost burden for the city,' he added.
Opposition leader Cilliers Brink said an efficient council makes decisions that serve residents efficiently.
'We need motions brought to council to be heard and a compliant presiding officer as a speaker to oversee the administration of council and appointment of committees,' he added.
Accused of protecting mayor
Brink said the opposite was happening and described Ndzwanana as a partisan speaker from the ANC who was protecting the mayor from scrutiny and hindering the elected representatives of the residents.
Speaker Ndzwanana said his rulings were not based on emotions.
Ndzwanana denied opposition parties were being silenced in council meetings.
ALSO READ: Planned water shutdown to hit parts of Hammanskraal on Monday
He also denied that his office was denying committee members and councillors the opportunity to hold the executive accountable and called the allegations 'shallow'.
'Furthermore, it should also be noted that the council was on recess for the festive holidays, with service delivery continuing.
'The allegations that the new administration is evading accountability and disregarding legislative processes are misleading and untrue,' he said.
Speaker denies allegations
Ndzwanana said he has read the recorded reasons for the motion and the reasons for it are without merit.
'A defence against the motion does not have to be mounted. 'The truth will prevail,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gayton McKenzie and Liam Jacobs clash in heated exchange over NAC appointment and party politics
Gayton McKenzie and Liam Jacobs clash in heated exchange over NAC appointment and party politics

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

Gayton McKenzie and Liam Jacobs clash in heated exchange over NAC appointment and party politics

Minister Gayton McKenzie has responded to reports claiming he is ghosting important committee meetings Image: Gayton McKenzie/Facebook What started as a debate over political appointments escalated into a war of words this week, with Sport, Arts and Culture Minister Gayton McKenzie accusing DA MP Liam Jacobs of disrespectful conduct and veiled political bias. The clash was triggered during a parliamentary committee meeting where Jacobs questioned McKenzie's decision to appoint Eugene Botha—a fellow member of the Patriotic Alliance (PA)—as chair of the National Arts Council (NAC). Jacobs also claimed that McKenzie had previously removed PA members from Parliament, a charge the minister flatly denied, calling such an action a 'thuggish act.' 'We must investigate whether there is actual ethics that can be found in this. We must investigate the potential of conflict of interest,' Jacobs said. 'I want to understand his understanding as to why a member of the PA became the chair of the board, being a member of the PA while he, as a minister, is a member of the PA. What is the rationale?' McKenzie asserted the appointment was lawful and rejecting Jacobs' concerns as a political attack cloaked in moral language. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ 'Jacobs knows that I haven't breached any act or law, hence he's talking about ethics. My ethics and his ethics are different. Ethics are debatable. Some people say it's ethical to have an abortion, other people say it's unethical. We are not dealing with what he feels and what I feel. He admitted that the Act allows me to appoint Eugene Botha,' McKenzie said. He went further, pointing out what he sees as hypocrisy in Jacobs' criticism. 'Two, he talks about my party membership. I'm going to give him a name: Tim Harris. Tim Harris was previously a member of the DA. He served as a DA member of the National Assembly. He held other DA-related positions. He was the CEO of Wesgro. Now he mustn't come here and say it has never happened where a party member is part of a board. Our constitution does not disallow you from becoming a member of a board. Our constitution is very clear—political affiliation is your right.' Tensions escalated as Jacobs pushed for clarity on whether McKenzie saw a potential conflict in leading the panel that appointed Botha. 'Chairperson, I would like to ask the minister: does he contend that there might be a conflict of interest between himself, the person leading the interview panel, and the chairperson of the board?' Jacobs asked. McKenzie dismissed the notion, calling it "laughable". 'Does knowing someone equate to conflict of interest? That is laughable. I know him. I know you. Knowing someone does not equal conflict of interest.' Democratic Alliance's (DA) member of the portfolio committee on Department of Sports, Arts and Culture Image: Facebook/Liam Jacobs

We can't just ‘get over' apartheid
We can't just ‘get over' apartheid

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

We can't just ‘get over' apartheid

Calls to forget apartheid ignore the trauma of families who never saw justice, closure or accountability for their suffering. Lukhanyo Calata (Fort Calata's son) testifies at the Cradock Four Inquest at Gqeberha High Court on June 06, 2025 in Gqeberha, South Africa. (Photo by Gallo Images/Die Burger/Lulama Zenzile) Many white people like to say that, when it comes to apartheid, people need to 'get over it' and to 'move on'. It's not something you should say to Lukhanyo Calata, however. He was just a toddler when, in 1985, his father, Fort, failed to return to the family home in the Eastern Cape town of Cradock, then a hotbed of opposition to apartheid. Calata, Matthew Goniwe, Sicelo Mhlauli and Sparrow Mkhonto were all assassinated by operatives from the then Security Police. They were beaten and stabbed and then their bodies were burned. To this day, no-one has been brought to book for the murders. ALSO READ: Apartheid then, apartheid now: Israel's aggression is no different The Truth and Reconciliation Commission found six members of a police hit squad were involved and denied them amnesty from further prosecution. But there was no follow-up action and all six have since died. The stories of the families of the Cradock Four are echoed around the country. Many people who were victims of the apartheid security apparatus have no answers about who killed their relatives and, in many cases, where the bodies are. If we are ever to have reconciliation – and true peace – we should not just get over these stories. NOW READ: Operation New Broom is echo of apartheid past

One year on, SA's GNU marked by dysfunction and missed opportunities
One year on, SA's GNU marked by dysfunction and missed opportunities

IOL News

time16 hours ago

  • IOL News

One year on, SA's GNU marked by dysfunction and missed opportunities

A year into South Africa's Government of National Unity, political compromise remains elusive, raising concerns about gridlock, infrastructure decay, and coalition fragility amid hopes for economic reform and unity. As South Africa marks the one-year anniversary of its Government of National Unity (GNU), the country stands at a crossroads—again. The 2024 general election failed to produce an outright majority, ushering in a coalition arrangement intended to provide political stability and economic direction. But has it worked? That was the central question of a webinar hosted by the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) on Thursday, chaired by Professor Purshottama Reddy, a governance expert. The panel featured UKZN political science lecturer Zakhele Ndlovu, Merchant Africa director Advocate Lavan Gopaul, KwaZulu-Natal Finance MEC Francois Rodgers, and Deputy Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Narend Singh. Ndlovu noted that despite the hope surrounding the GNU's formation, the country remains mired in indecision and dysfunction. 'Eight months ago, I said we were at a crossroads. Guess what? We still are,' he said. He cited legislative stalemates over key bills - the BELA, NHI and Expropriation Bills - as well as a deadlock on the national budget, as evidence of systemic gridlock. 'All these bills passed without DA support, yet the DA remains in the GNU. Some call it capitulation. I disagree,' said Ndlovu, arguing instead that the DA's legal challenge over the budget reflects profound unease. Still, there have been flashes of unity. Ndlovu referenced a recent White House delegation led by President Cyril Ramaphosa: 'Seeing GNU partners speak with one voice gives us hope.' Ndlovu narrowed his economic critique to two flashpoints: collapsing infrastructure and dysfunctional state-owned enterprises (SOEs). 'Electricity and water outages caused by poor maintenance are hurting business. Rail systems, especially those serving working-class routes like Stanger-Durban, have all but collapsed,' he said. He called the cabinet's portfolio allocations 'misaligned,' pointing to Defence Minister Angie Motshekga's lack of military experience. 'Appointments must be based on competence, not political horse-trading.' beg to differ,' Ndlovu said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store