Cambodia courts global support in border row with Thailand, Malaysia leads Asean ceasefire check
The team consists of military attaches from seven member states – Malaysia, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, and Vietnam – will conduct field observations on August 3.
Meanwhile, Cambodian top negotiators will head to Kuala Lumpur for the General Border Committee (GBC) negotiations, where the release of 18 soldiers held captive by the Thai army is likely to top their agenda.
The soldiers are being held following a border conflict between the countries that erupted on July 24.
The bilateral talks, scheduled from August 4 to 7, are part of a ceasefire agreement reached between Cambodia and Thailand on July 28, which led to temporary de-escalation and pushed back soldiers to their barracks.
The GBC talks are being hosted by Malaysia in its capacity as the 2025 Asean Chair, and take place within the framework of the Asean- and internationally backed ceasefire.
Cambodia is shoring up diplomatic support. It has invited foreign missions based in Phnom Penh to observe the implementation of the ceasefire along the border in Oddar Meanchey and Siem Reap provinces.
More than 20 diplomats and representatives from various United Nations agencies participated in these inspection visits on Friday and Saturday.
'It underscores Cambodia's steadfast commitment to international law, de-escalation and continued adherence to the Asean Charter, the UN Charter, and the ceasefire agreement.
'Cambodia looks forward to advancing de-escalation efforts through the upcoming General Border Committee meeting,' Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Ministry spokesman Chum Sounry told a media briefing yesterday.
The armed confrontation that broke out on July 24 and lasted for five days triggered a diplomatic pause between Cambodia and Thailand, two neighbours that have yet to resolve their 817-kilometre border dispute dating back to 1907.
Dr Kin Phea, Director-General of the International Relations Institute of Cambodia, emphasised that both governments must honour the ceasefire agreement if lasting peace is to be achieved in the region.
'Both sides must maintain utmost restraints and resolve the conflict peacefully under legal frameworks and mechanisms, and both sides must fully and consistently respect international law and the UN Charter,' he told Bernama.
The dispute caused over 170,000 Cambodians to vacate their homes in several northern provinces. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
9 minutes ago
- The Star
Malaysia to continue coordinating Thailand-Cambodia ceasefire efforts, says Anwar
PUTRAJAYA: Malaysia will continue to play its coordinating role in the ceasefire efforts between Thailand and Cambodia, without a need for a full-scale Asean intervention, says Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. The Prime Minister said he had met with both Defence Ministers of Thailand and Cambodia to discuss the details of the protocols that must be observed at the contested borders. "Thankfully, as of now, both countries have expressed their desire for Malaysia to continue playing a coordinating role. 'They have committed to upholding the conditions necessary to ensure the ceasefire is fully respected. "In light of this, Malaysia will continue its role in facilitating the process," said Anwar after attending the 2026 Budget Consultation Council at the Finance Ministry here on Thursday (Aug 7). "At this point, we do not see the need for full Asean intervention. "Both sides support this initiative and it is sufficient for Malaysia to facilitate the cooperation between Thailand and Cambodia," he said The United States and China will not be involved to monitor the contested border area, he added. "They, however, have offered full cooperation in terms of logistical assistance or support should the need arise," said Anwar. Asked to reveal the challenges faced to reach a consensus, Anwar said at the moment both sides have agreed to a ceasefire. "This is an important milestone. "It's important to recognise that border issues between the two countries have persisted for hundreds of years. "Although there are some differences in opinion, it should not lead to conflict," he said. Thailand and Cambodia agreed to implement a ceasefire effective midnight on July 28 through a special meeting in Malaysia chaired by Anwar, that brought both South-East Asian neighbours to the negotiating table following heightened tensions. Tensions between the two countries peaked on May 28 when fighting broke out in the disputed Preah Vihear area, resulting in the death of a Cambodian soldier.
New Straits Times
9 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Asean needs emergency override mechanisms to address regional crises
WHAT happens when a neighbourhood's long-standing "mind your own business" rule becomes a dangerous barrier during a life-threatening crisis? This question perfectly captures Asean's current dilemma with Myanmar's political upheaval. Imagine living in a community where houses are built close together, and when one catches fire, the flames quickly spread to others. Yet the neighbourhood association has a strict rule: never interfere in your neighbour's problems. On Feb 1, 2021, the elected Myanmar government was overthrown, halting a decade of democratic progress. The military arrested key leaders, including Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, dissolved its Parliament, and declared a state of emergency. What followed was a systematic assault on Myanmar's civil society that launched the country into chaos and violence. The coup's aftermath has been devastating, with the military launching brutal crackdowns on peaceful protesters, using live ammunition against civilians, and conducting mass arrests. The numbers confirm an alarming humanitarian crisis because of the large number of casualties. The Assistance Association for Political Prisoners reports that over 4,000 civilians lost their lives while 25,000 people were arbitrarily detained, and 1.2 million people were forced to abandon their homes. The military purposefully attacked hospitals and healthcare staff leading to the destruction of public health infrastructure, according to Physicians for Human Rights. Schools remain closed while teachers encounter persecution as a result. Military operations actively target educational institutions to weaken civilian resistance while they consolidate their control over the country. Myanmar's situation extends beyond domestic political issues because it threatens to disrupt the stability of the whole region for Asean. Due to military actions, there are large refugee movements into Thailand, Bangladesh and India, and border areas have turned into centres for drug trafficking and arms smuggling. Asean members must decide how to handle situations where internal member state crises evolve into security threats that demand collective action. Myanmar's problems have become everyone's problems. The military's control extends beyond politics through massive business conglomerates that control jade mining, telecommunications, banking, and real estate — generating billions annually. This economic power makes them resistant to external pressure. Economically, Myanmar has suffered severe decline with the kyat currency depreciating sharply, and foreign investors withdrawing. The World Bank last year reported Myanmar's economy contracted by 18 per cent in 2021, with continued deterioration affecting vulnerable populations. Asean's response came through the Five-Point Consensus, adopted during an emergency summit in Jakarta in April 2021. For an organisation historically committed to non-interference, this represented a significant departure — like a quiet neighbour finally calling the police when the house next door becomes too dangerous. The consensus established five commitments: immediate violence cessation, constructive dialogue among all parties, appointment of a Special Envoy, humanitarian assistance provision, and unrestricted envoy access. However, implementation has proven catastrophically ineffective. Myanmar's military has systematically violated each point. Violence has intensified rather than ceased. Dialogue has been rejected outright, with the junta refusing to engage meaningfully with opposition groups or Asean representatives. Humanitarian aid has been blocked. Special Envoys have been denied meaningful access, often shown only what the military wants them to see. Myanmar's ability to obstruct collective action demonstrates how the "everyone must agree" rule paralyses response mechanisms when decisive action is needed. Subhadra, [7/8/2025 1:08 PM] The non-interference principle, once Asean's strength in preventing inter-state conflicts, has become a shield for authoritarian behaviour and protects member states from accountability for actions threatening regional stability. Asean also lacks early warning systems and rapid response capabilities, typically reacting to crises after they have escalated. Myanmar's crisis has created a domino effect across Southeast Asia. Thailand, sharing a 2,400-kilometre border with Myanmar, faces enormous pressure from refugee flows and cross-border criminal activities. Bangladesh, already struggling with over a million Rohingya refugees, now faces additional refugee burdens. India's northeastern border areas deal with refugee influx, straining local resources. Criminal networks have exploited Myanmar's governance vacuum, using the country as a base for transnational crime. The crisis has severely damaged Asean's international credibility. Despite these challenges, Malaysia's Asean chairmanship in 2025 presents a crucial opportunity for institutional renewal. Malaysia has historically played a constructive role in regional diplomacy and has the experience to lead meaningful change. The organisation urgently needs emergency override mechanisms allowing decisive action during humanitarian crises, even without unanimous consent. This doesn't mean abandoning consensus entirely, but creating exceptions for situations threatening regional peace and security. Asean must develop early warning systems and rapid response capabilities to prevent future crises from escalating. A reformed approach should combine traditional diplomatic engagement with targeted economic measures and broader stakeholder inclusion — engaging civil society organisations, the National Unity Government, and ethnic groups alongside state actors. International partnerships with the United Nations and major powers can provide additional leverage and resources. Success in resolving the Myanmar crisis will determine whether Asean can maintain its role as Southeast Asia's primary security architecture. The path forward requires balancing sovereignty respect with responsibility to protect regional peace and human rights. Asean must upgrade institutional capabilities while preserving the cooperative spirit that has made Southeast Asia peaceful.
Malay Mail
9 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
‘I don't smoke', says Anwar, backing push to raise tobacco tax
PUTRAJAYA, Aug 7 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim today said he agrees in principle with raising tobacco taxes. He was responding to calls for the government to review tobacco duties. 'I agree with the spirit of that proposal. I myself not only do not smoke, but also fully support anti-smoking campaigns,' he told reporters when asked about the matter. In 2015, Malaysia raised the excise duty on tobacco by 42.8 per cent. Together with the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST), the overall tax on cigarettes increased from 28 sen per stick in 2014 to 40 sen in 2015. Since then, tobacco taxes have not been revised. In Budget 2024, Anwar's administration introduced a 5 per cent excise duty on chewing tobacco, but left cigarette taxes unchanged. In May, a Merdeka Center survey found that two-thirds of Malaysians support higher cigarette taxes, provided they are implemented moderately and predictably. The survey revealed that 66 per cent backed a tax hike, 25 per cent opposed it, and nine per cent were unsure. Support was strongest among those aged 21 to 30, with over 84 per cent in favour, while opposition was highest among respondents aged 51 to 60.
