State board ruling may bring longtime dispute over a Waukegan coal ash ponds to a close
Ruling NRG will get no special treatment from the state, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) is now in a position to move toward imposing a solution on NRG. Waukegan Mayor Ann Taylor said in a statement city officials will soon meet with members of the IEPA.
'This is a major win for Waukegan, as our community has spent over 10 years pushing for the removal of the unlined and leaking coal ash along Lake Michigan,' Taylor said. 'The IEPA has confirmed these sites are contaminating groundwater with dangerous toxins.'
The Illinois Pollution Control Board ruled in a 16-page opinion March 20 in Chicago, agreeing with the IEPA all three sites on the property set aside for containing coal ash still have the pollutant on the land.
'The (grassy) area, the east pond and the west pond were originally a settling basin for sluiced (coal ash) and the area still contains historic (coal ash),' the board wrote in its opinion. 'The discharges from the area have caused a negative environmental impact.'
After the state enacted the Coal Ash Pollution Prevention Act in 2019, NRG decommissioned the plant in 2022. At the time, it put a plan in motion to remove the east pond, cap the west pond and made no plans for the grassy field. Taylor continues to advocate for full removal.
'Waukegan will continue to push forward with our legislators and community partners to ensure proper cleanup of this site to protect the long-term health of our people and our lakefront,' Taylor said in the statement.
After proposing to remove the east pond and cap the west pond, NRG decided to cap both last year. Ann Duhon, a NRG spokesperson at the time, said the procedure is better suited to the situation.
'There are a number of risks associated with removing the coal ash including the risk of exposure to people, the environment and the community,' Duhon said in an email in May of last year.
Making it clear NRG violated Illinois law in its handling of the ponds, the board ruled the grassy field is part of the package for cleaning the site because it presents 'environmental and health risks,' according to the opinion.
'Grassy field is an inactive surface impoundment that has never been closed by removal, nor has any type of low permeability cover been installed on top of it,' the board wrote in its opinion.
Taylor, state Sen. Adriane Johnson, D-Buffalo Grove, and State Rep. Rita Mayfield, D-Waukegan, all wanted to push for the complete removal of both ponds as well as proper treatment for the grassy field.
In early 2022, Johnson introduced legislation that passed the senate to require NRG to remove both ponds. As Mayfield tried to push it through the state House of Representatives, she did not bring it for a vote because there were not enough favorable legislators.
Johnson said Thursday she believes legislation is the best way to assure the ponds are removed. She believes NRG will oppose any effort to take action and the best way to ensure compliance is through a law requiring it.
'We must pass legislation to ensure coal ash is properly removed from the Waukegan site,' Johnson said. 'Holding polluters accountable and safeguarding our water, air and public health for generations to come.'
Introducing legislation when the Illinois General Assembly opened in 2023, Mayfield made another effort to enshrine the removal of the ponds in law. Again, she fell a few votes short and it did not come to the floor for a vote. She authored a similar bill early this year.
'It had its second reading and when there is a 60-vote majority it will come to the floor for a vote,' Mayfield said stressing she was working to secure the necessary support. She is not disclosing how many votes she has or who they are for fear NRG will lobby them against it.
'NRG has been lobbying very hard against it,' Mayfield said. 'They'll push ever harder if they know who they are.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Chicago residents blast ‘monstrosity' Obama Presidential Center as displacement fears grow
Chicago community leaders and longtime residents say the Obama Presidential Center risks washing away the neighborhood's fabric, warning that proposed luxury developments tied to the project could price out families who have long called the South Side home, according to a report. They also say the sprawling 19.3-acre site in historic Jackson Park, with its 225-foot-tall concrete museum, has become an eyesore that disrupts the natural landscape and all locals are getting in return for the unsightly structure is soaring rents and higher tax bills. Advertisement 'This is a monument to one man's ego,' Steve Cortes, a longtime Chicagoan and former advisor to President Donald Trump, told the Daily Mail. 'Look at the Reagan Library. It's beautiful. This? There are almost no windows. What are they hiding? And this Brutalist cement look in a city known for its incredible architecture.' The Obama Foundation secured a 99-year lease for the public parcel for $10 in 2018 and promised to revitalize the area. Obama said at the time that the project did not intend to displace residents, adding that its overseers are trying to balance boosting jobs and economic development in the area while maintaining and protecting existing affordable housing. Alderwoman Jeanette Taylor, who represents much of the working-class neighborhood surrounding the site, fears that locals are being priced out. 'Every time large development comes to communities, they displace the very people they say they want to improve it for. This was no different, and we're living what is actually happening,' Taylor told the outlet. 'We're going to see rents go higher and we're going to see families displaced.' Advertisement 5 The Obama Presidential Center seen under construction on Aug. 17, 2024. The Washington Post via Getty Images She has pushed for protections such as affordable housing requirements around the site, tenant purchase rights and rental assistance to shield residents from displacement. She won some concessions in the 2020 agreement – whereby 30% of new units on city-owned land were to be affordable – but many of her broader demands, including a full Community Benefits Agreement (CBA), were not adopted. A CBA is a binding deal that requires developers to deliver protections such as affordable housing, local hiring or other safeguards to ensure big projects don't push out existing residents. 'The city of Chicago should have done a Community Benefits Agreement before the first shovel went into the ground, but they didn't,' Taylor said. 'We're going to see small landlords having to raise the rent. Their property taxes are going up and we're going to see development that is not inclusive to our community.' Advertisement 5 Chicago residents and community activists are afraid of the project displacing residents on the city's South Side neighborhood. TNS Residents point to a proposed 250-room luxury hotel as a symbol and a driver of economic pressures far beyond the scale of existing neighborhood development. Once a major luxury project is approved, surrounding property values typically spike and so its presence signals to investors and developers that the area is shifting toward wealthier clientele and away from its historically working-class, majority-Black base. The hotel's approval is still under review, and residents have held demonstrations calling for its rejection. The investment firm behind the project is headed by Allison Davis, a veteran real estate developer and lawyer who was Obama's first boss out of Harvard Law School. 'When you got people's rent going from $850 to $1,300 you're telling people you don't want them in the neighborhood,' said Dixon Romeo, an organizer with the Obama Community Benefits Agreement Coalition, told NBC Chicago at a demonstration in April. Advertisement 5 Former President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama breaking ground at the site of the Obama Presidential Center on Sept. 28, 2021. Photo by KAMIL KRZACZYNSKI/AFP via Getty Images) Since ground was broken, construction has progressed at a snail's pace while costs have ballooned from an original estimate of $330 million to a 2021 foundation projection of $830 million – with no updates since then. The center, which aims to honor former President Barack Obama's political career, will also consist of a digital library, conference facilities, a gymnasium and a regulation-sized NBA court. It will also house the nonprofit Obama Foundation, which is overseeing the center's development. The scale of the project and the aesthetics of its centerpiece library have come in for criticism. 5 A rendering of the completed Obama Presidential Center. EPA Ken Woodward, an attorney and father of six who grew up in the area, called it a 'monstrosity.' 'It looks like this big piece of rock that just landed here out of nowhere in what used to be a really nice landscape of trees and flowers,' Woodward told the Daily Mail. 'It's over budget, it's taking way too long to finish and it's going to drive up prices and bring headaches and problems for everyone who lives here. It feels like a washing away of the neighborhood and culture that used to be here.' Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Kyana Butler, an activist with Southside Together who campaigned for a CBA around the Obama Center, shared similar sentiments with the outlet. 'It's pretty huge and monstrous,' Butler said. 'It could have been smaller in scale and cost a lot less money. We're all worried about the impact on the community.' Tyrone Muhammad, director of Ex-Cons for Community and Social Change, said, 'It's truly the Tower of Babel.' 5 The Obama Foundation received a 99-year lease for the land in 2018. TNS Advertisement 'Property taxes are going up so much that the owner of my building is saying she might just walk away.. I don't blame President Obama for all of this, but the people on his team may not have the best intentions for people in this area,' Muhammed, a 2026 Illinois Senate candidate, told the outlet. 'It's disingenuous and hypocritical to take park space away from people and then not involve them in what takes its place. The move violates common decency.' Fox News Digital has reached out to the Obama Center for comment. In May, President Donald Trump offered to help out with the development of the center and linked DEI to the construction problems. The project set out 'ambitious goals' for certain construction diversity quotas, with its contracts to be allocated to 'diverse suppliers,' 35% of which were required to be minority-based enterprises (MBEs). Advertisement 'Look, President Obama, if he wanted help, I'd give him help because I'm a really good builder and I build on time, on budget. He's building his library in Chicago. It's a disaster,' Trump said, adding that Obama was paying for prioritizing DEI over meritocracy. 'And he wanted to be very politically correct and he didn't use good, hard, tough, mean construction workers that I love, Marco,' Trump said, while addressing Secretary of State Marco Rubio. A $40.75 million racially charged lawsuit filed earlier this year by a minority contractor against the project's structural engineer shined a spotlight on the DEI-driven aspect of the project. The structural engineers claimed the minority contractor lacked sufficient qualifications and experience to perform its work, resulting in delays.
Fox News
6 hours ago
- Fox News
Chicago residents call Obama Presidential Center a 'monstrosity,' fear they'll be displaced: report
Chicago community leaders and longtime residents say the Obama Presidential Center risks washing away the neighborhood's fabric, warning that proposed luxury developments tied to the project could price out families who have long called the South Side home, according to a report. They also say the sprawling 19.3-acre site in historic Jackson Park, with its 225-foot-tall concrete museum, has become an eyesore that disrupts the natural landscape and all locals are getting in return for the unsightly structure is soaring rents and higher tax bills. "This is a monument to one man's ego," Steve Cortes, a longtime Chicagoan and former adviser to President Trump, told the Daily Mail. "Look at the Reagan Library. It's beautiful. This? There are almost no windows. What are they hiding? And this Brutalist cement look in a city known for its incredible architecture." The Obama Foundation secured a 99-year lease for the public parcel for $10 in 2018 and promised to revitalize the area. Obama said at the time that the project did not intend to displace residents, adding that its overseers are trying to balance boosting jobs and economic development in the area while maintaining and protecting existing affordable housing. Alderwoman Jeanette Taylor, who represents much of the working-class neighborhood surrounding the site, fears that locals are being priced out. "Every time large development comes to communities, they displace the very people they say they want to improve it for. This was no different, and we're living what is actually happening," Taylor told the outlet. "We're going to see rents go higher and we're going to see families displaced." She has pushed for protections such as affordable housing requirements around the site, tenant purchase rights and rental assistance to shield residents from displacement. She won some concessions in the 2020 agreement – whereby 30% of new units on city-owned land were to be affordable -- but many of her broader demands, including a full Community Benefits Agreement (CBA), were not adopted. A CBA is a binding deal that requires developers to deliver protections such as affordable housing, local hiring, or other safeguards to ensure big projects don't push out existing residents. "The city of Chicago should have done a Community Benefits Agreement before the first shovel went into the ground, but they didn't," Taylor said. "We're going to see small landlords having to raise the rent. Their property taxes are going up and we're going to see development that is not inclusive to our community." Residents point to a proposed 250-room luxury hotel as a symbol and a driver of economic pressures far beyond the scale of existing neighborhood development. Once a major luxury project is approved, surrounding property values typically spike and so its presence signals to investors and developers that the area is shifting toward wealthier clientele and away from its historically working-class, majority-Black base. The hotel's approval is still under review, and residents have held demonstrations calling for its rejection. The investment firm behind the project is headed by Allison Davis, a veteran real estate developer and lawyer who was Obama's first boss out of Harvard Law School. "When you got people's rent going from $850 to $1,300 you're telling people you don't want them in the neighborhood," said Dixon Romeo, an organizer with the Obama Community Benefits Agreement Coalition, told NBC Chicago at a demonstration in April. Since ground was broken, construction has progressed at a snail's pace while costs have ballooned from an original estimate of $330 million to a 2021 foundation projection of $830 million -- with no updates since then. The center, which aims to honor former President Barack Obama's political career, will also consist of a digital library, conference facilities, a gymnasium, and a regulation-sized NBA court. It will also house the nonprofit Obama Foundation, which is overseeing the center's development. The scale of the project and the aesthetics of its centerpiece library have come in for criticism. Ken Woodard, an attorney and father of six who grew up in the area, called it a "monstrosity." "It looks like this big piece of rock that just landed here out of nowhere in what used to be a really nice landscape of trees and flowers," Woodward told the Daily Mail. "It's over budget, it's taking way too long to finish and it's going to drive up prices and bring headaches and problems for everyone who lives here. It feels like a washing away of the neighborhood and culture that used to be here." Kyana Butler, an activist with Southside Together who campaigned for a CBA around the Obama Center, shared similar sentiments with the outlet. "It's pretty huge and monstrous," Butler said. "It could have been smaller in scale and cost a lot less money. We're all worried about the impact on the community." Tyrone Muhammad, director of Ex-Cons for Community and Social Change, said, "It's truly the Tower of Babel." "Property taxes are going up so much that the owner of my building is saying she might just walk away.. I don't blame President Obama for all of this, but the people on his team may not have the best intentions for people in this area," Muhammed, 2026 Illinois Senate candidate, told the outlet. "It's disingenuous and hypocritical to take park space away from people and then not involve them in what takes its place. The move violates common decency." Fox News Digital has reached out to the Obama Center for comment. In May, President Donald Trump offered to help out with the development of the center and linked DEI to the construction problems. The project set out "ambitious goals" for certain construction diversity quotas, with its contracts to be allocated to "diverse suppliers," 35% of which were required to be minority-based enterprises (MBEs). "Look, President Obama, if he wanted help, I'd give him help because I'm a really good builder and I build on time, on budget. He's building his library in Chicago. It's a disaster," Trump said, adding that Obama was paying for prioritizing DEI over meritocracy. "And he wanted to be very politically correct and he didn't use good, hard, tough, mean construction workers that I love Marco," Trump said, while addressing Secretary of State Marco Rubio. A $40.75 million racially charged lawsuit filed earlier this year by a minority contractor against the project's structural engineer shined a spotlight on the DEI-driven aspect of the project. The structural engineers claimed the minority contractor lacked sufficient qualifications and experience to perform its work, resulting in delays.
CNBC
a day ago
- CNBC
A lot still needs to happen before Ukraine-Russia peace deal: intelligence expert Kendall-Taylor
Fred Kempe, Atlantic Council, and Andrea Kendall-Taylor, Former Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Russia and Eurasia at the National Intelligence Council, join 'Closing Bell Overtime' to talk today's meeting between Ukraine and the United States.
