HC directs DGP to implement GO sanctioning weekly off to cops
Madurai:
on Monday directed the director general of police (DGP) to ensure the proper and effective implementation of the 2021 govt order (GO) sanctioning a one-day weekly off for head constables and constables.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Justice Battu Devanand made it clear that any future violation of this directive would necessarily invite the initiation of proceedings against the officers concerned under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, read with Article 215 of the Constitution.
The court was hearing a petition filed by M Senthil Kumar, a head constable at Austinpatti police station in Madurai district. He stated that GOs were passed in 2021 and 2022, sanctioning one-day weekly off for police personnel, but they were not implemented.
Hence, he moved court.
The state submitted that the petitioner is raising the grievances of other police personnel for their benefit and, as such, the present petition should be treated as a petition filed as public interest litigation.
However, justice Battu Devanand noted that the petitioner was denied a weekly off on several occasions contrary to the GOs. The petitioner attempted to demonstrate the difficulties faced by all police personnel.
Therefore, it cannot be construed that the petitioner filed this petition as public interest litigation.
"There is no association for police personnel working in the state of Tamil Nadu to enable them to represent their grievances to the state govt or the concerned authorities. It is also an admitted fact that in neighbouring states, police personnel have their associations. In such a factual situation, the authorities cannot expect that every police personnel has to approach the court by filing separate petitions seeking to extend the benefit of a weekly off provided by the state govt by amending the police standing orders.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Under such circumstances, filing this petition to bring the difficulties of the petitioner himself before the court and at the same time his attempt to bring the difficulties of all the police personnel working in the state cannot be faulted," the judge observed.
The judge observed that the aim and objective behind the announcement made by the Tamil Nadu chief minister (CM) to grant a weekly off to police personnel is to take care of their health condition and it would be helpful for them to spend some time with their family members to come out from work tension and stress.
The decision of the CM is very much laudable.
"But the GOs issued based on the announcement of the CM are not being implemented effectively and properly. Due to the inaction of the authorities, the aim and object for amending police standing orders for a weekly off is being defeated and police personnel are not able to enjoy the fruits of the policy decision of the state govt," the judge observed.
The petitioner only seeks the effective and proper implementation of the orders issued by the govt to extend the benefit of a weekly off to the police personnel.
The request made by the petitioner is reasonable, and he is entitled to relief, the judge observed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
No official version of Bharat Mata portrait, so cannot be allowed in govt events: Kerala government
The Left government in Kerala on Friday made it clear that it was not in agreement with the use of the Bharat Mata portrait at the Environment Day event at the Raj Bhavan here as the picture was not authorised as the official version by the Constitution or the Indian government. Kerala Agriculture Minister P Prasad , who boycotted the event at the Raj Bhavan a day ago over the use of the portrait, said that those in constitutional offices cannot convert government programmes into political events . A similar view was also expressed by state General Education Minister V Sivankutty who said that the Raj Bhavan and the Governor were above politics and said that Arlekar should withdraw from the stand taken by him. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like El patrimonio de Palito Ortega conmociona al mundo. Boite A Scoop Undo The government's stand came a day after Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar asserted that there would be no compromise on Bharat Mata. Prasad, while talking to a TV channel, said that no Bharat Mata portrait has ever been acknowledged as the official or authorised version by the Constitution or any of the governments in power since independence. Live Events He further said that the portrait about to be used at the event was not carrying the Indian flag, but that of a political organisation, and therefore, it could not be honoured during a government event. The minister said that the particular political organisation and the Governor were free to pay homage to the portrait at private events, but it cannot be done in state government programmes. "We all have a political view, but those in constitutional positions have restrictions on how they express it," he added. He said that the government view was that such a stand ought not to have been taken by a constitutional establishment and expressed hope that it will be corrected by the concerned persons. "It actually should not be repeated in our country. We cannot accept it in Kerala," he added. The minister also questioned why the Governor was "rigid" on the issue, when none of the earlier Governors in the state and not even the Presidents of the country have carried out such a practice in the past. For the World Environment Day event, the Raj Bhavan came out with a minute-to-minute programme, but it initially did not have anything about paying floral tributes to the portrait of Bharat Mata, he said. On eve of the programme, a new schedule was sent to us and it included the paying of floral tribute to Bharat Mata portrait. "So, I enquired with the Raj Bhavan about the floral tributes and asked them to send me a picture of the portrait. The portrait was the one used by the RSS and was not recognised or authorised as an official version, I informed the Raj Bhavan that we cannot offer floral tributes to it," he said. The minister said that the Raj Bhavan in response said they cannot remove the portrait. On being told that the opposition was criticising the lack of response on the issue by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, Prasad said that the Congress-led UDF was trying to gain political mileage out of it especially in view of the upcoming bypoll in Nilambur assembly constituency. After knowing Raj Bhavan's stand, the state government relocated the event to the Secretariat's Durbar Hall and the Raj Bhavan went ahead with its programme. Later, in a statement issued by the Raj Bhavan, the Governor said, "Whatever be the pressure, from whichever quarters, there will be no compromise whatsoever on Bharat Mata." In his speech at the Raj Bhavan programme, the Governor said two ministers--state Education Minister and Agriculture Minister--had agreed to attend the function but they did not turn up for the event. While Sangh outfit Bharatiya Vichara Kendram strongly backed the Governor, the ruling CPI(M) and the Congress criticised the Raj Bhavan on the matter.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
Can JD Vance be the next Trump?
US Vice President JD Vance has stayed away from the Trump-Musk showdown. Also, it is not the first time his name has come up for consideration for a possible successor to Trump read more From calling Donald Trump the 'greatest president ever' to 'he should be impeached', Elon Musk's relationship with the Republican leader is on thin ice after the duo engaged in a very public feud. When a right-wing commentator, Ian Miles Cheong, said on X, 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him,' Musk agreed and said, 'Yes.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Late on Thursday, Trump and Musk took to Truth Social and X, respectively, to engage in a war of words that has now turned into a full-blown bashing of each other. Both individuals claimed things that could become controversial. The president has floated the idea of ending government subsidies and contracts for the companies run by Elon Musk as a way of saving money. Can Vance fill in Trump's shoes? Interestingly, US Vice President JD Vance has stayed away from the Trump-Musk showdown. Also, it is not the first time his name has come up for consideration for a possible successor to Trump. Although the president has expressed his desire to run for a third term, something that is not permissible under the US Constitution, Trump last month broke his silence on his potential successor. In an interview with MSNBC, Trump said, 'You look at Marco, you look at JD Vance, who's fantastic,' after he was asked what gives him confidence that his MAGA movement will continue once he's out of office. 'You look at — I could name 10, 15, 20 people right now just sitting here,' he added. Also, three people in Rubio's orbit who spoke with NBC News, cognizant of Vance's higher rank in the line of succession and of polling that reinforces his higher standing among Republican voters, see Vance as having the right of first refusal on the Republican nomination in 2028. Musk wants to form a new party Musk has put forth the idea of creating his own political party following his formal exit from the White House. He began an online poll on X, asking, 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?'
New Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Two cops dismissed for role in Hyderabad drug trafficking case
TIRUPATI: Tirupati Armed Reserve Constables M. Guna Sekhar (ARPC 1501) and P. Ramachandra (Armed Head Constable 1425) have been dismissed from service for their involvement in a major drug trafficking case registered under the Kukatpally Police Station limits in Hyderabad. Guna Sekhar, who was on casual leave from May 31 to June 9, was arrested on June 4 in Crime No. 725/2025. He faces serious charges under the NDPS Act, including Sections 8(c) r/w 21(c), 25A, and 29, which relate to possession, trafficking, and conspiracy involving commercial quantities of narcotics and precursor chemicals. Investigations revealed that both constables maintained close links with drug smugglers and facilitated the transport of narcotics using insider knowledge. Their dismissal orders were issued under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution and Rule 25(11) of the APCS (CC&A) Rules, 1991, which permits termination without a full inquiry when it is not reasonably practicable. Guna Sekhar's dismissal was ordered late Wednesday night by Tirupati SP V. Harshavardhan Raju, IPS, while Ramachandra's order followed on Thursday. The SP's report termed Guna Sekhar's conduct as gross misconduct, involving moral turpitude and a breach of integrity, in violation of Rule 3(1) of the AP Civil Services Conduct Rules, 1964. The report also cited national security concerns and the risk of interference with evidence and witnesses as reasons to forego a departmental inquiry.
