S.C. Senator advocates for medical marijuana for 2026
The bill would legalize medicinal cannabis for patients with qualifying medical conditions as long as it's prescribed by a doctor.
Medical marijuana is legal in 39 states, but not in South Carolina. Senator Tom Davis (R – Beauford) said after over a decade of trying, 2026 is the year.
'That pharmacist is going to take an oath. I mean, we're not just going to dispense this when it's not warranted, you know, so there's checks and balances in place when you have medical providers involved,' said Brian Clark from South Carolina Pharmacy Association.
Davis said it's a no-brainer because it promotes medical freedom.
'It is a conservative bill. It is strictly limited to medical conditions, and really this is all about helping patients,' Davis said.
Clark said he has heard continuously that there needs to be more research, but he said almost every study said 70-80% of voters think it's needed.
'Well, medical marijuana has been used for years and years. I mean, we're looking at least probably 70, 80 years. At what point do we do we start with needing more studies?' Clark said.
The bill has passed in the senate twice before, but the Speaker of the House, Murrell Smith, has said there is not enough support in the House to pass the bill.
'Speaker Smith's previous statement on the medical marijuana bill holds true,' said a statement from Speaker Smith's office.
Governor Henry McMaster said last week that he recognizes both sides of the argument.
'They have it was a very compelling situation,' McMaster said. 'On the other hand, law enforcement almost took into and are still have grave concerns. I think what we need to do is study it very carefully, get as much information as we can, and try to do the right thing.'
Davis said that he plans on talking to Smith directly because he believes that he has the votes in the House to pass it.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
18 minutes ago
- Axios
Homelessness climbs in Utah, especially for older adults
Homelessness in Utah is worsening, with sharp increases among older adults and veterans, according to a new state report. The big picture: An increasing share of Utah's senior population, many of whom depend on fixed incomes, is unable to keep up with rising housing costs, according to an annual report released Wednesday by the Utah Office of Homeless Services. By the numbers: The number of people experiencing homelessness in Utah rose 18% from the previous year, per a January point-in-time count. Among Utahns over age 64, homelessness grew by 42%, while veterans saw a 36% jump. Children lacking permanent housing increased by 12%. People encountering chronic homelessness saw a 36% rise. Meanwhile, first-time homelessness experienced a 5% uptick between 2023 and 2024, the report showed. What they're saying: "I am deeply concerned about the trajectory of homelessness in the state of Utah and in our capital city," Salt Lake City Mayor Erin Mendenhall said in response to the newly released figures during a Wednesday news conference outside city hall. Mendenhall lambasted state lawmakers for their "lack of forward momentum" to address the state's homelessness crisis. The other side: In a joint statement, Gov. Spencer Cox, Senate President Stuart Adams, House Speaker Mike Schultz said state leaders have stepped up to help local governments "find real solutions" to curb homelessness. "It's frustrating to continuously take one step forward and two steps back with Salt Lake City," per the statement that urged Mendenhall to "turn down the politics." Zoom out: The state's homeless rate is 13 per 100,000 people — below the 2024 national rate of 23 per 100,000 people, according to the data. Zoom in: The vast majority of people (95%) included in January's count were in shelters, compared with 18% in 2023, a milestone that state leaders attributed to the expansion of winter shelter capacity.
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Newsom urges Illinois, NY to hurry-up on redistricting
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Tuesday urged Illinois and New York to press ahead with redistricting efforts as GOP lawmakers push to pick up five additional House seats in Texas. 'Right now forget the talking, it's not about press. It's time to move. You gotta move. I mean, enough,' Newsom said. 'We're all saying the right thing. Now we gotta do the right thing, which means we gotta fight fire with fire,' he told Beto O'Rouke, a former Texas state representative during the Tuesday episode of the ' This is Gavin Newsom ' podcast. The two discussed also criticized Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R ) for advocating for the arrest of Democratic lawmakers who fled the state in an effort to block a vote advancing redistricting efforts in the Lone Star State. The Democratic state lawmakers who left are preventing the Texas legislature from having the quorum necessary to pass legislation. Lawmakers in New York and Illinois have launched redistricting efforts in response to Texas. In New York, state Senate Deputy Leader Michael Gianaris (D) and Assembly member Micah Lasher (D) introduced legislation to amend the state's constitution permitting redistricting efforts outside of the traditional cycle. Lawmakers in Illinois are working on a similar measure. On the Tuesday podcast, Newsom also noted that California's elected officials would be moving swiftly to combat Republican efforts with countermeasures later this week. 'Later this week, we're gonna announce the campaign. Next week, the legislature's gonna move this forward,' Newsom said. Newsom has been listed as a potential contender for the White House in 2028 as Democrats prepare to launch a comeback bid after losing the presidential race and the Senate majority last year.
Newsweek
19 minutes ago
- Newsweek
`Who is Kim Davis? Kentucky Clerk Seeks to Overturn Same-Sex Marriage Ruling
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Speculation of whether the U.S. Supreme Court will take a case to overturn same-sex marriage at the federal level is mounting after embattled Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis pushed the effort as far up the legal chain as possible. Davis's attorney, Matthew Staver, previously told Newsweek he is optimistic the court will again rule on Obergefell v. Hodges, the landmark case that guaranteed the right to same-sex marriage nationwide. William Powell, the attorney who represented the couple that sued Davis, previously wrote in a statement provided to Newsweek that he is "confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that Davis's arguments do not merit further attention." Why It Matters Obergefell v. Hodges, as part of a 5-4 Supreme Court ruling in June 2015, guaranteed that same-sex couples can marry by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. Prior the Court's ruling, equal rights and protections for same-sex marriage was already established in 36 states by statutes, court rulings, or voter initiatives. Davis made national headlines just two months after the Obergefell v. Hodges decision when she defied a U.S. federal court order to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. After being elected clerk of Rowan County, Kentucky, in 2014, she was defeated by Democratic challenger Elwood Caudill Jr. in 2018. Rowan County Clerk of Courts Kim Davis (R) stands with Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee (L) in front of the Carter County Detention Center on September 8, 2015 in Grayson, Kentucky. Rowan County Clerk of Courts Kim Davis (R) stands with Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee (L) in front of the Carter County Detention Center on September 8, 2015 in Grayson, To Know Where is Kim Davis From? Davis was born in September 1965 in Morehead, Kentucky. As of 1991, she served as chief deputy clerk of Rowan County, Kentucky, reporting to her mother, Rowan County Clerk Jean W. Bailey. In 2014, when Bailey didn't run for reelection, Davis filed as a Democrat and defeated Elwood Caudill Jr., then a deputy clerk in the Rowan County property valuation administrator's office, by 23 votes in the party primary. In the general election, she defeated Republican John Cox, who implied nepotism was at play in the results. Who is Dwain Allen Wallace? Dwain Allen Wallace was Kim Davis's first husband, whom she wed in the 1980s when she was 18 years old, according to CBS News. The couple divorced in 1994, with facts coming out later showing Davis's infidelity and court records indicating she had given birth to two children in 1994 with another man. Kim Davis' Marital History: How Many Times Was She Married? Davis has been married four times to three different men. In 1996, Kim Davis married Joe Davis for the first of two eventual marriage ceremonies. They divorced in 2006. The next year, at age 40, Davis married Thomas McIntryre, but that union lasted less than one year. By 2009, she re-married Joe Davis—who told CBS News in September 2015 that he and Kim had been together 19 years but declined to say how much of that time was spent while married. "Four and a half years ago, Kim Davis was a completely different person," Davis's attorney, Matthew Staver, told CBS News at the time. "She made a lot of mistakes. She regrets many of the decisions that she made, and she loves the Lord, and she doesn't want to be disobedient." What People Are Saying Eric Subin, trial attorney, in an email to Newsweek: "As a preliminary matter, it is extremely unlikely that the Supreme Court will grant the writ of certiorari and even hear the case at all. In fact, the Supreme Court grants less than 1 percent of all of the writs of certiorari filed each year. "Since there is a well-established principle that public officials acting under color of state law, as Kim Davis was in this case, are not shielded from liability by the First Amendment there is virtually no compelling legal reason to grant the petition. Even in the very unlikely event that the Supreme Court did grant the petition, it is again extremely unlikely that Davis would prevail on the merits. In order for her to succeed, the Supreme Court would have to completely upend longstanding First Amendment doctrine as well as overturn established precedent." Freedom From Religion Foundation on X: "Concerned about the 'sanctity' of marriage? Gay male couples actually divorce less than straight couples. But, Kim Davis's four marriages are really helping to skew the numbers in their favor." Congressional Equality Caucus on X: "Kim Davis—who illegally denied same-sex couples marriage licenses—asked SCOTUS to overturn marriage equality as she seeks to avoid paying damages to those whose rights she violated. The Justices should not take this case, because marriage equality should NOT be up for debate." What Happens Next While the Supreme Court could make a decision about whether to accept Davis' case in the coming months, there's been no indication yet of whether it intends to do so.
