
Why I am a Pixel guy
My current daily driver is the Google Pixel 9 Pro, and whenever I need to use another phone for work, I immediately find myself missing it. But what is it about this phone, and the Pixels that came before it, that keeps me so locked in? After a lot of thought, I've realized it comes down to a few key areas where Google consistently gets it right for me, even if it gets a few other things wrong.
It starts with the design
Ryan Haines / Android Authority
I take smartphone design very seriously. I realize that's not common. Most people tell me they don't even care what a phone looks or feels like, because it's 'just going to go into a case,' which I can't argue with. However, I will always be obsessed with the designs of phones because that's what creates (or, more often, doesn't create) my emotional attachment to it.
With Pixels, I've almost always been a fan of the way Google designs them. Sure, there have been some missteps — the bathtub-sized display notch on the Pixel 3 XL comes to mind — but overall, I think Pixels have consistently been some of the best-looking phones out there. Since the Pixel 6, Google has leaned into its camera bar design, which is not only a bold and distinctive visual statement but also wonderfully practical. In a sea of phones that look frustratingly similar, the camera bar is instantly recognizable. Better yet, it prevents the phone from wobbling when I lay it on a table — a pet peeve of mine that drives me crazy with other devices.
Google hasn't always nailed design, but over the past few years, it's really come into its own.
The Pixel 9 Pro, specifically, has become my favorite design yet, mainly because it's a powerful phone in a manageable size. I know plenty of Android fans love massive phones, but the Pixel 9 Pro hits the sweet spot for me. It's comfortable to use one-handed, which has been a game-changer for my daily use and has made me feel more connected to the phone. It just feels right in a way no other device has.
Best of all, I don't feel like I'm making a sacrifice for this smaller size. Ignoring a slight difference in battery capacity, the Pixel 9 Pro is virtually identical in specs to the larger, more expensive Pixel 9 Pro XL. You get the same performance, the same display quality, and the same versatile cameras. Right now, no other Android phone truly offers that top-tier, no-compromise experience in this form factor. In other words, the Pixel 9 Pro is the Goldilocks phone: just right.
The camera I can actually trust
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
If you follow the smartphone world at all, you've heard this a thousand times: Pixel cameras are fantastic. A huge reason for their success is how easy Google makes it to get a great shot. You don't need to be a professional photographer; you can just point, shoot, and be confident you'll get a photo that looks somewhere between pretty good and absolutely amazing.
You've heard a thousand times that Pixels have great cameras, but what does that mean? For me, it means trust, which is very important.
While most flagship phones can take great pictures these days, they often come with frustrating trade-offs. Samsung's phones, for example, are notorious for shutter lag — a delay between pressing the button and the photo actually being taken. We've tested this extensively at Android Authority, and it can mean the difference between capturing a perfect moment with a fast-moving pet or kid — or missing it entirely. Samsung also tends to oversaturate colors, making photos vibrant but unrealistic. iPhones, on the other hand, often ship with weaker camera hardware compared to similarly-priced Android phones. No matter how much software magic you use, larger sensors and better lenses will almost always produce more detailed results.
What it all comes down to is trust. When I'm capturing a precious memory I can never get back, I don't want to worry about whether the phone will nail the shot. I want to point, shoot, and get back to living my life. I trust Pixels to do that more reliably than any other phone.
But it's really all about the software
Joe Maring / Android Authority
The single biggest thing that keeps me planted in the Pixel world is the software experience. There are so many useful things my Pixel can do that other phones either can't do at all or can't do nearly as well.
At the top of that list is how it manages my phone calls. I hate talking on the phone and will avoid it if I can. Features like Call Screen, which has Google Assistant answer calls from unknown numbers for me, are invaluable. I can see a live transcript of the conversation and decide if it's important enough to take over. Similarly, Hold for Me is a lifesaver. It waits on hold for me and plays an alert when a real person is finally back on the line. These aren't gimmicks; they are practical features that make my life easier.
Smartphones can do a lot of great things, but there are so many things a Pixel can do that no other phone can.
Another feature I can't live without is the advanced voice typing in Gboard. While Gboard is available everywhere, the experience on a Pixel is on another level. It's far more accurate, automatically adds punctuation as I speak, and lets me seamlessly switch between typing and talking. It even understands when I want to add an Emoji and can send a message when I'm done, making it truly hands-free. For someone who uses voice-to-text constantly, there's simply no going back.
And of course, there's the major perk of getting the latest version of Android on Day One and knowing that I have support for up to seven years. As an Android enthusiast, I always want the newest features as soon as they're stable, and owning a Pixel is the only way to guarantee that — without becoming an unpaid beta tester for another smartphone company, anyway.
Pixels aren't perfect, and that's okay
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
OK, so this whole article is just me praising Pixels, but I'm not blind to their flaws. The Tensor processor, while fine for everyday tasks, can't compete with high-end Snapdragon chips in raw performance and efficiency. That's undeniable. Pixels also tend to run warm under heavy use and have slower charging speeds than many competitors. Pixels are expensive from a spec-to-value ratio, and they aren't available in as many countries as competitors. There are tons of issues that I can't deny.
But I'm comfortable with these trade-offs for two main reasons. First, no phone is perfect. Every single device has its own set of compromises. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a beast, but it's also massive and expensive. The OnePlus 13 is also great — I even think it might be the best of 2025 — but its camera system isn't quite as consistent as Pixels or even Galaxy phones. It also comes in only one size throughout most of the world: gigantic. The fact that Pixels aren't perfect isn't a dealbreaker because they consistently deliver on the things that I personally care about most.
The problems with Pixels are real and significant, but the benefits outweigh those issues by a huge margin.
Second, and more importantly, after investing deeply in Pixels and the wider Made by Google ecosystem, I'm not trapped. Apple is obviously the worst offender with this and its so-called 'Walled Garden,' but Samsung is guilty of engineering customer lock-in as well. Unlike other ecosystems, Google hasn't locked me into its world. If I wanted to buy a OnePlus 13 tomorrow, my smartwatch would still work, my smart home devices would still be controllable, and my digital life would carry on almost unchanged. The moment Google does something I don't like, I can leave without a second thought. Ironically, that freedom from lock-in makes me even more loyal to the Pixel world, because I know I'm there by choice.
Ultimately, being a 'Pixel guy' isn't about believing Google has created the objectively perfect device, because no such thing exists. It's about choosing the phone that consistently nails the features that matter in the real world — the camera I trust with my precious memories, the software that makes my day genuinely better, and designs that feels tailor-made for how I actually use the product. Other phones may win on benchmarks or being better from a cost/value perspective, but the Pixel wins my loyalty by getting the human element right. And in a world of walled gardens designed to trap you, there's a certain power in sticking with the ecosystem that's confident enough to let you leave. For me, that makes the choice clear. Now, bring on the Pixel 10 series!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Android Authority
22 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Emulating PC games on your non-Snapdragon device just got better
Hadlee Simons / Android Authority TL;DR GameSir has announced that its GameHub app now offers much better support for MediaTek chipsets with Mali GPUs. The company also revealed that it's working with MediaTek to launch custom Mali GPU drivers. GameHub lets people play PC games on their Android phones without streaming. There are a few ways to natively play PC games on your phone without streaming, with Winlator and GameSir's GameHub app being the most popular solutions. These apps traditionally offer better support for Qualcomm Snapdragon devices, but there's good news if you've got a MediaTek-powered device. GameSir announced via its app that the latest version of GameHub offers much better support for devices with Mali GPUs. It points to devices with MediaTek Dimensity chips, specifically mentioning the Dimensity 9000 to 9400 processors. It says these devices should support DirectX9 to DirectX11 PC games 'with performance comparable to Qualcomm Adreno, and even surpassing it in some scenarios.' The GameHub team delved into some technical challenges with Mali GPUs, starting with the unsatisfactory Vulkan implementation. It pointed to issues like 'unstable' shader compilers and missing driver capabilities. So how did GameSir address these problems? For one, the team said it invested time and resources in debugging/analyzing Dimensity devices and 'optimized' resource scheduling. Furthermore, it created a 'code conversion mechanism to optimize DirectX instructions into a format executable by Mali GPUs.' The team says it also made runtime optimizations in cases where the driver functionality wasn't adequate. Weirdly enough, the GameHub team also claimed that it offers 'native support' for 32-bit PC games. That sounds rather crazy, as compatibility layers like Wine or tools like Box can incur a performance penalty and technically don't offer native support. In some major news for mobile gamers, GameSir also said it's teaming up with MediaTek to eventually offer custom GPU drivers. We plan to jointly launch custom drivers with MediaTek, specifically designed for GameFusion, to address long-standing Mali GPU issues at the chip level, further enhancing the gaming performance of Dimensity devices. There's no release timeline for these drivers, though. This is still welcome news, as one major advantage of Snapdragon devices is the prevalence of open-source Adreno drivers (dubbed Turnip). These drivers can improve emulation/gaming performance and address bugs. MediaTek isn't the only chipmaker using Mali GPUs, though. Google Pixel phones with Tensor chips use Mali GPUs too. We've asked GameSir's representatives whether some of these improvements will filter down to Pixel phones. We've also asked the representatives for more details on 'native support' for 32-bit PC games. We'll update the article when the company gets back to us. Nevertheless, we hope a few of these improvements and optimizations come to Pixel devices. However, Pixel 10 rumors suggest that Google will switch to Imagination GPUs. So even if these upgrades apply to Pixel phones with Mali graphics, it won't apply to the Pixel 10 series. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice. Follow


Android Authority
22 minutes ago
- Android Authority
After Facer, Pujie and WatchMaker announce Wear OS 6 support
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority TL;DR After Facer, watch face distribution apps Pujie and WatchMaker are extending support for Wear OS 6. The updated versions comply with Google's mandate to switch to the new Watch Face Format. While Pujie is separating development into two apps (for new and old watches), WatchMaker is likely to continue using just one. With Wear OS 5, Google introduced a new standard to make watch faces more power-efficient. And, to ensure watch face designers and developers running distribution apps like Facer, Pujie, or WatchMaker make the switch to Watch Face Format (or WFF), it effectively blocked support for legacy watch faces on newer Wear OS versions. Starting 2026, legacy watch faces cannot co-exist with WFF ones on these distribution apps, which is why Facer recently announced an updated phone app that works with Wear OS 6 watches. That will include support for the Watch Ultra and the newly launched Galaxy Watch 8 — with many more to follow. Now, other apps, Pujie and WatchMaker, are also making the switch, bringing similar solutions with Wear OS in mind. Pujie is bifurcating its efforts into two apps: one to apply watch faces to smartwatches running Wear OS 6 and future versions, and another to support watches running Wear OS 4 or older versions. This separation ensures that the older app continues to support legacy watch faces while the newer version works only with WFF. Pujie's approach differs from Facer's, which does not require you to download two separate apps if you have two different smartwatches. However, you need to select the smartwatch within Facer's Android app where you wish to apply a new watch face, and the app dynamically refreshes to support only one of the two kinds — legacy or WFF — faces. To put it simply, Facer is running two versions of the apps in a broader environment. In contrast, Pujie's approach might make sense for its use case, since it allows extensive customization of watch faces, including a system where you can create your own watch faces using different building blocks. Among other changes to the new app, it introduces a real-time simulator to reflect changes immediately and supports animation preview and will also let you transfer watch faces between two versions of the app. Meanwhile, WatchMaker did not clarify in its blog post which approach it is taking, although it appears to be proceeding in the same manner as Facer. This approach is suggested by a single app listing on the Google Play Store by WatchMaker's publisher, 'androidslide.' Additionally, WatchMaker's blog post notes that more than 130,000 watch faces have already been adapted to support WFF, and all you need to do to use those is sync them to the new watch again. What's with Google's Watch Face Format? Google's Watch Face Format takes a modular approach, where designers and developers only need to work on the front end and upload the details in a lightweight XML file, while the Wear OS system automatically handles the execution. Although this allows for lighter watch faces that are quicker to sync and consume less battery, it also limits visual effects such as depth or shadow, rendering very artificial-looking visuals. This approach can be especially detrimental to watch faces that simulate analog watches, and has also resulted in enthusiasts, including my colleague Rita El Khoury, lamenting these limitations. Follow
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Google Maps for Android has developed an annoying public transit bug
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Public transit routes are buggy on Google Maps It seems to be affecting some but not all users Google hasn't yet made any comment on the issue Millions of us rely on Google Maps to get from A to B every day, so when something goes wrong with the app it can cause a serious headache – as seems to have happened with a new bug that affects searching for public transit directions. As noted by Android Police, a lengthy thread on Reddit documents the experiences of many users who are seeing the Google Maps app for Android crash when they search for public transit directions to a direction. It's difficult to assess just how widespread the problem is at the moment: the Android Police team was able to replicate the bug on one of their phones, but it's not an issue I'm seeing on my own Google Pixel 9 at the moment. What's certain is that it's frustrating for those people who are seeing it, leaving them unable to use Google Maps to plot a route to their destination. As yet, Google hasn't said anything officially about the problem or a potential fix. What you can try With no word from Google yet – and I'll update this article if there is – users are really left sitting and waiting for a fix. It sounds as though the issue has hit multiple Android phones, including those made by Google, Samsung, and Poco. From the Reddit thread, it seems that putting Google Maps into incognito mode might help. You can do this by tapping your Google account avatar inside the app (top right), then choosing Turn on Incognito mode from the menu. This apparently fixes the problem, though your searches and journeys obviously won't be saved in your Google account. It also suggests that the problem might be something to do with the way Google Maps is syncing to accounts. It might also be worth your while checking out some of the alternative public transit apps available on Android, such as Citymapper and Moovit. There's also Apple Maps too of course, but this bug doesn't seem to affect Google Maps for iOS. You might also like Some Garmin watches get a Google Maps upgrade 10 things you didn't know Google Maps could do Google Maps gets key upgrades for routes and AI