Stephen Starr's vintage-glam reinvention of The Occidental is here
The big picture: Restaurateur Stephen Starr has been on a two-year opening spree in D.C. — El Presidente, Pastis, and new VIP magnet Osteria Mozza — but he's often dished to us about the one that excites him most:
This glamorous reinvention of The Willard hotel's 1906 power spot (long faded) overlooking the White House.
"I think the time is right for it," Starr tells Axios. "It's a grown-up place. It feels intimate."
And while the menu is studded with spendy luxuries like caviar service and ribeyes, "The food isn't challenging — you can just eat here," no tweezers or deconstructions involved.
Dig in: While few may remember the time when glazed Virginia ham steaks with pineapple were popular, the menu is full of lesser-seen throwbacks like that, lobster Newburg or steak Diane — plus some revived Occidental classics like oysters beurre blanc or lamb chops with mint jelly.
Cocktails lean nostalgic too, whether memories drift back to icy cold martinis — here shaken until glacial with manzanilla olive brine and sea salt — or cosmos mixed with Grand Marnier.
Between the lines: Starr noticed a post-pandemic hunger for nostalgia. Even his oldest Philadelphia restaurants, whose sales once waned, "started doing crazy business. People wanted to feel comfortable and go to places they remembered."
The Occidental, Starr says, "is for everyone, Democrats and Republicans," towing the statesman line of many restaurateurs opening in D.C. (Mozza has welcomed all stripes – the Obamas, Jeff Bezos, and as of Monday night per restaurant sources, the Bidens).
The vibe: 19th-century dazzle. Designer Ken Fulk, behind the vintage-glam looks of Carbone Miami and ZZ's Club, channels The Occidental's glory eras in the multi-tiered space.
That includes an Art Deco-style bar boasting a black-and-white marble floor and grand piano. A clubby main dining room outfitted with crystal chandeliers, potted palms and jewel-toned booths for both privacy and people watching. And a modish whiskey lounge tucked away upstairs.
One element that isn't throwback: the bill.
A tony vibe and prime downtown location come with prices to match, with most apps in the high teens to low $30s and entrees in the high $30s to low $70s.
The intrigue: Most Starr restaurants serve a signature dish (e.g., Le Dip's burger, St. Anselm's axehandle ribeye). The owner's bet here is on the salt-crusted prime rib served au jus with creamy horseradish. Or pheasant presented under a smoking cloche with braised thigh, seared breast, and foie gras.
That said, smaller indulgences may win. We have our bets on the buttery, brick-size "giant hash browns" anointing every table during a pre-opening service.
Also, pretty slices of Champagne cake or coconut chiffon, served on custom china, that you can chase with grasshopper mochas — the 1960s answer to espresso martinis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Change in Republicans' Thinking Shifts Policy Support in Renewables
Americans have been and continue to be hungry for energy, in any effective form they can get it, renewable or not. While a majority of Americans still prioritize renewables in energy policy, a shift is taking place, mostly among younger Republican and Republican-leaning individuals, according to a recent Pew Research Study. This has been changing since the end of Trump's first term in office. While the battle continues for the hearts and minds of Americans over the debate between fossil fuels and renewables, the current Trump administration appears to be responsive to this shift by setting priorities for the development of fossil fuels. Democrats and Democrat-leaning respondents to the Pew poll remain staunchly in favor of renewable priorities, although there is a minor slippage in the numbers there as well. It appears that there needs to be room for all of it. Energy appetites tend to exceed energy sources globally. Maybe Republicans are thinking the next 10 years ahead, rallying behind Trump's 'drill, baby, drill' mantra, while perhaps Democrats are more worried about 25 years from now? The survey is silent on that one. Mizuho Securities thinks there's only 25 more years of oil shale wells left to drill anyway. Regardless of the source, from oil fracking to coal mining, more Americans support fossil fuel development, according to Pew. At the same time, Republicans have weakened their support for renewables since the first Trump administration. Perhaps it's because wind and solar are extraordinarily inefficient compared to fossil fuels, according to the Institute for Energy Research. How inefficient? According to a 2022 study, solar costs ten (10) times as much as gas to generate electricity, and wind costs seven (7) times as much. Hopefully, that will change soon. Either that or the decline in fossil fuel supply will make renewables competitive on price in the future. Something both Republicans and Democrats agree on is that phasing out new gasoline cars by 2035 is unpopular (65% of the entire sample). California and 11 other states have adopted plans to ban new gas cars and trucks by 2035, but the House and Senate have blocked the plan thus far. Another is that more nuclear power is a good thing (both parties have majorities in favor of more development in that area). Several AI plants will be powered by nuclear energy. Maybe we could build a nuclear-powered car with a mini reactor? Well, that was dreamed up in the 1950s with the Ford Nucleon and later fantasized in the 1980s with Doc Brown's DeLorean. In reality, we still have a long way to go on that one.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
US appeals court strikes down SEC rule on 'audit trail' funding
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A federal appeals court on Friday struck down 2023 regulations adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on funding a comprehensive market surveillance system, finding that Wall Street's top regulator had not provided a sufficient basis for allowing stock exchanges to pass on its costs to their members, court papers showed. The unanimous decision represented another blow to SEC regulations adopted under the Biden administration, which faced concerted opposition from industry and Republican lawmakers. It was also a setback for the Consolidated Audit Trail, a repository of investor and transaction data meant to give regulators overarching visibility into U.S. market operations that has faced delays and obstacles for more than a decade. The American Securities Association and Citadel Securities, which brought the lawsuit, both hailed the outcome. The ruling "prevents a tax hike on every American investor who buys or sells a share of stock," ASA President Chris Iacovella said in a statement. The SEC said it was considering its next steps. "Before the court's decision, Chairman Atkins directed SEC staff to undertake a comprehensive review of the CAT," said a spokesperson, referring to commission chief Paul Atkins. Over the objections of its Republican members, the SEC in 2023 split the operating costs among buyers, sellers, and exchanges. Officials said at the time this would divide costs evenly but also allow exchanges several years to recoup hundreds of millions already spent. This drew stiff objections from the investment industry, which said it could be left paying an unfairly large share. The two Republicans are now part of the five-member commission's controlling majority. In an opinion for a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for 11th Circuit, Circuit Judge Andrew Brasher said that, because the SEC had not advanced a sufficient justification in deciding how the system's cost would fall on different actors in the marketplace, "we conclude that the 2023 Funding Order is arbitrary and capricious" and therefore in violation of federal laws governing the crafting of regulations. The appeals court sent the rule back to the SEC for further processing in line with the court's decision. The SEC mandated the CAT's creation in 2012 as a response to the "flash crash" of 2010 when major Wall Street indexes temporarily erased nearly $1 trillion in market value in a matter of minutes. Officials say it can allow regulators to spot market manipulation and have cited its data in enforcement actions. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Homeowners in these states are the winners if Trump ends capital-gains taxes for home sellers
President Donald Trump says he's eyeing the elimination of capital-gains tax on home sales as a way to coax more people into selling their homes, amid a housing market that's been frozen for nearly three years by high prices and high interest rates. After being stuck with the same tax rules for nearly three decades, any law change would be a sea change for many homeowners across the country. 'He cannot match my spending': I'm 65 and have $7 million. My boyfriend is 73. Should he release equity from his home so we can enjoy retirement? Wall Street braces for deluge of Treasury bills, a crucial test of market demand My ex-husband's benefit will be $2,600 at retirement age, and mine is $2,200. Can I claim on his record instead? Yet the biggest winners would be clearly clustered in one state, according to a new analysis. Home prices have risen sharply over the past few years, even as the housing market has largely stagnated. Many homeowners have ultralow mortgage rates that they are reluctant to give up, and home buyers are frustrated with an unaffordable market. At the same time, many homeowners are reluctant to sell as their homes gain significant value. If they were to sell, they would have to pay taxes on the sale if their profits are steep enough — so the tax bite has kept a lid on housing supply, industry sources said. 'I absolutely believe that elimination of capital gains taxes will incentivize people to sell their homes,' Shabber Jaffer, a real-estate agent based in the San Francisco Bay Area, told MarketWatch. Eliminating capital-gains tax on home sales 'could be a winning issue for Republicans' in the 2026 midterm elections, Greg Valliere, chief U.S. policy strategist at AGF Investments, said in a Wednesday note. 'We'll follow the capital-gains issue closely this fall — it could have a major impact on the sluggish housing industry.' The White House declined to comment. Individuals can now exclude $250,000 of their profits on a home sale from capital-gains taxes, while married couples can exclude $500,000 of their profits. These exclusion limits have been in place since 1997. Profits above that point are subject to capital-gains taxes up to 20%, depending on the rest of the seller's income. A 3.8% net investment income tax might also apply on the profit above the exclusion, depending on the seller's income. In 1997, the median existing-home price was $126,100, which when adjusted for inflation is about $256,000. In 2024, the median annual existing-home sale price was $407,500, a 223% increase, said Jessica Lautz, deputy chief economist at the National Association of Realtors. 'The implications of this home-price increase are staggering,' said Lautz. The run-up in prices has made it harder for first-time home buyers to enter the housing market, on top of making downsizing an expensive proposition for seniors on fixed incomes. The NAR has been lobbying Congress for at least two years for a change in the capital-gains tax exemption. Congress would have to pass a law to eliminate the capital-gains tax on home sales. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, introduced a bill seeking to do that, titled the No Tax on Home Sales Act, earlier this month. A previous bipartisan bill, titled the More Homes on the Market Act, was introduced two years ago and proposed doubling the exemption amount, but stalled in the House. If capital-gains taxes on home sales were to be axed, it would be another major change for homeowners in Trump's second administration. It could also mark another way the tax code could hand a win to some housing markets, but not all of them. The sweeping tax and spending bill Trump signed on the Fourth of July increased the amount of state income and local property taxes homeowners will be able to deduct on their taxes to $40,000, up from $10,000 previously, through 2029. The higher SALT cap was one flashpoint in Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act because critics said it was a costly giveaway to wealthier homeowners who can afford living in high-tax areas — often in Democrat-led states. California lawmakers were part of the SALT caucus. Their state could win again under the bill if capital-gains taxes were eliminated. In an exclusive analysis for MarketWatch, estimated the biggest beneficiaries of a removal of capital-gains taxes on home sales. 'This is largely a California story,' said Joel Berner, a senior economist at the company. 'Of all the homes that have appreciated by $250,000 or more since their last sale, a quarter of them are in California.' Florida is in second place, followed by New York. State % of homes appreciated over $250,000 since last sold % of homes appreciated over $500,000 since last sold California 25% 39.8% Florida 9.6% 7.9% New York 6.2% 7.2% Washington 5.1% 5.9% Massachusetts 4.3% 5% New Jersey 4.9% 4.1% Colorado 3.6% 3% Virginia 3.2% 2.8% North Carolina 3% 2.1% Arizona 3.2% 2.1% ( is operated by News Corp subsidiary Move Inc.; MarketWatch publisher Dow Jones is also a subsidiary of News Corp.) Jaffer, the real-estate agent, said that the average homeowner in San Jose holds their home for about 18 years. Between June 2007 and June 2025, the total increase in the median single-family-home price in the San Jose area was about $925,000, he said. So if these homeowners sold their home, the profit they would make is over the capital-gains-exemption amount of $500,000 for married couples. 'Therefore, the average single-family-home owner would be paying capital-gains taxes on $425,050,' he said. At a 15% tax rate, that's about $64,000 in federal taxes. Hence 'we anticipate that removing the capital-gains tax on home sales will boost inventory and buyer activity in the higher-dollar segments of the market,' Berner said, noting that the effect will likely be most concentrated in California. California, the most populous state in the U.S., faces a dire housing-affordability crisis, as rent costs and home prices have skyrocketed over the years. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has made various efforts to bring down the cost of building new homes, including rolling back a landmark environmental-protection rule to speed up the process of building homes. But a major change on the capital-gains tax might be another key solution to boost the number of homes for sale in the state. Rep. Jimmy Panetta, a California Democrat representing a district along the state's central coast, sponsored a bill to double home sellers' capital-gains exclusion and index it for inflation. 'It's a good thing that the president finally is acknowledging the seriousness of the affordable-housing issue, not just in my congressional district, but also all across our country,' Panetta said in a statement. 'I've heard from many people who have grown out of their house and want to move or downsize, but they will lose much, if not all, of the profit from the sale of their home.' Panetta said he's ready to work on solutions, including his bill. 'I just hope that the President is serious about doing something, and not just saying it, when it comes to a fix for the affordable-housing issue.' The results of legislation altering the tax rules on home sales may vary state by state, and also by income. To reap tax savings beyond today's rules, individuals would have to pull at least $250,000 in profits above the price they paid for their house. Married couples need to net at least $500,000 above what they paid. An estimated 15% of homeowners would benefit from a change in capital-gains tax rules, according to the National Association of Realtors. These 'constrained' homeowners are not selling because the profits would trigger capital-gains taxes, NAR researchers noted. These sellers would likely be richer and older, according to a separate analysis from the Budget Lab at Yale University. Homeowners with gains above the current exclusion amounts had an average net worth of $5.7 million, according to Budget Lab researchers, who used data from the Federal Reserve's 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances. The average 2022 home value for this demographic was roughly $1.4 million and their average income was $431,000. Their average age was about 65, researchers said. It's not clear if removing capital-gains taxes will help the housing market, said Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at Redfin RKT. Homeowners near the exclusion limit might delay selling or have less motivation to make major home improvements that increase the cost basis of home, she noted. 'The most important consequence of the tax change is that it is a tax break for wealthy homeowners at the expense of all other tax payers,' Fairweather said. Some aging homeowners may need the profits to pay for expensive healthcare going forward, she acknowledged. 'But elderly renters also struggle with eldercare expenses, so it doesn't make sense to address that problem in this manner,' Fairweather said. 'If I was writing the checks at Coke, I wouldn't write the check for this,' one expert says about cane-sugar Coke 'His income is limited': Should I pay $800 a month towards my husband's $67,000 student debt?
