Russia's Vladimir Putin commends Saudi Arabia for efforts towards Russia-Ukraine peace talks
Mr Trump and Mr Putin met in Alaska on Friday, marking the first meeting between the presidents of the US and Russia since Moscow invaded Ukraine more than three years ago.
During Tuesday's phone call, Mr Putin thanked the kingdom for its role in the process, after it hosted negotiators from the US and Russia in March, the Saudi Press Agency reported.
He reiterated his appreciation for Prince Mohammed's efforts towards ending the Ukraine war.
'The Crown Prince affirmed the kingdom's continued support for diplomatic dialogue as a means of resolving international disputes,' the report added.
While no deal was reached in Alaska, Mr Trump and Mr Putin agreed to continue with the process towards peace. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy then met Mr Trump at the White House on Monday, along with European leaders.
The US President has said a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders is required first to set the peace process in motion, although concerns remain that Mr Putin may not agree to bilateral talks.
US efforts towards a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine started to take shape in Saudi Arabia in March, during the first high-level meeting between American and Russian officials in years.
The talks, which focused among other issues on trying to reach a Black Sea maritime ceasefire deal, were described by Washington as a step in Mr Trump's efforts to end the war.
Before the talks in Riyadh, Mr Zelenskyy had also met Prince Mohammed in Jeddah to discuss peace efforts. During the meeting, the Crown Prince voiced the kingdom's support for international efforts to resolve the crisis in Ukraine, SPA said at the time. Mr Zelenskyy said he was grateful for Prince Mohammed's perspective and highlighted the important role played by Saudi Arabia in recent talks.
Russia has occupied about 20 per cent of Ukrainian territory, a vast area that is home to more than three million people. How much land Ukraine will agree to give up to its enemy will be a key component in reaching a peace deal.
It has been a struggle to reach even a limited, 30-day ceasefire – which Moscow and Kyiv agreed to in principle earlier this year – as both sides continued to attack each other with drones and missiles. The agreement fell short of the broader ceasefire that Washington and Kyiv had sought, which would have paused hostilities entirely for 30 days.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Oil firms as investors await next steps in Ukraine peace push
LONDON - Oil rose on Wednesday as the American Petroleum Institute reported a drop in U.S. crude inventories and investors awaited the next steps in talks to end the Ukraine war, with sanctions on Russian crude remaining in place for now. Crude fell more than 1% on Tuesday on optimism that an agreement to end the war seemed closer. However, U.S. President Donald Trump conceded that Russian President Vladimir Putin might not want to make a deal. Brent crude futures rose 44 cents, or 0.7%, to $66.23 a barrel by 1000 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures for September delivery, set to expire on Wednesday, gained 65 cents, or 1%, to $63. "It seems oil prices are thrown down one day, followed by a rebound the next day. The API report was on the positive side, so I assume some price support is coming from that," said Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at UBS. U.S. crude stocks fell by 2.42 million barrels, market sources said on Tuesday, citing American Petroleum Institute figures, ahead of official data at 1430 GMT. "Not so sure about the peace deal - will have to see if something moves forward over the coming days," Staunovo added. Trump said on Tuesday the United States might provide air support as part of a deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine. A day earlier, Trump said he was arranging a meeting between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to be followed by a trilateral summit among the three presidents. Russia has not confirmed it will take part in talks with Zelenskiy. "The likelihood of a quick resolution to the conflict with Russia now seems unlikely," said Daniel Hynes, senior commodity strategist at ANZ, in a note on Wednesday. Oil also found support from flooding at a large U.S. refinery. BP said on Tuesday operations at its 440,000-barrel-per-day refinery in Whiting, Indiana, were affected by flooding after a severe thunderstorm, potentially weighing on crude demand at the facility - a key fuel producer for the Midwest market. (Additional reporting by Colleen Howe
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
There's a new triangle in US foreign policy
This week's White House meetings on the Ukraine war have demonstrated how drastically the world has changed. The US president wants to broker a deal that ends the fighting but doesn't seem overly concerned about the details. As long as Donald Trump can claim the status of international peacemaker and perhaps win a much-coveted Nobel Peace Prize, he will probably be satisfied. It's unmistakable political theatre. Until now, in any such situation, there would be two camps: Russia versus a US-led western front backing Ukraine. But US policy has become so unrecognisable that there are now instead three poles – Russia, the US, and Ukraine backed by Europe – creating a triangle with Washington as the hypotenuse. That means valuable European leverage and energy that could be used to pressure Russia is being diverted to prevent the US president from abandoning Ukraine, Europe, Nato and traditional US national security doctrines. They're succeeding on that thus far, but there's no progress towards ending the conflict. Russian President Vladimir Putin appears happy to continue talks with the fighting ongoing, confident his far more numerous forces can wear down the Ukrainian military. He's concentrating on shifting Mr Trump's attention and rhetoric away from demands for an immediate ceasefire, with some apparent success. Mr Trump is instead focused on triangular talks between the three sides. Were this summit to take place, it could have a questionable outcome because neither party may be willing to make concessions to the other. They will only make concessions, if at all, to third parties such as the US or Europeans. It's difficult to imagine a positive result emerging from a trilateral meeting while negative scenarios abound. Were this summit to take place, it could have a questionable outcome because neither party may be willing to make concessions to the other The sensible approach would be what has been, not entirely unsuccessfully, pursued between Israel and Hamas, with third party negotiators talking to both delegations. But proximity talks between professional diplomats is box office poison. To Mr Trump – once a highly experienced and skilful television producer – a three-way summit may sound like a potential blockbuster. The cast is perfect if they play their roles together in person, and numerous readily available settings, such as the White House or a similar venue in Western Europe, would be a perfect backdrop for a magnificent peace-making spectacle. But it's hard to see how the Ukrainian and Russian positions can be bridged without a major change in the military and strategic equation on the ground. One side will have to essentially win. It's not impossible to imagine a ceasefire or even armistice in which Ukraine refuses to formally cede any land but that leaves parts of it in Russian hands. But even this bitter struggle over land isn't the core of the conflict. Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 with the confident expectation of establishing its own governing authority in Kyiv and eliminating Ukraine's increasingly western-oriented state and society it found profoundly threatening. Ukraine, democratising despite rampant corruption, was even a 'bad example' to Russians about their own political alternatives. Certainly, Russia may want to annex Ukrainian territory, now packaged as potential 'land swaps'. But what it really wants is to ensure that Ukraine doesn't integrate further into the West creating, from Mr Putin's perspective, an intolerable threat to Russia along much of its western border. But greater integration into the West and Europe is precisely what Ukraine intends. These two positions are clearly irreconcilable and far more significant than the land deal on which Mr Trump seems focused. Potential US or western 'security guarantees' for Ukraine cut precisely to the point. Ukraine already received guarantees from the west, and Russia itself, in their denuclearisation agreements between 1991–1994. None of this protected Ukraine from Russia in 2014 or 2022. The closest thing to a reliable guarantee would be for Ukraine to join Nato, the ultimate Russian red line. Mr Trump's negotiator, Steve Witkoff, spoke about the potential for new guarantees that would mimic Article 5 of the Nato treaty that is commonly interpreted to commit the US and other signatories to militarily defending any Nato member that comes under attack. It would effectively throw an American and European nuclear umbrella over Ukraine. Unfortunately, Mr Trump has indicated several times that not only is he highly suspicious of Nato in general, he does not accept that Article 5 commits the US to defending anyone. Indeed, the Article was originally crafted to allow isolationist Americans to read it in this manner, although this has never been a White House perspective until now. This conflict is simultaneously simple yet profound. Ukraine wants to be independent, increasingly democratic and gradually join the EU and possibly even Nato. It sees its future as shaped by an identity that looks West rather than East. For Russia, all of that is simply unacceptable. That leaves Mr Trump seeking an agreement he probably can't get, especially if he allows Mr Putin to keep steering him away from the necessity for an immediate ceasefire. Russia can continue to wear down Ukraine on the battlefield, although a resumption of robust US military aid might eventually make that prohibitively costly. Mr Putin wants time to press for additional advantage, while Ukraine needs all the help it can get. Ukraine still has rational hopes that even under Mr Trump, Washington will eventually resume backing its resistance to Moscow. But Mr Putin appears to skilfully be playing for time, equally rationally confident that his larger forces can wear the Ukrainians down, especially without US military aid. We clearly see the extraordinary transformation of the global strategic landscape. What ought to be two sides is now three, with the US appearing to no longer lead, or even participate in, a western alliance defending Ukraine. The 2022 Russian invasion may well be remembered as the turning point to a new era in international relations in which, for a time at least, whatever rules once existed are gone, and only might makes right. Under Mr Trump, Washington seems perfectly OK with that.
Zawya
4 hours ago
- Zawya
Fed minutes could show whether Waller and Bowman had company in favoring rate cuts soon
Last month's decision by the U.S. Federal Reserve to hold interest rates unchanged prompted dissents from two top central bankers who wanted to lower rates to guard against further weakening of the job market, and a readout of that two-day gathering on Wednesday could show whether their concerns had started to resonate with other policymakers, perhaps reinforcing expectations that borrowing-cost reductions could begin next month. Not even 48 hours after the conclusion of the July 29-30 Federal Open Market Committee meeting, data from the Labor Department appeared to validate the concerns of Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller when it showed far fewer jobs than expected were created in July, the unemployment rate ticked up and the labor force participation rate slid to its lowest since late 2022. More unsettling, though, was an historic downward revision for estimates of employment in the previous two months. That revision erased more than a quarter of a million jobs thought to have been created in May and June and put a hefty dent in the prevailing narrative of a still-strong-job market. The event was so angering to President Donald Trump that he fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Data since then, however, has provided some fodder for the camp more concerned that Trump's aggressive tariff regime risks rekindling inflation to hold their ground against moving quickly to lower rates. The annual rate of underlying consumer inflation accelerated more than expected in July and was followed by an unexpectedly large jump in prices at the producer level. "The minutes to the July Federal Open Market Committee will give a more nuanced sense of the split on the committee between the majority that voted to leave rates on hold and the dovish bloc led by dissenting Governors Miki Bowman and Christopher Waller," analysts at Oxford Economics wrote ahead of the minutes release, set for 2 p.m. ET (1800 GMT) on Wednesday. "However, the minutes are more stale than usual since they predate the revised payroll figures, which prompted a rapid repricing of the probability of a September rate cut." Heading into the release of the minutes, CME's FedWatch tool assigns an 85% probability of a quarter-point reduction in the Fed's policy rate from the current range of 4.25%-to-4.50%, where it has remained since December. Another reason the minutes may feel stale on arrival is they come just two days before a highly anticipated speech from Fed Chair Jerome Powell at the annual economic symposium near Jackson Hole, Wyoming, hosted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Powell's keynote speech on Friday morning - set to be his last Jackson Hole address as Fed chair with his term expiring next May - could show whether Powell has joined ranks with those sensing the time has come for steps to shield the job market from further weakening or if he remains in league with those more wary of inflation in light of its moves away from the central bank's 2% target. The lack of Fed rate reductions since Trump returned to the White House has agitated the Republican president, and he regularly lashes out at Powell for not engineering rate cuts. Trump is already in the process of screening possible successors to Powell and after the unexpected resignation earlier this month of one of the seven Board of Governors members, he has a chance to put his imprint on the Fed soon. He has nominated Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran to fill the seat vacated by Adriana Kugler, a term that expires at the end of January. It is unclear whether Miran will win Senate confirmation before the Fed's September 16-17 meeting.
