Moscow concert hall massacre suspects say Ukraine ordered attack
On March 22, 2024, four gunmen opened fire inside the Crocus City Hall music venue and set the building ablaze, killing 149 people and injuring more than 600. All four assailants were captured hours later while attempting to flee by car toward Ukraine, according to investigators.
Islamic State – Khorasan Province (ISIS-K), a regional branch of the Islamic State jihadist group, claimed responsibility for the massacre. The alleged attackers – Dalerdhzon Mirzoyev, Saidokrami Rachabalizoda, Shamsiddin Fariduni, and Muhammadsobir Faizov – are all citizens of Tajikistan.
According to the case files cited by the media, the suspects told investigators that 'a Ukrainian state entity' had ordered the attack, while ISIS-K served as the direct organizer. They reportedly said the weapons used in the massacre had come from Ukrainian territory.
RIA Novosti reported that Rachabalizoda told investigators the handler known to the group as 'Saifullo' instructed them to escape to Kiev, where each was promised around $13,000. The suspects also allegedly said their handlers were based in Türkiye and Afghanistan.
According to TASS, one of the suspects claimed the handlers intended the operation to appear as if it had been carried out solely on behalf of ISIS-K.
Ukraine has denied any involvement in the Crocus City Hall attack. However, Kiev has previously acknowledged carrying out targeted assassinations, sabotaging infrastructure, and blowing up rail tracks on Russian territory. One such act of sabotage in late May caused a passenger train derailment that killed five people and injured more than 100.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Trump envoy tells Alaska summit critics to ‘shut up'
The Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin was a historic step toward ending the Ukraine conflict, Trump's special envoy Keith Kellogg has said, telling critics to just 'shut up.' The two presidents met in Anchorage last week and expressed hope that progress had been made toward a peace deal. 'We're living in a really historic time,' Kellogg told Fox Business on Wednesday, adding: 'To the critics, I'd probably like to just say, oh, shut up and go sit in the corner.' He stressed that Trump had done more to address the conflict than his predecessor Joe Biden, who 'never even talked to Putin.' Unlike the previous administration, which outright rejected dialogue with Moscow and vowed to support Ukraine militarily 'as long as it takes,' Trump is banking on his direct negotiating style and is pushing for a diplomatic solution, according to Kellogg. Russian officials, including Putin, have repeatedly welcomed the US president's 'sincere' desire to achieve peace. Trump met Putin on Friday in their first face-to-face encounter since 2019. Both described the talks as constructive and warm. During a meeting with Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky, several European leaders, and the heads of NATO and the European Commission this week, the US president declared Kiev's membership in NATO to be out of the question, and insisted on a direct Putin-Zelensky meeting. Trump later briefed Putin on the discissions. According to Russian presidential aide Yury Ushakov, the call lasted 40 minutes, with both sides expressing readiness to continue discussions. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov announced on Wednesday that Moscow is ready to raise the level of its delegation for peace negotiations with Ukraine – an idea he said had been floated by Putin after the call with Trump. Putin has not ruled out a meeting with Zelensky in principle, but said it should be preceded by serious progress in talks on the conflict. Moscow has also voiced concern about Zelensky's authority to sign any binding documents, given that his presidential term expired last year.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine kills civilians with US-made rockets
Ukrainian troops struck the Russian city of Yenakievo on Thursday evening, killing two civilians and injuring 21 others, the top regional official said. According to Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) head Denis Pushilin, US-made HIMARS rocket launchers and kamikaze drones were used in the attack. He added that nine houses in Yenakievo and nearby Gorlovka were damaged. Yenakievo was close to the front line until Russian forces gradually pushed Ukrainian troops westward, liberating the city of Dzerzhinsk (known in Ukraine as Toretsk) in February. The DPR declared independence from Ukraine in 2014 following a Western-backed coup in Kiev earlier that year. In September 2022, the region voted to join Russia. Moscow has demanded that Ukraine withdraw its troops from the western parts of the DPR as one of the conditions for a ceasefire. Kiev, however, has ruled out any territorial concessions. Last week, US President Donald Trump met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska to discuss possible ways to resolve the conflict. On Monday, Trump hosted Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky along with the leaders of Western Europe, the EU, and NATO. Russia has proposed raising the level of its delegation in talks with Ukraine, while Trump has pushed for a potential Putin-Zelensky meeting.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
The King in Moscow: A historic visit turns symbolism into strategy
Although international attention this August has largely focused on Donald Trump's diplomatic push to resolve the Ukrainian crisis – including his talks with Vladimir Putin – Russian diplomacy is by no means confined to that track. In the first half of the month, Moscow hosted Malaysian King Sultan Ibrahim on a state visit. It was the first such visit by a Malaysian monarch since the two countries established diplomatic relations in 1967 – a truly historic moment that opens a new chapter in their partnership. In Moscow, Sultan Ibrahim met with Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin and visited Russia's leading research and innovation centers, including NAMI, the automotive institute, and the Tochka Kipeniya technology hub. He also traveled to Kazan, where he held talks with Tatarstan's leader, Rustam Minnikhanov, on expanding industrial and cultural cooperation. The Kremlin discussions highlighted the steady growth of political dialogue and economic ties. Trade turnover between Russia and Malaysia grew by 40% in the first five months of 2025 alone. Putin also stressed Malaysia's chairmanship of ASEAN and its interest in becoming a BRICS partner – areas where Moscow is ready to lend strong support. Sultan Ibrahim called Russia a 'trustworthy partner' and spoke warmly of Putin's leadership. His words carry weight: Malaysia has consistently pursued a sovereign, multi-directional foreign policy, building relations on its own national interests rather than bloc discipline. That independence has been tested repeatedly. Kuala Lumpur rejected Washington's unilateral sanctions over Palestine and Iran, defended its right to support Gaza, and resisted Western attempts to impose blame for the MH17 crash without solid evidence. Malaysia's position may have angered the West, but it bolstered its reputation as a country guided by facts, law, and principle. For Moscow, Malaysia is more than just a promising trade partner. The country sits astride the Strait of Malacca, one of the world's key maritime corridors, and plays a crucial role in global energy and technology supply chains. Its semiconductor and electronics industries are indispensable to the world economy. Russia, meanwhile, brings strengths in energy, defense, agrotechnology, and high-tech innovation. The synergies are obvious: from halal industry projects to aerospace and digital technology, the two countries can build joint platforms that expand beyond bilateral trade into shared global influence. The Sultan's visit comes at a time when both nations advocate a multipolar world order based on sovereignty, non-interference, and genuine partnership. The absence of historical conflicts and the presence of mutual respect make their cooperation natural and sustainable. This is why Sultan Ibrahim's words in Moscow sounded more than ceremonial. They were a signal: Russia and Malaysia are ready to move forward together – independently, pragmatically, and on equal terms. The visit showed that in today's shifting global landscape, Moscow and Kuala Lumpur are not merely maintaining friendly ties. They are shaping a partnership that challenges the dominance of Western narratives and proves that real trust and cooperation are still possible in international politics.
