Carbon pipeline company seeks pause in permitting schedule after SD adopts eminent domain ban
Summit Carbon Solutions wants the schedule of proceedings for its South Dakota permit application 'paused for review and adjustment' after the state's Legislature and governor approved a ban on the use of eminent domain for carbon dioxide pipelines.
The company filed a motion Wednesday with the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission asking for a suspension of the scheduling order and an indefinite extension of the deadline for regulatory action on the application. The existing schedule includes a multi-day evidentiary hearing in August and September.
Summit cited House Bill 1052, signed last week by Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden, as a significant obstacle to completing land surveys along the pipeline's planned route.
'With the passage of HB 1052, the Applicant's ability to obtain survey permission has changed,' wrote Summit attorney Brett Koenecke. 'The surveys which are necessarily required to inform the route decisions as to right of way will be significantly delayed.'
South Dakota governor signs eminent domain ban on carbon pipelines
Eminent domain is a legal process for acquiring access to land for projects that have a public benefit, with compensation for landowners determined by a court. It's commonly used for projects such as electrical power lines, water pipelines, oil pipelines and highways.
The ban has been hailed as a victory by some landowners who have resisted Iowa-based Summit's proposed $9 billion carbon capture pipeline. The project would transport carbon dioxide emissions from dozens of ethanol plants in five states to an underground storage site in North Dakota. It would qualify for billions in federal tax credits incentivizing the sequestration of heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions.
The project has permits in other states, although some are being challenged in court. South Dakota regulators rejected Summit's first application in 2023, largely due to the route's conflicts with local ordinances that mandate minimum distances between pipelines and existing features. The company has since made adjustments to its route and reapplied.
Critics of the project are interpreting Summit's motion as another victory for the opposition.
'This request for extension is a clear sign that Summit knows they have lost the trust of South Dakota, and will be unable to proceed on their original timeline without being able to force surveys on unwilling landowners,' said Chase Jensen, of Dakota Rural Action, in a statement.
Rhoden, a longtime advocate for property rights, described the ban last week as a way to restore trust between landowners and developers. Summit issued a statement last week criticizing the ban as unfairly targeting its project and said 'all options are on the table' when asked if it was considering legal action.
Summit did not immediately respond to South Dakota Searchlight's requests for comment Wednesday.
The company is not the first to encounter trouble earning a permit for a carbon capture pipeline in South Dakota. Navigator CO2 canceled its $3 billion project in October 2023, citing the 'unpredictable nature of the regulatory and government processes involved, particularly in South Dakota and Iowa.' South Dakota regulators had denied Navigator's permit application a month earlier.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Former Iowa administrator Adam Steen announces GOP campaign for governor
Adam Steen, former Iowa director of Administrative Services, was joined by his sons, Maverick and Ryker and his wife Kasey Steen, as announced he was running for governor Aug. 19, 2025 at Berean Church in Pleasant Hill. (Photo by Robin Opsahl/Iowa Capital Dispatch) Republican Adam Steen, former director of the Iowa Department of Administrative Services, announced his campaign for governor Tuesday, labeling himself as a 'faith guy' in the race to succeed Gov. Kim Reynolds. Steen held a campaign kickoff event Tuesday at Berean Church in Pleasant Hill, starting with a musical performance from Nathan Thomas and the A17 worship band and an introduction from Pastor Gary Pilcher. As he introduced himself, Steen said there had been some speculation online about what type of candidate he would be. 'Let me tell you, from my own lips, who I am: I am the faith guy,' Steen said. 'I'm a Jesus guy. I'm a Make America Great Again guy. I'm a common-sense policy, America first, people first guy.' In addition to being a credentialed minister, Steen said some of his highest profile commitments to faith were as DAS director. The department had canceled a Satanic Temple of Iowa holiday celebration event at the Iowa Capitol in December 2024, with Steen saying the event was denied because it included 'elements that are harmful to minors.' Steen said at the campaign event he was 'the guy that stood in front of the Satanists when they blatantly targeted our children, and I'm the guy getting sued by the Satanists for protecting our children.' He also said there was another event request at the Capitol he denied, for an all-ages, family-friendly drag show. He said this planned event was not as well known, but that he believed it was the right thing to do despite being at risk of getting sued. Steen, appointed in 2021 to serve as DAS director in Reynolds' administration, said he led some of the major policies changing state government, like the government agency restructuring signed into law in 2023. Speaking with reporters, Steen said he had discussed running for the seat with Reynolds and came to a 'mutual agreement' that he would resign from his position if he ran for the office. 'Today, at 10 a.m., I walked into the governor's office and I submitted my resignation,' Steen told the crowd. 'Today I walked away from a job that I loved. I walked away from a job that I loved, so I could join the fight and defend the state that I love.' Before leading DAS, Steen was the director of business development at Syverson Strege, a financial services firm, and had previously owned a management consulting firm called 25 Connections. He also was a minor league baseball relief pitcher in 2002, playing for the Philadelphia Phillies and Batavia Muckdogs. Steen highlighted his commitment to protecting private property rights, but did not go into detail on his views about the use of eminent domain for carbon capture pipeline projects — the subject of a contentious bill that was vetoed by Reynolds this session. 'I was working with her at this time, and I support everything that Governor Reynolds is doing,' Steen said. When asked about his views on the use of eminent domain in these projects, he said 'I'm a pro-property rights, pro-private ownership person.' Steen is the latest Republican to join the field of GOP candidates seeking to take the mantle from Reynolds after she announced she would not run for reelection in 2026. U.S. Rep. Randy Feenstra and state Sen. Mike Bousselot, R-Ankeny, currently have 'exploratory' committees for governor, while Rep. Eddie Andrews, R-Johnston, and former state legislator Brad Sherman have announced campaigns. Iowa Auditor Rob Sand is considered the current frontrunner to become the Democratic gubernatorial candidate. Former political operative Julie Stauch and Democrat Paul Dahl are also running to become the party nominee.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Air Canada labor deal may reshape pay for North American airline crews
By Allison Lampert and Rajesh Kumar Singh MONTREAL/CHICAGO (Reuters) -A crippling strike by Air Canada flight attendants that grounded thousands of flights over wages and unpaid labor is the latest blow to the airline industry's compensation system that does not fully pay cabin crews for their hours at work. The union, representing more than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants, said on Tuesday they reached a tentative deal that ends unpaid work, without sharing further details. Analysts say any gains could influence upcoming contract negotiations in North America. The deal could also drive up structural costs in a cyclical industry. Labor is airlines' biggest operating expense after fuel. The four-day strike that stranded more than 500,000 passengers mirrors unrest at U.S. carriers, where flight attendants cannot walk off the job until the National Mediation Board grants permission. But cabin crews at American, Southwest, and Alaska Airlines last year rejected several contract deals, saying they did not address concerns about unpaid work. Flight attendants at United Airlines last month voted down a $6-billion tentative labor agreement, which did not provide compensation for time on the ground before and after flights. The Chicago-based airline's union is surveying its members before returning to bargaining in December. United and the union did not immediately respond to requests for comments. While cabin crews get paid for a minimum number of hours, they are mostly compensated when planes are in motion, neglecting the crucial tasks performed during boarding, deplaning, and other ground operations. Unions say this amounts to significant unpaid labor. In previous contract negotiations, airlines secured concessions from workers as the industry was struggling due to economic downturns or the pandemic. But a runup in inflation, stagnant wages, and increased workload have fueled resentment among flight attendants, bolstering demands for a change in pay practices. "The Air Canada strike helps negotiations everywhere. It defined the problem of ridiculous expectations for flight attendants to work without pay," said Sara Nelson, international president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, which represents 55,000 flight attendants at 20 airlines, including United. "The striking flight attendants are an inspiration to working people everywhere." Nelson spoke with Wesley Lesosky, head of Air Canada's flight attendants union, on Monday to coordinate positions, representatives of both unions told Reuters. Shanyn Elliott, an Air Canada Rouge flight attendant, said when she started work in 2017, she would pick up long-haul flights to earn extra pay as her C$23 ($16.60) hourly wage did not cover the cost of living. Adding to her frustration, frequent flight delays after the pandemic meant longer hours, said Elliott, who heads the strike committee for Air Canada flight attendants at the Canadian Union of Public Employees. Air Canada CEO Michael Rousseau said the industry needed to review its compensation models. In an interview, he said the Canadian carrier has accepted the concept of ground pay, adding other airlines will likely look at their own models. "I do think the industry has to take a closer look at this over time," Rousseau told Reuters. "We all should be open to change." American and Alaska have already begun compensating attendants for boarding time in their new labor agreements. American's flight attendants are now also compensated for some hours between flights. Those gains came after Delta Air Lines, whose flight attendants are not in a union, instituted boarding pay for cabin crew at half of their hourly wages in 2022 when they were trying to organize. HIGHER COSTS But paying for boarding and time on the ground would inflate airlines' operating costs. American Airlines' new flight attendant contract is estimated to cost it an extra $4.2 billion over five years. The company last month blamed increased labor costs in part for its margin underperformance. Canaccord Genuity analyst Matthew Lee estimates the proposed wage hikes at Air Canada would mean up to C$140 million in incremental costs. Air Canada's wage bill has increased about 26% since before the pandemic. The airline is already grappling with weak passenger traffic to the U.S. amid strained trade relations between Canada and the U.S., leading to a nearly 40% year-on-year decline in quarterly profit. But analysts warn holding the line on costs risks industrial peace. "The movement is on," said John Gradek, a faculty lecturer in supply networks and aviation management at McGill University. ($1 = 1.3855 Canadian dollars) Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Explainer-Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in U.S. elections?
By Jack Queen (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump wants to ban mail-in ballots in federal elections, a form of voting popular with many Americans. About three in 10 ballots were cast through the mail in the 2024 general election, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Trump, a Republican, does not have clear legal authority to do this, though his allies in Congress and state governments could enact policies barring the practice. Here is a look at Trump's authority and how the law could be changed. CAN TRUMP UNILATERALLY BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? Only states and the U.S. Congress can pass laws regulating elections. A unilateral ban by the president on mail-in ballots would likely exceed Trump's limited authority to enforce existing law. In a Monday social media post, Trump said mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud and that he would lead a movement to ban them, beginning with an executive order bringing "honesty" to the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans have filed scores of lawsuits seeking to end mail-in voting in recent years, citing possible fraud. Democrats generally support mail-in ballots as a way to expand access to voting. Voter fraud in the U.S. is extremely rare, multiple studies have shown. White House representatives provided a general statement about Trump's election policies but did not answer questions about his legal authority to ban mail-in ballots or what an executive order would say. COULD TRUMP'S ALLIES BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? States are responsible for administering their votes under the U.S. Constitution, and Republican-controlled legislatures could pass laws banning mail-in ballots so long as they do not conflict with federal law. Congress could ban the use of mail-in ballots in federal elections and override state laws protecting their use, but Trump's Republican Party has slim majorities in Congress and would face difficulty getting past opposition by Democrats. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. To pass a mail-in ballot ban they would need to end the filibuster, a longstanding tradition requiring 60 of the chamber's 100 members to approve most legislation. State and federal laws banning mail-in voting could be challenged in court as unconstitutional impediments to voting. WHAT OTHER POWERS DO PRESIDENTS HAVE OVER ELECTIONS? Presidents in the U.S. have some discretion in enforcing election laws, and Trump could try to use those powers to end or restrict mail-in voting, though it is unclear how. In June, a federal judge blocked parts of an executive order by Trump requiring voters to prove they are U.S. citizens and attempting to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Day. The Trump administration is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," said U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama.
