Iran's Khamenei Fed Up With Trump's "Nonsense" Demands, Defers Future Talks
Quick Read
Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed.
Iran's Supreme Leader criticized US demands in nuclear talks as unreasonable.
Khamenei doubts a new nuclear deal will materialise amid ongoing tensions.
Iran's foreign minister called US demands illogical and potentially harmful.
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has let his displeasure about Donald Trump and the US administration's demands in the crucial nuclear talks be known publicly, calling them nonsensical and utterly outrageous.
Khamenei, who is increasingly doubtful that a new nuclear deal with the US will see the light of day, has called the US' demands of Tehran ending all uranium enrichment as "excessive and outrageous".
Asked about the progress being made by Tehran and Washington in drafting a new nuclear deal, a visibly annoyed Mr Khamenei said, "I don't think nuclear talks with the US will bring any result. I don't know what will happen."
'NOT NEGOTIABLE'
Four rounds of talks in, Mr Khamenei, frustrated with Washington's insistence over 'no enrichment', said the US should avoid such "nonsense" demands, which Iran has made clear, is "non-negotiable".
Giving a cold shoulder to Washington over its request to hold the next (fifth) round of talks, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araqchi said, "A date has been suggested but we have not yet accepted it." However, there has been some talk in both capitals about the possible venue being Rome.
'DEFIES LOGIC'
Iran's foreign minister went on to say that the demands being made by the US side during negotiations "defy logic". Such an approach "creates problems" and might derail talks, he hinted. He said Iran is waiting for logic to prevail in Washington before Tehran even considers the next round of talks.
"We are witnessing positions on the US side that do not go along with any logic and are creating problems for the negotiations. That's why we have not determined the next round of talks. We are reviewing the matter and hope logic will ultimately prevail," he said.
Both sides have been combative regarding talks on uranium enrichment, and neither is looking to budge on its stance, leading to, what now seems like, a stalemate. Preempting this, Donald Trump has issued an open-ended threat to Iran - "move quickly or something bad is going to happen".
TRUMP'S WARNING TO IRAN
In recent times - when Iran was reluctant to even come to the negotiating table - Donald Trump had threatened Tehran on multiple occasions, saying Iran would be bombed and shall also face very harsh sanctions if it did not compromise on its nuclear programme. President Trump has already moved in two US aircraft carrier fleet - USS Carl Vinson and USS Harry S Truman - in the Arabian Sea while also ordering the largest-ever deployment of B-2 bombers in the Indian Ocean - at its military base in Diego Garcia.
Satellite images have shown at least six B-2 stealth bombers parked along the military base runway in Diego Garcia - a joint Indian Ocean military base of the US and Britain. That's roughly 30 per cent of its B2 Bomber fleet.
NUKE AMBITION
Steve Witkoff, United States Special Envoy to the Middle East has said that for civilian purposes, 3.67 per cent uranium enrichment is enough. Tehran has already gone far beyond that. Enrichment levels of uranium in Iran are already up to 60 per cent - a short, technical step away from reaching weapons-grade levels of 90 per cent.
"This cannot be allowed," Mr Witkoff has said, while Donald Trump backed him, saying, "Iran has to get rid of the concept of a nuclear weapon. These are radicalised people, and they cannot have a nuclear weapon."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
18 minutes ago
- Mint
Iran's supreme leader rejects US nuclear deal offer
Iran's supreme leader effectively rejected a U.S. proposal that allows temporary uranium enrichment in the country before ending it completely, forcing the White House to reconsider its approach as tensions mount over Iran's nuclear program. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, speaking Wednesday on the anniversary of the death of his predecessor, said the recent U.S. offer to Iran to resolve the standoff over Tehran's nuclear program breached Tehran's principles of independence. 'To the American side and others we say: Why are you interfering and trying to say whether Iran should have uranium enrichment or not? That's none of your business," Khamenei said on X. Iran and the U.S. have held five rounds of nuclear talks so far, but the two sides have clashed over Washington's insistence that Tehran give up enrichment. Western officials believe Iran wants to enrich to retain the option of producing a nuclear weapon. Iran says its nuclear work is peaceful. Last week, President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff submitted what U.S. officials called a term sheet to Tehran, which allows Iran to enrich a limited amount of uranium for a period of time before phasing it out. Iran is in the process of responding formally to the U.S. offer, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tuesday. Khamenei is the country's decision maker on security matters and his comments on Wednesday are the clearest indication of Iran's likely formal response. A U.S. official said this week Washington expected Tehran to reject the initial U.S. offer and will have to consider their next steps. Negotiations could continue this weekend, officials say. Under the proposal, the U.S. would help foster the creation of enrichment facilities managed by a consortium of regional countries, according to a U.S. official and a person briefed by Iran's negotiating team. Meanwhile, Iran would be able to enrich small amounts of uranium at an overground site. But Iran would have to stop all enrichment in the country once the consortium is up and running. Iran would have to render its current underground enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordow inoperable up front under the proposal, the U.S. official said. That would shutter the vast bulk of Iran's centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium. Some Iranian officials have expressed openness to a consortium but have said any enrichment must continue in Iran and under its control. Iranian officials have long insisted Tehran's enrichment program isn't up for negotiations. Trump said this week a new nuclear deal would preclude an enrichment program. That may not rule out an interim arrangement allowing some domestic enrichment by Iran. Iranian officials have complained that Witkoff has refused to commit to specific sanctions relief, say Arab and Iranian officials. Oman, which is mediating between Iran and the U.S., has also suggested Iran halt some enrichment on a temporary basis in exchange for sanctions relief. Trump has said he prefers to see a nuclear deal with Iran but warned he could take military action if there is no deal. Israel has also threatened action against Iran's nuclear program if Tehran moves toward building a nuclear weapon. Iran has amassed a highly enriched uranium stockpile, according to the United Nations atomic agency in Vienna. It is producing roughly one bomb's worth of highly enriched uranium monthly, based on the U.N.'s most recent assessment. While the talks continue, Western powers are on a collision course with Tehran at the U.N. atomic agency, which could put further pressure on the negotiations. Last weekend, the International Atomic Energy Agency circulated a long-awaited report on Iran's stalling over a six-year-old probe into undeclared nuclear material found in Iran. European diplomats in Vienna say they plan to push ahead with a resolution at the IAEA board of governors meeting next week declaring Iran in noncompliance with its basic nuclear safeguards obligations, a step that could push the issue to the attention of the U.N. Security Council for a response. The U.S. is expected to back the move, a senior diplomat said Wednesday. Britain, France and Germany have said this could be the next step in their threat to reimpose all the international sanctions lifted on Iran under the 2015 nuclear deal. Iran has warned that if snapback proceeds, it would withdraw from the international treaty banning the spread of nuclear weapons and kick out international inspectors. Over the past four years, Iran has faced a series of rebukes at the Vienna agency over its lack of cooperation with the IAEA. Each time, it has reacted by gearing up its nuclear program or further downgrading oversight of its work. Write to Benoit Faucon at Laurence Norman at and Alexander Ward at
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
China restricts rare earth exports: Will it put the brakes on India's EV ambitions?
India's electric vehicle (EV) ambition has hit a roadblock due to China's curbs on the export of rare earths, which include alloys, mixtures and magnets. These components are difficult and expensive to extract, additionally causing significant environmental costs. The development comes at a time when the Indian government is heavily pushing the EV sector in the country by providing incentives and allocations in the Budget 2025 to boost domestic production of these vehicles and encourage e-mobility. The decision is viewed as a direct response to the US restrictions on Chinese technology, particularly the semiconductor industry. China's move also underscores the country's dominance in the critical mineral industry and is seen as leverage by China in its ongoing trade war with US President Donald Trump, reported Reuters. China's decision to suspend exports of a wide range of rare earths and related magnets has disrupted the supply chains of automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies, and military contractors worldwide. India depends on imports for rare earth magnets — a small but vital component for the production of EVs. In FY25, the country imported 870 tonnes of these magnets valued at ₹ 306 crore, reported the Economic Times. Moneycontrol reported that China accounts for about 70 per cent of global rare earth metals mining and nearly 90 per cent of its production, which makes the export curbs a pressing concern for the EV industry. The automakers might need to pass on the increased costs to consumers, raising costs by as much as 8 per cent. The Indian vehicle manufacturers must now self-declare the magnets' end use, which is the only option to clear shipments. The long process can only be approved by the Chinese Embassy. About 30 applications have reportedly made it through the Indian side but are still pending Chinese clearance, said Moneycontrol. The Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) has raised concerns with the government, cautioning that lower magnet inventories may cause delays in production. In response, the Indian government is reportedly considering dispatching a delegation of auto industry leaders to Beijing to press for a resolution.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US market futures today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures steady as Trump's tariff shock tests market nerves
U.S. stock futures held firm early Wednesday, with Wall Street taking a cautious stance after President Donald Trump stunned markets by doubling tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. The move, aimed at shielding American industry, rekindled trade war fears—but surprisingly, investor reaction remained measured. Futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average ticked up 0.1%, while S&P 500 futures added 0.2%. The Nasdaq 100 futures barely budged, holding just above flat after a solid Tuesday rally. The calm tone comes as traders digest Trump's latest executive order, which hikes tariffs from 25% to 50%, exempting only the United Kingdom. What triggered Trump's new tariffs on steel and aluminum? The sudden tariff hike, which took effect early Wednesday, follows a fresh executive order signed by President Trump Tuesday night. His move to double steel and aluminum import duties is part of a broader push to defend American manufacturers and reduce foreign dependency in critical sectors. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Alívio da dor sem os riscos: entenda o que essa planta pode fazer. Saúde e Bem Estar Undo Interestingly, the UK stands alone as the only major ally spared from these new tariffs. Trump's decision comes amid worsening U.S. tensions with both China and the European Union, stemming from broader clashes over technology exports, rare earth materials, Taiwan, and visa restrictions. In a pointed message on social media, Trump called Chinese President Xi Jinping 'extremely hard to make a deal with,' further dimming hopes for a near-term U.S.-China trade breakthrough. Live Events How is Wall Street responding to the trade pressure? Despite rising geopolitical tension, U.S. markets ended Tuesday on a positive note, marking a second straight day of gains. What helped calm investors? A surprisingly upbeat reading from the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS). The report showed strong labor demand, reassuring investors that the underlying U.S. economy remains resilient—even in the face of intensifying global uncertainty. Job openings rose more than expected, signaling that companies are still hiring and supporting overall market sentiment. Still, with more labor data coming this week—including the ADP private payrolls report and Friday's nonfarm jobs report—traders are staying alert. A weak surprise could shift this mood quickly. Will the new tariffs hurt chances for a U.S.-China trade deal? It's looking increasingly unlikely. Trump's latest rhetoric and tariff move seem designed to apply maximum pressure, but they could just as easily backfire by pushing Beijing further away from the negotiating table. Key sticking points—like semiconductor export controls, intellectual property disputes, and strategic access to rare earths—remain unresolved. And with Trump labeling Xi as a tough partner, the path to any meaningful deal is narrowing. Global supply chains, especially in tech and manufacturing, are already feeling the pinch. If these trade flare-ups continue, investors should brace for more volatility on Wall Street and across global markets. What could move the stock market next? All eyes now turn to U.S. labor data, which could make or break the market's next move. Wednesday's ADP report is expected to provide early insight into private-sector job growth. But the main event is Friday's May nonfarm payrolls report—a key indicator the Federal Reserve watches closely. If job growth remains strong and wage inflation slows, it could ease pressure on the Fed to raise interest rates further. That would be a welcome sign for investors. However, if the data disappoints, especially with new tariffs now in the mix, markets may start pricing in fresh risks—potentially dragging stocks lower in the short term. Is Wall Street downplaying the risks or banking on economic strength? Right now, it's a balancing act. On one side, tariffs, trade tensions, and rate uncertainty present real headwinds. On the other, strong economic signals—particularly around employment—are keeping investor optimism alive. If Friday's jobs numbers hit the mark and inflation trends lower, stocks could rally further. But if cracks start to show, the recent calm could turn quickly into concern. FAQs Q1: Why are Dow, S&P 500, and Nasdaq futures steady despite Trump's new tariffs? Markets remain resilient thanks to strong labor data and optimism that the U.S. economy can handle trade headwinds. Q2: What did Trump change in steel and aluminum tariffs? Trump doubled tariffs from 25% to 50% on steel and aluminum imports, exempting only the UK from the increase.
