A legal fight is playing out around a Mexican migrant activist accused of human trafficking
On Tuesday, Mexico's Attorney General's Office announced it will appeal the decision from the previous day to release Luis García Villagrán, who has helped organize migrant caravans that travel north from southern Mexico.
When García Villagrán was released from detention on Monday, Judge Jonathan Izquierdo in Tapachula, a city in the state of Chiapas on Mexico's border with Guatemala, said authorities did not have enough evidence to prosecute him for human trafficking.
'I had never seen anything like it,' Attorney General Alejandro Gertz Manero said during the president's news briefing Tuesday. The judge ignored a multitude of presented evidence and claiming that because 'he was dedicated to protecting migrant groups, he was releasing' the suspect.
Gertz Manero added that his office would appeal but did not elaborate.
After his release, García Villagrán told reporters the 'judge ordered my release because he said that we do not belong to organized crime' but rather to the activist group Centro de Dignificación Humana AC, dedicated to protecting the rights of migrants and recognized by the Ministry of the Interior.
The activist-lawyer, who often accompanies migrant caravans, claimed that his arrest amounted to persecution by Mexican federal authorities for his activism.
Such caravans have been criticized by authorities, and are regularly blocked by law enforcement, but have been used as a mechanism for migrants to travel safely through an area that has largely been considered the most dangerous stretch of the journey to the United States.
President Claudia Sheinbaum and her predecessor President Andrés Manuel López Obrador have both emphasized the need to protect migrants, but under pressure from the United States have deployed immigration agents and the National Guard to try to keep migrants from reaching the U.S. border. There have long been accusations that smugglers take advantage of the caravans to move people north.
When he was arrested last week, García Villagrán was helping organize a new caravan of up to 300 people that was to leave Tapachula. The march began its walk toward central Mexico and has so far advanced only a few miles (kilometers).
Authorities say García Villagrán had been wanted for years and that his arrest followed a series of investigations that identified a network of human traffickers using various migrant support organizations as a 'front' for 'human trafficking and drug distribution' in Mexico.
García Villagrán was identified as the 'person in charge of obtaining false documentation' for the passage of migrants through Mexico, in addition to operating as 'one of the main promoters of migrant caravans' and having an outstanding arrest warrant.
His arrest even drew comments from Sheinbaum who said during her daily news briefing on Wednesday that he was 'not an activist' but was tied to trafficking people — and 'that is the crime.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Colombians bid farewell to presidential hopeful Uribe after shooting at political rally
BOGOTA, Colombia — Colombians on Wednesday bid farewell to senator and presidential hopeful Miguel Uribe Turbay, who died more than two months after being shot during a political rally in the South American country's capital. Family, friends, members of Congress and a delegation of government officials from the United States honored Uribe, whose coffin was draped with Colombia's flag. The 39-year-old died Monday in the hospital where he had been since the June 7 shooting. Thousands of mourners paid their respects Tuesday. 'The bullets that took his life not only broke the hearts of his family, they reopened the fractures of a country that has yet to find peace,' Senate President Lidio García said, referring to Colombia's long history of violence against politicians. Uribe had become one of the strongest critics of Colombia's current government. In October, he joined the list of politicians seeking to replace Gustavo Petro , the first leftist to govern Colombia, in the May 2026 elections. Uribe was shot three times , twice in the head, while giving a campaign speech in a park in a working-class Bogota neighborhood. Authorities have arrested six people, including the teenager they say shot him, but they have not determined who ordered the attack or why. The shooting, caught on multiple videos, alarmed Colombians who have not seen this kind of political violence against presidential candidates since Medellin drug lord Pablo Escobar declared war on the state in the 1990s. Uribe's mother, well-known journalist Diana Turbay, was among the victims in that period. She died during a police rescue after being kidnapped by a group of drug traffickers led by Escobar seeking to block their extradition to the U.S. 'If my mother was willing to give her life for a cause, how could I not do the same in life and in politics?' Uribe, who was 5 when his mother was killed, said in an interview with a Colombian news outlet last year. The senator's family said he would be buried Wednesday at Bogota's Central Cemetery. The cemetery is the oldest in the city and the final resting place of figures such as Liberal leader Luis Carlos Galán, who was shot dead in 1989 while giving a presidential campaign speech in Bogota.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Judge Appears Skeptical of Lawsuit Against Federal Bench in Maryland
A federal judge signaled on Wednesday that he had doubts about an extraordinary lawsuit the Trump administration filed against the entire federal bench in Maryland, challenging a standing order intended to briefly slow down the government's ability to deport undocumented immigrants. During a hearing in Federal District Court in Baltimore, the judge, Thomas T. Cullen, said he had some reservations about the suit, making his remarks even before a lawyer for the Justice Department had the chance to offer any arguments on behalf of the administration. 'I don't have a very good poker face,' Judge Cullen told the department lawyer, Elizabeth Hedges, as she stepped up to the podium to address him. 'And you probably picked up on the fact that I have some skepticism.' It was clear from the outset of the hearing just how unusual the case was, which amounted to the administration's latest attack on the judiciary. Because all 15 federal judges in Maryland were named as defendants, Judge Cullen, who normally sits in Roanoke, Va., was asked to cross state lines to preside over the matter. The judges themselves were excused from being in the courtroom and some in fact were on the bench in other proceedings as the hearing unfolded. Moreover, the judges managed to get Paul Clement, a former solicitor general who has argued more than 100 cases in front of the Supreme Court, to represent them. Out of the gate, Mr. Clement emphasized the bizarre nature of the government's efforts. 'This is, to state the obvious,' he told Judge Cullen, 'not an ordinary lawsuit.' The administration filed the suit in June, about a month after the chief federal judge in Maryland, George L. Russell III, issued the standing order saying that immigrants who sought to contest their removal from the country by filing what is known as a habeas petition would automatically be granted a two-day reprieve from being expelled by the government. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Judge is skeptical of Justice Department's lawsuit against 15 federal judges as Trump tries to limit power of judiciary
Donald Trump Trump legal cases Federal agencies ImmigrationFacebookTweetLink Follow A federal judge was skeptical at a hearing Wednesday of the Justice Department's effort to sue all of Maryland's federal court judges in a case testing the Trump administration's effort to limit the power of the judiciary. The case raises major questions about ongoing power struggles between the Trump administration and the federal courts, specifically as judges have tried to curtail due process violations in President Donald Trump's aggressive approach to immigration. The Maryland court has become one of the central playing fields for immigration clashes between the administration and judges, after lawsuits, including one from Kilmar Abrego-Garcia, challenged how the administration was removing detainees with little to no due process. 'I don't have a very good poker face,' US District Judge Thomas Cullen said during a major hearing in the case, where the Trump administration is challenging the ability of all 15 judges in Maryland's federal district court from following a court rule that temporarily bars the administration from carrying out fast-moving deportations of immigrants. 'I have some skepticism.' Cullen, a 2020 Trump appointee to the federal bench in Virginia who was also a US Attorney in the first Trump administration, was brought in to oversee the immigration case at the federal court in Baltimore since all of Maryland's judges are recused from the matter. The judge spent nearly two hours on Wednesday criticizing the administration's decision to file the lawsuit and questioning whether it could lead to other executive branch litigation against federal benches all the way up to the Supreme Court. He said he would rule by Labor Day. 'You have to concede that if they can do this at the district court level, they could do this at the Circuit or potentially the Supreme Court,' Cullen said at one point, appearing sympathetic to the judges' arguments. The judges hired well-known conservative lawyer and George W. Bush-era Solicitor General Paul Clement to defend them in the case and argue the case should be thrown out. 'The logic of the executive branch suit here would extend fully in a suit against the 4th Circuit,' Clement said, referring to the Richmond-based federal appeals court that oversees cases arising from several mid-Atlantic states, including Maryland. In arguing that the case should be thrown out, said that his clients enjoy 'judicial immunity' from lawsuits like this one and that the administration had no cause of action – or claim – through which they could seek to block the Maryland court's rule. 'There really is no precursor for this suit,' Clement said. 'There's just nothing like this kind of injunction against the judicial branch.' The Justice Department sued all federal judges on the lower-level District Court of Maryland in late June, after the court's chief judge put in place a rule that would automatically and temporarily block the Trump administration from removing an immigration detainee from the US if the detainee had gone to court to challenge their removal. The rule was meant to keep the status quo, so a court could intervene within two business days before a detainee would be moved away. The order, from Chief Judge George Russell, was an unusual approach to detainees' cases, though not unheard of in court, coming after a high-profile dispute in the Maryland federal court where the Trump administration mistakenly sent the Abrego Garcia, to a Salvadoran prison without due process and then said it couldn't bring him back to the US. The Justice Department's approach to sue the judges, however, is equally unusual, and judges nationwide have told CNN they consider it to be an extreme approach. Cullen acknowledged that reality on Wednesday after a Justice Department attorney tried to point to other suits brought in the past by executive branch officials against members of the federal judiciary. Those lawsuits include one filed in the 1990s by then-US Attorney Sheldon Whitehouse against Rhode Island's federal court. But those suits, Cullen said, were 'considerably more modest' than the one brought by the Justice Department in June. 'This is taking it up about six notches, isn't it?' he added. The DOJ attorney, Elizabeth Hedges, also tried to tamp down concerns that a raft of litigation could result from a favorable ruling. 'These sorts of suits have been brought in the past and we have not seen a proliferation of litigation,' she said. 'This is not opening the floodgates.' 'We can take your word on that – this is a one-off?' Cullen shot back. None of the 15 Maryland judges who are named defendants in the lawsuit were present in the courtroom for Wednesday's hearing, a spokesman for the court told CNN. Eleven former federal judges from various circuits, including some appointed by Republican presidents, warned in a friend-of-the-court brief in the case that if the Trump administration is allowed to carry its approach through 'to its logical conclusion,' it would 'run roughshod over any effort by the judiciary to preserve its jurisdiction that frustrates the Executive's prerogatives. … That result would be devastating to the efficacy of the Nation's courts.' Apart from the implications of the lawsuit, Cullen indicated he was concerned by the fact that the Justice Department decided to mount a wholesale challenge to the Maryland court instead of taking issue with court orders around detainee removals on a case-by-case basis. 'Why not file an interlocutory appeal as applied in any one of these (immigration) cases' and take it up to the Supreme Court when necessary, he said. The judge pointed to the fact the high court has acted quickly on cases appealed to it on its emergency docket. Such an approach, he said, 'would be more expeditious than the two months we have spent on this.'
