US Warns Citizens Against Travelling to Libya
In the updated Level 4 advisory, released on Wednesday, the State Department cited a host of grave concerns: 'crime, terrorism, unexploded landmines, civil unrest, kidnapping, and armed conflict.' The notice underscores the unpredictable and dangerous environment, urging all Americans currently in Libya to leave immediately using commercial transport options.
The advisory highlights the growing threat of terrorist attacks in public spaces such as markets, government facilities, transportation hubs, and hotels. According to the State Department, such attacks could occur 'with little or no warning.' Kidnapping is also rampant, with U.S. citizens potentially targeted for ransom or political leverage.
Adding to the dangers are widespread remnants of war. 'Unexploded landmines, cluster munitions, and ammunition' continue to pose risks across the country. Sporadic clashes between rival armed groups have also heightened the instability, often erupting without warning—even in major cities.
With limited diplomatic operations in Libya, the United States government warns it cannot provide regular consular support to citizens in the country. It strongly advises all U.S. nationals to reconsider any plans to travel to Libya and to leave immediately if already present.
This reissued advisory reaffirms Libya's status as one of the most dangerous travel destinations for Americans, reflecting the ongoing collapse of law and order and the absence of a unified security apparatus. Tags: libyaterrorismtravelus
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Listen up WNBA fans, players are fed up with sex toy bit, so can you please keep it in your pants?
The WNBA has been busy making headlines for rising in popularity, having rookie players that are breaking records, and being extremely queer. But lately, the league has been in the news because colorful dildos have been flying onto the court during games. At first, it seemed comical, playful even, and maybe a good luck charm for the Golden State Valkyries, who won both games where a dildo ended up on the court. But now, women's sports fans, it's time to talk because you've taken it too far. It's not funny anymore. The first lime green dildo was thrown onto the court of a contentious game between the Valkyries and the Atlanta Dream on July 29 in Georgia. Almost the entirety of the internet thought the incident was hilarious and quickly got busy making memes. But then it just kept happening. The bizarre trend continued a few days later at an August 1 game between the Valkyries and the Chicago Sky. The third time this happened, Indian Fever star Sophie Cunningham ended up getting hit in the head with the sex toy after telling people on X (formerly Twitter) to 'stop throwing dildos on the court… you're going to hurt one of us.' Then, someone tried to throw another green dildo at a New York Liberty game, but instead of it landing on the court, it nearly hit a child, according to a video posted on social media. Once a sex toy almost nails a kid in the head, it's time to look at what we're doing. At first, we wondered if this wasn't a funny, tongue-in-cheek way to call out just how sapphic the game has gotten, but now that a man has been arrested and said that it was 'supposed to be a joke' and 'go viral,' the intentions seem more problematic. Being taken seriously as a female athlete is already a tough assignment, and having sex toys flying left and right during games isn't helping, especially at a time when WNBA players are fighting for better compensation and revenue sharing. Bottom line: women's sports are not a joke. And while we'd like to think this started as a harmless prank that gave us all a chuckle, it's starting to smack of sexism. In the beginning even some of the players seemed to laugh along. Fever guard Sydney Colson even went on her podcast dressed a green dildo, but then things kept escalating and other players started pointing out how 'disrespectful' and 'dangerous' it is. 'It's super disrespectful,' Sky center Elizabeth Williams said after he game against the Valkyries, per Front Office Sports. 'I don't really get the point of it. It's really immature. Whoever's doing it just needs to grow up.' Sparks coach Lynne Roberts also said, 'It's ridiculous, it's dumb, it's stupid. It's also dangerous. Player safety is number one, respecting the game, all those things. I think it's really stupid.' And GOAT Diana Taurasi had the perfect response for the jokesters, 'I would have picked that thing up and thrown it right back at them.' Maybe we should all just listen to the players themselves. So whoever is keeping this 'joke' going, whether they are straight or gay, it's time to call it quits. The bit is getting tired anyway, right? This article originally appeared on Pride: Listen up WNBA fans, players are fed up with sex toy bit, so can you please keep it in your pants? RELATED Marina Mabrey's manicure is missing *those* nails and lesbians are spiraling WNBA rookie Maddy Westbeld hard launches relationship with college baller Olivia Miles Flying sex toys keep interrupting WNBA games and players are calling foul
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Roger Goodell explained why he doesn't think ESPN will change NFL RedZone
The deal had been rumored and reported for weeks, and on Tuesday, it became official. ESPN is acquiring the rights to distribute NFL Network and NFL RedZone in exchange for a 10 percent stake in the network. And while the deal obviously ruins any facade of objectivity ESPN has with respect to covering the NFL, fans are also concerned about what it will mean for the wildly popular NFL RedZone. RedZone — and its seven hours of commercial-free football — has been a staple of the NFL fan experience for 16 years now. And the last thing fans want is for ESPN to come in, replace Scott Hanson with Stephen A. Smith and load RedZone with ads. In an interview on SportsCenter Wednesday, Roger Goodell assured fans that nothing about RedZone would change. According to Goodell, RedZone would remain an in-house production for the NFL. Just instead, it will air on ESPN-owned platforms. Under that arrangement, ESPN wouldn't actually be able to change the content we see on RedZone. It would almost seem like ESPN is just simulcasting the typical version of RedZone. At least that's how Goodell described the beginning of this arrangement. Could ESPN slowly make changes to the product down the road? It wouldn't be surprising. But for now, it does sound like RedZone will remain the same viewing experience. That's good to hear. This article originally appeared on For The Win: Roger Goodell explained why he doesn't think ESPN will change RedZone
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CF Industries misses quarterly profit estimates on higher costs; shares fall
(Reuters) -CF Industries missed estimates for second-quarter profit on Wednesday, as higher costs weighed on the fertilizer firm, sending its shares down 4.3% in extended trading. The company's quarterly cost of sales was up about 27% at $1.14 billion from a year earlier on higher natural gas costs, which were up 77% at $3.36 per million British thermal units. U.S. natural gas prices, a key feedstock for nitrogen fertilizers, rose in the second quarter as power demand spiked on the back of energy-hungry data centers, escalating production costs for fertilizer producers. The Northbrook, Illinois-based company reported an adjusted profit of $2.35 per share for the three months ended June 30, compared with the analysts' average estimate of $2.54, according to data compiled by LSEG. Crop prices — including those of soybean, wheat and corn — have been falling in recent quarters due to oversupply and weakening demand, forcing farmers to cut back spending on fertilizers, affecting companies such as CF Industries. Peer Mosaic also missed second-quarter profit estimates on Tuesday, as higher costs weighed against gains from stronger potash prices and robust sales in Brazil. CF Industries' quarterly net earnings attributable to common stockholders fell about 8% to $386 million from a year earlier. The results come at a time when the agrichemical industry is bracing itself for a potential fallout from U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on most imports, which are expected to lower demand and curb farmers' spending. Sign in to access your portfolio
