logo
Women's basketball is hot as ever but will March Madness still soar without Caitlin Clark?

Women's basketball is hot as ever but will March Madness still soar without Caitlin Clark?

New York Times18-03-2025

You don't have to inform ESPN senior vice president of production Meg Aronowitz about the challenge of producing the NCAA women's basketball tournament without Caitlin Clark the year after she had galvanized the property to NFL viewership heights.
'You never want to be the guy that follows Nick Saban, right?' Aronowitz said, laughing.
Advertisement
There is an interesting duality with the women's tournament this year. The sport is as hot as ever and includes stars in every corner of America from USC's JuJu Watkins to UConn's Paige Bueckers to Notre Dame's Hannah Hidalgo to Texas' Madison Booker. Regular season games were up three percent year-over-year across all of ESPN properties — and up an eye-popping 41 percent over 2023. But it will be nearly impossible for ESPN to match last year's title game viewership between South Carolina and Iowa, a game that averaged an astonishing 18.9 million viewers and peaked at 24.1 million viewers. That was a 90 percent increase from the 2023 title game and a 289 percent increase from 2022 — a unicorn among unicorn ratings.
'It is extremely healthy where women's college basketball is, but it would take a miracle for the women's title game to get 19 million viewers again,' said Aronowitz, the point person for ESPN's women's basketball coverage. 'It's not beyond reason for it to get 12 (million) if we get the right teams, the right momentum and the right storylines. What we are going to do is make sure that as the audience grows with us from the Selection Show through Tampa, we keep the audience engaged as long as we possibly can.
'But we also have to manage expectations,' she continued. 'There is no Caitlin Clark, but there are a lot of incredible student-athletes that we're going to showcase throughout this tournament, and maybe one of them sets fire and becomes a national sensation. That would be great. We're going to tell the best stories we can, we're going to document the games, and we're going to put the best basketball coverage that we can possibly do on television.'
I've written plenty of media-centric women's basketball pieces over the years and was fortunate to cover women's college basketball for Sports Illustrated for many years. What's been particularly evident over the past five years are the resources added by ESPN — a sign that the tournament is a money-maker. AdAge reported the tournament's total ad sales are up 200 percent from last year alone, and a 30-second ad unit for the championship game is going for around $1 million.
Advertisement
Below is a look at ESPN's coverage over the next three weeks:
ESPN platforms will air all 67 games covered, beginning Wednesday with the First Four. Games will air across ABC, ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU and ESPNEWS. There will be select matchups throughout the tournament on ESPN+ and Disney+. The tournament will feature more games on ABC and ESPN than ever before.
The final from Tampa will air on ABC sometime shortly after 3 p.m. (ET) on April 6. A one-hour pregame show will take place on ABC beginning at 2 p.m.
There is one very significant move. The main studio group for ESPN and ABC coverage will be Elle Duncan, Andraya Carter and Chiney Ogwumike, with the possibility of some high-profile coaches popping on later in the tournament. Carolyn Peck will switch to a full-time game analyst role through the regional final. 'They've obviously galvanized as a group and we've done the season of Women's Game Day with them,' Aronowitz said. 'You're going to see them featured and focused on the studio side and we've given the studio team more resources.' Kelsey Riggs Cuff will host a second studio team for the early rounds alongside analysts Muffet McGraw and Megan McKeown. Lisa Mattingly and Violet Palmer will join the studio teams as rules analyst from the Sweet 16 through the final game. For the open Final Four practice day on Saturday, the studio group will be Kelsey Riggs, Peck and Fever coach/ESPN broadcaster Stephanie White.
First, all broadcasters will be on site for the 16 opening round sites. That's excellent news. This link will give you where each game will air across the ESPN networks. Below are the teams that will call the event.
First and second round commentator teams
• Dave O'Brien, Christy Winters-Scott and Holly Rowe (Los Angeles – UCLA)
Advertisement
• Courtney Lyle and Carolyn Peck (Columbia, S.C.)
• Tiffany Greene and Steffi Sorensen (Austin, Texas)
• Eric Frede, Christy Thomaskutty and Holly Rowe (Los Angeles – USC)
• Beth Mowins and Rebecca Lobo (Storrs, Conn.)
• Brenda VanLengen and Andrea Lloyd (Fort Worth, Texas)
• Jenn Hildreth and Kelly Gramlich (Durham, N.C.)
• Wes Durham and Angela Taylor (Raleigh, N.C.)
• Pam Ward and Stephanie White (South Bend, Ind.)
• Roy Philpott and Jimmy Dykes (Baton Rouge, La.)
• Kevin Fitzgerald and Kim Adams (Norman, Okla.)
• Angel Gray and Aja Ellison (Chapel Hill, N.C.)
• Sam Gore and Tamika Catchings (Lexington, Ky.)
• Kirsta Blunk and Mary Murphy (Waco, Texas)
• Matt Schumacker and Brooke Weisbrod (Columbus, Ohio)
• Jay Alter and Helen Williams (College Park, Md.)
Sweet 16 and Elite 8 commentator teams
• Ryan Ruocco, Rebecca Lobo and Holly Rowe (Spokane, Wash.)
• Pam Ward, Stephanie White and Holly Rowe (Spokane, Wash.)
• Courtney Lyle, Carolyn Peck and Kris Budden (Birmingham, Ala.)
• Beth Mowins, Debbie Antonelli and Angel Gray (Birmingham, Ala.
Final Four and national championship commentator teams
• Ruocco, Lobo and Rowe
Games will start Wednesday and run through Thursday. Los Angeles (UCLA), Austin (Texas), Chapel Hill (North Carolina) and South Bend (Notre Dame) will serve as the First Four host sites. Here's the TV schedule:
Wednesday
No. 11 Princeton vs. No. 11 Iowa State, 7 p.m. (ET), ESPNU
No. 16 Southern vs. No. 16 UC San Diego, 9 p.m., ESPNU
Thursday
No. 11 Washington vs. No. 11 Columbia, 7 p.m., ESPN2
No. 16 William & Mary vs. No. 16 High Point, ESPN2
It does. 'The Bird & Taurasi Show' returns for its fourth year featuring Sue Bird and Diana Taurasi. The show will be available on ESPN2 and ESPN+ for the semifinal games, then will air on ESPN and ESPN+ for the championship. As in years past, you can expect well-known people from sports and pop culture to appear.
Advertisement
Plenty. But if they both advance in their opening games, No. 6 Michigan vs. No. 3 Notre Dame on Sunday in South Bend would be a fascinating matchup between a program with great freshmen (Michigan) and a title contender (Notre Dame) that has struggled lately.
ESPN's two lead college basketball directors, Jimmy Platt and Mike Roig, will direct all of the regional games. Platt is the current director for the women's Final Four while Roig is ESPN's top men's basketball director. The production has added High Frame Rate (HFR) technology, which provides super slow-motion sequences of key moments in a game or even for viewers. There are also additional shallow–depth–of–field cameras at both locations and those cameras make sports look much like cinema or a video game. (This is what the NFL does with its broadcasters.)
Aronowitz said ESPN as a company has bought into the women's tournament significantly when it comes to discussing the tournament away from tournament-specific programming. That was something that was not clearly the case years ago.
'My boss, (executive vice president of sports production) Mike McQuade, is a huge proponent for cross-platform promotion for all of our properties, and he firmly believes that the women's tournament is the most important thing that we're going to do in March at the company,' Aronowitz said. 'You see it with his support, combined with (executive vice president of sports news and entertainment) Dave Roberts, who is a huge women's basketball fan, and then their direct lieutenants. If anything, what the most challenging thing at this point is trying to feed all of the requests that are coming in for people that want our talent on their shows as we start to build towards Tampa. I've been doing this a long time, and it's normally having to fight to get the attention to get some exposure for this sport, and that's not the case anymore with women's basketball.'
We have you covered. Bookmark this page for the tournament. 'No Offseason: The Athletic Women's Basketball Show' podcast will have multiple episodes each week during the tournament.
Said Aronowitz: 'Look, there is always a fear of fatigue in terms of do we talk about them too much. But our audience research tells us that's what our fans care about and our research also tells us that we're still getting new viewers only starting to come to women's college basketball right now. So we need to be able to tell the stories of the stars because those stars in theory people will follow all the way to Tampa. We try to be as balanced as we can. I always remind our team that the journey for most of these teams was to just get to the women's tournament, and we have to tell those stories too.'
South Carolina. It has been phenomenal since the UConn blowout loss — especially the win over Texas in the SEC title game — and I always like when a power team has a loss in February because I think it makes a team sharper. I can't see anyone in the Birmingham 2 Region giving the Gamecocks any issues. Then comes the Final Four: UCLA has been great this year, but South Carolina has already played the Bruins (a 15-point UCLA win in December in L.A.), so it'll be ready for Round 2. I think a South Carolina-UConn final would be a massive viewership game for the sport so that's something to root for if you are a neutral party who wants to see the sport continue to pop in interest.
(Photo of Ryan Ruocco, left, Rebecca Lobo: Ethan Miller / Getty Images)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The case for the WNBA extending its season into NFL territory
The case for the WNBA extending its season into NFL territory

USA Today

time30 minutes ago

  • USA Today

The case for the WNBA extending its season into NFL territory

The case for the WNBA extending its season into NFL territory What we're all watching this summer is technically the longest WNBA season ever. All 13 teams across the league will play 44 games over 118 days, from May 16 to September 11. When it's all said and done, this will be the most games ever played in a WNBA season. As a fan, I'm thankful on one hand. The more WNBA the better. On the other, this new schedule already seems to be posing a problem for players around the league, and the season isn't even quite a month old yet. Players expressed their concerns about the schedule in an article from Front Office Sports' Annie Costabile. The crux of it is this: The WNBA's schedule has increased the number of games played over four years, from 32 in 2021 to 44 in 2025. While the league has added more games, it hasn't added the requisite amount of time in between these games for proper rest and recovery for its players. That packed schedule has resulted in stints where players are playing four games in six nights or, like in the Phoenix Mercury's case, nine games in 18 days. That's grueling and, really, unnecessary. That packed schedule is only going to get worse. The WNBA is adding two more teams next season, in the Toronto Tempo and the Portland expansion team. We're probably looking at another few games added to the schedule with those two teams coming. If that happens, an expansion on the season is desperately needed. The only argument against the expansion is that the WNBA will be encroaching deep into NFL territory, which is something essentially every league is afraid of these days. The NFL is a ratings monster. Go up against a football game — especially during primetime — and your audience is probably going to get cannibalized. It could also run up against the NBA, which could be a source of internal strife among the two organizations. MLB will also be playing the World Series around this time. However, I'd argue that these are not things the WNBA should be concerned with at this point. As far as TV ratings go, the WNBA should be confident enough at this point to believe it can hold its own against any other league it might run up against. And, yes, that includes the NFL. The W's most popular players are drawing nearly 3 million viewers to regular-season games at this point. You could argue that's a bit anomalous because it's Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese and people will watch every time they play. But when games are being played that late in the season in September and October, we're either talking about late regular-season matchups that have significance for playoff seeding or we're talking about playoffs outright. People will be drawn to these games. But, honestly, the ratings conversation doesn't even really matter here. We've said it once before and we'll say it again: The WNBA has already signed the biggest TV deal in the league's history. That deal is locked in for the next decade. Ratings no longer matter in conversations about this league. They won't until it's time to lock in the next deal, and once we arrive there, the league will likely be light years ahead of where it is today. In the end, ratings shouldn't take precedence over player health. We're only a few weeks into the season and we've already seen so many players suffer from soft tissue injuries that you can't help but feel like they could've been avoided if not for so much wear and tear on the talent. If extending the WNBA's calendar out another month or so can alleviate some of that, then so be it. The league should do it, no matter what the NFL, NBA, or anyone else thinks. Bennedict Mathurin becomes Michael Jordan The Indiana Pacers are two wins away from winning an NBA championship and pulling off one of the biggest upsets in the league's history and it's all thanks to Bennedict Mathurin, who was the hero of Game 3 for Indy. The dude scored 27 points in 22 minutes, which is bonkers. But it gets even more bonkers when you see the conversation he just entered. Mathurin is only 22 years old. Here's the list of dudes who've scored at least 25 points in the NBA Finals at 22 or younger: There are a bunch of Hall of Famers on that list and then there's Mathurin, who is still charting his course. I have no idea where things go from here for the Pacers' forward, but that's a pretty good list to be on. Byron Buxton to the moon I don't even know what to say about Byron Buxton's 479-foot homer against the Rangers. The Twins' broadcast team didn't, either. All they could do was laugh. Here's Cory Woodroof on the moonshot: "It's one of the longest home runs of the 2025 MLB season, and it's one that left the Twins television broadcast in stitches over just how dominant it really was. I mean, he sent that baseball into another time zone. You don't often see an MLB player hammer a homer like this, but Buxton slammed this baseball in stride. You know you've done well when all your team's broadcast team can do is laugh at how great of a home run it was." Look at this thing. It truly is comical. Insane. Quick hits: A new consensus mock ... The Knicks get rejected again ... and more — Here's Bryan Kalbrosky with a new consensus NBA mock draft for you. Can't believe it's almost draft season. — The Knicks really need to go find a head coach who doesn't already have a team, man. Charles Curtis has more on their latest rejections. — Our Meg Hall had a nice chat with Sha'Carri Richardson! Y'all know you need to click this one. — A dentist is playing in the US Open. No, seriously. Charles Curtis has five facts you need to know about him. — Charles Barkley roasted the Knicks' coaching search. Absolutely love this. — Here's Robert Zeglinski on Kyle Shanahan being annoyed with how fans overreact to NFL practices. This is brilliant. That's a wrap, folks. Thanks for reading. Peace. -Sykes ✌️ This is For The Win's daily newsletter, The Morning Win. Did a friend recommend or forward this to you? If so, subscribe here.

Kris Moutinho opens up on dark time after UFC release: I was close to 'ending it all'
Kris Moutinho opens up on dark time after UFC release: I was close to 'ending it all'

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Kris Moutinho opens up on dark time after UFC release: I was close to 'ending it all'

Kris Moutinho opens up on dark time after UFC release: I was close to 'ending it all' ATLANTA – Kris Moutinho had very dark thoughts after his original stint in the UFC ended. Moutinho (14-6 MMA, 0-2 UFC) made his UFC debut on short notice against former bantamweight champion Sean O'Malley in July 2021. He lost the fight by third-round TKO at UFC 264 but earned a Fight of the Night bonus for his effort, which made him a fan favorte. But Moutinho would receive his walking papers after getting finished by Guido Cannetti in the first round at UFC Fight Night 203. That's when things took a really bad turn for the 32-year-old. "I went through a really bad time with relationships, with everything else," Moutinho told MMA Junkie and other reporters during Wednesday's UFC on ESPN 69 media day. "My life was just a mess. I was very close to ending this thing, ending it all and being done. "I don't want to talk too much about it, but it was a bad time, one of the worst times in my life. I found the girl I'm with now, my beautiful girlfriend. She saved me, saved my life, helped me find God a lot better, and I'm just in a better place." Moutinho has been given a second chance in the UFC after putting together a five-fight winning streak. However, the opportunity will come on short notice once again, and it'll be against undefeated Malcolm Wellmaker (9-0 MMA, 1-0 UFC) on Saturday's UFC on ESPN 69 (ESPN, ESPN+) prelims at State Farm Arena. Despite the far-from-ideal circumstances, Moutinho insists he's at peace. "I feel like I'm where God put me, where I'm supposed to be," Moutinho said. "I feel like this is the guy that should have been here in 2021, the guy that is mentally focused, enjoys this stuff again. Then, I was just kind of going through the motions, and I was happy to be here, but I was kind of just happy to be here. I'm not that guy no more. I don't care. I'm coming to kill. I'm coming to knock him out. He has to kill me to get me out of there."

Adam Schefter was ‘essentially banned' from Pat McAfee's ESPN show — until now
Adam Schefter was ‘essentially banned' from Pat McAfee's ESPN show — until now

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Adam Schefter was ‘essentially banned' from Pat McAfee's ESPN show — until now

You'd be hard pressed to find an NFL insider with more scoops than Adam Schefter, but that hasn't mattered for Pat McAfee and his show. According to The Athletic's Andrew Marchand, Schefter was 'essentially banned' from 'The Pat McAfee Show' back in March after the insider failed to make an appearance on the show at McAfee's request. The apparent dispute arose at the start of NFL free agency when McAfee wanted Schefter to come on the show, but the latter was busy with a free agency special that was airing on ESPN2. 3 Pat McAfee's self-titled show has been an ESPN staple for the past several years. AP 3 Adam Schefter is one of the NFL's top insiders. AP Schefter hasn't been seen on the former All-Pro punter's show since, and NFL Network's Ian Rapoport has instead made numerous appearances, including one as the guest host. But the apparent squabble seems to have reached its end, as Marchand reported that Schefter is expected to appear on Thursday's 'Pat McAfee Show,' where viewers could find out furtther details of Schefter possibly having been 'banished' from the show for the past several months. ESPN president of content Burke Magnus didn't seem too concerned about the rumored feud as he spoke on McAfee's successes and relationship with the rest of the network. 'Pat and his show are thriving on ESPN,' the statement reads, per Marchand. 'We are very pleased with the partnership.' 3 Adam Schefter making an appearance on The Pat McAfee Show in January. Pat McAfee Show/X Magnus also downplayed the idea that McAfee banned Schefter. 'In the nearly three years since Pat has brought his show to our platforms, we've continuously seen those out there that are seemingly obsessed with wanting to see Pat fail on ESPN,' he said. 'This rumor is just the latest example of that. Pat and his show continue to break the mold and reach new audiences, and we look forward to the continued success together.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store