World's most liveable city for 2025 revealed
It's official. Vienna is no longer the most liveable city in the world.
After a three-year run at the top of the annual list from the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), the Austrian capital has been beaten out by 'Wonderful, Wonderful Copenhagen.'
Denmark's capital has taken the number one spot on the ranking of the world's most liveable cities for 2025, which was released on Tuesday.
The EIU, a sister organization to The Economist magazine, ranked 173 cities around the world on a number of factors, including healthcare, education, stability, infrastructure and environment.
Copenhagen triumphed after receiving 'perfect' scores for stability, education and infrastructure, while Vienna tied for second place with Swiss city Zurich.
Australia's Melbourne retained its fourth place spot, while Switzerland's Geneva was fifth on the list.
Just outside of the top five, Sydney, Australia moved up the list, jumping from joint seventh place to sixth, while Japanese city Osaka and New Zealand's Auckland tied for seventh place.
In ninth place, Adelaide was the third Australian city to make the top 10, while Canada's Vancouver took the number 10 slot.
So why did Vienna fail to come out on top this year?
Although the Austrian city scored well in most categories, its score in the stability category fell significantly, while Copenhagen scored highly in all sections.
The 'sharp decline' in Vienna's stability score was attributed to recent incidents, including a bomb threat at a Taylor Swift concert last summer, which led to the event being canceled.
'Global liveability has remained flat over the past year, and as in 2024, scores for stability have declined at a global level,' Barsali Bhattacharyya, deputy industry director at EIU, said in a statement.
'Pressure on stability has led Vienna to lose its position as the most liveable city after a three-year stint.'
However, Vienna wasn't the only city that received lower marks for a category it had previously scored well in.
Calgary, which took fifth place in 2024, dropped out of the top 10 this year, falling to 18th after receiving a lower healthcare score, along with three fellow Canadian cities, due to a 'strain' on the country's healthcare system.
Toronto also placed lower this year, as a result, falling from 12th to 16th place.
'That's really just reflecting the long waiting lists for medical checkups,' Bhattacharyya tells CNN Travel. 'There's been a shortage of staff at medical facilities and hospitals.'
Bhattacharyya stresses that other parts of the world have also been experiencing pressures on healthcare systems and housing infrastructure, but Canada 'stood out' because of the sustained impact of these factors.
'Just to put that into context, they're still some of the most livable cities in the world,' she adds.
Honolulu, Hawaii was the highest US city on the list, coming in 23rd place.
'We've seen a trend where sort of smaller or medium-sized cities in the US actually do a lot better than the really big cities like New York or LA,' explains Bhattacharyya. 'And that's largely because of the strains on public services infrastructure.'
Meanwhile, UK cities London, Manchester and Edinburgh also moved down the rankings after receiving lower scores in the stability category.
This follows a period of rioting and unrest in the UK last year after an anti-immigrant misinformation campaign stoked outrage over a stabbing attack in Southport, northern England.
This year's list saw London drop from 45th to 54th place, Manchester from 43rd to 52nd and Edinburgh moving from 59th to 64th.
'As in 2024, stability scores have declined for western Europe and the Middle East and North Africa,' adds Bhattacharyya.
'In this edition, they have also declined for Asia, amid intensified threats of military conflict for cities in India and Taiwan.'
While some destinations fell down the list, others made significant gains, with Saudi Arabia's Persian Gulf city of Al Khobar jumping 13 places from 148th to 135th.
The kingdom has made considerable investments to improve healthcare and education access under Vision 2030, an extensive plan to diversify its economy and reduce its dependence on oil.
Indonesia's Jakarta also moved up the list, jumping 10 places from 142 to 132 thanks to an improvement in its stability core.
Unsurprisingly, the rankings at the very bottom of the list haven't changed much in the past year, with Damascus, Syria still ranking as the least liveable in the world six months after the fall of ex-president Bashar al-Assad. Libya's Tripoli ranked just above it.
Bangladesh capital Dhaka was third from bottom, while Pakistan's Karachi and Algeria's Algiers were ranked as the fourth and fifth least liveable cities.
While 2024 saw global liveability rise 'fractionally,' this certainly hasn't been the case this year.
'This is because of the declines in stability,' explains Bhattacharyya. 'Because we have seen improvements in categories like healthcare and education, largely led by cities in the Middle East. But that has basically been offset by declines in stability.'
1. Copenhagen, Denmark
2. Vienna, Austria
2. Zurich, Switzerland
4. Melbourne, Australia
5. Geneva, Switzerland
6. Sydney, Australia
7. Osaka, Japan
7. Auckland, New Zealand
9. Adelaide, Australia
10. Vancouver, Canada
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Reveals New Price Tag for Canada To Join 'Golden Dome' Defense System
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump increased the proposed price for Canada's participation in the U.S. Golden Dome missile defense system. "They want to be in," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Monday. "Seventy-one billion they're going to pay." The new price tag is $10 billion higher than Trump's earlier public demand for Canadian entry into the program. Newsweek has contacted the White House and Canada's prime ministerial office via email for comment. Canada's defense ministry directed questions to Prime Minister Mark Carney's office. President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on May 20, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on May 20, 2025, in Washington. AP Photo/Alex Brandon Why It Matters Trump revealed initial plans for the Golden Dome missile defense system earlier this year, touting the design as "state of the art." The president said the Golden Dome would be up and running by the end of his administration, shielding North America from "next-generation" threats like ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missiles. According to Defense One, a defense official said in March that it would take at least five to seven years to develop the Golden Dome's space-based weapons. Russia, China and North Korea have heavily invested in their militaries, including in long-range weapons. What To Know Trump said Canada had requested to be part of the development of the Golden Dome. Canada and the U.S. already work together under the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) to detect incoming threats to North America. Trump said Canada would "have to pay a lot of money" for the Golden Dome, indicating Washington would make a separate deal for the missile defense system with Ottawa in addition to a trade agreement. Trump said access to the Golden Dome would come with a $61 billion price tag for Canada "if they remain a separate, but unequal" country. It would be free if Canada became the 51st state, Trump said. In response to Trump's earlier remarks, Canadian Ambassador to the United Nations Bob Rae likened the terms to a "protection racket" and reaffirmed Canada's sovereignty. Canada has railed against Trump's repeated reference to it becoming part of America. Carney, who won re-election in April on Canadian infuriation about Trump's overtures toward Canada, said last month it was positive to "have protections in place for Canadians" but added: "There will be discussions that could have an impact on Canada, but Canada wouldn't be a part of them." But Canada brings something to the table with nearly 4 million square miles of lines of sight for U.S. sensors to defend against missiles that China and Russia are developing to fly over the North Pole, which is a gap in U.S. air defenses, Politico reported last month. The Golden Dome is loosely modeled on Israel's famed short-range Iron Dome air defense system. The Iron Dome, however, is designed to intercept the kind of attacks common against Israel, unlike long-range missiles able to cross continents. As it stands, the U.S. does not have a joined-up system for intercepting large-scale intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) strikes launched from Russia or China, although it would be able to take out the relatively small number of missiles that North Korea could fire at the U.S. The U.S. currently has 44 ground-based interceptors (GBIs) deployed around the country—40 are in silos in Alaska, with four at the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California as part of its Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system. Around 2028, the Pentagon will add 20 next generation interceptors, or NGIs, to the 44 GBIs. Whatever is missed by these interceptors would likely fall to the U.S. Navy's Aegis system. Trump has framed the Golden Dome system as the end result of a program kicked off by President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, popularly known as "Star Wars." The Golden Dome will use space-based sensors and interceptors to knock out missiles "even if they are launched from space," Trump said. The Golden Dome, using space-based weapons to strike targets closer to the ground, "will be transformational," the Council on Geostrategy, a U.K.-based think tank, said in a paper published last month. It said the missile shield will have "far-reaching strategic consequences." The Congressional Budget Office said in May that the bill for the space-based part of the Golden Dome could come in at $542 billion over the next two decades. The Trump administration said the estimated price tag stands at about $175 billion. An initial $25 billion has been earmarked in next year's budget. What People Are Saying General Chance Saltzman, head of the U.S. Space Force, told lawmakers at a congressional hearing last month: [The space-based weapons envisioned for the Golden Dome] "represent new and emerging requirements for missions that have never before been accomplished by military space organizations." Mao Ning, a spokeswoman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, during a press briefing: "This highly offensive system violates the principle of peaceful use of outer space. It will exacerbate the risk of turning outer space into a battlefield and starting an arms race and shake the international security and arms control system." Glen VanHerck, a retired Air Force general and former head of the U.S. Northern Command, told Politico in May: "What Canada really brings is terrain. If we can position, or Canada positions, over-the-horizon radars further north in the Arctic, that dramatically increases the United States and Canada's ability to see over the pole into Russia, into China and other places." What Happens Next The Pentagon and U.S. Northern Command are in the process of drafting an initial capabilities document, according to a U.S. official. This article contains reporting by The Associated Press.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Energy, tourism among talking points during New England meeting, says Hogan
Eastern Canadian premiers met with northeastern U.S. governors once again on Monday amid ongoing trade tension between the two countries. But the meeting itself was amicable, according to Newfoundland and Labrador Premier John Hogan, who says there's still interest in economic co-operation. U.S. President Donald Trump's trade policies and their impacts were topics of discussion, especially on the blow to tourism south of the border. "You could really hear it in their voices and how they were talking," Hogan told CBC Radio's The St. John's Morning Show on Tuesday. "They were just sort of asking us to recognize that it's one person doing this damage, that Americans still really much love Canadians. They want us to help them in their economic situation as well." Hogan, along with Doug Ford of Ontario, Tim Houston of Nova Scotia, Susan Holt of New Brunswick and Rob Lantz of Prince Edward Island travelled to Boston for the meeting at the invitation of some northeastern U.S. governors in a bid to navigate Trump's trade war. Hogan said other topics on the minds of governors were Canadian energy projects. "There is an opportunity for Newfoundland and Labrador to continue to work with their neighbours and in particular in the field of developing more energy in our province and transmitting it somehow," said Hogan. He also spoke optimistically about the new Churchill Falls plan that would increase hydroelectric production and how it could supply the energy needs of the northeastern U.S. in the future. "They will have an increased ability to get extra energy, not from Canada generally, but specifically from Newfoundland and Labrador," he said. He said he would welcome talks about wind energy, as well as natural gas. Earlier this month the province released its natural gas resources assessments. Hogan said the Canadian premiers got the message that Americans still "love" Canadians, but they couldn't commit to encouraging more tourists to head to the U.S. Since Trump instigated a trade war, Canadians have been boycotting travel down south. The provincial government has previously spoken about encouraging more travellers to visit Newfoundland and Labrador. Hogan said the number of tourists coming to the province hasn't fallen like they have in the U.S. "I think that we see Canadians from across the country traveling to Newfoundland and Labrador rather than coming down to the States," said Hogan. "So certainly, we're happy that our tourism numbers are still as good or better than they have been in the past." Of the governors who attended Monday's meeting, only one was a Republican — Vermont's Phil Scott — which raises the question on how effective the meeting could be in swaying Trump's mind. Hogan said Canadians are sending a message to Americans, as well as Trump, by not travelling to the country or buying their products. "I think they need to step up their messaging to their constituents here in New England if they want to make any change with regards to what's happening in Washington," he said. Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Click here to visit our landing page.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
World's most liveable city for 2025 revealed
It's official. Vienna is no longer the most liveable city in the world. After a three-year run at the top of the annual list from the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), the Austrian capital has been beaten out by 'Wonderful, Wonderful Copenhagen.' Denmark's capital has taken the number one spot on the ranking of the world's most liveable cities for 2025, which was released on Tuesday. The EIU, a sister organization to The Economist magazine, ranked 173 cities around the world on a number of factors, including healthcare, education, stability, infrastructure and environment. Copenhagen triumphed after receiving 'perfect' scores for stability, education and infrastructure, while Vienna tied for second place with Swiss city Zurich. Australia's Melbourne retained its fourth place spot, while Switzerland's Geneva was fifth on the list. Just outside of the top five, Sydney, Australia moved up the list, jumping from joint seventh place to sixth, while Japanese city Osaka and New Zealand's Auckland tied for seventh place. In ninth place, Adelaide was the third Australian city to make the top 10, while Canada's Vancouver took the number 10 slot. So why did Vienna fail to come out on top this year? Although the Austrian city scored well in most categories, its score in the stability category fell significantly, while Copenhagen scored highly in all sections. The 'sharp decline' in Vienna's stability score was attributed to recent incidents, including a bomb threat at a Taylor Swift concert last summer, which led to the event being canceled. 'Global liveability has remained flat over the past year, and as in 2024, scores for stability have declined at a global level,' Barsali Bhattacharyya, deputy industry director at EIU, said in a statement. 'Pressure on stability has led Vienna to lose its position as the most liveable city after a three-year stint.' However, Vienna wasn't the only city that received lower marks for a category it had previously scored well in. Calgary, which took fifth place in 2024, dropped out of the top 10 this year, falling to 18th after receiving a lower healthcare score, along with three fellow Canadian cities, due to a 'strain' on the country's healthcare system. Toronto also placed lower this year, as a result, falling from 12th to 16th place. 'That's really just reflecting the long waiting lists for medical checkups,' Bhattacharyya tells CNN Travel. 'There's been a shortage of staff at medical facilities and hospitals.' Bhattacharyya stresses that other parts of the world have also been experiencing pressures on healthcare systems and housing infrastructure, but Canada 'stood out' because of the sustained impact of these factors. 'Just to put that into context, they're still some of the most livable cities in the world,' she adds. Honolulu, Hawaii was the highest US city on the list, coming in 23rd place. 'We've seen a trend where sort of smaller or medium-sized cities in the US actually do a lot better than the really big cities like New York or LA,' explains Bhattacharyya. 'And that's largely because of the strains on public services infrastructure.' Meanwhile, UK cities London, Manchester and Edinburgh also moved down the rankings after receiving lower scores in the stability category. This follows a period of rioting and unrest in the UK last year after an anti-immigrant misinformation campaign stoked outrage over a stabbing attack in Southport, northern England. This year's list saw London drop from 45th to 54th place, Manchester from 43rd to 52nd and Edinburgh moving from 59th to 64th. 'As in 2024, stability scores have declined for western Europe and the Middle East and North Africa,' adds Bhattacharyya. 'In this edition, they have also declined for Asia, amid intensified threats of military conflict for cities in India and Taiwan.' While some destinations fell down the list, others made significant gains, with Saudi Arabia's Persian Gulf city of Al Khobar jumping 13 places from 148th to 135th. The kingdom has made considerable investments to improve healthcare and education access under Vision 2030, an extensive plan to diversify its economy and reduce its dependence on oil. Indonesia's Jakarta also moved up the list, jumping 10 places from 142 to 132 thanks to an improvement in its stability core. Unsurprisingly, the rankings at the very bottom of the list haven't changed much in the past year, with Damascus, Syria still ranking as the least liveable in the world six months after the fall of ex-president Bashar al-Assad. Libya's Tripoli ranked just above it. Bangladesh capital Dhaka was third from bottom, while Pakistan's Karachi and Algeria's Algiers were ranked as the fourth and fifth least liveable cities. While 2024 saw global liveability rise 'fractionally,' this certainly hasn't been the case this year. 'This is because of the declines in stability,' explains Bhattacharyya. 'Because we have seen improvements in categories like healthcare and education, largely led by cities in the Middle East. But that has basically been offset by declines in stability.' 1. Copenhagen, Denmark 2. Vienna, Austria 2. Zurich, Switzerland 4. Melbourne, Australia 5. Geneva, Switzerland 6. Sydney, Australia 7. Osaka, Japan 7. Auckland, New Zealand 9. Adelaide, Australia 10. Vancouver, Canada
