Catnip wines designed for anxious cats and dogs
The non-alcoholic beverages can be enjoyed by cats and dogs, and even people, though it is not recommended just yet.
Roberts said the wines were inspired by ''dog beers'', which are usually made from bone broth.
He wanted something felines could also enjoy.
PHOTO: SUPPLIED
Cats prefer the lighter taste of whites such as Champawgne and Prosecatt while the deeper blends such as the Purrno Noir and Pawt are popular with dogs.
''With the growing international interest in catnip and the 'humanification' of pet diets, it was a natural extension to explore the development of a premium beverage for pet owners to celebrate with their pets.''
Roberts said the catnip wines also helped reduce stress in pets - catnip is a mood enhancer for cats and makes them more playful, while for dogs it helps them relax.
''We created the range to help alleviate some of the modern stressors on pets, but unlike conventional wines, our products contain zero alcohol.''
The range offers multiple varietals, each featuring a different concentration of catnip: lighter whites such as the Champawgne appeals more to cats, while the deeper blends such as the Purrno Noir and Pawt are popular with dogs, Mr Roberts said.
Despite having launched less than a year ago, he was now looking to expand into the United States and was working with New Zealand Trade and Enterprise to identify distributors in overseas markets.
''We believe the reputation of New Zealand's wine sector in North America will help us establish an entry into this market and we now actively looking for US distributors.''
PHOTO: SUPPLIED
Mr Roberts said catnip was a resilient crop which grew well in his part of East Auckland.
He said the commercial-scale farming of catnip would further diversify New Zealand's horticultural sector.
Global demand for catnip is rising, driven by pet product manufacturers and natural health industries.
The catnip essential oil market is projected to grow by almost 6% each year by 2030 to reach $400 million.
''We'd love to see entire fields of catnip grown right here. The idea that we could turn a small backyard experiment into a nation-wide horticultural endeavour, and share it with pet lovers worldwide, is really exciting. It's a chance for New Zealand to do something fresh and unexpected - yet again.''
Muttley's Estate is also looking at developing a variety for human consumption.
- RNZ
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Collins coy over possible Aukus pact review
Defence Minister Judith Collins. Photo: RNZ The Defence Minister says there's no reason for New Zealand to comment on reports the Pentagon is reviewing the Aukus defence alliance. A US defence official told Reuters the review was part of ensuring the security pact was aligned with US President Donald Trump's America First agenda. The strategic pact between the US, UK and Australia had long been a talking point in New Zealand, with consecutive governments pondering whether to join parts of the alliance. Aukus was formed in 2021 to address shared worries about China's growing power. Under the pact, Australia would be armed with nuclear submarines at a cost of $A350 billion ($NZ377 billion). In a statement, Defence Minister Judith Collins said the US review was about Aukus Pillar One, which New Zealand had never been a part of. New Zealand has had ongoing discussions about joining Pillar Two of the alliance, but any decisions on whether to join Pillar Two would be a matter for Cabinet, Collins said. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has not received any reports or advice on what the Trump administration reviewing the Aukus security pact might mean for New Zealand. Luxon told RNZ he was not concerned the review could spell the end for Pillar Two "It's been left very open-ended. We're exploring Pillar Two - it's been to be honest quite slow going. "We are yet to be invited to partipate in Pillar Two." Luxon said the review was for Australia, the US, and the UK to work through. Australia was last week told by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to significantly boost its defence spending. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would not be dictated to on defence spending. He he noted Australia's defence spending was already set to increase from 2 percent to 2.3 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over the next eight years. Collins has denied any allies have put pressure on the government to up defence spending. Foreign Minister Winston Peters previously said New Zealand's trading partners would judge us if we did not "step up" and play our role by increasing defence spending.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
30 With Guyon Espiner: Netflix ‘Doesn't Need Us' Or Our ‘Silly' Levy
Global streaming giant Netflix 'doesn't need us' and a proposal to force them in to funding local shows is 'silly,' says TV production pioneer Dame Julie Christie. Dame Julie, a founding force in reality TV and an internationally successful format producer, is the latest guest on RNZ's multimedia talk show 30 with Guyon Espiner. She is critical of proposals suggested by industry groups and the government that would compel global streamers to invest more in local productions or face bans. More focus needs go on funding ideas and formats that will garner international success, she says. People should not 'stand around and whine, or do silly things like threatening Netflix – 'If you don't make more local productions, we'll turn you off in this country.' You can imagine the public reaction to that.' Christie, whose production company Touchdown helped define and export iconic shows like Treasure Island and Game of Two Halves, said New Zealand needs to be more realistic about its size and global influence. 'Netflix doesn't need us,' she says, dismissing suggestions that a levy on streaming giants would fix the problem. 'And who's going to decide what's made with that revenue? Netflix. I just don't think it will work.' Instead, the country should focus on producing globally appealing content in genres where New Zealand can compete – particularly in unscripted formats and documentaries. 'True crime is the biggest genre in the world … and we're not making it, because you usually can't get it publicly funded,' she says. 'As a result, we're not making what the world wants.' NZ On Air has become too narrowly focused on funding projects that meet too specific cultural criteria, often at the expense of international interest. 'The number one thing you have to have to get funded by New Zealand on Air is to reflect our cultural identity. Now, what is our cultural identity now?' Highlighting her experience producing a docu-series about Auckland's Football Club, Forever FC, Christie says: 'If you go to Auckland FC, it's very different [to NZ On Air criteria]. It's 20 immigrant families within one team. I think that we have to really open up about what we think our culture is.' New Zealand's small population, while a challenge, could be turned into a strength if the industry embraced creating distinctively local stories and tailoring them for international sale. 'We're belly-gazing, basically,' she says. 'We don't think, 'If I adjust this show by 20%, I might be able to sell it to Australia or a smaller American channel.'' NZ On Air needs to adapt to the new global content environment and stop treating cultural identity and commercial potential as mutually exclusive. 'There should be a massive tick if you've got international viability in anything,' she says. Scrambling for cash Christie welcomes the increase in screen production rebates announced in the Budget, but says we should be aiming higher. 'It's working in bringing film production into New Zealand. That provides jobs. The problem is, it's working for wages,' she says. 'It is less than half the cost to make shows here than most places in the world. 'We should be taking huge advantage of that, while creating our own IP … creating things we own.' New Zealand used to have a stronger international outlook, but the industry has become bogged down in local funding battles, Christie says. 'We were leading the world in creating formats in the early 2000s. Now we just don't do it because we're all scrambling to get that little bit of New Zealand On Air money.' * Watch the full interview with Dame Julie Christie on 30 With Guyon Espiner.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Concerns KiwiSaver Is Being Used As ‘Piggy Bank' To Solve Financial Woes
Article – RNZ A growing number of New Zealanders are making hardship withdrawals from their retirement savings. , Money Correspondent KiwiSaver is in danger of being considered a 'piggy bank' to solve all of New Zealanders' financial woes, one provider says, and too many people are tapping into their savings on hardship grounds. Founder of Kōura KiwiSaver scheme Rupert Carlyon was wary of calls for settings to be changed to allow people to use their money to buy farms. He said KiwiSaver was already being called on to solve the country's housing and infrastructure crises. Carlyon said changing the rules to allow more withdrawals sent the wrong message to people, who should be using KiwiSaver for their retirement. Instead, they were tapping into KiwiSaver in growing numbers. In April, 4220 people withdrew savings for financial hardship reasons, up from 3700 in April 2024. They withdrew a combined $37.6 million. 'It encourages more and more people to think about it like a piggybank. It's scary what's happening in that space,' he said. He said he saw people making repeated hardship withdrawals, depleting their balance. 'People come back multiple times with the same claims… it's hard to figure out what's real and what's not.' He said it would now not be possible to close the 'hardship loophole' because people expected it to be available and any change could dent confidence in the scheme. But he said it should be tightened up so there was a limit on the number of withdrawals that could be made within a certain timeframe. 'The other part is it's very resource intensive. We spend on average up to six hours per financial hardship claim… It's hard on staff because they often have to say no when they want to say yes.' A spokesperson for Public Trust, one of the KiwiSaver supervisors, said people were not required to repay hardship withdrawals if it was found they were not necessary. 'Their future self might not thank them for dipping into their retirement savings. We see situations of real and urgent need… there are strict rules and checks in place to help ensure withdrawals are only approved for genuine financial hardship, and applicants need to sign a legal declaration confirming their situation. 'If someone doesn't use funds as intended, it could affect their ability to make another hardship withdrawal in the future.'
