Leaders of Holy Land churches condemn Israeli settler violence during a West Bank visit
Speaking in the village, Taybeh, on a rare solidarity visit, Greek Orthodox Patriarch Theophilos III and Latin Patriarch Pierbattista Pizzaballa denounced an incident last week when settlers set fires near the community's church. They alleged that Israeli authorities failed to respond to emergency calls for help from the Palestinian community.
In a separate statement, the patriarchs and heads of churches in Jerusalem demanded an investigation into the incident and called for the settlers to be held accountable by the Israeli authorities, "who facilitate and enable their presence around Taybeh.'
The church leaders also claimed that settlers had brought their cattle to graze on Palestinian lands in the area, set fire to several homes last month and put up a sign reading 'there is no future for you here.'
Israel's military did not immediately respond to the allegations. It has previously said it takes action against outlaw settlers and that many incidents of settler violence involve stone-throwing and clashes between Israeli settlers and Palestinians.
The war in Gaza has sparked a surge of violence in the West Bank, with the Israeli military targeting militants in large-scale operations that have killed hundreds of Palestinians and displaced tens of thousands. That has coincided with a rise in settler violence and Palestinian attacks on Israelis. Palestinian militants have attacked and killed Israelis in Israel and the West Bank.
Pizzaballa, the top Catholic cleric in Jerusalem, said he believed the West Bank was becoming a lawless area.
'The only law (in the West Bank) is that of power, of those who have the force, not the law. We must work for the law to return to this part of the country, so anyone can appeal to the law to enforce their rights,' Pizzaballa told reporters.
He and Theophilos prayed together in the church of St. George, whose religious site dates back centuries, adjacent to the area where settlers ignited the fires.
The statement from the heads of churches comes as Palestinians report a surge of settler violence. On Sunday, hundreds descended on the village of Al-Mazraa a-Sharqiya, south of Taybeh, for the funeral of two young men killed during a settler attack on Friday.
The Christian community in Israel and the Palestinian territories has dwindled as a percentage of the overall population over the decades, with experts citing lower birthrates and emigration by people fleeing conflict or seeking better opportunities abroad. Christians now make up a tiny percentage of the population.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
44 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
UC Berkeley chancellor faces House questions on campus antisemitism
UC Berkeley Chancellor Richard Lyons is expected to defend his university's handling of campus antisemitism Tuesday when he and the leaders of two other universities become the latest to be grilled on the subject by the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. Joining Lyons in Washington will be Robert Groves, interim president of Georgetown University, and Felix Matos Rodriguez, chancellor of the City University of New York. Ahead of the hearing, committee chair Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Michigan, characterized antisemitism as 'festering at schools across the country.' Earlier this year, the Trump administration announced an investigation of UC Berkeley and other universities into whether an 'antisemitic hostile work environment' exists. It's unclear what the investigation turned up, if it happened at all. Congress and the U.S. Department of Justice had already opened investigations into antisemitism at the school in 2024. In December, a House report noted that UC Berkeley had 'issued no suspensions and placed only one student on probation' after student protests that year. The committee has held several such hearings with campus leaders since Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas militants attacked Israel and triggered the ongoing war in Gaza. The conflict prompted college students across the country to demonstrate throughout 2024 for Palestinian rights and against Israel. Their tent encampments and entrenched protests rocked the usual campus equilibrium, as university leaders struggled to navigate students' right to protest while trying to guard against hate speech and occasional violence targeting Jews and Muslims alike. The committee's Republican majority has focused on antisemitism alone and typically has taken a harsh tone toward the academics, pushing for missteps during their testimony. At stake is much of the federal funding that helps power the universities, and even whether the leaders' responses to the questioning could topple them from their posts. The presidents of Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania resigned after the first such hearings in Dec. 2023 when their answers failed to deliver the sharp condemnations of antisemitism that committee members were looking for. Since then, the presidents of Columbia and the University of Virginia have also stepped down, as the Trump administration has withheld billions of dollars from Harvard and Columbia, demanded operational changes at the universities — including the hiring of more conservative employees — and threatened to halt hundreds of millions of dollars more to other universities. Committee member Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican known for her aggressive questioning of campus leaders, appeared to take glee in the resignations, remarking at one point: 'Three down, so many to go.' At the most recent hearing in May, as the committee reiterated threats to halt federal funding over the schools' allegedly tepid response to antisemitism, the presidents of Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, Haverford in Pennsylvania and DePaul in Chicago each apologized to the committee for not doing more to tamp it down. During the same hearing, David Cole, a former legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union who testified with the presidents, likened the antisemitism hearings to those of the House Un-American Activities Committee in the 1950s aimed at routing out hidden Communists. Like those hearings, today's 'are not an attempt to find out what happened but an attempt to chill protected speech,' Cole said. UC Berkeley has been the site of notable incidents, including the violent shut-down in Feb. 2024 of a speech by an Israeli lawyer invited by Jewish students to speak at Zellerbach Playhouse. Protesters broke a window, called an attendee a 'dirty Jew' and grabbed another by her neck. For years, pro-Palestinian students have periodically set up mock Israeli checkpoints — used in Israel to prevent passage of Palestinians — at Sather Gate, a main campus entry, forcing students to detour if they did not want to pass through. After the Hamas invasion, such incidents prompted law Professor Steven Solomon to pen a widely read essay titled 'Don't Hire My Antisemitic Law Students,' and political science Professor Ron Hassner to stage a sit-in against campus antisemitism. Student Karin Yaniv is also suing her campus union, UAW Local 4811, which represents graduate student workers, accusing it of repeatedly excluding and mocking Jewish members who tried to participate in meetings. Union leaders deny the allegations. On Monday, as a counterweight to the perception of UC Berkeley as a pit of antisemitism, 82 Jewish faculty and senior staff submitted a letter to the hearing committee praising the way campus leaders — including Lyons, who took the helm a year ago, and his predecessor, Carol Christ — have handled the shifting landscape for Jewish students since Oct. 7, 2023. 'Teaching and research were not hindered, protests were confined, and the UC Berkeley administration made significant and impactful efforts to ensure that Jewish students, staff, and faculty were safe on campus and felt accepted and integral to the university community,' said the letter that commended leaders for negotiating a peaceful end to students' protest encampment and for supporting Jewish life on campus. 'We reject the claim that UC Berkeley is an antisemitic environment,' said the letter, which acknowledged that Jews on campus do face 'real challenges.' But the letter writers affirmed: 'We feel secure on campus and support the administration's efforts to balance safety with respect for free speech.' A fact sheet provided by the campus lists many of them, including regular meetings between senior leaders and the university's Jewish community, and public statements condemning antisemitism. Other efforts include: Financial support for the 'Antisemitism Education Initiative,' which helps campuses across the country tackle anti-Jewish discrimination. Mandatory antisemitism training during new student orientation and for resident assistants in campus housing. A new 'Berkeley Bridging Fellowship' Israel and Palestine dialogue group. Since the Zellerbach violence, the school has spent more than $10 million on additional security 'to ensure all events can safely proceed as planned.' UC Berkeley has not seen anti-Israel protests since about a year ago, when the University of California's systemwide President Michael Drake said that all campuses would enforce a policy banning tent encampments and masks intended to hide the identity of protesters. UC Berkeley officials have said they never arrested anyone in the Zellerbach incident because, even after studying footage, they could not identify any perpetrators. In New York, anti-Trump and pro-Palestinian protesters from City University of New York criticized their chancellor, Matos, for skipping a scheduled talk on economic mobility in that city to 'capitulate to the federal government' by testifying before Congress. Meanwhile, it's unclear how the committee selected Lyons and the other participants, who were not subpoenaed, but simply 'invited,' said a UC Berkeley spokesperson. Neither the university nor the committee would provide a copy of the invitation.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Top German court rejects case over US drone strikes in Yemen assisted by base in Germany
BERLIN (AP) — Germany's highest court on Tuesday rejected a case brought by Yemeni plaintiffs who argued the German government failed in a duty to protect relatives who they say were killed in a 2012 drone strike against an attack controlled with help from a U.S. military base in Germany. Ruling in a case that has been making its way through the German judicial system for over a decade, the Federal Constitutional Court found the German government can have a concrete duty to protect foreign citizens abroad in some cases. But it said that only could apply when there is a 'sufficient connection' to the German state's authority and 'a serious danger of systematic violation' of international law. It found the case at hand didn't fulfill the requirements. The plaintiffs argued the U.S. military's Ramstein Air Base in southwestern Germany plays a key role in relaying flight control data used for armed drone strikes in Yemen via a satellite relay station set up with the knowledge and approval of the German government. A lower court ruled in 2019 that the German government had partial responsibility to ensure U.S. drone strikes controlled with help from Ramstein are in line with international law, but judges stopped short of ordering the ban human rights activists had called for. The following year, a federal court overturned the ruling. The supreme court said the evidence submitted didn't lead to the conclusion the U.S. applied criteria that were unacceptable under international law in determining legitimate military targets in Yemen. The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, which argued the case for the Yemeni plaintiffs, said 'at a time when the adherence of state action to international law is increasingly being called into question, the court has failed to send a strong signal,' adding that 'individual legal protection remains a theoretical possibility without practical consequences.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Ukrainians welcome US aid but see Trump's 50-day ultimatum to Putin as too long
KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — Ukrainians welcomed President Donald Trump's pledge of more U.S.-made weapons in their fight against Russia's invasion, even though it is unclear what exactly they will get and how quickly. The time frame for further arms deliveries that European countries have agreed to pay for is crucial. Russia is making a summer push to break through along the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, and its drones and missiles are hammering Ukrainian cities more than at any time in the past three years. Ukrainian officials have made no direct comment about Trump's decision to allow Russia 50 days to reach a deal to end the war, or face what he said would be 'very severe' economic sanctions. While some believe strict tariffs on Moscow could be a game changer, the postponement until September struck others as being too long. For Russia, Trump's delay of new sanctions is a reprieve. Senior Russian lawmaker Konstantin Kosachev commented: 'Oh, how much can change both on the battlefield and with the mood of those leading the U.S. and NATO in 50 days.' Russian state television pointed out that Trump's decision would bring a bigger financial burden for Europe. Russia currently holds about 20% of Ukraine. Ukraine's depleted army has recently been losing more territory, but there is no sign of a looming collapse on the front line, analysts say. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he spoke to Trump after the Republican leader's Oval Office announcement Monday, expressing gratitude for the decision to send more Patriot air defense missiles that are vital to defend Ukrainian cities. 'We discussed … the necessary measures and decisions to provide greater protection for people from Russian attacks and strengthen our positions,' Zelenskyy said on Telegram. 'We agreed to talk more often and coordinate our steps in the future.' Trump and Zelenskyy have had a notoriously fraught relationship, and Washington's consent to providing more weaponry has eased Kyiv's worries. Even so, some Ukrainians felt the U.S. decision won't alter the course of the war. 'If we take the situation as a whole, it hardly looks like this will fundamentally change anything,' Kyiv resident Oles Oliinyk, 33, told The Associated Press. Nina Tokar, 70, was also skeptical. 'I have very little faith in (Trump). He says one thing today, and tomorrow he may say something else.' A Ukrainian army officer fighting in Ukraine's northeastern Kharkiv region said the 50-day delay on sanctions 'is a very long time.' 'They (the Russians) will say, 'Give us two more weeks,' and then in two weeks, 'Give us another week.' It will drag on until October or November,' he told AP, using only the call sign 'Cat' in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military. Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp agreed. 'I do believe that the 50 days that Mr Trump has announced is rather long. It's up to September 2. I think that's rather long.' Much remains to be worked out about how the weapons, especially the Patriot systems, will be provided, Denmark's Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said in Brussels on Tuesday. But, in an indication that Europe is relieved that the U.S. hasn't walked away from the conflict, he added: 'The most important thing is that we now have an American readiness to deliver these most needed weapons.' Some European countries, such as Hungary and Slovakia, still rely heavily on Russia for energy supplies and could be hit hard by Trump's threatened secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil and gas — an effort to isolate Moscow in the global economy. Lithuania's Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys said Trump's 50-day delay was a 'signal for Europe to prepare ourselves, because we still have some member states that are exposed to imports of oil and oil products from Russia.' German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said it remains to be seen whether Trump's announcement will be a turnaround but 'what is decisive is that the tone has changed.' The president's threat to impose sanctions after 50 days is 'significant progress,' Pistorius told ARD television.
