logo
What caused the Nepal jet crash that left only one survivor? Here's what the report says

What caused the Nepal jet crash that left only one survivor? Here's what the report says

Indian Express18-07-2025
Last year's fatal crash of a Saurya Airlines jet was caused by wrong take‑off speed figures in the aircraft's documentation, says a government panel in Nepal as reported by Reuters on Friday.
The CRJ‑200LR took off from Kathmandu in July 2024 and crashed moments later. The only survivor was the captain, Manish Raj Shakya. The CRJ-200LR aircraft, operated by Saurya Airlines, had 19 people on board and crashed moments after leaving Kathmandu's Tribhuvan International Airport.
A government-appointed investigation panel found that the aircraft suffered a 'deep stall during take-off because of abnormally rapid pitch rate commanded at a lower-than-optimal rotation speed.' In simple terms, the aircraft's nose lifted too quickly, at a speed too low for safe take-off, which caused it to lose lift and fall from the sky.
At the heart of the issue was a 'speed card' a document that gives pilots the correct speeds for take-off, climb, and landing. Investigators said the card contained incorrect information and that past warning signs, such as previous take-offs with high pitch rates, had not been properly addressed.
Aviation expert Nagendra Prasad Ghimire told Reuters the plane made a 'premature take-off before gaining the necessary speed.'
The report suggests that the plane entered an aerodynamic stall — when a plane stops flying because its wings lose lift. A common cause of a stall is a high angle of attack, which happens when the plane's nose points too far upward without enough speed to keep the aircraft in the air.
In this case, some analysts believe the aircraft may have experienced a wing stall, a type of stall where one wing loses lift before the other. This can cause the plane to roll sharply to one side — which is what early video footage shows: the jet banking steeply to the right before crashing.
According to flight training manuals, a stall close to the ground leaves pilots with very little time or altitude to recover.
The aircraft's steep climb at low speed meant that the wings could not generate enough lift. The crew did not have enough altitude to push the nose down and recover. In the final seconds, the plane's wings were seen levelling briefly before impact, suggesting a last attempt to regain control.
The investigation also found what it called 'gross negligence and non-compliance' in how the airline handled cargo and baggage. It recommended all airlines review their speed cards and ensure proper loading procedures are followed.
The panel urged Nepal's Civil Aviation Authority (CAAN) to tighten oversight of non-scheduled flights. CAAN said it had not yet reviewed the report and could not comment.
CAAN spokesperson Babu Ram Paudel told Reuters he could not comment because he had not seen the report. Saurya Airlines operations manager Bivechan Khanal said the carrier would 'do everything necessary' to carry out the recommendations, according to Reuters.
The crash once again draws attention to Nepal's troubled aviation safety record. The mountainous country relies heavily on air travel, but its airlines have long faced concerns over training, maintenance, and oversight. Since 2013, Nepali carriers have been banned from flying into European Union airspace due to safety concerns.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russian Boeing-737 turns back to Siberian airport after reporting depressurisation: Report
Russian Boeing-737 turns back to Siberian airport after reporting depressurisation: Report

Economic Times

timea day ago

  • Economic Times

Russian Boeing-737 turns back to Siberian airport after reporting depressurisation: Report

Representative Image Synopsis An S7 Airlines Boeing-737, en route from Novosibirsk to Sochi, returned to its origin airport due to a cabin pressure system issue. The aircraft, carrying 176 passengers, emitted an emergency signal and circled before landing. A replacement plane was arranged, and the incident is under investigation, occurring a day after a fatal An-24 crash in Russia's far east. A Russian passenger plane operated by S7 Airlines flying to the southern Russian resort city of Sochi on Friday turned back to Novosibirsk airport in Siberia to check its cabin pressure systems, the airline and Siberian prosecutors said. ADVERTISEMENT The tracking website indicated that the plane, a Boeing-737 with seating capacity for 176 passengers manufactured in 2001, sent an emergency signal. The site tracked the plane turning back and then repeatedly circling and flying in large loops. "Flight S7 5103, travelling from Novosibirsk to Sochi, is returning to its departure airport to check the cabin pressure control system," the airline told Reuters. The airline said in a statement that the plane was using up fuel before landing and that a replacement aircraft had been prepared to carry passengers to their destination. The Western Siberian Transport Prosecutor's office said it was monitoring the incident. The incident comes a day after an An-24 passenger plane crashed in Russia's far east as it was preparing to land, killing all 48 people on board in an incident that spotlighted the continued use of old, Soviet-era aircraft. (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates. NEXT STORY

DGCA sends four show notices to Air India for violation of norms
DGCA sends four show notices to Air India for violation of norms

Hindustan Times

time2 days ago

  • Hindustan Times

DGCA sends four show notices to Air India for violation of norms

NEW DELHI: India's aviation regulator on Wednesday issued four show cause notices to Air India for violations related to operational procedures, cabin crew training rules and their rest and duty norms. FILE PHOTO:A statement from Air India said it would respond to the notices within the stipulated two-week period. (REUTERS) The four notices were issued by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) on Wednesday, following the airline's voluntary reporting of the violations on June 20 and 21. A statement from Air India said it would respond to the notices within the stipulated two-week period. 'We acknowledge receipt of these notices from the regulator related to certain voluntary disclosures that were made over the last one year by Air India. We will respond to the said notices within the stipulated period. We remain committed to the safety of our crew and passengers,' the statement said. The airline has been given two weeks to respond to the notices. In all, the airline had reported 25 violations of norms. The violation of rules relating to the crew's duty and rest period, the notice stated, was in connection with flights operated on June 24, 2024, and June 15, 2025. Another notice was issued following voluntary disclosure on June 21 that reported three violations in cabin crew training and operational procedures. These were related to flights on December 1, April 10 and 11, 2024, and May 16 and 19, 2025. To be sure, the government has also started holding direct meetings with Air India management amid mounting safety incidents and ordered the carrier to maintain the highest safety standards. The first such meeting was held on Wednesday, in the midst of week in which an Air India aircraft caught fire at Delhi airport after landing from Hong Kong, a Kolkata-bound flight aborted takeoff due to technical issues, and a Kochi-Mumbai flight veered off the runway during landing in heavy rain. Air India has been facing enhanced surveillance after its flight from Ahmedabad following the June 12 crash of Air India Flight 171 that killed 260 people. The Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad marked one of aviation's deadliest tragedies in recent years and prompted comprehensive safety reviews. A preliminary report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Board (AAIB) has identified the fuel control switches, which were set to cut off during takeoff, as the main cause of the crash. Why the switches were flipped, or by whom, is now at the heart of the probe. Since that incident, at least 15 other operational issues and serious incidents have been reported involving Air India and its low-cost service arm Air India Express.

Russia plane crash: What's the Antonov An-24 flight that crashed, killing 49 on board?
Russia plane crash: What's the Antonov An-24 flight that crashed, killing 49 on board?

First Post

time2 days ago

  • First Post

Russia plane crash: What's the Antonov An-24 flight that crashed, killing 49 on board?

An Antonov An-24 passenger plane, which was earlier reported to be missing, has crashed with nearly 50 people on board in Russia's far east. Footage from the scene showed the aircraft crash in a densely forested area, with smoke rising from the site. Dubbed 'flying tractors', these planes are considered reliable by the Russian aviation ministry read more Smoke rises at the crash site of an Angara Airlines An-24 passenger plane near Tynda in the Amur Region, Russia July 24, 2025, in this still image taken from video. Federal Air Transport Agency/Handout via Reuters A Russian plane with about 50 people on board crashed in the country's far east on Thursday (July 24). Earlier, there were reports that the Antonov An-24 passenger plane disappeared about 16 km from its destination in the Amur region. The burning wreckage of the Angara airlines flight, carrying 42 passengers and six crew, was spotted on the ground by a helicopter. As per initial reports, all people on board the ill-fated plane are feared to have died. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What is the Russian aircraft involved in the crash? Is it safe? We will take a look. Russian plane crashes The Antonov An-24 passenger plane had left the city of Blagoveshchensk on Thursday and was en route to Tynda, a remote town in the Amur region bordering China. It vanished from radar screens as it prepared to land. 'Fifteen kilometres from Tynda, the wreckage of an An-24 was found on a slope. The plane was destroyed,' the Russian emergencies ministry said, as per the Interfax news agency. Footage from the scene showed the plane crash in a densely forested area, with smoke rising from the site. According to Vasily Orlov, the regional governor, there were 43 passengers, including five children, and six crew members on board. 'All necessary forces and means have been deployed to search for the plane,' he wrote. The Russian government has formed a commission to deal with the aftermath of the crash. An investigation into the cause of the crash has also been announced. Pilot error during landing in poor weather conditions or technical malfunction are being considered as possible causes. What we know about the Russian plane The tail number of the Antonov plane showed it was built in 1976 in the Soviet era. The aircraft was operated by the Soviet flag carrier Aeroflot before the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union. It was currently being operated by a privately owned Siberian-based regional airline called Angara, as per a Reuters report. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Angara airline, based in the Siberian city of Irkutsk, operates in the airports in Siberia and Russia's far east. It has 10 An-24s built between 1972 and 1976, according to the RussianPlanes website. An An-24 aircraft of Angara Airlines lands at the airport of Irkutsk, Russia April 13, 2014. File Photo/Reuters Designed for short- and medium-haul airlines, the propeller-driven An-24 took its first flight in October 1959. Its cruise speed is 420 km/hour and operational range of 990 km. The An-24 is the original aircraft of the Antonov family of twin turboprop civil and military planes, as per Skybrary. Are Antonov planes safe? The An-24s have earned the moniker of 'flying tractors' as they are considered reliable workhorses by the Russian aviation industry. These planes are appropriate for harsh conditions in Siberia as they can operate in sub-zero temperatures and don't have to land on runways, reported Reuters. However, Antonov aircraft have seen over 60 mishaps since 2000, as per 1001 Crash. Three crashes involving planes from the Antonov family were reported in 2021 – two in Russia and one in Sudan. In 2022, an Antonov An-12 cargo plane with eight people on board crashed near the city of Kavala in northern Greece. An An-24RV veered off the runway as it landed at Nizhneangarsk Airport in Russia in July 2019, killing two crew members. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In 2011, another Angara airlines An-24 crashed into the Ob river in Siberia, resulting in the death of seven passengers. The Angara Antonov 24 plane that crashed on Thursday had recently passed a technical inspection, as per officials. However, civil aviation authority told news agencies that the plane had been involved in four incidents since 2018, reported BBC. According to airline executives, pilots and industry experts, the cost of maintaining the Antonovs has surged after Western sanctions on Russia over its war in Ukraine hit investment and access to parts. Russia, whose fraction of a fleet of over 1,000 passenger planes is made up of Antonovs, was set to retire many of the planes in the coming years. But regional airlines continue to fly them as there are no alternatives yet. With inputs from agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store