
Women's basketball is hot as ever but will March Madness still soar without Caitlin Clark?
You don't have to inform ESPN senior vice president of production Meg Aronowitz about the challenge of producing the NCAA women's basketball tournament without Caitlin Clark the year after she had galvanized the property to NFL viewership heights.
'You never want to be the guy that follows Nick Saban, right?' Aronowitz said, laughing.
Advertisement
There is an interesting duality with the women's tournament this year. The sport is as hot as ever and includes stars in every corner of America from USC's JuJu Watkins to UConn's Paige Bueckers to Notre Dame's Hannah Hidalgo to Texas' Madison Booker. Regular season games were up three percent year-over-year across all of ESPN properties — and up an eye-popping 41 percent over 2023. But it will be nearly impossible for ESPN to match last year's title game viewership between South Carolina and Iowa, a game that averaged an astonishing 18.9 million viewers and peaked at 24.1 million viewers. That was a 90 percent increase from the 2023 title game and a 289 percent increase from 2022 — a unicorn among unicorn ratings.
'It is extremely healthy where women's college basketball is, but it would take a miracle for the women's title game to get 19 million viewers again,' said Aronowitz, the point person for ESPN's women's basketball coverage. 'It's not beyond reason for it to get 12 (million) if we get the right teams, the right momentum and the right storylines. What we are going to do is make sure that as the audience grows with us from the Selection Show through Tampa, we keep the audience engaged as long as we possibly can.
'But we also have to manage expectations,' she continued. 'There is no Caitlin Clark, but there are a lot of incredible student-athletes that we're going to showcase throughout this tournament, and maybe one of them sets fire and becomes a national sensation. That would be great. We're going to tell the best stories we can, we're going to document the games, and we're going to put the best basketball coverage that we can possibly do on television.'
I've written plenty of media-centric women's basketball pieces over the years and was fortunate to cover women's college basketball for Sports Illustrated for many years. What's been particularly evident over the past five years are the resources added by ESPN — a sign that the tournament is a money-maker. AdAge reported the tournament's total ad sales are up 200 percent from last year alone, and a 30-second ad unit for the championship game is going for around $1 million.
Advertisement
Below is a look at ESPN's coverage over the next three weeks:
ESPN platforms will air all 67 games covered, beginning Wednesday with the First Four. Games will air across ABC, ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU and ESPNEWS. There will be select matchups throughout the tournament on ESPN+ and Disney+. The tournament will feature more games on ABC and ESPN than ever before.
The final from Tampa will air on ABC sometime shortly after 3 p.m. (ET) on April 6. A one-hour pregame show will take place on ABC beginning at 2 p.m.
There is one very significant move. The main studio group for ESPN and ABC coverage will be Elle Duncan, Andraya Carter and Chiney Ogwumike, with the possibility of some high-profile coaches popping on later in the tournament. Carolyn Peck will switch to a full-time game analyst role through the regional final. 'They've obviously galvanized as a group and we've done the season of Women's Game Day with them,' Aronowitz said. 'You're going to see them featured and focused on the studio side and we've given the studio team more resources.' Kelsey Riggs Cuff will host a second studio team for the early rounds alongside analysts Muffet McGraw and Megan McKeown. Lisa Mattingly and Violet Palmer will join the studio teams as rules analyst from the Sweet 16 through the final game. For the open Final Four practice day on Saturday, the studio group will be Kelsey Riggs, Peck and Fever coach/ESPN broadcaster Stephanie White.
First, all broadcasters will be on site for the 16 opening round sites. That's excellent news. This link will give you where each game will air across the ESPN networks. Below are the teams that will call the event.
First and second round commentator teams
• Dave O'Brien, Christy Winters-Scott and Holly Rowe (Los Angeles – UCLA)
Advertisement
• Courtney Lyle and Carolyn Peck (Columbia, S.C.)
• Tiffany Greene and Steffi Sorensen (Austin, Texas)
• Eric Frede, Christy Thomaskutty and Holly Rowe (Los Angeles – USC)
• Beth Mowins and Rebecca Lobo (Storrs, Conn.)
• Brenda VanLengen and Andrea Lloyd (Fort Worth, Texas)
• Jenn Hildreth and Kelly Gramlich (Durham, N.C.)
• Wes Durham and Angela Taylor (Raleigh, N.C.)
• Pam Ward and Stephanie White (South Bend, Ind.)
• Roy Philpott and Jimmy Dykes (Baton Rouge, La.)
• Kevin Fitzgerald and Kim Adams (Norman, Okla.)
• Angel Gray and Aja Ellison (Chapel Hill, N.C.)
• Sam Gore and Tamika Catchings (Lexington, Ky.)
• Kirsta Blunk and Mary Murphy (Waco, Texas)
• Matt Schumacker and Brooke Weisbrod (Columbus, Ohio)
• Jay Alter and Helen Williams (College Park, Md.)
Sweet 16 and Elite 8 commentator teams
• Ryan Ruocco, Rebecca Lobo and Holly Rowe (Spokane, Wash.)
• Pam Ward, Stephanie White and Holly Rowe (Spokane, Wash.)
• Courtney Lyle, Carolyn Peck and Kris Budden (Birmingham, Ala.)
• Beth Mowins, Debbie Antonelli and Angel Gray (Birmingham, Ala.
Final Four and national championship commentator teams
• Ruocco, Lobo and Rowe
Games will start Wednesday and run through Thursday. Los Angeles (UCLA), Austin (Texas), Chapel Hill (North Carolina) and South Bend (Notre Dame) will serve as the First Four host sites. Here's the TV schedule:
Wednesday
No. 11 Princeton vs. No. 11 Iowa State, 7 p.m. (ET), ESPNU
No. 16 Southern vs. No. 16 UC San Diego, 9 p.m., ESPNU
Thursday
No. 11 Washington vs. No. 11 Columbia, 7 p.m., ESPN2
No. 16 William & Mary vs. No. 16 High Point, ESPN2
It does. 'The Bird & Taurasi Show' returns for its fourth year featuring Sue Bird and Diana Taurasi. The show will be available on ESPN2 and ESPN+ for the semifinal games, then will air on ESPN and ESPN+ for the championship. As in years past, you can expect well-known people from sports and pop culture to appear.
Advertisement
Plenty. But if they both advance in their opening games, No. 6 Michigan vs. No. 3 Notre Dame on Sunday in South Bend would be a fascinating matchup between a program with great freshmen (Michigan) and a title contender (Notre Dame) that has struggled lately.
ESPN's two lead college basketball directors, Jimmy Platt and Mike Roig, will direct all of the regional games. Platt is the current director for the women's Final Four while Roig is ESPN's top men's basketball director. The production has added High Frame Rate (HFR) technology, which provides super slow-motion sequences of key moments in a game or even for viewers. There are also additional shallow–depth–of–field cameras at both locations and those cameras make sports look much like cinema or a video game. (This is what the NFL does with its broadcasters.)
Aronowitz said ESPN as a company has bought into the women's tournament significantly when it comes to discussing the tournament away from tournament-specific programming. That was something that was not clearly the case years ago.
'My boss, (executive vice president of sports production) Mike McQuade, is a huge proponent for cross-platform promotion for all of our properties, and he firmly believes that the women's tournament is the most important thing that we're going to do in March at the company,' Aronowitz said. 'You see it with his support, combined with (executive vice president of sports news and entertainment) Dave Roberts, who is a huge women's basketball fan, and then their direct lieutenants. If anything, what the most challenging thing at this point is trying to feed all of the requests that are coming in for people that want our talent on their shows as we start to build towards Tampa. I've been doing this a long time, and it's normally having to fight to get the attention to get some exposure for this sport, and that's not the case anymore with women's basketball.'
We have you covered. Bookmark this page for the tournament. 'No Offseason: The Athletic Women's Basketball Show' podcast will have multiple episodes each week during the tournament.
Said Aronowitz: 'Look, there is always a fear of fatigue in terms of do we talk about them too much. But our audience research tells us that's what our fans care about and our research also tells us that we're still getting new viewers only starting to come to women's college basketball right now. So we need to be able to tell the stories of the stars because those stars in theory people will follow all the way to Tampa. We try to be as balanced as we can. I always remind our team that the journey for most of these teams was to just get to the women's tournament, and we have to tell those stories too.'
South Carolina. It has been phenomenal since the UConn blowout loss — especially the win over Texas in the SEC title game — and I always like when a power team has a loss in February because I think it makes a team sharper. I can't see anyone in the Birmingham 2 Region giving the Gamecocks any issues. Then comes the Final Four: UCLA has been great this year, but South Carolina has already played the Bruins (a 15-point UCLA win in December in L.A.), so it'll be ready for Round 2. I think a South Carolina-UConn final would be a massive viewership game for the sport so that's something to root for if you are a neutral party who wants to see the sport continue to pop in interest.
(Photo of Ryan Ruocco, left, Rebecca Lobo: Ethan Miller / Getty Images)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How long can Aari McDonald stay on Indiana Fever? Explaining WNBA hardship contracts
INDIANAPOLIS – Injuries to Caitlin Clark and Sophie Cunningham left the Indiana Fever shorthanded and desperately in need of a ball-handling guard. Clark, the Fever's starting point guard, has been out since May 26 with a quad strain. Cunningham, one of the players who shared the load at point, has been out with an ankle injury since May 30. Advertisement So, the Fever brought in Aari McDonald on a hardship contract on June 1, and she has impressed in her two games with Indiana so far. McDonald has been key for the Fever in this stretch, coming off the bench to help Sydney Colson share the point guard duties. She's able to push the pace in transition and is tough defensively, despite her size (5-6). She had two days to learn the Fever offense before playing against Washington on June 3 and didn't miss a beat. McDonald played 27 minutes against the Mystics, making an impact on both ends — including drawing three offensive fouls in an eight-minute stretch. She scored seven points with a team-leading five assists and three steals. Advertisement Her June 7 outing against Chicago was even better, scoring 12 points on 4-of-8 shooting in 25 minutes and adding two rebounds, two assists and three steals. 'She's taken full advantage of her opportunity,' Fever assistant coach Austin Kelly said following Indiana's win over Chicago on Saturday. 'We see it every year: players go down, there are hardship contracts, and she definitely stayed ready. We always talk about staying ready so you don't have to get ready, and she epitomizes that… We couldn't be more proud of her and how she's transitioned, and how she's taken us to another level and allowed us to continue to play the same way we want to play on both ends.' She has been imperative for the Fever lately. But with Clark and Cunningham nearing their returns, McDonald's time with the Fever is becoming limited. Story continues below gallery How long will Aari McDonald play for Indiana Fever? McDonald will be able to play for the Fever until either Clark or Cunningham return, which would bring the Fever's roster of available players back up to 10. Advertisement Once there are 10 players available from Indiana's standard roster, McDonald's contract will be automatically terminated. Caitlin Clark injury update: When will Fever star return? 'We're gonna play the long game' Sophie Cunningham injury update: Fever cautious hoping to avoid another re-aggravation Will Aari McDonald be able to stay on Indiana Fever after Caitlin Clark, Sophie Cunningham return? No. her contract will be terminated by default once either Clark or Cunningham become game-ready, according to Article VII, Section 4, point b(i) of the WNBA collective bargaining agreement (pg. 82). Advertisement 'If a Team during the Regular Season, as a result of injuries, illnesses, other conditions or other extenuating circumstances that have affected its players, has fewer than ten (10) players on its roster who are able to play, it may apply to the WNBA to obtain an Exception to sign one or more Replacement Player(s) to Replacement Contract(s) to replace one or more of the Team's unavailable Players,' the collective bargaining agreement reads. 'Any such Replacement Contract shall be terminated immediately once ten (10) other players on the Team's roster are again able to play.' McDonald is on an emergency hardship contract, which allows teams to go over the roster limit and the cap to sign players if they have fewer than 10 available players. Clark and Cunningham's injuries give Indiana nine available players, thus allowing the Fever to sign one player to a hardship contract to get them back up to 10. She is considered a 'Replacement Player' through her contract with the Fever and the league. She is not on a standard player contract. The Fever are not able to waive another player on an unprotected contract once they get up to 10 and keep McDonald instead. As McDonald is on a replacement player contract, hers will need to be the one that is terminated. Advertisement More: Stephanie White returns to Fever after taking time away for personal matter Can Indiana Fever cut other players, bring Aari McDonald back? The Fever could bring McDonald back, in theory, but it would require a lot of rearranging. First off, Indiana would need to wait 10 days after terminating her contract to bring her back, according to Article 5, section 14(f) of the CBA. The only exception to that rule is if there was a hardship need, but the Fever will not be in that situation. Immediately after her contract with the Fever is terminated, too, McDonald is an unrestricted free agent able to sign with any team in the league — whether on a standard player contract or hardship contract. Advertisement Indiana also does not have enough cap space in its current structure to pay McDonald. Indiana was able to go over the cap to sign her to a hardship, but the money they paid her for the time she was on the Fever will still count toward the cap. McDonald is also considered a veteran player, as she has 4+ years of experience, so her minimum pay structure is higher than the base minimum in the league. The full-season player minimum for players 0-3 years is $66,079, while the veteran minimum for players with 4+ years is $78,831. Those amounts are prorated with each passing game, but it still makes McDonald more expensive to sign. When the Fever would be able to sign her as a 12th player depends on when her replacement contract is terminated, but it likely would not be until at least July. The Fever also have the option of waiving a player on an unprotected contract if they want to get McDonald back earlier than that. Colson, forward Brianna Turner and rookie forward Makayla Timpson are all on unprotected contracts, but it's unlikely that the Fever would waive them. Advertisement Colson is Clark's direct backup, starting in her place while she's out with injury, and Turner, while she plays minimal minutes currently, will provide crucial depth when Fever backup center Damiris Dantas will miss four games because of a Brazilian national team obligation. The Fever also like Timpson as a development player, and she gets some minutes here and there. This could also all be null, as well, if McDonald signs with another team in that 10-day period. And based on how she's played for the Fever so far, it wouldn't be surprising if another team picked her up. Chloe Peterson is the Indiana Fever beat reporter for IndyStar. Reach her at capeterson@ or follow her on X at @chloepeterson67. Get IndyStar's Indiana Fever and Caitlin Clark coverage sent directly to your inbox with our Caitlin Clark Fever newsletter. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: How long can Indiana Fever keep Aari McDonald with a hardship contract?


Fast Company
39 minutes ago
- Fast Company
NCAA agrees to $2.8 billion settlement. Here's how it changes college sports
The business of college sports was upended after a federal judge approved settlement between the NCAA and former college athletes on June 6, 2025. After a lengthy litigation process, the NCAA has agreed to provide $2.8 billion in back pay to former and current college athletes, while allowing schools to directly pay athletes for the first time. Joshua Lens, whose scholarship centers on the intersection of sports, business, and the law, tells the story of this settlement and explains its significance within the rapidly changing world of college sports. What will change for players and schools with this settlement? The terms of the settlement included the following changes: The NCAA and conferences will distribute approximately $2.8 billion in media rights revenue back pay to thousands of athletes who competed since 2016. Universities will have the ability to enter name, image, and likeness, or NIL, agreements with student-athletes. So schools can now, for example, pay them to appear in ads for the school or for public appearances. Each university that opts in to the settlement can disburse up to $20.5 million to student-athletes in the 2025-26 academic year, a number that will likely rise in future academic years. Athletes' NIL agreements with certain individuals and entities will be subject to an evaluation that will determine whether the NIL compensation exceeds an acceptable range based on a perceived fair market value, which could result in the athlete having to restructure or forgo the deal. The NCAA's maximum sport program scholarship limits will be replaced with maximum team roster size limits for universities that choose to be part of the settlement. Why did the NCAA agree to settle with, rather than fight, the plaintiffs? In 2020, roughly 14,000 current and former college athletes filed a class-action lawsuit, House v. NCAA, seeking damages for past restrictions on their ability to earn money. For decades, college athletics' primary governing body, the NCAA, permitted universities whose athletics programs compete in Division I to provide their athletes with scholarships that would help cover their educational expenses, such as tuition, room and board, fees, and books. By focusing only on educational expenses, the NCAA was able to reinforce the notion that collegiate athletes are amateurs who may not receive pay for participating in athletics, despite making money for their schools. A year later, in 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in a separate case, Alston v. NCAA, that the NCAA violated antitrust laws by limiting the amount of education-related benefits, such as laptops, books, and musical instruments, that universities could provide to their athletes. The ruling challenged the NCAA's amateurism model while opening the door for future lawsuits tied to athlete compensation. It also burnished the plaintiffs' case in House v. NCAA, compelling college athletics' governing body to take part in settlement talks. What were some of the key changes that took place in college sports after the Supreme Court's decision in Alston v. NCAA? Following Alston, the NCAA permitted universities to dole out several thousand dollars in what's called ' education benefits pay ' to student-athletes. This could include cash bonuses for maintaining a certain GPA or simply satisfying NCAA academic eligibility requirements. But contrary to popular belief, the Supreme Court's Alston decision didn't let college athletes be paid via NIL deals. The NCAA continued to maintain that this would violate its principles of amateurism. However, many states, beginning with California, introduced or passed laws that required universities within their borders to allow their athletes to accept NIL compensation. With more than a dozen states looking to pass similar laws, the NCAA folded on June 30, 2021, changing its policy so athletes could accept NIL compensation for the first time. Will colleges and universities be able to weather all of these financial commitments? The settlement will result in a windfall for certain current and former collegiate athletes, with some expected to receive several hundred thousands of dollars. Universities and their athletics departments, on the other hand, will have to reallocate resources or cut spending. Some will cut back on travel expenses for some sports, others have paused facility renovations, while other athletic departments may resort to cutting sports whose revenue does not exceed their expenses. As Texas A&M University athletic director Trev Alberts has explained, however, college sports does not have a revenue problem—it has a spending problem. Even in the well-resourced Southeastern Conference, for example, many universities' athletics expenses exceed their revenue. Do you see any future conflicts on the horizon? Many observers hope the settlement brings stability to the industry. But there's always a chance that the settlement will be appealed. More potential challenges could involve Title IX, the federal gender equity statute that prohibits discrimination based on sex in schools. What if, for example, a university subject to the statute distributes the vast majority of revenue to male athletes? Such a scenario could violate Title IX. On the other hand, a university that more equitably distributes revenue among male and female athletes could face legal backlash from football athletes who argue that they should be entitled to more revenue, since their games earn the big bucks. And as I pointed out in a recent law review article, an athlete or university may challenge the new enforcement process that will attempt to limit athletes' NIL compensation within an acceptable range that is based on a fair market valuation. The NCAA and the conferences named in the lawsuit have hired the accountancy firm Deloitte to determine whether athletes' compensation from NIL deals fall within an acceptable range based on a fair market valuation, looking to other collegiate and professional athletes to set a benchmark range. If athletes and universities have struck deals that are too generous, both could be penalized, according to the terms of the settlement. Finally, the settlement does not address—let alone solve—issues facing international student-athletes who want to earn money via NIL. Most international student-athletes' visas, and the laws regulating them, heavily limit their ability to accept compensation for work, including NIL pay. Some lawmakers have tried to address this issue in the past, but it hasn't been a priority for the NCAA, as it has lobbied Congress for a federal NIL law.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Colleges can now begin paying athletes directly following $2.8B landmark settlement
CHICOPEE, Mass. (WWLP) – Following a multibillion-dollar landmark settlement, colleges can now begin paying athletes directly. Athletes express concern over NCAA settlement's impact on non-revenue sports A federal judge approved the deal between the NCAA on Friday for Division One athletes. The NCAA can now pay thousands of current and former athletes who competed in college at any time from 2016 to now. A share of nearly $2.8 billion in damages is expected to be paid out over the next decade. 22News spoke to the community about this significant shift in the world of college sports. 'It feels good, like knowing that athletes are finally getting the money they deserve, especially after colleges make a lot of money off of athletes. So, I mean, definitely it's a great achievement for them. I'm proud of them,' said Rahman Martin of Springfield. During the decade-long agreement, the annual cap starts at roughly $20 million per school. It will then go up every year. Athletes will receive these new payments in addition to their scholarships and other benefits. WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.