
A new Texas law mandates age checks on phones. It may be just the start.
Happy Thursday from the Tech Brief, where we only cite studies that exist. Send news tips to: will.oremus@washpost.com
Below: Trump's meme coin dinner draws scrutiny from Democrats. First:
A new Texas law mandates age checks on phones. It may be just the start.
Texas passed a law this week forcing Google and Apple to check the ages of mobile app store users and require parents' permission before a teenager or child can download an app or use it to buy something. It became the second and largest state to do so after Utah passed a similar law in March.
Both laws are set to take effect next year, though legal challenges are likely.
In the meantime, Texas lawmakers are eyeing an even more aggressive move that has yet to receive much national attention: a bill that would ban minors from using social media at all.
Texas' age-verification law is a big deal in its own right.
With more than 30 million people, Texas is increasingly wielding a California-like power to help set the national tech policy agenda. This is the latest in a string of consequential internet laws that Republican Gov. Greg Abbott has signed in recent years, including one that restricted social media content moderation and another requiring adult-oriented websites to verify users' ages.
Both have been challenged in cases that reached the U.S. Supreme Court. The restrictions on content moderation are on hold after the high court's majority signaled last year in NetChoice v. Paxton that they may violate the First Amendment and sent the case back to lower courts. A Supreme Court ruling on the age-verification requirements for adult websites is expected in the coming weeks, and it could have implications for the legality of age-verification laws in general, including the one Texas just passed.
The latest law is another win for Meta in its battle with Apple over who should be held responsible for checking users' ages.
The social media giant has pushed for laws that put the onus on the operators of mobile app stores — i.e., Apple and Google — rather than individual apps, such as Facebook, Snapchat and Roblox.
Apple has lobbied heavily on the other side. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Apple CEO Tim Cook called Abbott personally to ask for changes or a veto. Evidently Abbott was unmoved.
In a statement attributed to an unnamed spokesperson, Apple said it shares the goal of strengthening kids' online safety but is concerned that the Texas law will require the company to collect sensitive personal data on all users. The company argues for what it says is a forthcoming and less invasive approach called 'age assurance,' in which children's ages would be input by parents but then shared only as an inexact 'age range' with app developers, minimizing identifying details such as birthdays.
Heat Initiative, a child advocacy group focused on pressuring Apple to do more to protect kids, sees that as progress but not sufficient.
'Apple had a very hands-off approach to the App Store' for years, Heat Initiative CEO Sarah Gardner said. That allowed developers to publish apps that were rated safe for kids despite providing sexualized content, anonymous chats with adult strangers, and AI 'girlfriend simulators' and appearance-rating tools. Now, Gardner added: 'I think finally we are seeing Apple being dragged into the child safety arena kicking and screaming.'
Google has a foot on both sides of the fence. It runs the Google Play Store app on Android devices but also owns the social platform YouTube. Asked for comment on the Texas law, the company said only that it is 'assessing next steps.'
Texas age checks are just one salvo in a larger battle over teens' access to the internet.
Earlier this month, Apple lent its support to the federal Kids' Online Safety Act, or KOSA, which would hold social media companies rather than app stores responsible for keeping young users safe. That bill, co-sponsored by Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut), passed the Senate by a vote of 91-3 last year but stalled in the House. Its backers hope Apple's endorsement, along with those of Microsoft, Snap and X, can help it overcome opposition by Meta and the internet trade group NetChoice.
Meanwhile, numerous other states are considering age-verification bills similar to those in Utah and Texas, along with an array of other online safety legislation. It's the rare cause that enjoys bipartisan support these days in statehouses and Congress alike, with Republican and Democratic lawmakers differing mostly on the details.
The biggest obstacle so far has proved to be the First Amendment, which sets a high bar for the government to justify laws that curtail otherwise legal expression, though there are exceptions for obscenity and speech that's deemed harmful to children. Free-speech advocates warn that overly restrictive or ill-crafted online safety laws could lead down a slippery slope to censorship and repression of marginalized groups and unpopular ideas.
Texas's next big move could be a law to keep teens off social media altogether.
The Texas House of Representatives earlier this month passed House Bill 186, which would require social media platforms to check users' ages and prevent anyone under 18 from creating an account. The next step is the state Senate, where it also enjoys bipartisan support, according to the Texas Tribune.
The bill has critics on both left and right who say it's invasive, draconian and poorly written. If passed, it could face an uphill battle in the courts; a judge has already blocked a similar law in Utah.
Regardless, the wave of state-level kids' online safety bills appears unlikely to crest anytime soon, adding to the pressure on Congress to tackle the issue.
Trump's meme coin dinner draws Democrats' scrutiny
A top House Democrat opened a probe into President Trump's meme coin dinner, our colleague Cat Zakrzewski reports for the Tech Brief.
Rep. Jamie Raskin, the ranking opposition member of the House Judiciary Committee, pressed Trump to turn over the names of the guests who attended last week's gala, having secured their invitations by pouring millions of dollars into the president's crypto venture.
Democrats are increasingly criticizing Trump for profiting from his office, focusing on the ways his sons are expanding his real estate and crypto businesses.
'Profiting off the memecoin is just the latest in a bewildering gamut of schemes in which you and your family have profited after your return to office,' Raskin wrote in a letter to the White House, also citing the Trump family's business deals in the Middle East.
Raskin demanded that the Trump administration share details about the source of the funds used to buy the coins, citing concerns that the president may have violated the emoluments clause of the Constitution. The clause prohibits federal officials from accepting gifts from foreign governments without the consent of Congress.
Back at SpaceX, Musk says in interview DOGE became D.C's 'whipping boy' (Christian Davenport)
New student visas paused as State Dept. plans tougher social media review (Anumita Kaur and Adam Taylor)
Trump administration ramps up push as crypto ally (Shannon Najmabadi)
The U.S. government's new strategic reserve: Billions in seized crypto (Lisa Bonos)
Labor Department reverses course on crypto in 401(k) plans (The Hill)
Key market watchdog plagued by departures amid crypto turf war (The Hill)
Tesla investors ask board to make Musk work full-time (Trisha Thadani)
SpaceX loses another Starship on test flight as Musk seeks to renew focus (Christian Davenport)
Civitai ban of real people content deals major blow to the nonconsensual AI porn ecosystem (404 Media)
Netflix co-founder Reed Hastings joins Anthropic's board of directors (The Verge)
Telegram, Musk-owned xAI partner to distribute Grok to messaging app's users (Reuters)
Elon Musk tried to block Sam Altman's big AI deal in the Middle East (Wall Street Journal)
DOGE employees may access sensitive Treasury data, judge rules (Kelly Kasulis Cho)
Data broker giant LexisNexis says breach exposed personal information of over 364,000 people (TechCrunch)
Anthropic CEO says AI could wipe out half of entry-level white-collar jobs (Axios)
Taiwan semiconductor boom runs on exploited migrant labor (Rest of World)
Climate and weather scientists are joining the anti-Trump resistance in the most 'scientist-iest' way (CNN)
This film was made entirely with Runway AI and Google's Veo. It nearly broke us. (Wall Street Journal)
Why 'wrench attacks' on wealthy crypto holders are on the rise (Associated Press)
That's all for today — thank you so much for joining us! Make sure to tell others to subscribe to the Tech Brief. Get in touch with Will (via email or social media) for tips, feedback or greetings.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon and Trump's Breakup Results In Hilarious Consequences For Dogecoin
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's nasty feud has had some unintended consequences for the meme coin that inspired the Department of Government Efficiency. As CNBC reports, Dogecoin fell 10 percent on Thursday, the day that the Musk and Trump spat spilled over onto social media, and was down 22 percent week-over-week at its lowest point last night, when it was worth less than 17 cents per token (don't gasp too hard, but it's now soared back up to 18 cents.) Given that it's a meme coin, Doge has never been worth all that much to begin with. At its absolute peak in 2021, the coin traded just under 75 cents thanks to Musk's endorsement — and despite regular peaks and valleys, it's never again surpassed that all-time high. Despite its near-worthlessness, Dogecoin has been a useful metric for tracking the way Musk affects market. As CNBC notes, the meme coin spiked 15 percent in a day when Tesla began accepting it for merchandise in 2022, and jumped 35 percent later that same year when Musk bought Twitter. Just as Doge giveth, Doge seems to taketh away. The unelected billionaire has entirely squandered the gains he garnered for the meme coin when riding on Trump's coattails, first with the announcement of the agency's creation and again when its official website was launched just after the president's inauguration. As Cointelegraph reports, the coin could be poised to slip even further. Dogecoin's three-week Trump slump suggests, per the site's analysis, that it could fall to as little as six cents per coin if its bearish streak continues. Should it continue to fall, a massive selloff event may occur as itchy investors seek to rid themselves of the tarnished token. Over on the everything app, Doge bros are, as usual, acting absolutely bonkers about the coin's chances of survival. "Looks like yesterday was just another bear trap for Dogecoin," one such investor tweeted alongside a chart showing projected "euphoric" highs that almost certainly will not be attained. "Let's go!" In another unrealistic prognostication that borders on tragic, one account shared a graphic explaining that if investors "hold together, nobody will fall." "I'll keep reposting till we hit the Dollar," the delulu poster exclaimed. In Washington, the fiery feud between Musk and Trump has shaken the status quo — but for crypto types, it's just another weekend. More on meme coins: You'll Never Guess What Happened to Trump's Meme Coin After He Announced His Tariffs
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says Elon Musk will face 'very serious consequences' if he funds Democratic candidates
President Donald Trump on Saturday said there would be 'serious consequences' if tech mogul Elon Musk funds Democratic candidates to run against Republicans who vote in favor of the GOP's sweeping budget bill. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News in a phone interview, but declined to share what those consequences would be. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' he added. The president also said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk after a feud between the two men erupted into public view earlier this week. 'No,' Trump said when asked if he had any wish to do so. Asked if he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said, 'I would assume so, yeah.' Trump's comments were the most extensive since he and Musk exchanged threats and attacks on X and Truth Social earlier this week. He added that he thought the Republican Party was more unified than ever after the two men fell out in front of the world. Trump said he has no plans to speak with Musk anytime soon. 'I'm too busy doing other things,' he said, adding, 'I have no intention of speaking to him.' Trump also accused Musk of being 'disrespectful to the office of the President.' 'I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President,' he added. Musk on Thursday launched a barrage of posts on X against the president, including a now-deleted post highlighting the onetime links between the president and the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'That's called 'old news,' that's been old news, that has been talked about for years,' Trump said on Saturday. 'Even Epstein's lawyer said I had nothing to do with it. It's old news.' In the days leading up to their public falling out, Musk had been critical of a GOP-led spending bill that the House passed last month. In the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump responded to Musk's criticisms, telling reporters, 'I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill. I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Shortly after those comments, Musk launched his flurry of posts, including a now-deleted post promoting a call for Trump to be impeached and another where he said the president's tariff agenda would cause a recession later this year. Trump on Thursday also responded with his own posts on Truth Social. In one post, he wrote, 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' suggesting that Musk knew what was in the bill before it was passed. He also wrote on Thursday, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' referring to federal contracts with SpaceX. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' On Saturday, Trump said he hadn't given his suggestion about canceling Musk's companies' federal contracts any more thought. 'I'd be allowed to do that,' he said, 'but I have, I haven't given it any thought.' Trump also responded to calls from outside allies, like conservative activist Steve Bannon, who have said that Musk's business dealings and immigration record should be investigated by the federal government. The president told NBC News that he hasn't had those conversations. 'I mean it's not something that's on top of my mind right now," Trump said. He also cast doubt on the notion that Musk's opposition to the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' is jeopardizing the bill's chances of success, saying he's 'very confident' that the bill will pass the Senate before July 4. 'The Republican Party has never been united like this before. It's never been. It's actually more so than it was three days ago,' Trump said. Musk contributed major financial support to Trump's presidential bid in 2024, spending over a quarter of a billion dollars to boost him in swing states last year. In the first months of the administration, Trump put Musk in charge of the Department of Government Efficiency, where he oversaw mass layoffs of federal workers and the shuttering or partial closing of several agencies. The feud, Trump said, has made lawmakers see the benefits of the bill. 'I think, actually, Elon brought out the strengths of the bill because people that weren't as focused started focusing on it, and they see how good it is,' Trump said. 'So in that sense, there was a big favor. But I think Elon, really, I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken.' This article was originally published on
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Measles resurgence highlights the toll of RFK Jr.'s anti-vaccine policies
After the U.S. surpassed 1,000 reported measles cases nationwide, it's clear the Trump administration is failing to protect our health and well-being. The measles outbreak in Texas is now the largest since 2000, when the country eliminated measles. And it's not yet over, threatening to make measles endemic in America again, where the risk of infection comes from within our country. Furthermore, two unvaccinated school-aged children in Texas died from measles, the first American children to die from the viral infection since 2003. Normally, a preventable infection causing avoidable deaths of children would lead to prompt government action. In 1991, I was a medical student with the U.S. Public Health Service in Philadelphia during a large measles outbreak. Over 1,000 people were infected, and nine children died. Government and public health leaders required home visits of infected children, mass immunization, education efforts and even court-mandated vaccinations. The outbreak was stopped. In Dec. 2014, a measles outbreak began at Disneyland and spread in communities with low vaccination rates. Public health action stopped this large outbreak at 125 cases. To prevent further outbreaks in California, I authored Senate Bill 277, which eliminated non-medical exemptions for school vaccines. And with further U.S. measles outbreaks in 2019, I authored Senate Bill 276 to crack down on fraudulent medical exemptions. These laws — championed by California parents demanding safe schools for children — raised statewide vaccination rates and shielded our communities. As Congress waits, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is dismantling decades of public health achievement that will make America sicker. Kennedy reduced vaccine outreach, removed key public health officials, spread disinformation from his official post and suppressed data while elevating conspiracy theorists to top positions. Kennedy and the Department of Government Efficiency fired a quarter of Health and Human Services staff, gutting the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Institutes of Health teams vital to outbreak response. He installed anti-vaccine extremists as advisors, including David Grier, a discredited researcher disciplined for unethical experiments on children with autism, to 'research' if vaccines cause autism, despite decades of research debunking this myth. The CDC has been muzzled: An analysis showing high rates of measles in low vaccination areas was suppressed, and dozens of Texas vaccination clinics were forced to close. When Kennedy dismantled the CDC's communication team, his former anti-vaccine organization, Children's Health Defense, filled the void with disinformation by publishing a fake CDC-branded vaccine 'safety' website that falsely linked vaccines to autism. The site mimicked official CDC design and branding, deliberately misleading the public. After news reports exposed the deception and forced the site's removal, no federal action has been taken to investigate or prosecute this unlawful impersonation of a federal agency. Furthermore, Dr. Peter Marks, the nation's top vaccine regulator who led President Donald Trump's Operation Warp Speed, refused a demand for false data on brain swelling and death caused by the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine, of which there are no credible cases. Kennedy forced him to resign. In his resignation letter, Marks wrote, 'it has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.' And what of the dead children from measles? Kennedy dismissed the first measles death, saying 'it's not unusual.' He blamed measles on poor nutrition, called vaccines a 'personal choice' that could cause 'adverse events' and claimed Vitamin A and cod liver oil treated measles. Subsequently, many Texas children hospitalized with measles also had Vitamin A toxicity. At his first Congressional hearing, Kennedy testified, 'I don't think people should be taking medical advice from me.' He then refused to answer whether he would vaccinate a child against polio. As Health and Human Services secretary, he cravenly refuses to save Americans in a public health crisis. How many children must get sick — and even die — before Congress demands that Kennedy and the Trump administration answer for these preventable deaths and the continued spread of a preventable disease? This flu season, as flu vaccination declined, 226 children died from influenza — the highest since the 2009-10 pandemic. Other preventable and deadly diseases, including polio and whooping cough, will also return when vaccination is hampered and discouraged. Our state has made progress in raising vaccination rates, but we are not immune to Kennedy's dangerous vaccine disinformation; California has communities with enough unvaccinated people to fuel a serious outbreak. Measles outbreaks in other states makes it imperative that California strengthen our public health defenses against sparks of infection. And California needs Congress to hold President Donald Trump and Kennedy accountable for not stopping preventable disease in America. Dr. Richard Pan is a pediatrician and former California state senator who authored landmark legislation to eliminate non-medical exemptions to school vaccination requirements in response to major measles outbreaks.