A new Texas law mandates age checks on phones. It may be just the start.
Below: Trump's meme coin dinner draws scrutiny from Democrats. First:
A new Texas law mandates age checks on phones. It may be just the start.
Texas passed a law this week forcing Google and Apple to check the ages of mobile app store users and require parents' permission before a teenager or child can download an app or use it to buy something. It became the second and largest state to do so after Utah passed a similar law in March.
Both laws are set to take effect next year, though legal challenges are likely.
In the meantime, Texas lawmakers are eyeing an even more aggressive move that has yet to receive much national attention: a bill that would ban minors from using social media at all.
Texas' age-verification law is a big deal in its own right.
With more than 30 million people, Texas is increasingly wielding a California-like power to help set the national tech policy agenda. This is the latest in a string of consequential internet laws that Republican Gov. Greg Abbott has signed in recent years, including one that restricted social media content moderation and another requiring adult-oriented websites to verify users' ages.
Both have been challenged in cases that reached the U.S. Supreme Court. The restrictions on content moderation are on hold after the high court's majority signaled last year in NetChoice v. Paxton that they may violate the First Amendment and sent the case back to lower courts. A Supreme Court ruling on the age-verification requirements for adult websites is expected in the coming weeks, and it could have implications for the legality of age-verification laws in general, including the one Texas just passed.
The latest law is another win for Meta in its battle with Apple over who should be held responsible for checking users' ages.
The social media giant has pushed for laws that put the onus on the operators of mobile app stores — i.e., Apple and Google — rather than individual apps, such as Facebook, Snapchat and Roblox.
Apple has lobbied heavily on the other side. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Apple CEO Tim Cook called Abbott personally to ask for changes or a veto. Evidently Abbott was unmoved.
In a statement attributed to an unnamed spokesperson, Apple said it shares the goal of strengthening kids' online safety but is concerned that the Texas law will require the company to collect sensitive personal data on all users. The company argues for what it says is a forthcoming and less invasive approach called 'age assurance,' in which children's ages would be input by parents but then shared only as an inexact 'age range' with app developers, minimizing identifying details such as birthdays.
Heat Initiative, a child advocacy group focused on pressuring Apple to do more to protect kids, sees that as progress but not sufficient.
'Apple had a very hands-off approach to the App Store' for years, Heat Initiative CEO Sarah Gardner said. That allowed developers to publish apps that were rated safe for kids despite providing sexualized content, anonymous chats with adult strangers, and AI 'girlfriend simulators' and appearance-rating tools. Now, Gardner added: 'I think finally we are seeing Apple being dragged into the child safety arena kicking and screaming.'
Google has a foot on both sides of the fence. It runs the Google Play Store app on Android devices but also owns the social platform YouTube. Asked for comment on the Texas law, the company said only that it is 'assessing next steps.'
Texas age checks are just one salvo in a larger battle over teens' access to the internet.
Earlier this month, Apple lent its support to the federal Kids' Online Safety Act, or KOSA, which would hold social media companies rather than app stores responsible for keeping young users safe. That bill, co-sponsored by Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut), passed the Senate by a vote of 91-3 last year but stalled in the House. Its backers hope Apple's endorsement, along with those of Microsoft, Snap and X, can help it overcome opposition by Meta and the internet trade group NetChoice.
Meanwhile, numerous other states are considering age-verification bills similar to those in Utah and Texas, along with an array of other online safety legislation. It's the rare cause that enjoys bipartisan support these days in statehouses and Congress alike, with Republican and Democratic lawmakers differing mostly on the details.
The biggest obstacle so far has proved to be the First Amendment, which sets a high bar for the government to justify laws that curtail otherwise legal expression, though there are exceptions for obscenity and speech that's deemed harmful to children. Free-speech advocates warn that overly restrictive or ill-crafted online safety laws could lead down a slippery slope to censorship and repression of marginalized groups and unpopular ideas.
Texas's next big move could be a law to keep teens off social media altogether.
The Texas House of Representatives earlier this month passed House Bill 186, which would require social media platforms to check users' ages and prevent anyone under 18 from creating an account. The next step is the state Senate, where it also enjoys bipartisan support, according to the Texas Tribune.
The bill has critics on both left and right who say it's invasive, draconian and poorly written. If passed, it could face an uphill battle in the courts; a judge has already blocked a similar law in Utah.
Regardless, the wave of state-level kids' online safety bills appears unlikely to crest anytime soon, adding to the pressure on Congress to tackle the issue.
Trump's meme coin dinner draws Democrats' scrutiny
A top House Democrat opened a probe into President Trump's meme coin dinner, our colleague Cat Zakrzewski reports for the Tech Brief.
Rep. Jamie Raskin, the ranking opposition member of the House Judiciary Committee, pressed Trump to turn over the names of the guests who attended last week's gala, having secured their invitations by pouring millions of dollars into the president's crypto venture.
Democrats are increasingly criticizing Trump for profiting from his office, focusing on the ways his sons are expanding his real estate and crypto businesses.
'Profiting off the memecoin is just the latest in a bewildering gamut of schemes in which you and your family have profited after your return to office,' Raskin wrote in a letter to the White House, also citing the Trump family's business deals in the Middle East.
Raskin demanded that the Trump administration share details about the source of the funds used to buy the coins, citing concerns that the president may have violated the emoluments clause of the Constitution. The clause prohibits federal officials from accepting gifts from foreign governments without the consent of Congress.
Back at SpaceX, Musk says in interview DOGE became D.C's 'whipping boy' (Christian Davenport)
New student visas paused as State Dept. plans tougher social media review (Anumita Kaur and Adam Taylor)
Trump administration ramps up push as crypto ally (Shannon Najmabadi)
The U.S. government's new strategic reserve: Billions in seized crypto (Lisa Bonos)
Labor Department reverses course on crypto in 401(k) plans (The Hill)
Key market watchdog plagued by departures amid crypto turf war (The Hill)
Tesla investors ask board to make Musk work full-time (Trisha Thadani)
SpaceX loses another Starship on test flight as Musk seeks to renew focus (Christian Davenport)
Civitai ban of real people content deals major blow to the nonconsensual AI porn ecosystem (404 Media)
Netflix co-founder Reed Hastings joins Anthropic's board of directors (The Verge)
Telegram, Musk-owned xAI partner to distribute Grok to messaging app's users (Reuters)
Elon Musk tried to block Sam Altman's big AI deal in the Middle East (Wall Street Journal)
DOGE employees may access sensitive Treasury data, judge rules (Kelly Kasulis Cho)
Data broker giant LexisNexis says breach exposed personal information of over 364,000 people (TechCrunch)
Anthropic CEO says AI could wipe out half of entry-level white-collar jobs (Axios)
Taiwan semiconductor boom runs on exploited migrant labor (Rest of World)
Climate and weather scientists are joining the anti-Trump resistance in the most 'scientist-iest' way (CNN)
This film was made entirely with Runway AI and Google's Veo. It nearly broke us. (Wall Street Journal)
Why 'wrench attacks' on wealthy crypto holders are on the rise (Associated Press)
That's all for today — thank you so much for joining us! Make sure to tell others to subscribe to the Tech Brief. Get in touch with Will (via email or social media) for tips, feedback or greetings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Power couple Jay-Z, Beyoncé have $57M mortgage — are they ‘broke billionaires' or is something else going on?
Why bother with a mortgage when you have billions of dollars? Why even fill out a loan application for that matter when you can simply pay cash for any home on the market? Well, that's probably why Jay-Z and Beyoncé's decision to take on not one but two mortgages on their $88 million Bel Air mansion has raised some eyebrows. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes A quicker path to financial freedom Your Path to Homeownership Property records examined by The Daily Mail suggest that the couple, who are worth roughly $3.3 billion together, secured a $57.75 million mortgage on the property this April. That's in addition to the previous $52.8 million mortgage secured four years ago. Are the music moguls struggling financially and broke billionaires, as some online commentators have speculated, or is this a savvy real estate move? Here's a closer look. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it I've got 99 problems, but a mortgage ain't one An outstanding liability of roughly $110.55 million on a single property sounds mind-boggling until you put it into context. Not only is the figure just 3.4% of the couple's combined wealth, it's also at a fairly attractive interest rate. According to The Daily Mail, the new mortgage has been secured from Morgan Stanley's Private Bank Group at a 30-year term with an interest rate fixed at 5% for the next ten years. The previous mortgage, meanwhile, was secured from Goldman Sachs at 3.15%. Effectively, the average rate on both these mortgages is significantly below the August 2025 30-year mortgage rate of 6.6%, according to the Federal Reserve. Even if the interest rates were closer to the average, these loans would have still unlocked some key financial benefits for the billionaire couple. Buy, borrow, die By borrowing money against an asset they can easily afford, Jay-Z and Beyoncé seem to be pulling from the 'Buy, Borrow, Die' playbook. The strategy involves acquiring appreciating assets, such as real estate, stocks or artwork. Then they borrow against those assets to create tax-free cash flow, subsequently passing the assets to their heirs (Blue Ivy, Rumi and Sir) to erase capital gains over the long term. Beyond the tax advantages, this method also helps wealthy families minimize opportunity costs. By borrowing against their Bel Air mansion, Jay-Z and Beyoncé can invest roughly $110 million in their various business ventures or even the S&P 500, which has delivered a compounded annual growth rate of 13.66% over the past ten years. On their passing, the property portfolio's tax basis would reset, potentially saving the three children millions of dollars in capital gains taxes. Jay-Z and Beyoncé are not the only ones using this clever strategy. Back in 2012, Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg refinanced his Palo Alto home at a 30-year fixed term with an adjustable rate of 1.05% despite being the 40th richest person in the world at the time. The good news is that you don't have to be a billionaire to use leverage as a financial tool. Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. Can't knock the hustle Anyone, regardless of their net worth, can use debt in strategic ways to start building wealth. The most important part of this strategy is to borrow only for appreciating assets. So, a mortgage to buy property or a business loan to start a new venture should help you build equity, while an expensive personal loan or credit card debt to finance vacations could destroy wealth over time. While borrowing money, shop around for the best rate and try to negotiate before signing up. Every basis point you can cut from the loan agreement can magnify your savings over the long term. You may also want a hard cap on how much you can borrow, regardless of how low the interest rate is or how attractive the underlying asset seems. Zuckerberg, Jay-Z and Beyoncé have mortgages that are a small fraction of their overall net worth. Similarly, financial advisors suggest keeping your debt-to-income ratio below 41% to avoid risk. Finally, consult a financial advisor to understand all the tax benefits your loan could offer. For example, couples filing together can deduct mortgage interest payments from their taxable income for payments on the first $750,000 of mortgage debt. By strategically planning and applying debt in this way, you could supercharge your wealth creation journey. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
2 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump is right about border and criminals, but he's losing voters with mass deportations
President Donald Trump delivered on his key campaign promise: Securing the border. Yet the only thing falling faster than illegal crossings has been his approval rating on immigration. The problem: Instead of building on his win at the border with more popular arrests of criminal threats inside the country, the administration is going after migrants indiscriminately. Democrats can't deny it: The border crisis is over. Border Patrol arrests have fallen nearly 90% since December to near-record lows. Nonetheless, only 40% of voters approved of the president's handling of immigration in a July Quinnipiac poll, while 55% disapproved. The 15-point approval deficit contrasts with a +1 rating in the January Q-poll. Other polls show similarly dramatic declines. Of course, people don't actually want more illegal immigration. Polls consistently show that the president is the most trusted on the border. Instead, it's the deportations from within the United States driving the discontent. Quinnipiac's July poll found that only 38% approve of how the administration is handling deportations. That doesn't mean voters back the other side — 84% of disagree with Democrats who want to suspend deportations completely, according to a March Pew Research Center poll. But Trump emphasized that he would prioritize ending 'sanctuary and protection for dangerous criminals' — the position of 81% of voters. Unfortunately, most voters don't believe the president is doing that right now. Even as late as June, voters told CBS News they thought that the president was prioritizing 'dangerous criminals' over peaceful immigrants 53%-47%. By mid-July, it was 44%-56% the other way — an 18-point swing in a month. What happened? Voters started to see how the priorities shifted. According to The Post's reporting, agents were instructed in late May to focus on 'quantity over quality' to meet a 3,000-per-day 'goal' set by the White House. ICE was advised to target people looking for work at Home Depot and to raid businesses in industries likely to employ illegal workers. Rather than scooping up violent criminals recklessly sent back to the streets by New York City or even cleaning out the homeless shelters costing New York taxpayers a fortune, ICE is arresting immigrants who are helping power the Trump economy. Since the White House ordered the change, there has been a dramatic escalation in arrests of people without criminal records. In June, the number of immigrants arrested without criminal convictions was 1,100% higher than it was even in 2017 during the first Trump term: nearly 6,000 per week. Yet there are still half a million illegal immigrants with criminal convictions out there to remove — and ICE should locate them before spending its time and resources on workers. It's common sense: ICE agents told The Post that the policy was 'leading them to leave some dangerous criminal illegal migrants on the streets.' Setting aside politics and crime, Trump has already publicly acknowledged there's an economic downside to these non-criminal deportations. 'Our aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long-time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' he said in June, referencing farms, hotels, and leisure businesses. The president is correct. Besides the border, the president's other primary election issue was inflation. And immigrants reduce inflation — not, as critics claim, by depressing wages for American workers, but by increasing production of goods and services. When supply decreases, prices go up for consumers, as we painfully saw throughout the pandemic. Immigrant workers also benefit their American counterparts: Companies invest more when there is enough labor to quickly construct and fully man facilities, and Americans end up in better jobs as managers and supervisors when immigrant workers fill lesser-skilled jobs. Booting the nearly 2 million illegal-immigrant construction workers will pull Americans out of those better-paying jobs, not into the labor force. Whatever the immigration politics are, Trump's midterm success will ultimately depend most on his economic outcomes. Americans re-elected him because they remember his first term before the pandemic as a period of stable wage and job growth — but random mass deportations are both politically unpopular and economically destabilizing. Although the president has promised 'changes are coming' on deportations, none have yet occurred. In April, Trump floated the idea that employers might be able to sponsor their illegal workers for visas if the workers leave the country and return legally. That's a great starting point: If no employer is willing to vouch for them, deportation likely won't have much economic downside. The president has diagnosed the problem. He's come up with a viable solution. And the One Big Beautiful Bill shows he's capable of navigating controversial legislation across the finish line. With the economy slowing and midterms looming, there's no reason to wait. David J. Bier is Director of Immigration Studies at the Cato Institute.
Tom's Guide
2 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Apple's smartphone market share plummets as Samsung surges — here's why
The rising demand for the best foldable phones is great for Samsung and not so great for Apple. Now, a new report shows Samsung is eating into Apple's market lead in the U.S. after the iPhone maker saw a rare double-digit dip last quarter. In the second quarter of 2025, Apple's market share in the U.S. fell from 56% to 49%, while Samsung's share surged from 23% to 31%, according to data from Canalys. That means Samsung managed to close the market share gap between it and Apple from 33% a year ago to 18% last quarter. Much of Samsung's second-quarter improvement hinged on its more affordable Galaxy A series, like the Galaxy A36. That just goes to show that the race for the best cheap phones is heating up alongside rising prices. Samsung's premium offerings, particularly the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 that debuted last month, have also gained plenty of traction on social media for their surprising durability and value. Canalys credits Samsung's record Q2 growth to its strategy of "smart volume," a focus on offering a wider range of products at different price levels compared to Apple's line-up. Samsung's Galaxy and Z phone lineups start at $650 (for the Galaxy S24 FE) and go up to $2,400 (for the 1TB storage option Galaxy Z Fold 7). "That is a massive span of devices,' Canalys analyst Runar Bjorhovde told NBC News. 'There is an idea that you can target people at every single price point, and you can meet them at every spot.' Though the overall U.S. smartphone market barely grew during the same period, up to 27.1 million units compared to last year's 26.7 million, Samsung enjoyed the strongest performance of any phonemaker. The company shipped 8.3 million units in Q2 2025, a 38% increase year over year. Apple, on the other hand, saw shipments fall by 11% to 13.3 million units, down from 14.9 million a year ago. Apple still holds the crown for most smartphone sales in the U.S., but for the first time in over a decade, its position is beginning to look shaky on its home turf. The last time we saw Samsung seriously challenge Apple's top spot was back in 2014, when the Korean smartphone manufacturer embraced big-screen phones and phablets while Apple was still dragging its feet. Consumer preference isn't the only thing fueling the market share shift, though. As Canalys notes, "Samsung's performance in Q2 was boosted by frontloading of inventory into the U.S. amid tariff concerns," one of several strategies smartphone makers used to minimize the impact of Trump's tariffs. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. If Apple wants to regain its standing in the U.S. market, it'll have to pull out all the stops at its iPhone 17 event this September. This year promises a big shake-up for the iPhone lineup, with the Plus model expected to be replaced by the super-thin iPhone 17 Air. The iPhone 17 Air is a direct competitor to the Galaxy S25 Edge, Samsung's thinnest phone yet, but it may not be enough to change Apple's fortunes. Counterpoint Research, a research firm that estimates smartphone sales, found Samsung only saw a "slight year-over-year boost" in sales after the S25 Edge was released in May. If consumers are as blasé about the Air as they were about the Edge, Apple's going to be in trouble. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
