logo
Facing crisis, Pak sent four letters to India asking it to end IWT abeyance

Facing crisis, Pak sent four letters to India asking it to end IWT abeyance

Pakistan has reportedly sent four consecutive letters urging India to reconsider its decision to place the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in abeyance following the terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which claimed the lives of 26 tourists.
Sources revealed that the letters were dispatched by Pakistan's Ministry of Water Resources Secretary, Syed Ali Murtaza, to India's Jal Shakti Ministry, which then forwarded them to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).
With Pakistan now facing an escalating water crisis, the tone of these appeals has grown increasingly urgent, according to individuals familiar with the matter.
The sources further noted that even after India launched Operation Sindoor, targeting terror networks in both Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK), another letter regarding the IWT was sent by Pakistan.
India firm on terror and treaty abeyance
India has reiterated that there can be no dialogue while terrorism persists, maintaining that 'blood and water also can't flow together.' While the IWT was originally signed in the spirit of goodwill and cooperation, New Delhi asserts that Pakistan violated this spirit by continuing to promote cross-border terrorism.
India has invoked its national security prerogative and affirmed that the treaty will remain in abeyance until Islamabad 'credibly and irrevocably' halts support for cross-border terror. This suspension was approved by the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), India's apex strategic body, shortly after the 22 April Pahalgam terror attack. This marks the first time India has suspended the World Bank-mediated agreement.
Following India's military response under Operation Sindoor, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has indicated a willingness to engage in peace talks to resolve bilateral issues.
This shift came after several senior Pakistani politicians appealed to the Sharif government to address what they described as a looming 'water bomb' threatening the country after India's suspension of the IWT.
'We would die of hunger if we don't resolve the water crisis now. The Indus Basin is our lifeline as three-fourths of our water comes from outside the country, nine out of 10 people depend on the Indus water basin for their living, as much as 90 per cent of our crops rely on this water and all our power projects and dams are built on it. This is like a water bomb hanging over us and we must defuse it," Pakistani senator Syed Ali Zafar said in May.
History and scope of the Indus Waters Treaty
Signed in 1960, the Indus Waters Treaty regulates the sharing of six rivers — Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej — between India and Pakistan.
India has consistently maintained that Pakistan has undermined the treaty's goodwill by supporting terror activities and obstructing essential upgrades to key water infrastructure projects.
India outlines its position at the United Nations
Responding to Pakistan's criticism at the UN Security Council in New York on 24 May, India's Permanent Representative, P Harish, stated, 'Far-reaching fundamental changes have taken place not only in terms of escalating security concerns through cross-border terror attacks, but also growing requirements for producing clean energy, climate change, and demographic change.'
India has formally approached Pakistan multiple times in the past two years to negotiate modifications to the treaty, but Pakistan has consistently refused.
'Pakistan has continued to consistently block any changes to this infrastructure, and any modifications of the provisions, which are permissible under the treaty,' Harish said.
He also emphasised that, although the treaty's preamble is based on goodwill and friendship, Pakistan has waged three wars and facilitated thousands of terror attacks on India.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

P Chidambaram writes: Military boldness, political timidity
P Chidambaram writes: Military boldness, political timidity

Indian Express

time12 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

P Chidambaram writes: Military boldness, political timidity

During the debate in both Houses of Parliament last week, the government gave the impression that Operation Sindoor had been finally paused, the goals had been achieved, and it is back to the usual way of doing things. That would be wrong. The truth is, the military was playing a tough game when the civilian government forcibly snatched the ball. Operation Sindoor has busted some myths: that fighting a war against Pakistan will be easy, that India's superiority in conventional war will prevail, and that India has friends and Pakistan none. The military leadership was exemplary. Apparently, they asked for and got operational freedom. The Indian armed forces' first-mover advantage gave them early wins: 9 places that hosted terrorist infrastructure were demolished and several terrorists were killed. However, Pakistan's armed forces quickly recovered. They counter-attacked on May 7-8 using China-made aircraft (J-10), China-made missiles (PL-15) and drones acquired from Türkiye. Realising that 'tactical mistakes' had been made, the military leadership paused the operation and 're-strategised'. That is leadership. It re-launched the Operation on May 9-10, struck at 11 military airbases and severely damaged them. Inevitably, the Indian armed forces suffered some 'losses', and the Chief of Defence Staff and the Deputy Chief of Army Staff admitted the losses. That too is leadership. Contrast the political leadership. It will not admit the mistakes or the losses. Like an ostrich whose head is buried in the sand, it maintains that India scored a 'decisive victory' in Operation Sindoor. If there was a decisive victory, why did India not press its advantage, secure more military gains, and demand and obtain from Pakistan political concessions? Why was the first outreach by the DGMO, Pakistan accepted immediately and without conditions? There were no answers from the government. [A celebrated example of a decisive victory was the surrender of Pakistan's General Niazi to India's Lt General Aurora on December 16, 1971.] Nor will the political leadership acknowledge the reality: Pakistan and China have forged strong military and political bonds. China is supplying new generation fighter aircraft and missiles to Pakistan. Obviously, China was testing its military hardware in a battlefield in a real war. The military bond is visible. On the political front, China's foreign minister Wang Yi praised Pakistan's 'resolute action on terrorism'. China also voted in favour when IMF, World Bank and Asian Development Bank approved large amounts of loans to Pakistan. The other reality is that Pakistan's (at least the Pakistan military's) bonds with the United States are firmly in place. President Trump invited General Asim Munir, Pakistan's Army Chief, to lunch at the White House, an unprecedented honour to a person who is not Head of State or Head of Government. Mr Trump thanked General Munir 'for not going into the war and ending the war', and gloated again that he had brought about the ceasefire. The Prime Minister and the Home Minister do not miss an opportunity to rebuke the Opposition but dare not rebut or refute President Trump or President Xi or their foreign ministers. The overwhelming reality is that the US and China are on the same page in their support to Pakistan militarily, politically and economically. Keeping aside their differences, the US and China have decided to support and patronise Pakistan. Worse, every country to which India reached out offered sympathy for the victims of the Pahalgam attack and condemned terrorism but did not condemn Pakistan as the perpetrator. India's political leadership refuses to acknowledge the reality and continues to nurture the false belief that Pakistan is friendless and India has friends all over the world. The other delusion of the Indian political leadership is that the 'terror ecosystem' has been smashed in Jammu & Kashmir. The truth is different. Ministry of Home Affairs disclosed to the all-party meeting on April 24, 2025 (immediately after the Pahalgam attack on April 22) that, between June 2014 and May 2024, there were — Undeniably, there were terrorist incidents and casualties in the governments of A B Vajpayee (1998-2004) and Manmohan Singh (2004-2014) as well. The terror ecosystem is populated by Pakistan-based infiltrators and India-based extremists, especially in Kashmir. Often, they work together, strike together and help each other. On April 26, the government demolished several houses in Kashmir of suspected 'terrorists associated with the Pahalgam massacre' — the owners were obviously India-based. In June 2025, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) arrested two Indians for harbouring the suspected terrorists. The suspected terrorists were neutralised on July 27-28 and identified as infiltrators. India-based terrorists have committed terrorist attacks in the past. For example, Mumbai witnessed terror attacks in 2006 (suburban train bomb blasts), 2008 (Tajmahal Hotel) and 2011 (Zaveri Bazaar). The 2006 incident was committed by India-based terrorists, the 2008 attack was by 10 Pakistani infiltrators including Kasab, and the 2011 incident was by India-based terrorists. The government's claim that the terror ecosystem in India has been dismantled is manifestly wrong. The failure of intelligence and the absence of security forces in Pahalgam led to the tragedy. No one in the government has taken responsibility. The military's gains in Operation Sindoor will have a deterrent effect on Pakistan but the political leadership's timidity before the US and China may cancel the gains and give encouragement to Pakistan.

PM dedicates Op Sindoor success to Mahadev
PM dedicates Op Sindoor success to Mahadev

Hans India

time42 minutes ago

  • Hans India

PM dedicates Op Sindoor success to Mahadev

Varanasi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday invoked Lord Shiva's 'Rudra roop' (fierce form) to describe India's resolute action against terrorism, saying Operation Sindoor showcased the country's strength to the world and delivered a clear message that anyone who dares attack India will not be spared, not even in 'Pataal Lok'. Addressing a public meeting in his parliamentary constituency Varanasi, the Prime Minister also accused the Congress of repeatedly insulting the valour of the armed forces and even terming 'Operation Sindoor' a "tamasha" (spectacle).

Baloch leader to Trump: You've been ‘gravely misled' by Munir, Balochistan's resources don't belong to Pakistan
Baloch leader to Trump: You've been ‘gravely misled' by Munir, Balochistan's resources don't belong to Pakistan

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Baloch leader to Trump: You've been ‘gravely misled' by Munir, Balochistan's resources don't belong to Pakistan

Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch has warned Trump that he was 'gravely misled' by Pakistan about the true location of vast natural resources, saying they belong to Balochistan, not Pakistan. read more Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch has issued a sharp warning to US President Donald Trump, accusing him of being 'gravely misled' by Pakistan's military leadership about the true ownership of vast natural resources in the region. In an open letter, Mir Yar Baloch stated that General Asim Munir and Islamabad's diplomatic channels had falsely claimed that massive reserves of oil, natural gas, copper, lithium, uranium, and rare earth minerals were part of Pakistan, when in fact, he said, they rightfully belong to Balochistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Your recognition of the vast oil and mineral reserves in the region is indeed accurate. However, with due respect, it is imperative to inform your administration that you have been gravely misled by the Pakistani military leadership, particularly General Asim Munir, and by their diplomatic channels regarding the true geography and ownership of these critical resources,' he wrote. He further asserted that these untapped deposits are not located in Punjab—the core territory of Pakistan—but in the 'Republic of Balochistan,' which he described as 'a historically sovereign nation currently under illegal occupation by Pakistan.' 'These untapped reserves of oil, natural gas, copper, lithium, uranium, and rare earth minerals are not located within the territories of Punjab, which is the actual Pakistan. They belong to the Republic of Balochistan, a historically sovereign nation currently under illegal occupation by Pakistan. The claim that these resources belong to Pakistan is not only false, it is a deliberate attempt to misappropriate Balochistan's wealth for political and financial gain,' Baloch added. He also warned that granting Pakistan access to Balochistan's mineral riches would empower its military and intelligence services—specifically the ISI—which he accused of a long record of sponsoring terrorist groups. 'Such access would significantly enhance the operational and financial capabilities of the ISI, enabling it to expand its global terror networks, recruit more militants, and potentially facilitate large-scale attacks reminiscent of 9/11,' he cautioned. Reaffirming Balochistan's stand, he declared the region was not 'for sale.' 'We will not permit Pakistan, China, or any other foreign power to exploit our land or its resources without the explicit consent of the Baloch people. Our sovereignty is non-negotiable, and our struggle for rightful ownership and independence continues with dignity and resilience,' he said in the letter. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The statement came after Trump announced a major energy partnership with Islamabad, under which the US and Pakistan would jointly develop what he described as 'their massive oil reserves.' 'We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. Meanwhile, Pakistan's largest refinery, Cnergyico, claimed to have finalised a deal with Vitol to import 1 million barrels of American oil, according to the company's vice chairman, Usama Qureshi, who spoke to Reuters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store