logo
Land row: AMU asserts ownership, ANN justifies taking possession of four hectares

Land row: AMU asserts ownership, ANN justifies taking possession of four hectares

Hindustan Times02-05-2025

: After the Aligarh Nagar Nigam took action on Wednesday to re-establish possession of a four-hectare land after 80 years, Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) has issued a statement asserting its legal ownership of the property and its intent to take effective measures, including legal recourse, to protect its 'rights'.
However, when contacted, sub divisional magistrate (Koil) Digvijay Singh justified the Aligarh Nagar Nigam's action. Singh stated that the revenue records do not mention AMU as the owner of the four-hectare land. He added that AMU was given sufficient opportunity to establish ownership but failed to do so, leading to the repossession of the land.
A press statement issued by AMU's public relations office (PRO) on Thursday stated, 'The Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) wishes to make it unequivocally clear that the land over which the Municipal Corporation recently carried out on-site action is a legally owned property of the university.'
'The University holds all relevant documents, archival records, and legal evidence establishing its rightful ownership, which are being duly submitted before the appropriate legal forums. The land in question has been under the University's ownership for several decades, and there has never been any question of its illegal occupation by the University,' the statement said.
'Aligarh Muslim University is a central university that adheres fully to legal norms, institutional propriety, and constitutional responsibility in all its affairs. The university is taking appropriate legal and administrative measures to safeguard its legitimate rights,' the press statement added.
The four-hectare land in question has no construction on it but was used by AMU as a ground for horse riding.
The AMU press statement further said, 'The university assures all stakeholders that it remains committed to protecting its assets and institutional integrity, and is undertaking all necessary steps in this regard with due diligence.'
Refuting AMU's claim, SDM (Koil) Digvijay Singh said, 'Anybody claiming its right to the land needs to have proper mutation in revenue records, but there is no mention of AMU over the land in the revenue records. It is land owned by Nagar Nigam and is recorded as 'banjar' (barren) land in the revenue records.'
'We conducted complete proceedings and gave sufficient opportunity to AMU but they were unable to produce sufficient ownership documents, barring the document of a British period dating back to 1913. As such, the Nagar Nigam has taken possession,' Singh said. He added more such pieces of land remain to be reclaimed from AMU but proper verification is being done at present.
Meanwhile, a student leader Faizul Hasan criticised the AMU administration for letting go of the possession of 'such precious land' of the university.
Former Rajya Sabha MP and All India Pasmanda Muslim Mahaz national president Ali Anwar Ansari claimed that this land, worth hundreds of crore rupees, was donated to AMU by the ruler of Pandawal, Bakar Ali Khan, a hundred years ago. He questioned the action by Aligarh Nagar Nigam and assured that the matter would be taken to the high court.
Ansari blamed the AMU administration for being in collusion with the district administration and allowing the BJP to dominate affairs at the university.
'This exercise began during the tenure of former VC Tariq Mansoor who later joined the BJP and became an MLC,' Ansari alleged.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran warns of strikes on US, UK, French bases: Why that would be dangerous
Iran warns of strikes on US, UK, French bases: Why that would be dangerous

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Iran warns of strikes on US, UK, French bases: Why that would be dangerous

Iran has warned it will target US, British, and French military bases in the region if they assist Israel in defending against Tehran's attacks. With thousands of Western troops stationed across the region and Iran's missile and drone capabilities expanding, this confrontation could trigger a far larger conflict read more A rescue personnel walks next to a damaged vehicle at an impact site following missile attack from Iran on Israel, in Ramat Gan, Israel, June 14, 2025. File Image/Reuters Iran has formally cautioned the United States, United Kingdom and France that if they interfere with its their forces stationed in the region will be considered legitimate targets. This announcement was transmitted through state-controlled Iranian media on Saturday and follows intensified hostilities between Israel and Iran following attacks linked to Iran's nuclear dispute with Israel. Western countries are now caught in a precarious position. US President Donald Trump has pledged support for Israel's defence, and American defence officials have acknowledged the role of US forces in countering airborne threats directed toward Israeli territory. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD France's President Emmanuel Macron echoed a similar stance, confirming on Friday that France would aid Israel if Iran escalated. Meanwhile, the British government has clarified that its forces have not been directly involved in any such support operations, with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer highlighting the importance of restraint. The risk for Iran in executing its threat lies in the possibility of drawing Western militaries directly into the conflict, at a time when Israeli airstrikes have already imposed substantial pressure on Iranian-aligned infrastructure. Despite this, Tehran appears intent on deterring further foreign military support for Israel. Speaking at a UN Security Council meeting, US diplomat McCoy Pitt remarked, 'No government proxy or independent actor should target American citizens, American bases or other American infrastructure in the region. The consequences for Iran would be dire.' Where are Western forces located in the region? The United States maintains a widespread and enduring military presence across the region. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, this includes a network of permanent and temporary facilities in no fewer than 19 locations. There are eight fixed bases among these, located in Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. As of mid-2025, there are an estimated 40,000 to 50,000 American service personnel stationed across the region. These troops are distributed between major hubs and forward-deployed positions that serve logistical, intelligence, naval and aerial operational purposes. Among the most heavily manned countries are Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE and Saudi Arabia — nations that host key facilities vital to Washington's projection of power in the region. The United Kingdom also operates several installations across the Gulf and nearby territories. British forces are based at multiple locations, including Cyprus which is home to the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia, which are key staging grounds for RAF combat and support aircraft under Operation Shader. These bases also feature signal intelligence capabilities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bahrain serves as the location of the UK Naval Support Facility, serving as the Royal Navy's primary Gulf support point, while Oman serves as the permanent joint support installation in Duqm aids maritime operations and training exercises, and it also is being developed as a key strategic anchor. British forces also utilise the Al Udeid air base in Qatar, a central node for RAF regional command and control while RAF personnel operate from the Al Minhad air base in the United Arab Emirates. UK forces and support staff are also present, albeit in smaller numbers, in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states. France, for its part, has had a naval air station — formally named the French Military Settlement in the United Arab Emirates (IMFEAU) — in Abu Dhabi since 2009, supporting both aerial and maritime operations. What could happen if Iran struck Western assets? Iran's threat raises alarms across military and diplomatic circles. Even though US officials have insisted their role is defensive, Iranian leadership appears convinced that Western powers are facilitating Israeli operations. Likely Iranian targets include American military camps in Iraq, Gulf-based installations and possibly embassies and consulates. Tehran-backed armed groups remain active in Iraq, despite diminished activity from other Iranian proxy forces like Hamas and Hezbollah. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Missiles launched from Iran are intercepted, as seen from the city of Ashkelon, Israel, June 13, 2025. Reuters Given the rising tension, the United States has already taken precautionary measures, including repositioning personnel in vulnerable areas. A serious flashpoint could emerge if an American national were to die in the ongoing conflict, whether in Israel or another hot zone. In such a case, Trump might face increased political pressure to respond militarily. The capabilities required to destroy deeply embedded Iranian nuclear facilities — such as those at Fordow — are currently only in the possession of the United States. While Trump campaigned on promises to avoid prolonged wars in the region, many in his political base support Israel's strategic objectives, including the goal of confronting Tehran directly. Escalation, however, carries far-reaching risks. If Iran's primary strikes fail to damage well-defended Israeli targets, Tehran may turn to more vulnerable points in the Gulf region. Past incidents serve as reminders: Iran was blamed for the 2019 drone and missile attacks on Saudi Aramco oil facilities and its Houthi allies successfully struck targets in the UAE in 2022. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite recent diplomatic efforts to ease regional hostilities, the countries that host US and allied airbases — some of whom discreetly assisted Israel's air defense — could now find themselves under threat. Should these nations come under fire, they may seek assistance from American and allied air power, thereby expanding the theatre of war. What's next: Escalation, patience, or proxy retaliation? The future of this crisis hinges on Tehran's next steps. A continuation of long-range attacks appears likely, though immediate success against Israel's layered air defences is doubtful without backing from other powers, such as Russia or China — an outcome deemed improbable at this stage. Iran may instead resort to a more patient strategy, conserving its arsenal and waiting for a more opportune moment to strike again. This approach may involve periodic waves of drone and missile launches, each carefully timed to test or wear down Israeli and Western defences. For Washington, this creates a dilemma. Each new round of defence support to Israel — whether in the form of air defence systems or ammunition — entangles the US deeper in a conflict Trump has sought to contain. Not to forget, the risk of economic fallout, including surging oil prices grows with each retaliatory cycle. With inputs from agencies STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Unanswered questions about Trump's name in Epstein files
Unanswered questions about Trump's name in Epstein files

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Unanswered questions about Trump's name in Epstein files

The suspicious suicides of Jeffrey Epstein and his main accuser Virginia Giuffre during Donald Trump's two terms remain unexplained read more A picture is worth a thousand words—sounds clichéd and stodgy, right? But what if a 25-year-old photo still triggers suspicions of complicity in sexual assault and orgies involving girls as young as 13-14 and the rich and powerful. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Donald Trump, his then-girlfriend Melania Knauss, the late paedophile-rapist Jeffrey Epstein and his pimp-girlfriend and British-French-American socialite Ghislaine Maxwell in the same frame. The picture wasn't taken at Epstein's Little Saint James island, Palm Beach (Florida) mansion, New Mexico home, Manhattan mansion or his Boeing 727 (Lolita Express), where he abused minor girls as part of his widespread sex racket and 'served' them to the crème de la crème of society. The two couples were photographed at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort, Palm Beach, on February 12, 2000. The 45th and the 47th POTUS was seen in several other pics with Epstein and Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year imprisonment for trafficking underage girls for his boyfriend between 1994 and 2004. That's 'One Big Bizarre Bombshell', especially after Trump's billionaire bosom bud Elon Musk dropped 'the really big bomb' on June 5 after their short yet torrid bromance. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' the world's richest man and former DOGE boss tweeted after the fallout over Trump's 'disgusting abomination', the One Big Beautiful Bill. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD ❗Time for a really big retreat and apology Tech Billionaire Elon Musk deleted the tweet where he claimed that Trump is in the Epstein files. — Wolf Brief (@wolfbrief_) June 7, 2025 He added, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' However, on June 7, the owner of SpaceX, Tesla and X deleted the tweet. Now, Musk regrets 'some of my posts about' Trump and feels 'they went too far'. Trump, though 'surprised' and 'disappointed', has also signalled burying the hatchet with Musk. On New York Post columnist Miranda Devine's podcast 'Pod Force One', the president said that he could reconcile and forgive Musk. Trump's name in the Epstein files, released in five batches last year upon a court order and the Department of Justice (DoJ) in one batch in February, is neither a secret nor a shocker. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Musk's allegation was without evidence. However, not all files have been made public, and the ones released/leaked or made public by the DoJ are heavily redacted. The avalanche of documents, released in January 2024, describing Epstein's chronicle of sexual abuse, contains the names of other affluent, influential and famous people, including politicians and celebs as well. The other A-listers include Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, late Stephen Hawking, Noam Chomsky, former CIA director William Burns, famous American criminal lawyer Alan Dershowitz, former Israeli premier Ehud Barak, the late Michael Jackson, former supermodel Naomi Campbell and several others. The papers released in 2024 stemmed from the hearing of the 2015 civil suit filed by Epstein's victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre. The documents also contain legal arguments, exhibits and depositions recounting allegations and descriptions of alleged crimes. Giuffre was one of the several minors hired as masseuses and trafficked by Epstein and Maxwell. What Musk hinted at in his tweet on Trump's name being mentioned in the Epstein files will remain a riddle unless the remaining documents are released unredacted. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Besides, the mention of a particular name in the files doesn't mean the person was complicit in the sexual depravity. However, Trump's early association with Epstein and the mysterious deaths of two key figures, including the paedophile, in the sexual saga during his two presidencies raises questions. Trump's shady association with Epstein Money, women, power and status—Trump and Epstein bonded for almost two decades, starting in the '80s. The neighbours partied hard at Mar-a-Lago and dined at Epstein's Manhattan mansion. The upcoming realty tycoon and the wealthy financier often jetted together. According to flight logs, Trump flew on the Lolita Express seven times between 1993 and 1997, especially between Palm Beach and NYC. Inside Jeffrey Epstein's 'Lolita Express' – the private jet that the billionaire used to 'shuttle underage girls' — Daily Mail US (@Daily_MailUS) July 12, 2019 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I've known Jeff [Epstein] for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump told New York Magazine in a 2002 interview. Cemented by their passion for money and women, the bond seemed unshakable until 2004, when the two playboys turned adversaries over a Palm Beach property called Maison de l'Amitie with Trump outbidding Epstein. By late 2007, Trump barred Epstein from visiting Mar-a-Lago. In June 2018, he was arrested after pleading guilty to soliciting sex from girls as young as 14. After Epstein was arrested for the second and final time in July 2019, Trump said in the Oval Office, 'I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, if witnesses are to be believed, what appeared to be a mere bonding between two powerful men had a filthy side. Giuffre, Epstein's main accuser, was only 16 when she was a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 and was hired by Maxwell for massages. In her lawsuit, she alleged that Epstein raped her at Palm Beach and Manhattan. In October 2024, former Sports Illustrated model and Epstein's girlfriend Stacey Williams accused Trump of groping her in front of him in a 'twisted game' at Trump Tower in 1993, the year the future president married Marla Maples. Few days before the 2016 election, a woman mentioned as 'Katie Johnson' and 'Jane Doe' in court filings dropped her third suit accusing Trump of raping her during an orgy at Epstein's Manhattan home in 1994 when she was 13. She also cancelled a press conference at the last minute with her attorney Lisa Bloom saying that 'Johnson' received death threats. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD One of the exhibits unsealed on January 8, 2024, contains explosive emails Epstein's victim Sarah Ransome sent to then-New York Post journalist Maureen Callahan in October 2016. Ransome claimed to have videos of multiple sexual encounters Clinton, Andrew and Virgin Atlantic founder Richard Branson had with her friend. According to one email, Ransome alleged that Trump had sex with 'many girls', including her friend, at Epstein's mansion. Strangely, Ransome wrote to Callahan in her final email that she wants to 'retract everything I have said to you and walk away from this'. Epstein's sudden, mysterious death In August 2017, exactly two months before his mysterious death, Epstein told American journalist and columnist Michael Wolff that he was Trump's 'closest friend' for 10 years. In a recording obtained exclusively by The Daily Beast, he told Wolff, who was researching his bombshell bestseller Fire and Fury, about Trump's proclivity for sex that included cuckolding his best friends. Epstein also claimed that 'the first time he [Trump] slept with her [Melania] was on my plane'. 🚨BREAKING: In a new leaked tape, Jeffrey Epstein says he was Donald Trump's 'closest friend' for 10 years. Epstein also revealed that the first time Donald Trump slept with Melania was on his 'Lolita Express' private — Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) November 3, 2024 It's been widely alleged that Epstein blackmailed several of his clients and friends after 'videorecording' their sexcapades and also threatening to leak their affairs, including that of Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates. According to Epstein's younger brother Mark, the paedophile had shocking information on Trump and the Clintons that could have disrupted the 2016 presidential election. 'If I said what I know about both candidates, they'd have to cancel the election,' he told Mark in 2016. In his book Ticking Clock: Behind the Scenes at 60 Minutes, former 60 Minutes producer Ira Rosen recounts Maxwell telling him before the 2016 election that Epstein had videotapes of both presidents in compromising positions with women. It can't be a coincidence that around one month after he was arrested and charged with sex trafficking by federal prosecutors in July 2019, Epstein died under mysterious circumstances in his cell at Manhattan's Metropolitan Correctional Centre (MCC) on August 10, 2019. Was Epstein eliminated because of his ' Black Book', which contained 1,749 entries of 1,510 people, including around 40 members of royalty and European nobility and 12 high-ranking politicians and diplomats? Discovered by famous investigative journalist Nick Bryant in 2012, the Black Book was first published by Gawker, a non-mainstream media website/blog, in 2015. Unsurprisingly, the booklet and the published flight manifest of people on board the Lolita Express didn't get traction with the mainstream media. However, the 'Black Book' was under the media glare with Epstein's arrest in July 2019. There's a high probability that the influential persons mentioned in the booklet feared being implicated. 'If Epstein talks, there's gonna be a lot of powerful people who could go down,' Bryant told Vanity Fair in July 2019. He wondered why Epstein's house manager 'circled' the names of Trump, Barak and Dershowitz in the booklet. Within a month of his bail rejection, while prosecutors were building their case, Epstein was found 'hanging' from the lower bunker of his cell with his buttocks 1-1.5 inches above the ground. How many sheets do they provide a guy on suicide watch? This is Epstein's cell after his body was removed. — Kathy - Just a Patriotic American (@Kathy_Arizona) June 7, 2025 Epstein's death triggered strong suspicions of a homicide with Mark believing he was murdered. Within a week, a medical examiner termed Epstein's death a suicide with then-attorney general Bill Barr calling the situation a 'perfect storm of screw-ups'. In its 128-page report, the DoJ blamed 'long-standing operational challenges' for his death. Contrary to instructions, Epstein was left alone without a cellmate and taken off suicide watch despite his highly questionable earlier attempt to 'kill himself'. He was found on his cell floor with neck injuries on July 23. Later, he told his lawyers that his cellmate, former Westchester County cop Nicholas Tartaglione—found guilty of murdering four people in April 2023—tried to kill him. Then-Manhattan Federal Court Judge Richard Berman wrote to MCC warden Lamine N'Diaye that to his 'knowledge, it has never been definitely explained what the BOP [Bureau of Prisons] concluded about the incident'. In an interview with journalist Declan Hill on the Crime Waves podcast in December 2023, Mark seriously doubted the suicide angle. Jeffrey Epstein Files: It was murder. The evidence indicating that Epstein was killed. A review of thousands of pages of documents & exclusive interviews by my Investigations students @UNewHaven CrimeWaves Podcast#Epstein #EpsteinClientListhttps:// — Declan Hill (@declan_hill) January 2, 2024 Why would Epstein commit suicide if his appeal against the bail rejection was to be heard a few days later? He spent most of August 9 (Friday) with his legal team. 'Jeff was looking forward to defending himself against the charges,' he said. In fact, during the last meeting with his lawyers on Friday, Epstein was in 'great spirits', a source told the New York Post. 'Everyday, he was very positive and the night before, he was really positive,' the source said. 'I'll see you Sunday,' he told one of his lawyers. Epstein called someone around 7.40 pm on August 9. The MCC said that it was his mother—but she had died in 2004! Mark claimed to know the person, who was 'equally surprised to know Jeff killed himself'. The New York City pathologist said that it looked more like a homicide with the original certificate stating that the cause of death is 'pending'. A few days later, however, the chief pathologist, who wasn't present during the actual autopsy, termed it suicide. As the media devours the Epstein list. The results of an in-depth investigation by the Investigations Program @UNewHaven into his mysterious death in jail. Exclusive interviews with his brother, lawyer and sensational detailshttps:// #EpsteinClientList — Declan Hill (@declan_hill) January 4, 2024 Online pics of other suicide victims show the noose high up on the chin and behind the ears. But the mark on Epstein's neck was 'at the centre of his neck and straight back as if he was strangled with a rope'. Mark hired famous forensic pathologist Michael Baden, who was present during the four-hour autopsy. He saw something unusual. 'There were fractures of the left, the right thyroid cartilage and the left hyoid bone. I have never seen three fractures like this in a suicidal hanging,' he told CBS News 60 Minutes. 'Going over a thousand jail hangings, suicides in the New York City state prisons over the past 40-50 years, no one had three fractures,' Baden said. Besides, two nooses were found in the cell, but the one included in the autopsy report didn't appear to match the injuries on Epstein's neck. The ligature mark was in the middle of his neck, not beneath the jawbone, as common in a hanging. 'The forensic evidence released so far, including autopsy, point much more to murder and strangulation than the suicide and suicidal hanging,' he added. According to Mark, the fractures resembled injuries caused by a karate chop. 'I found out from Special Forces people that it is how they kill people. In this particular case, as if someone gave him a karate chop and garrotted him.' Several other questions remain unanswered. It was a crime scene and the body shouldn't have been touched until the coroner showed up. But Epstein's picture showed him in a hospital gown on a gurney, not the prison dress. Mark asked the following questions: Who decided to dress a dead body in a hospital gown? Why were the PCR and the 911 reports never found? Why were there no pics of Epstein's body inside the cell? Why did the camera that could have captured Epstein's cell door and the doors of other inmates on his tier malfunction on the night of August 9 and 10? Why did the two guards on duty on the second tier fall asleep? Why were the two unnamed guards present on August 10 not named? Who are they? Where are they today? Mark also pointed to the lack of lividity, the bluish-purple skin discolouration after death, on Epstein's legs. He was found hanging at 6.30 am. 'If he was hanging for two hours, he should have had blood at the back of his leg and buttocks. Blood settles in your body due to gravity because it is not being pumped. His legs looked clear.' Suspicious deaths of Giuffre, Maxwell witness Giuffre, the primary Epstein accuser who had told a court that he passed her around 'like a platter of fruit' to other men, including Andrew, suddenly died at 41 in Neergabby, Australia, on April 25. Shockingly, she apparently committed suicide, days after posting that she had 'four days to live'. Sharing her pictures from a hospital bed on Instagram, she wrote that her car was hit by a school bus, her kidneys failed and doctors told her she had 'four days to live'. However, in a post on X (then Twitter) in 2019, Giuffre had said she wasn't suicidal. 'I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal. I have made this known to my therapist and GP—If something happens to me—in the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me to protect them. Too many evil people want to see me [quieted].' Virginia Giuffre dead by suicide at age 41. There will never be justice will there? @AGPamBondi — Franklin (@FranklinTPotato) April 26, 2025 Giuffre's father, Sky Roberts, suspected that she was murdered. 'And then for them to say that she committed suicide, there's no way that she did. Somebody got to her. She was very strong and had too much to live for.' Giuffre's lawyer, Karrie Louden, also questioned the suicide and said that there was no proof she would resort to taking her life. 'We've got big question marks over it. 'She was in a lot of pain, but she was looking forward to things in the future. She wanted to renovate the house and all sorts of things like that.' Another Epstein victim whose court testimony was crucial in Maxwell's 2021 conviction died mysteriously from a reported accidental drug overdose in a West Palm Beach hotel room on May 23, 2023. Carolyn Adriano, 36, who had struggled with drug abuse after being sexually abused by a relative at four, told the jury during the Maxwell trial that the socialite had groped her and Epstein molested her up to three times a week during massages until she was 18. Adriano's mother, Dorothy Groener, told The Daily Beast that her daughter 'was ecstatic' before her death. Adriano, a mother of five, and her husband, John Pitts, had purchased a house in North Carolina a few weeks before her death. 'She was all set up for a whole new lifestyle,' Groener said, adding that she had messaged her recently about being free of drugs and alcohol. Though a toxicology report concluded that Adriano had methadone, fentanyl and alprazolam in her system when she died, Groener claimed that vodka bottles were found in the room, but she didn't have any alcohol in her system. 'Nobody's giving me any answers, and you know what? I'm over it. Because this is my daughter, and she deserves justice. She got to a point where she was turning her whole life around,' said adding that the police investigation 'shouldn't be closed'. 'I begged them; I sent them [the police] numerous messages. I've asked for them to make meetings, contact me, and to no avail.' The writer is a freelance journalist with more than two decades of experience and comments primarily on foreign affairs. He tweets as @FightTheBigots. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the writer. They do not reflect Firstpost's views.

#NotMyKing: Royals face heat over Trooping the Colour expenses, here's how much monarch's birthday parade costs
#NotMyKing: Royals face heat over Trooping the Colour expenses, here's how much monarch's birthday parade costs

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

#NotMyKing: Royals face heat over Trooping the Colour expenses, here's how much monarch's birthday parade costs

The British monarchy is in dire need of a display of strength for this year's Trooping the Colour, and King Charles III is keen to demonstrate that he is strong, composed, and unfazed by his persistent health issues. Even while Saturday's ceremony is full of pomp and circumstance, it has deeper significance. It represents stability and resiliency and makes it apparent that the 76-year-old monarch is determined to convey to the British people his strength, family unity, and unshakable devotion. Although King Charles III's real birthday is in November, a series of ceremonial ceremonies known as Trooping the Colour are held to commemorate and acknowledge the monarch's birthday in an official manner. According to a royal source who spoke to The Post, the grand event display of strength. 'The King is serving his country, and he's not going to let a diagnosis get in the way of that.' As the major Royal event takes place on Saturday, several netizens criticised the King Charles' family over the cost of Trooping the Colour. Meanwhile, #NotMyKing started trending on X, with one user asking, 'How much did this pathetic trooping of colours cost?' 'People like me are struggling due to the cost of living crises whilst the people you call King Charles, Prince William, Kate Middleton and the other Royal family members ride around in million pound gold carriages waving at pathetic people. Sickening. We demand a referendum about the future of the monarchy,' the critic added. 'I rather watch grass grow….Sickening,' another wrote. 'Perhaps people like you shouldn't have had children you can't afford?' a third person said. Also Read: King Charles 3rd Trooping the Colour in pics: A look at defining moments as Kate Middleton and kids attend Royal event Meanwhile, anti-monarchy group Republic are staging protest against King Charles with banners in their hands while raising slogans -- 'not our King'. Republic CEO Graham Smith wrote a press release outlining the anti-monarchy group's grievances prior to their rally. The statement likened the occasion to a parade that President Donald Trump is hosting on Saturday to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the US Army in Washington, DC, which also happens to be his birthday. 'US citizens have very real concerns about Trump's actions and his military parade. Here in the UK we have the real deal, a king who dresses up in unearned uniforms and medals and insists on a huge military parade through London,' read Republic's statement. They blasted: 'Trooping the Colour is the key iconic royal event of the year. From now on there will be protesters there, calling out the event and the monarchy as a superficial cover for a grubby and corrupt institution.' The UK Ministry of Defence responded to a freedom of information request in 2021, stating that Trooping the Colour cost the department £59,662.70. This covers expenses for transportation and fuel as well as stuff like makeshift stables, but it doesn't cover everything that goes into the main event, and the number is based on estimates, so it might not be accurate. The Sovereign Grant, which the government provides to the royals in return for the monarch giving up the Crown Estate's profits, and money from the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster are used by Buckingham Palace to fund Trooping the Colour. A portion of Trooping the Colour's expenses are being covered by the taxpayer, as the Sovereign Grant is typically calculated at 15% of the Crown Estate's net income over the preceding two years. Additionally, taxpayers pay for police expenses, which can be high for an enormous occasion like this. The late Queen's Platinum Jubilee celebrations included a birthday parade, which cost an estimated £2 million to police in 2022, according to The Express. According to the publication, the total cost of King Charles's first Trooping the Colour in 2023 was approximately £10 million.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store