'Relief' at rejection of incinerator plan
Campaigners have said they are "relieved" a proposal to build an incinerator that would have burned up to 260,000 tonnes of waste a year has been rejected by councillors.
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council's planning committee voted to turn down the application from MVV Environmental Ltd to construct the energy-from-waste facility at Canford Resource Park near Bournemouth.
It would have burned non-recyclable and non-hazardous domestic, commercial and industrial waste to generate electricity.
Opponents had raised concerns about levels of air pollution and a "six-mile toxic plume" from the plant.
MVV Environmental's proposals said the plant would have provided 28.5MW of electricity to businesses at Churchill Magna Business Park as well as to Arena Way and Magna Road.
The council said 469 objections had been received during the planning process.
They included objections to building on green belt land, issues over transporting waste into the site and removing residue, as well as air pollution and its impact on nearby Canford Heath.
Council planners had recommended the scheme be approved but it was rejected by the committee by six votes to three.
Following the meeting, Frank Ahern from local campaign group MagWatch said he was "cock-a-hoop" at the decision.
"People will be absolutely thrilled and relieved. A lot of young mothers were distraught at the thought of this going through and the effect it would have on their children.
"The answer is not incinerating - it's recycling more effectively," he added.
Joanna Bury of Wimborne Extinction Rebellion said: "I am so relieved. The community was so frightened of this happening.
"We are so grateful to all the councillors who stood up for the people of Dorset, for all the worried families and for nature."
Resident Natalie Clarke who lives less than a mile from the proposed plant had earlier said the issue was "emotional"
"My concern is what affect will this have on my family, especially our young children, breathing in these toxic fumes 24-7. The long-term effects could be devastating".
Speaking during the meeting, Paul Carey of MVV Environmental insisted the company would be a "good neighbour".
"Please be assured of our intentions to work responsibly in our community and environment," he told councillors.
In a statement following the decision, the company said: ""We will need to wait for the publication of the official reasons for refusal, and to see if the Secretary of State intends to intervene, before deciding whether to appeal."
You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Incinerator proposal rejected by council
Proposed incinerator is granted environmental permit
Views wanted on waste incinerator plans
BCP Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Can An Airport Really Become Green? Christchurch Airport Is Trying
Claire Waghorn, the airport's sustainability transition leader, on the top floor of the Novotel Christchurch Airport. Can an airport be sustainable? Before you answer that question, step outside any terminal and catch a whiff of burning jet fuel — a searing, earthy odor that reminds you air travel is one of the most carbon-intensive industries on the planet. But Christchurch Airport, a small aviation hub on New Zealand's sparsely populated South Island, is determined to flip the script. Over the past two decades, the airport has quietly tried to transform itself into a sustainability innovator — and prove that even in an industry notorious for its environmental impact, meaningful change is possible. "It's a challenge," says Claire Waghorn, the airport's sustainability transition leader. "But we must rise to the challenge." Christchurch Airport has already slashed its operational emissions by 92 percent from a decade ago. And last week, it announced the adoption of a sophisticated new carbon emission tracking system. Now it's tackling the far greater challenge of reducing aircraft emissions. While the path to sustainability is fraught with challenges and occasional missteps, Christchurch Airport's progress offers a possible blueprint for how airports — and perhaps entire industries — can reimagine their environmental impact. An electric bus at Christchurch Airport. Christchurch Airport's approach to sustainability is deeply influenced by Māori principles, particularly the concept of kaitiakitanga, or guardianship. 'It's about recognizing that everything is interconnected,' Waghorn explains. 'We can't address climate change in isolation. We have to consider biodiversity, social equity, and economic resilience as part of the same puzzle. Alongside this, understanding we need to act with intergenerational interests at heart.' This holistic philosophy is reflected in the airport's use of the 'doughnut economics' framework, which balances environmental limits (the outer ring of the doughnut) with social minimum standards (the inner ring). The goal is to operate within these boundaries and ensure that the airport's operations are not at the expense of the planet. Christchurch Airport's sustainability journey began in 2006, long before most airports were even thinking about carbon footprints. Back then, their emissions tracking was rudimentary, but it laid the groundwork for what would become one of the most ambitious decarbonization plans in the aviation industry. By 2015, the airport had a clear road map in place. Since then, it has reduced its operational emissions by 92 percent. How did they do it? 'We've got this little bit left on our own plate,' Waghorn said, referring to the remaining 8 percent of emissions. 'It's things like backup generators and fire extinguishers — tiny amounts that are surprisingly hard to eliminate.' An electric plane recharging at Christchurch Airport. While Christchurch Airport has made steady progress in reducing its own emissions, it's quick to acknowledge the bigger challenge: aircraft emissions. 'Our operational footprint is around 240 tons per year,' Waghorn noted. 'The airlines? Eight hundred thousand tons.' To address this, the airport is positioning itself as a pioneer in the transition to low-carbon aviation. Its strategy focuses on three key technologies: 'Airlines sign contracts for new planes three to four years before delivery," says Waghorn, "but the infrastructure to support them takes seven to eight years to build. It's very challenging. We have to act now, even without certainty about which technologies will dominate.' Sustainability at Christchurch Airport isn't just about cutting emissions. It's also about biodiversity, water conservation, energy efficiency, and rethinking waste. The airport has implemented a robust circular economy program, focusing on materials recovery and reducing single-use plastics. One standout initiative is its waste sorting system. The airport collects everything and sorts it back of house offsite. The results have been staggering: half of what was once considered general waste is now diverted to recycling or composting streams. 'We've also partnered with local organizations to repurpose food waste from our lounges,' Waghorn added. 'It's about finding the best possible outcome for every item that comes through our terminal.' Despite the progress, Christchurch Airport faces its share of challenges and skeptics. For one, sustainability efforts often go unnoticed by passengers. 'A lot of this work happens behind the scenes,' Waghorn acknowledges. 'It's not as tangible as, say, a solar panel or a wind turbine.' Sustainability is not entirely invisible. For example, you might see the airport's solar farm when you taxi for takeoff — it's being built on the southwestern side of the airport. And you might notice electric buses shuttling passengers around the airport and into the city. There have been a few missteps. The airport's attempt to replace milk bottles with milk kegs failed because of timing and fluctuations in milk use. Christchurch Airport's sustainability journey is far from over. With a goal of achieving absolute zero emissions in airport operations by 2035 — no offsets, just real reductions — the facility is pushing the boundaries of what's possible in airports, while continuing to explore how to support and accelerate the wider aviation transition. "It's really, really hard to get consistent behavior from a transient crowd," says Waghhorn. Some of the missteps are funny, in hindsight. Consider the airport's purchase of an electric autonomous shuttle in 2017. Although the shuttle was a bold step toward modernizing airport transportation, it could not be used on the road because it wasn't street-legal. "We learned so much from that," laughs Waghorn. The airport quietly sold the shuttle and transitioned to an electric van driven by a human. The airport's experiences suggest that the path to sustainability is almost never linear. The airport has had to adapt, learn from its errors, and stay focused on the bigger picture, even when faced with setbacks and skepticism. "We always have to keep trying to do more," she says. Christchurch Airport's sustainability journey is far from over. With a goal of achieving absolute zero emissions by 2035 — no offsets, just real reductions — the facility is pushing the boundaries of what's possible in airports. But perhaps its greatest contribution lies in its willingness to share its successes — and failures. 'Collaboration is everything,' Waghorn says. 'We can't do this alone. It's about working with airports, airlines, manufacturers, energy providers, and communities to create a shared vision for the future.' For travelers, Christchurch Airport offers a glimmer of hope. It's proof that even in an industry as carbon-intensive as aviation, sustainability is not just a buzzword. It's a tangible, achievable goal. And while the road ahead is long and filled with pitfalls, the airport's progress serves as a reminder that every step, no matter how small, may bring us closer to a sustainable future.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
What has happened to Bournemouth Air Festival?
As hopes of a 2026 edition of Bournemouth Air Festival fade, what factors have led to its demise, and will it ever return? The private air show operator that was expected to run the event on a 10-year contract has pulled out of talks. The major sticking point was its plan to close the promenade and seafront between the piers, which the council said it legally could not do. The US-based firm has also blamed the "instability of the financial and political climate" for its decision to withdraw. The free air festival was first held in 2008 and has taken place every August, with the exception of 2020 when Covid restrictions were in place. At its peak, it attracted about 1.3 million visitors to the seaside conurbation, and estimates of how much it annually contributed to the local economy vary from £14m to £59m. But the cost to the council has sky-rocketed in recent years, with hikes across insurance, security, infrastructure and counter-terrorism measures. Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole Council (BCP) said its net budget for the four-day festival had risen from £300,000 in 2019 to £400,000 by 2022. New legislation brought in after the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing is also set to significantly increase costs for all organisers of public events. The authority, which has been run by a coalition since 2023, has already slashed millions from its budget as it grapples with a huge deficit for its special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) services. Half a million people attended the final council-funded air show in 2024, which was scaled back from four days to three, with the final net cost to the council reaching £248,000. In the months that followed, officers explored two options - one was for a sponsor to foot the £400,000 bill of a council-run event, the other was for an external operator to run the air show at no cost to the authority. With no firm offers of sponsorship, but five potential operators raising their hand, things began to look up. But those early discussions led to just two firm expressions of interest and, with one of those requiring financial backing from the council, the initial flurry of enquiries quickly dwindled to a shortlist of one. BCP's destination and leisure councillor Richard Herrett said the prospective organisers had flown from the US to attend the 2024 event, but had drawn up a "wide range of requests that would have created significant financial pressures on the council". A report to BCP councillors said the plan to close off the beach and promenade between Boscombe and Bournemouth piers was to enable "a variety of hospitality offers ranging in price". But the authority said the firm's "non-negotiable" request presented legal difficulties, as fencing off the area would contravene the Open Spaces Act 1906. After the report was published, but before councillors met to discuss it, the company announced it was pulling out. In a letter read to councillors, the operator, whose name was redacted, said: "Several factors led us to this decision, with the most significant being that, without the ability to fence off and restrict access to a significant part of the beach and the surrounding areas, it would be challenging to create a financially sustainable event model. "The instability of the financial and political climate were also factors that would challenge us to deliver the event in a similar manner to our other events." Council leader Millie Earl said: "We are still open to any interest from potential operators or sponsors. "In the meantime, we remain invested in the cultural future of our beautiful area and are continuing to work with our partners and support others where we can." The council says its Bay Run, Arts By the Sea Festival and Christmas in Bournemouth events will still go ahead. But, with 12-months needed to organise the air show, any potential air show sponsor or operator would now be working towards 2027 at the earliest. You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram. Bournemouth Air Festival in doubt as sponsor search ends In pictures: Bournemouth Air Festival 2024 BCP Council
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Waste Management, Inc. (WM): I Could Buy It 'Consistently,' Says Jim Cramer
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE:WM) stands against other stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE:WM) is one of the biggest waste collection and management companies in America. The shares have gained 18% year-to-date after having recovered from their 8.6% post-Liberation Day drop in April. Cramer has discussed Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE:WM) several times in his show in 2025. He believes the firm is enjoying tailwinds from President Biden's infrastructure spending and is attractive due to its domestic exposure. However, Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE:WM)'s shares still remain vulnerable to recessionary concerns as they reduce the demand the firm experiences for some products. In his recent remarks, Cramer called the firm "timeless," and this time, after co-host David Faber sarcastically commented that tariffs could reduce imports to the US and save the space for stuff thrown in landfills, Cramer remarked: "I could buy Waste Management consistently because of Temu. . .well I got to find out how badly Shein's been hurt." Cramer discussed Waste Management, Inc. (NYSE:WM) in detail earlier this year. Here is what he said: 'For some reason, road building is a big theme among the winners and that means you want to own Martin Marietta Materials. […] as well as WM, that's the artist formerly known as Waste Management which gets a big boost from construction. […] Overall, WM ranks 12th on our list of stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. While we acknowledge the potential of WM as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at .
