Rain of lies, hail of false promises: Lalu Yadav's weather forecast on PM's visit
RJD chief Lalu Yadav on Friday took a dig at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who is in Bihar, humorously making a reference to weather, saying there was a "heavy rain of lies" and a "hail of false promises" in the state.Lalu Yadav's attack came after PM Modi, earlier today, took on the RJD-Congress combine over dynastic politics, asserting that those hankering for power focus solely on promoting their own families, while his government worked for inclusive development.advertisement"Weather warning in the interest of Bihar. Today, there is a heavy rain of lies, false promises and illusions in Bihar. Hailstones of false and tempting promises are also falling along with thunder. Be careful," Lalu Yadav wrote on X.
The RJD chief also shared an AI video to highlight the realities faced by the people after promises made by NDA, of which Chief Minister Nitish Kumar is an ally.The video shows an elderly man sitting in a rural area under an umbrella, conveying a message of the person seeking shelter from a 'flood of promises'. The clip then shows a young man holding an umbrella amid thunderstorms, signifying the vulnerability of people from a 'hail of false promises'.The video also shows Nitish Kumar and PM Modi happily dancing under a broken bridge, signifying infrastructural breakdown and corruption under the NDA regime.advertisement
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
Israel-Iran War: Can Trump bomb Iran without asking? Capitol Hill says no, invokes War Powers Act
President Donald Trump is keeping his cards close. When asked whether the United States would join Israel's escalating military confrontation with Iran, he simply said, 'I may do it. I may not.' That was on June 18, just days after Israel launched strikes on Iranian territory. Since then, speculation has grown over whether Trump might authorise a U.S. military operation—without getting the green light from Congress . According to Department of State spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, 'He is the singular guiding hand about what will be occurring from this point forward.' But many lawmakers disagree. And they're rushing to reassert control. Congress says, "Not without us" The U.S. Constitution is clear: only Congress has the power to declare war. Live Events 'This is not our war,' said Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.' Massie has introduced a resolution under the 1973 War Powers Act to stop any unauthorised U.S. strikes on Iran. He's joined by Democrat Ro Khanna of California, who posted on X, 'Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American people?' Over in the Senate, Democrat Tim Kaine has introduced a similar resolution. 'This resolution will ensure that if we decide to place our nation's men and women in uniform into harm's way, we will have a debate and vote on it in Congress,' he said. The War Powers Act: What it actually does Passed in 1973 after the Vietnam War and President Nixon's secret bombing of Cambodia, the War Powers Act was designed to limit the president's ability to launch military action unilaterally. It says, The president must notify Congress within 48 hours of launching military action. Military deployment without congressional approval is limited to 60–90 days. Congress must be consulted 'in every possible instance' before troops are committed abroad. The law was passed over Nixon's veto—but almost every president since has found ways to work around it. Why it's back in the spotlight As Israeli airstrikes continue and Trump hints at joining in, lawmakers worry that the U.S. could be dragged into another prolonged Middle East war. That's exactly what the War Powers Act was supposed to prevent. Bernie Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont, has proposed the No War Against Iran Act , which would prohibit the use of federal funds for any attack on Iran without a formal declaration of war or congressional authorisation. 'The recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran could quickly pull the United States into another endless conflict,' Senator Kaine warned. Can the President Act without Congress? Technically, the president is commander-in-chief of the military. Under Article II of the Constitution, Trump can respond to 'sudden attacks' or threats. But the power to start a war—that belongs to Congress. Still, history tells a different story. Since World War II, U.S. presidents have authorised military operations in Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf, Libya, Somalia, and more—without formal declarations of war. They've relied instead on broad laws like the 2001 and 2002 Authorisations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs), passed after the 9/11 attacks and before the 2003 Iraq invasion. Trump used the 2002 AUMF to justify the assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020. So does the War Powers Act have any real power? It's complicated. Congress can vote to end military action, but the president can veto that decision. Overriding a veto requires a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate—a rare feat in a divided Washington. In 2019, Congress tried to end U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen. Trump vetoed it. Then again in 2020, after the Soleimani strike, Congress passed a bill to limit Trump's powers to launch war on Iran. Trump vetoed that too. The War Powers Act has been criticised for being more symbolic than effective. Even President Joe Biden once led a Senate subcommittee that concluded the law was falling short of its original purpose. Opinions split, even within parties Not all Democrats back Kaine's resolution. Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has said he would vote against it. He believes Trump should retain the option to preemptively strike Iran's nuclear infrastructure. On the Republican side, some are more cautious. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky said: 'No president can bomb another country without the permission of Congress.' He added, 'It's always been my belief that you don't go to war without the approval of Congress and bombing other countries is obviously war.' But others support Trump's freedom to act. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas said, 'A single bombing run, historically, has not been understood to require congressional authorisation.' Sustained warfare, he agreed, would require Congress to act. Senator Lindsey Graham took it a step further. 'If diplomacy is not successful,' he said, 'I would urge President Trump to go all in… If that means flying with Israel, fly with Israel.' The House and Senate are currently on recess, but both will be forced to vote on the new resolutions once they return. The outcome will test the strength of Congress's war-making authority. Meanwhile, Trump has made it clear he's watching the conflict closely. After cutting short a G7 trip in Canada, he returned to Washington and declared, 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran.' He added, 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding... We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.' At its heart, this isn't just a legal or political issue. It's about whether the people, through their elected representatives, get to decide when America goes to war. For decades, war decisions have been drifting away from Congress and towards the Oval Office . This moment could shift that balance—or cement it. With Iran's nuclear programme in the crosshairs, and Israel already striking, the next move could redraw the map of the Middle East—and reshape America's role in it. And if history is any guide, the decision could be made by one man, not 535 lawmakers.
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Telangana sets benchmark with ₹1.04 lakh crore for Agriculture since Cong. came to power
Hyderabad The Telangana government has spent a staggering ₹1.04 lakh crore, ever since the Congress came to power, to revitalise agriculture and garnered the attention of other States. The series of pro-farmer policies include a ₹2 lakh loan waiver that has freed 25 lakh farmers from debt in a single year, as against the previous governments that took years to release crop loan waiver in installments, a senior Minister argued. The Revanth Reddy government waived crop loans worth ₹20,616 crore in its first year alone, bringing immediate relief and restoring the economic dignity of farmers across Telangana, said Bhongir MP Chamala Kiran Kumar Reddy. The Rythu Bharosa scheme has disbursed ₹7,310.59 crore within five days, beginning June 16, helping 65.12 lakh farmers. In total, the government has spent ₹12,682 crore on Rythu Bharosa payouts in 18 months. The government intends to disburse ₹9,000 crore in nine days. The same was informed to senior Congress leaders in New Delhi during the Chief Minister's recent visits drawing appreciation from the Congress leadership. Besides, the government continued 24x7 free electricity for agriculture and providing a subsidy of ₹16,691 crore for 29 lakh pump sets. The grain procurement practice has reached a new scale with ₹500 per quintal bonus incentive for paddy helping the Sreach a new milestone in rice production. Officials said in 2023-24, the government procured 95.31 lakh metric tonnes of paddy from 15 lakh farmers at a cost of ₹20,964 crore. So far, paddy worth ₹29,562 crore has been purchased and payments made to over 21.59 lakh farmers. Telangana produced 2.80 crore metric tonnes of paddy this year, highest in the country. Telangana is also leading in oil palm cultivation, with 18,985 farmers planting the crop across 60,432 acres since the Congress government took charge, officials argued. Officials also revealed that farmers hit by unseasonal rains and floods received ₹10,000 per acre in compensation, totalling ₹260 crore. Revival of Central schemes In addition, the State government has revived 16 Centrally-sponsored schemes that were previously stalled due to non-release of matching grants. A sum of ₹245 crore has been allocated for their reactivation. Telangana is also providing drip and sprinkler irrigation systems, including 100% for SC/ST farmers, 90% for small and marginal farmers, and 80% for others with 75% subsidy on sprinklers. Since December 2023, equipment worth ₹282 crore has been distributed to 40,265 farmers.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Quota for minorities in housing: Siddaramaiah turns tables on BJP, points to NDA's policy for minorities
Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Friday turned the tables on the Opposition BJP saying the increase in the quota for minorities in housing schemes in Karnataka has been in deference to a guideline issued by the NDA regime at the Centre and the same has been in force for years. If this was unconstitutional or appeasement , why did the Union Government ask all states to follow it? Why is it being implemented under Central schemes such as the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana?, the CM asked in a media statement. The quota was applicable to minorities including Christians, Jains, and Muslims. "This is based on the Prime Minister's 15-Point Programme for the Welfare of Minorities (2019), which clearly directs all Central and State implementing agencies to earmark 15% of physical and financial targets for minorities wherever possible." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: 1 simple trick to get all TV channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo "Our decision does not grant blanket enhancement of quota across the state. It only addresses a specific implementation challenge. In many panchayats where the minority population is less than 10%, the mandated 10% earmarking could not be utilised. To ensure optimal use of the allocated targets and avoid lapses, we have allowed the gap from such panchayats to be reallocated to those with a higher minority population, subject to a cap of 15%. This is an administrative adjustment within the unreserved category and does not affect SC, ST, or OBC reservations in any manner. The decision is legally sound and has been cleared by the Law Department after thorough review," Siddaramaiah said in response to criticisms from the BJP. The BJP's reaction, he said, was both hypocritical and politically motivated. The same party that implements the 15% target at the national level is now accusing Karnataka of appeasement for merely applying the same principle to its state schemes. "If the BJP has any objection, they must first explain why their own government continues to operate under the same guidelines and why it expects other states to do the same. This selective outrage is nothing but an attempt to stoke communal sentiments and derail efforts meant to uplift the poorest and most marginalised families in the state." Live Events Over 34,000 additional minority families, most of them landless and in need of housing, will benefit from this decision in the current year alone. Where no minority applicants are found in a panchayat, the unutilised share will be reallocated to where there is higher need, ensuring that not a single house remains unbuilt due to technical rigidities. This approach ensures equity, efficiency, and full utilisation of resources, while remaining fully compliant with constitutional provisions, the statement said. "We urge BJP leaders to rise above narrow political calculations and support measures that truly uplift the poor, instead of trying to block their path with misinformation and communal rhetoric," Siddaramaiah said. Deputy CM DK Shivakumar on Friday maintained that the 5% increase in the quota of minorities in the housing schemes would not eat into the share of other communities, lashing out at the BJP for threatening to launch an agitation demanding the reversal of the Cabinet decision. Housing Minister BZ Zamir Ahmed Khan has only transferred the quota of minorities from rural areas to urban areas as the population of minorities is low in rural areas. No quota is being snatched from anyone to give them to minorities, he told the media a day after the government's decision triggered sharp reactions from the Opposition BJP. The Karnataka cabinet on Thursday decided to increase the minority quota in the government's housing schemes by 5 percentage points, weeks after passing a bill to create a 4% Muslim quota in government's civil contracts. The government currently has a quota of 10%, which will now go up to 15%. Shivakumar said as per the Justice Sachar Committee report, minorities were given quotas in rural areas also. But it was not being used as the population of minorities was low in rural areas. As much as 90% of SC/STs have been given homes. The government cannot give funds unless they lay the foundation stone for their house, he added. The government cannot incur losses by keeping flats vacant, but the Opposition parties were politicising it, he said. Housing Minister Khan said the Centre already has a 15% quota for minorities as per the Sachar committee report. There has been a demand to have the same policy in Karnataka also. The Cabinet decided to implement the same here also, accepting the report of the Cabinet sub-committee, he said. Veteran BJP leader BS Yediyurappa said his party was not against the interests of minorities, it was not fair to over appease them for the sake of vote bank politics.
