
Leaked files confirm Assad regime held missing US journalist Austin Tice
For over a decade, the fate of American journalist Austin Tice remained one of the most enduring mysteries of the Syrian conflict. Now, previously unseen intelligence documents obtained by the BBC provide the first concrete confirmation that Tice was held by Syrian authorities under the leadership of Bashar Al-Assad.
The classified materials, verified by both the BBC and law enforcement sources, include internal communications between Syrian intelligence branches. They explicitly name Tice and detail aspects of his imprisonment following his 2012 abduction near Damascus. The findings, along with corroborating testimony from former Syrian officials, offer long-sought clarity about what happened to him in the early days of his disappearance.
Tice, a freelance journalist and former US Marine, vanished in August 2012 near Darayya, a suburb of the Syrian capital, just days after turning 31. He had entered the country to report on the escalating civil war. Roughly seven weeks later, a video surfaced online showing Tice blindfolded and reciting an Islamic declaration while surrounded by armed men. Though the clip suggested extremist movements' involvement, US analysts at the time raised doubts about its authenticity, with one official stating the video "may have been staged."
Despite years of speculation, no entity ever claimed responsibility for holding Tice. The Syrian government, under Assad, repeatedly denied having any knowledge of his whereabouts. That narrative has now been definitively challenged.
One of the documents, stamped 'top secret,' places Tice in a government-run detention facility in Damascus in 2012. Sources familiar with the site identified it as Tahouneh prison. A former high-ranking Syrian intelligence officer confirmed to the BBC that Tice was held there by the National Defence Forces (NDF), a pro-Assad paramilitary group.
A Syrian official told the BBC that Tice remained in custody at least until February 2013. During that time, he reportedly suffered from stomach problems and underwent medical treatment, including blood tests that revealed a viral infection. A visitor to the detention center who saw Tice recalled, "He looked sad, and that the joy had gone from his face," though he was said to be treated more humanely than Syrian inmates.
In a rare account, a former NDF member with direct knowledge of Tice's detention said that his captors recognized his strategic value, stating that "Austin's value was understood" and that he was viewed as a "card" for potential diplomatic negotiations with the US.
Tice allegedly made a brief escape attempt by climbing through a window, but was quickly apprehended. He is believed to have been interrogated at least twice by Syrian intelligence.
The BBC's investigation is part of a long-running project that began over a year ago for a Radio 4 podcast. Reporters were granted access to a Syrian intelligence archive while working alongside a Syrian war crimes investigator. The documents they found are the first hard evidence to support long-standing US claims that Tice was in Syrian custody.
When Bashar Al-Assad was deposed in December 2024, former US President Joe Biden expressed belief that Tice was still alive. Two days before, his mother Debra Tice shared that a 'significant source' had confirmed her son's survival and claimed he was being 'treated well.' Yet, when prisons across Syria were emptied following the regime's collapse, Tice was not among those released, and his current whereabouts remain unknown.
The Tice family, who have led a relentless campaign for answers, are aware of the newly surfaced files, as are US officials and a Syrian group documenting human rights abuses under Assad. Tice, who once served in Iraq and Afghanistan before pursuing a law degree at Georgetown University, is now believed to be one of the longest-held American hostages.
According to the Syrian Network for Human Rights, around 100,000 people were forcibly disappeared during Assad's rule. Tice's case, long marked by silence and uncertainty, now stands as a confirmed chapter in that broader tragedy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Jordan News
5 hours ago
- Jordan News
U.S. Pressure to Finalize Trade Deals Ahead of Tariff Deadlines - Jordan News
The Trump administration has asked countries to submit their best offers in trade negotiations by Wednesday, in an effort to speed up talks with several partners before the five-week deadline it set itself, according to a draft letter to negotiating partners obtained by Reuters. اضافة اعلان The draft, issued by the U.S. Trade Representative's office (USTR), offers a glimpse into President Donald Trump's plan to conclude irregular negotiations with dozens of countries that began on April 9, when he temporarily suspended the 'Liberation Day' tariffs for 90 days until July 8, after stock, bond, and currency markets fell due to the comprehensiveness of these tariffs. The document indicates a rush within the administration to complete deals before the deadline. Despite White House advisers such as Kevin Hassett asserting that many agreements are nearing completion, the only deal reached so far with a major U.S. trading partner has been with Britain—and even that deal was a framework for ongoing talks, not a final agreement. In the draft, the U.S. requests countries to submit their best offers across several key areas, including tariffs and proposed quotas for purchasing American industrial and agricultural products, as well as plans to address non-tariff barriers. Other requests include potential commitments on digital trade and economic security, alongside country-specific obligations, according to the letter. The U.S. will evaluate the responses within days and propose a 'possible landing zone' that may include a mutually agreed tariff rate, as stated in the letter. It is unclear which countries will receive the letter, but it is addressed to countries engaged in active negotiations involving meetings and document exchanges. Washington has been involved in similar talks with the European Union, Japan, Vietnam, India, and others. A U.S. Trade Representative official said the trade negotiations are ongoing. 'Productive talks with many major trading partners continue at a rapid pace, and it is in everyone's interest to assess progress and take next steps, regardless of ongoing litigation,' the official added. Tiffany Smith, vice president of global trade policy at the National Foreign Trade Council, welcomed the USTR's moves. She told Reuters, 'We are optimistic that the Trade Representative's office is pushing the negotiations forward as quickly as possible,' adding that trade agreements removing barriers to American companies abroad and reducing tariffs at home would be 'a win-win if implemented in a way that restores stability and clarity to trade relations.' Trump's ambitious—and often volatile—tariff policy is a cornerstone of his 'America First' economic agenda, aimed at reshaping foreign trade relations, reducing the trade deficit, and protecting American industries. Republican lawmakers also rely on tariffs as a means to boost federal revenue and offset the cost of the tax cut bill currently under congressional discussion. Trump's tariff policies have caused significant market volatility. In May, U.S. stocks experienced their best monthly rally since November 2023, but this followed sharp declines in global indices due to Trump's repeated tariff announcements in February, March, and early April. Stocks saw little change Monday afternoon following Trump's surprise announcement to double tariffs on steel and aluminum imports during an event held in Pittsburgh on Friday. Meanwhile, the legality of Trump's toughest tariffs is being challenged. Last Wednesday, the U.S. International Trade Commission ruled that Trump exceeded his authority when imposing tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), including the 'Liberation Day' tariffs and previous tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China, which Trump linked to accusations that these countries facilitated fentanyl entering the U.S. Less than 24 hours later, an appeals court temporarily halted the ruling, and the disputed tariffs are expected to remain in effect during the case. The draft sent to trading partners warns against relying on the tariffs being lifted if courts rule against Trump's use of IEEPA. It states: 'Regardless of ongoing lawsuits concerning the President's imposition of reciprocal tariffs in U.S. courts, the President intends to continue this tariff program based on other strong legal authorities if necessary, and it is therefore important that we continue discussions on these issues.' — Reuters


Roya News
17 hours ago
- Roya News
Over two dozen Palestinians killed near Gaza aid point
Rescuers said the 'Israeli' military killed at least 27 people near a US-backed aid centre in Gaza on Tuesday, with the army reporting it had fired on "suspects who advanced toward the troops". The UN human rights chief condemned such attacks as a "breach of international law and a war crime", after a similar shooting in the same area on Sunday killed and wounded scores of Palestinians seeking aid, according to the civil defence agency. Tuesday's shooting in the southern city of Rafah came as the agency reported 19 people killed in other 'Israeli'attacks in the territory, and as the 'Israeli' army announced three soldiers had been killed in northern Gaza. "Twenty-seven people were killed and more than 90 injured in the massacre targeting civilians who were waiting for American aid in the Al-Alam area of Rafah," said civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal, who earlier told AFP the deaths occurred "when Israeli forces opened fire with tanks and drones". The Al-Alam roundabout is about a kilometre from a centre run by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a recently formed group that 'Israel' has worked with to implement a new aid distribution mechanism in the territory. The United Nations and major aid groups have refused to cooperate with the group, saying it contravenes humanitarian principles and appears designed to cater to 'Israeli' military objectives. The military claimed a crowd was moving towards the aid centre when troops saw them "deviating from the designated access routes". "The troops carried out warning fire, and after the suspects failed to retreat, additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects who advanced toward the troops," it claimed, saying it was "aware of reports regarding casualties" and was looking into the details. GHF also claimed the operations at its site went ahead safely on Tuesday, but added it was aware the military was "investigating whether a number of civilians were injured". "This was an area well beyond our secure distribution site and operations area," it added, advising "all civilians to remain in the safe corridor when travelling to our distribution sites". Sunday's shooting also took place at the Al-Alam roundabout as people congregated before heading to the aid centre, rescuers and witnesses said. The civil defence agency reported 31 people killed and 176 wounded. A military source later acknowledged "warning shots were fired towards several suspects" about a kilometre from the aid site. UN chief Antonio Guterres urged an independent investigation into that shooting, calling it "unacceptable that Palestinians are risking their lives for food". "Deadly attacks on distraught civilians trying to access the paltry amounts of food aid in Gaza are unconscionable," UN human rights chief Volker Turk said after Tuesday's deaths.


Roya News
17 hours ago
- Roya News
Man convicted for Quran burning outside Turkish consulate in London
A 50-year-old man has been convicted of a religiously aggravated offence after burning a copy of the Quran in front of the Turkish consulate in London earlier this year. Hamit Coskun, who traveled from Derby to Knightsbridge, set fire to the Islamic holy book while making offensive remarks about Islam on February 13. The act, which took place outside the consulate on Rutland Gardens, was deemed both inflammatory and hostile by Westminster Magistrates Court. District Judge John McGarva found Coskun guilty of a religiously aggravated public order offence as well as disorderly behaviour, handing down a 240 pound (USD 324) fine and imposing an additional statutory surcharge of 96 pounds (USD 130). In court, Judge McGarva criticized the nature of Coskun's actions, describing them as 'provocative and taunting,' and stated, 'You have a deep-seated hatred of Islam and its followers.' The judge said Coskun's motivations were rooted in personal and familial experiences in Turkey, adding, 'It's not possible to separate your views about the religion from your views about the followers.' He further noted, 'Your actions in burning the Quran where you did were highly provocative, and your actions were accompanied by bad language… motivated at least in part by hatred of followers of the religion.' Coskun, who is of Kurdish and Armenian descent, had argued that his protest was aimed solely at the Turkish government, particularly President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whom he accused of turning Turkey into a haven for "radical Islamists". Prosecutors cited social media posts where Coskun denounced Erdogan's government and voiced concern about alleged moves toward establishing a 'Sharia regime.' Following his conviction, Coskun issued a statement calling the ruling 'an assault on free speech' and warning that it could discourage others from exercising their rights to protest. His legal defense has received backing from both the National Secular Society and the Free Speech Union (FSU), who have vowed to challenge the verdict through every legal channel. An FSU spokesperson said the organization is prepared to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary, arguing, 'Religious tolerance is an important British value, but it doesn't require non-believers to respect the blasphemy codes of believers.' The case has also drawn attention from political figures. Equalities Minister and Conservative MP Kemi Badenoch took to X, stating, 'De facto blasphemy laws will set this country on the road to ruin. Freedom of belief, and freedom not to believe, are inalienable rights in Britain.' While a spokesperson for the prime minister refrained from commenting on the specific case, they reaffirmed that 'there are no blasphemy laws and no plans to introduce any.' Judge McGarva emphasized in his ruling that the conviction was not an attempt to revive blasphemy laws, which were officially abolished in 2008. He acknowledged that burning a religious book is not inherently unlawful but said the combination of Islamophobic remarks and inflammatory conduct rendered Coskun's actions criminal in this instance. Humanists UK also weighed in, expressing concern about the legal threshold for such prosecutions. A spokesperson stated, 'We must make sure that public order legislation is not used to disproportionately target speech – even offensive speech – on religious matters, thereby chilling legitimate criticism and expression.'