logo
After Liberal win, can Carney bridge longstanding divides with the West?

After Liberal win, can Carney bridge longstanding divides with the West?

CBC02-05-2025

In the wake of Mark Carney's election win, several provincial leaders are calling for a political "reset" in how Ottawa engages with the West — particularly in Alberta and Saskatchewan, where grievances over federal decision-making run deep.
The federal government should "engage and consult" Saskatchewan, Premier Scott Moe said Tuesday.
Carney should "reach out to our friends out West, and tell them how he's going to build that pipeline," Ontario Premier Doug Ford added.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith congratulated Carney but said in a statement she would not "permit the status quo to continue."
She later told CBC's Power & Politics host David Cochrane that she believed there was a cross-partisan, national consensus emerging on energy corridors and market access.
"I hope he captures that and is able to move forward with some of the changes he needs to make in order to turn that into a reality," she said.
Carney has spoken of positioning Alberta as the heart of a new superpower in both clean and conventional energy.
"My government will work with Indigenous peoples, with the provinces, and with the private sector to fast-track projects that build our energy security by displacing foreign suppliers such as the United States," Carney said at an election rally in Calgary last month.
"Projects that diversify our export markets, so we rely less on the United States, and projects that enhance our long-term competitiveness, including with low-carbon oil and gas. I know that Alberta will be at the heart of all of these solutions."
A list of demands
Smith held a meeting with Carney before the campaign began and made a list of public demands, including ending Ottawa's proposed emissions cap, and warned that a national unity crisis could unfold should they not be met. On Thursday, she announced Alberta would seek a court ruling on the constitutionality of Ottawa's clean electricity regulations.
Pollster and political analyst Janet Brown said on CBC Radio's Alberta at Noon that Smith's immediate reiteration of her pre-election demands signalled her strategy.
"Danielle Smith is losing no time at all. And she's decided she's going to be on offence … she's going to go up to bat first," Brown said. "She didn't give [Carney] a couple days to settle in."
The onus moving forward is on both politicians, Brown added. For Carney, it will be important to extend an olive branch to Alberta, she said.
"[He'll need] to acknowledge that very few Albertans voted for him, but that he's working to acknowledge what Albertans value about their economy, and what needs to happen to have better relations," she said.
Danielle Smith is losing no time at all. And she's decided she's going to be on offence.
When asked on Power & Politics about a separatism push in her province, Smith said her government would not advance such an initiative but left the door open for a citizen referendum.
"I believe that we've got to try to be on Team Canada, but my view has always been that Team Canada has to show that they're on Team Alberta, too," she said.
"I think this is an opportunity for us to do that reset. I'm open-minded about it."
Brown added that Smith appears to be setting the stage for separatist sentiment without pulling the plug herself.
"Now forever after, she'll be able to say, 'No, no, I didn't call for this referendum, the public called for this referendum,'" Brown said, referencing recent legislation that lowers the threshold for citizen-led referendums.
Danielle Smith says her Alberta government won't advance a separation vote
2 days ago
Duration 8:09
The third-party option
Some observers say the need for a reset isn't just about Ottawa but about how Alberta has approached the relationship itself.
"If you think of the way that Premier Smith approached the election, you'll see that it was very different from, say, the way Premier Ford of Ontario or Premier [Tim] Houston of Nova Scotia, both conservative premiers, dealt with it," said David Stewart, a political science professor at the University of Calgary whose research is focused on Canadian politics.
"They took a more neutral stance, while Smith went really all-in in support for the federal Conservative Party. So, the relationship with the federal government is challenged a bit by that."
Stewart said he believes the Liberals have shown support for the energy industry, pointing to the Trudeau government's $34 billion investment in the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion. He warned that framing engagement with the federal government as involving a list of demands may undermine collaboration.
"It's not the case that the federal government has been unwilling to move to help the provincial government to some degree. So I think that part of this is politics rather than policy," he said.
Still, he said U.S. instability and trade concerns could represent a "unique opportunity" for collaboration.
"This is an opportunity to move forward that was not present in the prior years. And previously, it was simply the provincial government and the federal government, to a degree, at loggerheads," he said.
"Now, there's a third party that both the provincial government and the federal government have to deal with, so the situation is a little different than it's been in the past."
Stewart added he believes Carney appointing an Alberta MP to cabinet could help to smooth out the relationship.
"I think the step forward would be even greater if it was somebody from Calgary," he said.
Alberta to send 2 Liberals to Ottawa
Alberta remained solidly blue on election night, with the Conservative Party claiming all but three of the province's 37 ridings. The Liberals won in Edmonton Centre with Eleanor Olszewski and in Calgary Confederation with Corey Hogan, while the NDP won in Edmonton Strathcona with Heather McPherson.
Hogan, who defeated Conservative candidate Jeremy Nixon in Calgary, said he agreed that a "reset" between Alberta and Ottawa was a good idea.
"Let's work towards our common goals. And most of our goals are common, frankly. We quibble about the details, but the quibbling has become overwhelming," he said in an interview.
"Now, it's got to be about what we can do together to build as strong of a country as possible."
While Hogan said his primary role is to represent Calgary Confederation, he added he's also keen to be a pro-Alberta voice that's a strong voice for Canada.
"My role is showing what a western Liberal is and can be," he said.
"And that's somebody who's deeply connected to their community, who is interested in trying to build as good of a future for as many of us as possible, but also really cares about the economy and is very pragmatic in their approach."
Areas of jurisdiction
Still, frustration runs deep for some Albertans. One Edmonton caller to Alberta at Noon on Thursday said while he wasn't a separatist, he's long felt as though his province faces political obstruction, and wanted to consider what options might be best for his family.
Gary Mar, a former Alberta cabinet minister who is president and CEO of the Canada West Foundation, a public policy think-tank based in Calgary, said alienation with Liberal governments extends beyond Alberta's borders. He said similar sentiments are shared in other regions where resource-based industries are core to the economy.
Mar argued that much of the alienation stems from what he describes as federal overreach into areas of provincial jurisdiction.
"If you look at things like the emissions cap, that is really a cap on production. Well, that's not your jurisdiction in the federal government, it is the jurisdiction of provinces," Mar said.
Alberta has long held that the cap is a violation of the province's constitutional jurisdiction. Such provincial and federal standoffs tied to jurisdictional authority over emissions generated by Alberta's oilpatch have often landed in court.
Mar added that with around 85 per cent of Canadians voting for either the Liberals or Conservatives, certain policy planks shared by both parties appear to have won widespread popular support.
"It's a test of both [Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre] to see if they've got the best interests of Canada at heart," Mar said.
"But it has to start, in my view, with Prime Minister Carney coming out West, and understanding that provinces in areas of their jurisdiction, like natural resources, they're not just stakeholders, they are partners."
Carney's aim of "free trade by Canada Day" between provinces and territories is an example of an area where he could make progress, said pollster Brown.
"Those are some of the moves that Mark Carney can make very quickly to sort of calm the waters down here in Alberta, and it would be difficult for the premier to fight him on those things," she said.
Early signals encouraging, business leader says
Business leaders are also watching closely.
Adam Legge, president of the Business Council of Alberta, said Carney's early signals on energy are encouraging but optimism will last only if regulatory hurdles are addressed.
"The ambition is there, but it's got to be backed up with some quick action on what I would call the environment of the investment ambition. And then we can actually see things happen," Legge told Alberta at Noon.
Still, Legge said the business community was keen to work with Carney to understand his plans in-depth.
"It's some very positive signals out of the gate, from our perspective," he said.
Former Alberta premier Jason Kenney, previously at the helm of many of the province's fights with Ottawa over energy and environmental policy, has been vocal for weeks about the evolving dynamic.
On Thursday, he wrote on X that Alberta had long "faced a government in Ottawa fundamentally hostile to our largest industry, one central to Canada's economy."
"While I join most Albertans in being disappointed with Monday's election results, let's hold PM Carney to his words about making Canada 'a global energy superpower,' deregulating to build big projects, including pipelines," he wrote.
"But if we turn inward in a pointless debate on the charade of separation, we will reverse that momentum.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lately: Trump and Musk's bromance fallout, professors embracing AI and turning off GPS
Lately: Trump and Musk's bromance fallout, professors embracing AI and turning off GPS

Globe and Mail

time27 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Lately: Trump and Musk's bromance fallout, professors embracing AI and turning off GPS

Firstly, our apologies for mistakenly sending last week's e-mail earlier this morning. If you have feedback or just want to say hello to a real-life human, send me an e-mail. 🥊 Trump and Musk's bromance implodes on social media 🤖 The universities embracing AI 📍 Why you should turn off GPS 👾 Switch 2 is finally out Usually, we don't witness messy, high-profile breakups in real-time. But when the two partners both own social media platforms – and have a penchant for posting their every thought and feeling – the drama unfolds in a remarkably public forum. The feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump started earlier this week, when the world's richest man called the president's signature domestic policy bill a 'disgusting abomination.' It escalated on Thursday, when they began sparring back and forth on their respective platforms, X and Truth Social. Musk fired a barrage of insults, appearing to call for the president's impeachment and alleging that he is in the Epstein files, while Mr. Trump in turn threatened to strangle the business interests of the billionaire who was, until very recently, one of his most profitable political pals. The rift had immediate effects on Musk, with shares of Tesla plunging by roughly 15 per cent. But it also could have consequences for Trump's ability to spread his Make American Great Again agenda. 'The number one thing that keeps Trump's base on message, in line, obedient – it's Twitter,' said Florida political strategist Rick Wilson in an interview with Globe and Mail international correspondent Nathan VanderKlippe. If Musk adjusts X's algorithm 'and stops promoting Trump's content automatically, I think it starts to change the messaging environment for MAGA.' This week, two new projects that aim to make AI safer and more inclusive launched in Montreal. Famed AI researcher and Turing Award winner Yoshua Bengio is building a non-profit to develop safe AI systems that cannot deceive or harm humans. The organization, which has already raised close to US$30-million in philanthropic funding, is called LawZero – a reference to science-fiction writer Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics, which stipulates that intelligent machines may not harm human beings. LawZero was incubated at Mila, the prestigious Montreal-based AI institute. On Monday, the first cohort of 21 Indigenous students from across Canada gathered at Mila to learn about AI as part of a new six-week program. Students will learn about the technology and pitch ideas about how AI can be used to benefit Indigenous communities. The program's long-term goal is to help forge a network of AI professionals across the country. Although Indigenous people in Canada make up 5 per cent of the population, they make up less than 1 per cent in the tech sector. Universities have been cautious about adopting new AI tools, often because they're worried about the possibility of rampant cheating. About 80 per cent of the more than 500 Ontario postsecondary students surveyed in a recent study said they had used generative AI, and about half were using it on a weekly basis, mostly for brainstorming and getting feedback on their writing. So rather than deny the inevitable, some Canadian schools are taking the view that AI should be integrated into the learning process. For example, some professors are encouraging their students to experiment with different large language models, while others have created AI teaching assistants to answer student questions. The Global Positioning System, a network of two dozen satellites that can instantly pinpoint your location, began as a U.S. military project in the 1970s. In 1983, after a Korean airliner accidentally wandered into restricted Soviet airspace and was shot down, Ronald Reagan announced that GPS would be made available for limited civilian use. In 2000, Bill Clinton lifted the remaining restrictions, kick-starting our current reliance. In an excerpt from his latest book The Explorer's Gene: Why We Seek Big Challenges, New Flavors, and the Blank Spots on the Map, author (and Globe columnist) Alex Hutchinson explains how having a navigational tool in our hands at all times has changed how we construct the world around us. I relate to this. Last summer I ditched my iPhone for two weeks as part of a digital detox and was amazed how fulfilling it was to navigate without my iPhone. Sure, while I was visiting New York I got lost a couple of times. But I also felt I was taking in my surroundings more than I do when my eyes are glued to Google Maps. Days-long 'dark retreats' are the newest spiritual conquest for tech elites (WIRED) These companies are requiring workers to use the tech (The Washington Post) Tech giants in the Gulf are building super-apps to dominate digital life (Rest of World) Nintendo Switch 2, $629 At suburban malls and game stores across Canada, diehard video-game fans camped out on Thursday to snag the Switch 2, the follow-up to Nintendo's best-selling console of all time. Nintendo teased the new Switch back in January and had to delay its preorders after U.S. President Donald Trump issued 24-per-cent tariffs on Japan, where the company is based, and 46-per-cent tariffs on Vietnam, where the majority of the consoles are manufactured. Nintendo was able to launch the device within Trump's 90-day pause on tariffs and said it wouldn't raise the price. However, if you missed out on the preorder and your local store is sold out, you may have to pay even more. Resellers are already auctioning off consoles on eBay. Mountainhead, the new film from Succession screenwriter Jesse Armstrong out now on Crave, deftly skewers the tech-bro class. The film follows the story of a fictional social media platform called Traam, which is used by billions around the world, after it introduces new AI features without any content moderation, leading to the creation of real-time deepfakes that spark violent conflicts around the globe. As the world descends into chaos, the founder of Traam, along with three of his fellow tech bros, retreat to a luxurious mountain cabin for the weekend. In a review, The Globe's screens reporter J. Kelly Nestruck said, 'Armstrong's screwball dialogue in this film is as enjoyable – and unquotable in this newspaper – as Succession's at its most absurd.'

As separatist talk simmers in Alberta and Quebec, Canadians say breaking up will be hard to do: poll
As separatist talk simmers in Alberta and Quebec, Canadians say breaking up will be hard to do: poll

Vancouver Sun

time36 minutes ago

  • Vancouver Sun

As separatist talk simmers in Alberta and Quebec, Canadians say breaking up will be hard to do: poll

Against a backdrop of fresh talk of Alberta separation and the constant spectre of Quebec's sovereignty movement, a new national opinion poll found that most Canadians say breaking up will be hard to do. A large majority of respondents nationally said any secession by one province would require negotiation with all provinces and must be supported by a clear majority of voters in the province, and most said separation cannot be a unilateral decision, and it should require approval by the federal House of Commons. A national opinion survey , conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies and provided to Postmedia, was designed to probe Canadians attitudes about the process for separation, rather than their views on separation itself, and what should follow a successful provincial leave referendum. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'The bottom line is that Canadians across the country envision the process as much more complex than a simple majority vote on a referendum question,' said Jack Jedwab, president of the Montreal-based Association for Canadian Studies. Public discussion about Alberta separating from Canada drew more mainstream attention in May, after the federal election returned the Liberal Party to government and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith tabled provincial legislation to make it easier for Albertans to trigger a referendum on the province leaving the rest of Canada. Smith said she would hold such a referendum if a citizen petition called for it. Separatists in Quebec hope the renewed discourse on separation will boost their long-standing desire for independent statehood, which twice went to provincial referendum which failed to support sovereignty, in 1980 and 1995. The Parti Québécois plans another provincial sovereignty referendum in the years ahead. That creates plenty of secessionist talk and debate, but it has been 30 years since Canada has seen an actual separation referendum. 'Many Canadians of voting age and, of course, most immigrants didn't experience the last referendum 30 years ago, but there is a growing consensus that the rest of the country would want a say in the process and secession would not be simple,' said Jedwab. The poll asked 1,537 people across Canada a series of questions on the mechanism of a possible separation. A majority of Canadians said any referendum question regarding provincial separation from Canada must be unambiguous, with 59 per cent of respondents agreeing with that, with only 11 per cent disagreeing, and 30 per cent saying they don't know or declined to answer. Respondents in Quebec and Alberta showed the strongest support for an unambiguous question, at 71 and 62 per cent, respectively. A clear majority of Canadians, 66 per cent, said there must be a clear majority of voters supporting separation in a separatist referendum for it to be considered — with Quebecers the softest on the issue. The poll showed that 76 per cent in Atlantic Canada, 75 per cent in B.C., 72 per cent in Alberta, 66 per cent in Ontario, and 62 per cent in Manitoba-Saskatchewan agreed that there must be a clear majority of voter support for separation. In Quebec it was 55 per cent, still a majority, with 26 per cent saying it was not necessary, by far the highest in the country. A majority of respondents in every region agreed that a province separating from Canada would require negotiations with all provinces — even respondents in Quebec, although they were the softest on the issue. Nationally, 62 per cent of respondents agreed that negotiation was necessary for provincial separation, with 19 per cent saying it wasn't needed and another 19 per cent saying they didn't know or declined to answer. The age of respondents impacted how strongly that feeling was, with the youngest cohort of 18 to 34 year olds showing a low of 56 per cent agreement, the middle cohort of 35 to 54 year olds rising to 61 per cent agreement, and the oldest cohort, those 55 years old and above, being the strongest in agreement at 67 per cent. The regional breakdown on the need for negotiations was lowest in the two provinces most active with separatist ambition — Alberta at 52 per cent and Quebec at 57. The highest support for the need for negotiation was in Atlantic Canada (67 per cent), followed by Ontario (66), B.C. (65), and Manitoba-Saskatchewan (61). Most Canadians said that even after a favourable provincial vote for separation, a province cannot unilaterally leave Canada, the poll found, although there is a lot of uncertainty about the issue. Canadians will want agreement on the question Nationally, 42 per cent said a province cannot make its own decision to separate from Canada while 22 per cent said such a decision by a province was enough. A large number, 36 per cent, said they didn't know or didn't answer the question. Only respondents in B.C. delivered a majority response dismissing unilateral departure — barely — at 51 per cent. Other regions followed: Ontario (46 per cent), Atlantic Canada (44), Alberta (43), Manitoba-Saskatchewan (42), and Quebec (31). Quebec was the only region with more people embracing unilateral separation than dismissing the idea: 32 per cent said it was OK, while 37 per cent said they weren't sure or didn't answer. While a majority of those in British Columbia, Atlantic Canada, and Ontario said a referendum question on separation should require the approval of the federal House of Commons, most Quebecers and Albertans disagreed. In Alberta, 43 per cent said a referendum question should not require a federal parliamentary vote, while 35 per cent agreed it should. That's even stronger than in Quebec, where 36 per cent said it should not require a federal approval, with 34 per cent saying it should. Those in B.C. showed the strongest support for federal input, at 60 per cent, followed by Atlantic Canada at 58 per cent, and Ontario at 55 per cent. In Manitoba and Saskatchewan, pooled together in the poll, 43 per cent agreed there should be parliamentary approval, with 21 per cent saying it shouldn't be required and 36 per cent saying they didn't know or declined to answer. 'Canadians will want agreement on the question and will seemingly not be inclined to allow an outcome that involves a breakup to be established as set out solely by a province that wishes to separate,' said Jedwab. 'Without previous discussion around the process and the desired outcome, the risk is that results will not secure required recognition.' The public opinion survey was conducted online with 1,537 respondents in Canada from May 16 to 18. As a non-probability sample in a panel survey, traditional margins of error do not apply. • Email: ahumphreys@ | Twitter: AD_Humphreys Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

Readout - Prime Minister Carney speaks with Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi Français
Readout - Prime Minister Carney speaks with Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi Français

Cision Canada

timean hour ago

  • Cision Canada

Readout - Prime Minister Carney speaks with Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi Français

OTTAWA, ON, June 6, 2025 /CNW/ - Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, spoke with the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi. The two leaders discussed the longstanding relationship between Canada and India, including deep people-to-people ties and significant commercial links. Importantly, there was agreement to continued law enforcement dialogue and discussions addressing security concerns. Prime Minister Carney extended an invitation to Prime Minister Modi to attend Canada's 2025 G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta. Prime Minister Carney and Prime Minister Modi agreed to remain in contact and looked forward to meeting at the G7 Leaders' Summit later this month. Associated Link Canada-India relations This document is also available at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store