Study in Hong Kong but live outside? How students are grappling with hostel crunch
Advertisement
He had a shared dormitory room for his first year, but publicly funded Baptist University in Kowloon Tong has not assured him of accommodation for the new academic year, which begins in September.
Like other universities in the city, it does not have enough student housing for everyone who applies. Baptist University only guarantees housing to locals for a year and to non-locals in their first year of study.
'Half the non-local students I know are in the same situation,' Zhang said.
While the number of local students in full-time undergraduate and postgraduate programmes in the current academic year dropped by around 0.5 per cent to 115,298 from a decade ago, the number of non-locals more than doubled to 76,325 from 27,187 in 2015-16, according to official data.
Henry Li says he will consider renting a flat on the mainland if it becomes a struggle to find an affordable living space near Baptist University. Photo: May Tse
The shortage of student housing has become a pressing problem even as city leader John Lee Ka-chiu pledged in his policy blueprint last year to make Hong Kong a global post-secondary education hub and attract more overseas students through scholarships and other incentives.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
13 minutes ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong to continue implementing ‘patriotic education,' leader John Lee says in lead-up to 4th Policy Address
Hong Kong will continue implementing 'patriotic education' in schools, with national security now an integral part of the curriculum, Hong Kong's chief executive John Lee has said. Lee also said in a pre-recorded address posted to his social media accounts that the government had received some 6,900 public submissions throughout the consultation period for his upcoming Policy Address, marking a 10 per cent rise from last year. Lee is expected to deliver his fourth address next month. 'We will continue to integrate patriotic education into day-to-day education, and strengthen their affection for and sense of belonging to our country,' said Lee, who first introduced patriotic education initiatives to enhance national identity in his 2022 Policy Address. The chief executive added that the government had organised activities to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression, known otherwise as the Second Sino-Japanese War, and the 'World Anti-Fascist War' – Beijing's preferred name for the World War II. Patriotism focus National security-focused curriculum guidelines were introduced months after Beijing imposed a national security law directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution in June 2020. Secretary for Education Christine Choi had earlier said that Hong Kong schools should cultivate patriotism among students and step up training for teachers to prevent 'hostile forces from infiltrating schools.' Under a new humanities curriculum set to be trialled in the coming school year, primary school students are required to have a basic knowledge of national defence, the Beijing-enacted security legislation, and the Hong Kong People's Liberation Army garrison. Study tours in mainland China have also become a core part of secondary school curriculum. In the Sunday video, Lee also said that people could now 'safely' express their patriotism in public after positive changes in society brought about by the city's two national security legislations, saying some were doxxed or attacked for identifying as patriots 'a few years ago.' With the Beijing-imposed national security law and the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance – known colloquially as Article 23 – now in place, patriotism has been allowed to 'take root in society,' Lee said. 'Citizens can now express their patriotic sentiments safely and securely,' he added. There have been no large-scale protests since the 2020 law criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts. The move gave police sweeping new powers and led to hundreds of arrests amid new legal precedents, while dozens of civil society groups disappeared. The authorities say it restored stability and peace to the city, rejecting criticism from trade partners, the UN and NGOs.
AllAfrica
13 minutes ago
- AllAfrica
Why US upgraded Balochistan Liberation Army's terror designation
US systemic rivalry with China over the contours of the emerging world order has made many assume that it backs all opponents of the People's Republic, from neighboring states with whom Beijing has territorial disputes to terrorist groups, yet a recent move just shattered this perception. The US State Department abruptly raised the Balochistan Liberation Army's (BLA) 2019 'Specially Designated Global Terrorist' designation to a 'Foreign Terrorist Organization' amid the US-Pakistani rapprochement. The BLA is veritably a terrorist group whose last well-known attack was its deadly hijacking of the Jaffar Express earlier this spring, which followed an upsurge of other terrorist attacks over the past three years, including against projects connected to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). CPEC is a flagship project of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and was envisaged as giving China direct access to the Indian Ocean for preemptively mitigating the effects of any future US blockade of the Malacca Strait. This series of megaprojects has stalled in recent years for a variety of reasons, ranging from corruption to Pakistan's political dysfunction since April 2022's post-modern coup and especially the BLA's spree of terrorist attacks afterwards, which exploited the state's and security apparatus's new focus on crushing the opposition. Given the outsized role that the BLA has played in subverting the CPEC, which the US hitherto turned a blind eye to for reasons of strategic convenience despite its existing terrorist designation, it should be a de facto US ally. Instead, its US terrorist designation was just raised, thus naturally prompting the question of why. The rapidly evolving regional and global contexts help answer that. Not only has the US entered into a rapprochement with Pakistan, but it's also seeking one with China, as seen in Trump's eagerness to reach a trade deal and his recent muted criticism of Beijing. This could respectively reshape the region and the world alike if these dual rapprochements successfully derail India's rise as a great power. By raising the BLA's terrorist designation, the US is signaling that it will stop opposing CPEC as part of what might be a grand compromise with China, with this concession aimed at helping to revive one of the BRI's flagship projects so as to further strengthen the Sino-Pakistan alliance against India. Getting CPEC back on track could also offset the incipient Sino-Indo rapprochement since it was CPEC's announcement a decade ago that sparked the latest phase of their rivalry due to it transiting through Indian-claimed but Pakistani-controlled territory. The grand strategic goal that the US is pursuing is the 'G2'/'Chimerica' scenario of dividing the world with China after it failed to restore unipolarity, which requires containing, subordinating and possibly even 'Balkanizing' India since its rise as a great power would scupper the plan. Indian analyst Surya Kanegaonkar suspects that the BLA's new designation could precede a US-Pakistani attempt to place India on the Financial Action Task Force on the pretext that it backs the group, which may be correct but has never been proven. All told, the importance of the BLA's new terrorist designation is that it corroborates claims that the US is using its new rapprochement with Pakistan to advance a more globally significant one with China, both of which are driven in large part by their now apparently shared interest in derailing India's rise as a great power. Whether or not the US-Pakistani rapprochement holds, a US-Chinese one seems increasingly secured amid ongoing trade talks, and/or India is contained, the fact is that the US is attempting another power play follows its latest against Russia. This article was first published on Andrew Korybko's Substack and is republished with kind permission. Become an Andrew Korybko Newsletter subscriber here.
South China Morning Post
43 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Philippines' Subic Bay play aims to anchor US naval strategy in Asia
The Philippines is repositioning its historic Subic Bay shipyard as a cornerstone of both its own defence industry and Washington's naval expansion plans, analysts say, at a time of sharpening US-China tensions and with Manila seeking to revitalise its economy. Speaking to business leaders in Washington on Thursday, Philippine Ambassador to the US Jose Manuel Romualdez pitched the Agila Subic Shipyard – once a bustling hub for a subsidiary of South Korea 's Hanjin Heavy Industries, now under new management – as well placed to support America's plan to ramp up warship production over the next three decades. 'The US wants to increase their shipbuilding industry. It's been sort of on hold for many years, decades, and now they are reviving it,' Romualdez said on the sidelines of a meeting of the US-Asean Business Council, which advocates for the trade interests of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in the US. Subic, he said, 'could possibly be part of what the United States is looking at' – drawing a contrast between the Philippines' active shipbuilding sector and America's efforts to revive its long-stalled industry. A still from a social media video shows an aerial view of Agila Subic Shipyard when it was operated by Hanjin. Photo: YouTube Proposals for the Agila Subic Shipyard – which US private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management acquired in 2022 , investing some S$40 million to jumpstart operations – have long been floated within the Pentagon as part of Washington's search for overseas capacity.
