Trump Reveals New Price Tag for Canada To Join 'Golden Dome' Defense System
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump increased the proposed price for Canada's participation in the U.S. Golden Dome missile defense system.
"They want to be in," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Monday. "Seventy-one billion they're going to pay."
The new price tag is $10 billion higher than Trump's earlier public demand for Canadian entry into the program. Newsweek has contacted the White House and Canada's prime ministerial office via email for comment. Canada's defense ministry directed questions to Prime Minister Mark Carney's office.
President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on May 20, 2025, in Washington.
President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on May 20, 2025, in Washington.
AP Photo/Alex Brandon
Why It Matters
Trump revealed initial plans for the Golden Dome missile defense system earlier this year, touting the design as "state of the art."
The president said the Golden Dome would be up and running by the end of his administration, shielding North America from "next-generation" threats like ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missiles. According to Defense One, a defense official said in March that it would take at least five to seven years to develop the Golden Dome's space-based weapons.
Russia, China and North Korea have heavily invested in their militaries, including in long-range weapons.
What To Know
Trump said Canada had requested to be part of the development of the Golden Dome. Canada and the U.S. already work together under the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) to detect incoming threats to North America.
Trump said Canada would "have to pay a lot of money" for the Golden Dome, indicating Washington would make a separate deal for the missile defense system with Ottawa in addition to a trade agreement.
Trump said access to the Golden Dome would come with a $61 billion price tag for Canada "if they remain a separate, but unequal" country. It would be free if Canada became the 51st state, Trump said.
In response to Trump's earlier remarks, Canadian Ambassador to the United Nations Bob Rae likened the terms to a "protection racket" and reaffirmed Canada's sovereignty.
Canada has railed against Trump's repeated reference to it becoming part of America. Carney, who won re-election in April on Canadian infuriation about Trump's overtures toward Canada, said last month it was positive to "have protections in place for Canadians" but added: "There will be discussions that could have an impact on Canada, but Canada wouldn't be a part of them."
But Canada brings something to the table with nearly 4 million square miles of lines of sight for U.S. sensors to defend against missiles that China and Russia are developing to fly over the North Pole, which is a gap in U.S. air defenses, Politico reported last month.
The Golden Dome is loosely modeled on Israel's famed short-range Iron Dome air defense system. The Iron Dome, however, is designed to intercept the kind of attacks common against Israel, unlike long-range missiles able to cross continents.
As it stands, the U.S. does not have a joined-up system for intercepting large-scale intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) strikes launched from Russia or China, although it would be able to take out the relatively small number of missiles that North Korea could fire at the U.S.
The U.S. currently has 44 ground-based interceptors (GBIs) deployed around the country—40 are in silos in Alaska, with four at the Vandenberg Air Force Base in California as part of its Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system.
Around 2028, the Pentagon will add 20 next generation interceptors, or NGIs, to the 44 GBIs. Whatever is missed by these interceptors would likely fall to the U.S. Navy's Aegis system.
Trump has framed the Golden Dome system as the end result of a program kicked off by President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, popularly known as "Star Wars." The Golden Dome will use space-based sensors and interceptors to knock out missiles "even if they are launched from space," Trump said.
The Golden Dome, using space-based weapons to strike targets closer to the ground, "will be transformational," the Council on Geostrategy, a U.K.-based think tank, said in a paper published last month. It said the missile shield will have "far-reaching strategic consequences."
The Congressional Budget Office said in May that the bill for the space-based part of the Golden Dome could come in at $542 billion over the next two decades. The Trump administration said the estimated price tag stands at about $175 billion.
An initial $25 billion has been earmarked in next year's budget.
What People Are Saying
General Chance Saltzman, head of the U.S. Space Force, told lawmakers at a congressional hearing last month: [The space-based weapons envisioned for the Golden Dome] "represent new and emerging requirements for missions that have never before been accomplished by military space organizations."
Mao Ning, a spokeswoman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, during a press briefing: "This highly offensive system violates the principle of peaceful use of outer space. It will exacerbate the risk of turning outer space into a battlefield and starting an arms race and shake the international security and arms control system."
Glen VanHerck, a retired Air Force general and former head of the U.S. Northern Command, told Politico in May: "What Canada really brings is terrain. If we can position, or Canada positions, over-the-horizon radars further north in the Arctic, that dramatically increases the United States and Canada's ability to see over the pole into Russia, into China and other places."
What Happens Next
The Pentagon and U.S. Northern Command are in the process of drafting an initial capabilities document, according to a U.S. official.
This article contains reporting by The Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
3 minutes ago
- CNBC
Senate passes landmark GENIUS stablecoin bill, giving crypto industry its first major win
The Senate on Tuesday passed the GENIUS Act, a landmark bill that for the first time establishes federal guardrails for U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins and creates a regulated pathway for private companies to issue digital dollars with the blessing of the federal government. The bill passed with a 68-30 vote. It's a milestone day for the crypto industry and for President Donald Trump's sprawling digital asset empire. This is the first legislative victory for the digital asset industry, which put around $250 million in the 2024 cycle to elect what's now considered to be the most pro-crypto Congress in U.S. history. The bill still faces hurdles in the Republican-held House, but passage in the Senate signals a turning point — not just for the technology, but for the political clout behind it. The GENIUS Act, short for the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, sets guardrails for the industry, including full reserve backing, monthly audits, and anti-money laundering compliance. It also opens the door to a broader range of issuers, including banks, fintechs, and major retailers looking to launch their own stablecoins or integrate them into existing payment systems. The bill grants sweeping authority to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who last week told a Senate appropriations subcommittee in a hearing that the U.S. stablecoin market could grow nearly eightfold to over $2 trillion in the next few years. "Stablecoin legislation backed by U.S. Treasuries or T-bills will create a market that will expand U.S. dollar usage via these stablecoins all around the world," Bessent said. GENIUS now heads to the House, which has its own version of a stablecoin bill dubbed STABLE. Both prohibit yield-bearing consumer stablecoins — but diverge on who regulates what. The Senate's version centralizes oversight with Treasury, while the House splits authority between the Federal Reserve, the Comptroller of the Currency, and others. Reconciling the two could take a while, according to Congressional aides. The GENIUS Act was supposed to be the easiest crypto bill to pass, but took months to reach the Senate floor, failed once, and passed only after fierce negotiations. "We thought it would be easiest to start with stablecoins," Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., said on stage in Las Vegas at this year's Bitcoin 2025 conference, which focused heavily on stablecoins. "It has been extremely difficult. I had no idea how hard this was going to be," she said. At the same event, Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., echoed the frustration: "It has been murder to get them there," he said of the 18 Senate Democrats who ultimately crossed the aisle. Stablecoins are a subset of cryptocurrencies pegged to the value of real-world assets. About 99% of all stablecoins are tethered to the price of the U.S. dollar. The appeal is simple: Stablecoins offer instant settlement and lower transaction fees, cutting out the middlemen and directly threatening legacy payment rails. Shopify has already rolled out USDC-powered payments through Coinbase and Stripe. Bank of America's CEO said last week at a Morgan Stanley conference that they're having conversations with the industry and individually exploring stablecoin issuance. Payment stocks like Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Block slid after The Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon and Walmart are exploring their own stablecoins. That action has helped drive Circle's blockbuster stock surge, with shares up 400% since its public debut on June 5. Deutsche Bank found that stablecoin transactions hit $28 trillion last year, surpassing that of Mastercard and Visa, combined. Still, there are limits. The GENIUS Act limits non-financial Big Tech companies from directly issuing stablecoins unless they establish or partner with regulated financial entities — a provision meant to blunt monopoly concerns. JPMorgan, meanwhile, is taking a different route, launching JPMD, a deposit token designed to function like a stablecoin but tightly integrated with the traditional banking system. Issued on Coinbase's Base blockchain, JPMD is only available to institutional clients and offers features like 24/7 settlement and interest payments — part of the broader push by legacy finance to adapt to the stablecoin era without ceding ground to crypto-native firms. While Democrats tried to amend the bill to prevent the president from profiting off crypto ventures, the final legislation only bars members of Congress and their families from doing so. Trump's first financial disclosure as president, released Friday, revealed he earned at least $57 million in 2024 alone from token sales tied to World Liberty Financial, a crypto platform closely aligned with his political brand. He holds nearly 16 billion WLFI governance tokens — the crypto equivalent of voting shares — which could be worth close to $1 billion on paper, based on prior private sales. That's just one slice of the Trump crypto pie. The family's ventures, which include the controversial $TRUMP meme coin, a $2.5 billion bitcoin Treasury and proposed bitcoin and ether ETFs via and a newly launched mining firm called American Bitcoin, reflect a full-throttle push into digital finance. Forbes recently estimated Trump's crypto holdings at nearly $1 billion, lifting his total net worth to $5.6 billion.
Atlantic
5 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The Democratic Party Slides Into Irrelevance
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. This past weekend marked a high for opposition to Donald Trump, and another low for the opposition party. From Chula Vista, California, to Portland, Maine, and from Bellingham, Washington, to Key Largo, Florida, Americans demonstrated against the president, in 'No Kings' protests scheduled to coincide with Trump's military parade in Washington, D.C., on Saturday. The parade, desultory and poorly attended, set a striking contrast with the marchers, whom observers estimated to number in the millions. That would make Saturday's protests some of the largest in American history. Three of the biggest sets of U.S. demonstrations have taken place while Trump has been president, an indication of intense grassroots opposition toward him and his vision for the Republican Party. So these ought to be boom times for America's other major party. But Democrats seemed almost entirely irrelevant last weekend. While many ordinary Americans engaged in the most kinetic kind of politics, the Democratic National Committee was splintering acrimoniously, and some of the party's most prominent leaders were busy attending a glitzy Hamptons wedding that brought together two venerable, aging dynasties: the Soros family and the Clinton political machine. Although Democratic officials attended and spoke at many of Saturday's rallies, the No Kings protests were not driven by the Democratic Party—which may have been one of the protests' strengths. Not every Democratic politician is missing in action. California Governor Gavin Newsom, who spent recent months clumsily attempting to moderate his image by inviting MAGA figures on his podcast, now finds himself as the nation's foremost Trump foil. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz won praise for his handling of the response to the assassination of one state legislator and the wounding of another this past weekend. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York have drawn huge crowds at rallies around the country. As a whole, however, the Democratic Party seems unprepared and uninspired. Internally, the party is more consumed with relitigating 2024 than with looking toward 2026. It has no apparent leader: Barack Obama is apathetic, Joe Biden is obsolete, and Kamala Harris lost. The congressional leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries are hapless, declaring red lines that they have no evident means or intent of enforcing. (Did they not learn their lesson from Obama's red-line follies?) That means de facto leadership falls to the DNC. The party elected a new chair, Minnesota's Ken Martin, in February, but Martin has so far failed to inspire or unify the party. Martin's term has been most preoccupied with trying to manage David Hogg, the young gun-control activist who was elected DNC vice chair in February and then announced plans to spend millions backing primary challengers to sitting Democrats in safe seats. Challenging sitting officeholders isn't bad per se—in fact, it's often good for revitalizing politics—but for a top party official to be driving those seems to cut against the idea of a party organization. Democratic leaders first tried to badger Hogg into giving up the plan, but he refused. Then they stumbled on a solution of sorts that got rid of Hogg but validated every stereotype of Democrats as obsessed with procedure, consumed by elaborate diversity rules, and generally incompetent. A woman who'd unsuccessfully run against Hogg for vice chair argued that the DNC had violated its own rules and unfairly benefited two male candidates. The DNC concluded that the challenge was correct; invalidated the election of Hogg and another vice chair, Malcolm Kenyatta; and ordered a do-over. Hogg opted not to run in the new election. Problem solved! Along the way, however, audio in which Martin whined about how it had all affected him was leaked to Politico. 'I'll be very honest with you,' he said. 'The other night, I said to myself for the first time, I don't know if I wanna do this anymore.' Addressing Hogg, he went on: 'I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it's really frustrating.' No doubt, this has been unpleasant for Martin, but it's not encouraging that the guy Democrats chose to lead them as they take on a budding authoritarian is crumbling in the face of a 25-year-old activist with a relatively small war chest. Then, on Sunday, reports surfaced that Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, and Lee Saunders, the president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, had left the DNC; they complained that Martin was, in Weingarten's words, 'not enlarging our tent and actively trying to engage more and more of our communities.' Both had backed one of Martin's challengers for chairperson, and Weingarten had supported Hogg; before resigning, they'd been kicked out of seats on the powerful Rules and Bylaws Committee. Weingarten is a lightning rod, and teachers unions are controversial among Democrats. But the DNC can hardly afford to lose the buy-in of major unions. Organized labor provides both funding and foot soldiers for Democratic candidates. This has long been true, but the situation is more fragile than ever, as Trump has made gains among union members and union leaders. In 2024, he was able to persuade both the Teamsters and the International Association of Fire Fighters to forgo endorsements altogether. Forget enlarging the tent—the DNC appears to be in danger of shrinking it. The good news for Democrats is that the midterms are more than a year away, and the 2028 election is more than three years away—an eternity in politics. Trump can't figure out his position on even his signature issue of immigration, his administration is understaffed and underprepared, and public disapproval is strong; when he's been in office, voters have rejected him and his allies at the ballot box. But if anyone can figure out how to fumble the situation, it's the Democratic Party. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Today's News President Donald Trump called for Iran's ' unconditional surrender ' and issued a threat to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, stating that Khamenei is ' an easy target.' Trump left the G7 summit early yesterday and held a meeting about Iran today in the Situation Room with national-security officials. Federal agents arrested Brad Lander, the New York City comptroller and mayoral candidate, as he tried to escort a migrant past ICE officers at an immigration courthouse. His office said that he was released several hours later, and the Manhattan U.S. attorney's office said that it was investigating his actions. Evening Read The NBA's Parity Paradox By Jemele Hill If there were any truth to the running joke—or conspiracy theory—that the NBA rigs games so that big-market teams like the Los Angeles Lakers end up in the NBA Finals, then this year's matchup between the Oklahoma City Thunder and the Indiana Pacers would be disastrous for the league. In reality, NBA owners have gotten exactly what they wanted. Although television ratings are down, the NBA's plan to bring more parity to the league is working. Read the full article. More From The Atlantic When the military comes to American soil The dumbest phone is parenting genius. The perfect astronaut is changing. Members of Iran's opposition want change. Bill Cassidy blew it. Culture Break Play. Introducing The Atlantic Games, a digital parlor of puzzles and play. Enter and discover a collection of games, both brand new and beloved, including the crossword, Bracket City, Fluxis, and more.
Newsweek
6 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Democratic Support for Expanding Border Wall Surges by Double Digits: Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Democrats' support for a southern border remains minimal compared to Republicans, though the percentage of left-leaning Americans who support expansion of a wall between the United States and Mexico has increased double digits in the past six years, according to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center. Why It Matters Border crossings have drastically decreased under the current administration of President Donald Trump, fulfilling one of his major campaign promises to prevent illegal immigrants from entering the country. Trump's mass deportation efforts, which have included immigrant raids criticized by portions of the American public, have extended into other federal policies including more severe travel bans and visa restrictions. What To Know A 56 percent majority of Americans now favor expanding the wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, up from 46 percent in 2019, according to a survey of 5,044 people conducted from June 2 to June 8 by the Pew Research Center. While Republican support for a border wall remains high, with roughly 88 percent supporting wall expansion, Democratic support for expansion has increased to 27 percent—up from 14 percent in 2019. Migrants turn themselves in to U.S. Customs and Border Patrol officers after crossing over a section of border wall into the U.S. on January 5 in Ruby, Arizona. Migrants turn themselves in to U.S. Customs and Border Patrol officers after crossing over a section of border wall into the U.S. on January 5 in Ruby, total, 42 percent approve and 47 disapprove of the Trump administration's overall approach to immigration. Divisions in views on immigration shift based on partisanship. About 78 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents approve of the administration's approach to immigration, including 51 percent who strongly approve. Just 12 percent disapprove. Democratic antipathy toward the Trump administration's policies are more striking, with 81 percent of Democrats and Democratic leaners disapproving. Among them, 53 percent strongly disapprove. About 9 percent approve. Respondents also said that current policies will cost taxpayers more money (53 percent) rather than save money (29 percent). A majority also said that these policies will make the U.S. economy weaker (46 percent) instead of stronger (34 percent). Just about two in 10 (19 percent) said immigration policies won't have much of an economic impact either way. Terrell County, Texas, Sheriff Thad Cleveland told Newsweek on Tuesday that his community near the southern border had a little activity in March and April, but May and June have been "really slow." He said there's also a Department of Defense presence. "I attribute the decrease to Trump's voice on the issue and additional support brought to the border," Cleveland said. "During the Biden administration I often said it would take a president with a strong voice letting the world know you can't come to America, [it] would have the biggest impact for illegal entries. "I still think we, Terrell County, will see an increase as other portions of the border continue to see resources." Cleveland does wonder how long the policies and resources will be sustained, saying that eventually "something has to give." He's looking to lawmakers and not Trump for long-term answers. "President Trump has done his part, now Congress must do their part and pass legislation to continue to add technology, infrastructure and manpower, as well as ensuring a future president can't come in and open the borders as was done the previous four years," the sheriff said. Following the heightened period of the COVID-19 pandemic, border crossings under former President Joe Biden surged from the end of 2021 through early 2024, hitting a peak of 370,883 in December 2023. The Pew survey also shows that Hispanic (83 percent) and Black (78 percent) adults are more likely than Asian (63 percent) and white (58 percent) adults to say that undocumented immigrants should be able to stay if they meet certain requirements. Overall, 38 percent of white adults and 30 percent of Asian adults said there should be a national effort to deport immigrants illegally in the country. In contrast, 17 percent of Black adults and 14 percent of Hispanic adults shared that sentiment. What People Are Saying U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in its announcement Monday about a new app for legal border crossings: "Those who use the CBP Home mobile app to self-deport receive cost-free travel, forgiveness of any civil fines or penalties for failing to depart the United States, and a $1,000 exit bonus, paid after their return is confirmed through the app. If they already submitted their intent to depart using previous versions of CBP Home, they will not need to resubmit." What Happens Next The Trump administration's immigration efforts have received praise from none other than immigrants in the U.S. Immigrant voters, who favored Democrats by 32 points on immigration policy in 2020, now trust Republicans more on the issue by 8 points—a seismic 40-point swing in four years, according to an analysis of the American National Election Studies (ANES) by CNN's Harry Enten.
