Canada shocked by Denmark in major upset at men's hockey World Championship
Team Canada was eliminated in the quarterfinals of the World Championship in stunning fashion on Thursday thanks to a dramatic, 2-1 comeback victory for Denmark.
Canada, led by the duo of NHL superstars Sidney Crosby and Nathan MacKinnon, had rolled through the tournament up until this point, suffering only a shootout loss to Finland while easily handling the field.
Advertisement
The Canadians, however, shockingly met their match in the quarterfinals.
Most of the game was a scoreless tie featuring a goaltending duel between Canada's Jordan Binnington and Denmark's Frederik Dichow.
Order seemed to be restored five minutes into the third period as Crosby set up Travis Sanheim for the game's initial goal and a Canada 1-0 lead.
Canada held that lead until Denmark's Nikolaj Ehlers scored with 2:17 remaining in regulation to even the score. Ehlers' shot from the left point came with Denmark's goaltender pulled.
The score didn't stay tied for long.
Nick Oleson scored what will go down as one of the most memorable goals in Denmark's hockey history when he banged a rebound past Binnington for the winner.
GAME. CHANGER. Nick Olesen sends @dkishockey through! 🇩🇰💥 #MensWorlds #IIHF pic.twitter.com/en6PBK4F9I
— IIHF (@IIHFHockey) May 22, 2025
Dichow was the game's star, stopping 39 of Canada's 40 shots to backstop the major upset.
Canada outshot Denmark 40-33.
While Canada obviously wasn't showcasing its Olympic roster, its team still featured the likes of Crosby, MacKinnon and the very impressive Macklin Celebrini, not to mention Binnington, who led Canada to victory in the 4 Nations Face-Off in February.
This also officially concludes Marc-André Fleury's hockey career. He was Binnington's backup in this game and confirmed last week that this tournament will mark the end of his career.
(Photo of Dean Evason and Canada bench: Bo Amstrup / Getty Images)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Pacers Take 2-1 Finals Lead vs. Thunder As Unheralded Role Players Shine
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - FEBRUARY 08: Bennedict Mathurin #00 and T.J. McConnell #9 of the Indiana ... More Pacers react after a foul against the Los Angeles Lakers during the third quarter at Arena on February 08, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by) The Indiana Pacers have built their NBA Finals run on a blend of conventional wisdom and a flare for the dramatics. The former is a testament to head coach Rick Carlisle's willingness to stretch his rotation to ten or even eleven players in a playoff setting where most coaches are putting more mileage on their starters. That helps the Pacers maintain an up-tempo attack that wears on its opponents. The latter includes another improbable win in Game 1 against the Oklahoma City Thunder. Indiana trailed by nine with 2:52 remaining. Teams had been 0-121 on this stage when down by at least seven in the final 3:00 of the fourth frame and overtime, per Josh Dubow of the Associated Press. In becoming the first franchise to prevail in that predicament, the Pacers matched the largest fourth-quarter comeback victory in the Finals in the last 50 years, per ESPN's Matt Williams. Back in Indiana, Tyrese Haliburton nearly registered a triple-double. He finished with 22 points, 11 assists, and nine rebounds in a 116-107 win. However, it was the supporting cast that starred. The hosts second unit outscored the visitors 49-18 in Game 3. "We just had guys make plays after plays," voiced Haliburton after the victory. "Our bench was amazing." T.J. McConnell and Bennedict Mathurin refused to let the Pacers fail. The latter generated a game-high 27 points in 22 minutes. Mathurin's +16 plus-minus rating was second to Obi Toppin [+18], who was also fantastic off the bench. Toppin contributed eight points, six rebounds, and two blocks. He also had a put-back slam that gave Indiana a seven-point cushion with under 4:30 left. McConnell's fingerprints were also all over this game. He produced ten points, five assists, and five steals and was a +12. There were multiple instances where he scored or assisted on a basket, then stole the ensuing inbounds pass. The undersized guard, with a relentless motor, teamed with Mathurin to bring an infusion of energy the Thunder did not match. The latter shouldered the scoring load for stretches. McConnell disrupted Oklahoma City's offense, then pushed the pace to produce points for him and his teammates at the other end. "We really needed that boost, especially in the second quarter, Haliburton told Candace Parker in an interview on NBATV post-game. "We had a rough first quarter; the second unit came [in and] brought energy. When T.J. gets those steals, the building really gets into it. "Ben was amazing, getting downhill, not overthinking things. I thought he did a great job operating the pick-and-roll, rising up and shooting over guys, getting downhill. He just made play after play. Our whole second group did. Honestly, our second group really won us the game." For as much as the Pacers revolve around Haliburton, those two were at the heart of Indiana's taking a 2-1 lead and moving halfway to its first NBA championship.
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Blue Jays keep winning, putting 2024 far behind them: ‘Feels so much different'
ST. LOUIS — Blue Jays manager John Schneider thought for a moment, staring forward as he exhaled in the tunnels under St. Louis' Busch Stadium. Toronto had just won its fifth straight series, toppling the Cardinals before finishing the sweep on Wednesday. The manager was asked to think back: When was the last time his team had a stretch this good? Advertisement 'You've got to go back a couple years, I think,' Schneider said. He's right. The Blue Jays haven't won five series in a row since September 2022. Ross Stripling earned Toronto's final win in that stretch. Santiago Espinal had three hits in the last contest, and Raimel Tapia drove in a run. Simply put, it's been a while. There certainly weren't any stretches like this in 2024. The Jays were never better than three games over .500 last season, finishing the campaign with 74 wins — their fewest in a full season since 2019. Toronto's players and staff have vowed all spring and early summer that 2025 wouldn't be a repeat. Things changed, they said. This team was different. Capping off a 14-3 stretch with a 5-2 win over the Cardinals on Wednesday, the Blue Jays are proving it. 'It's the most fun we've had as a group, so far this year and in past years,' Ernie Clement said. 'It just feels so much different. It's just, it's fun showing up to the ballpark.' 22-10 in our last 32 😁 5 Straight Series Wins 😤 5th sWWWeep of the szn 🧹 IMMACULATE VIBES 😉 — Toronto Blue Jays (@BlueJays) June 11, 2025 The Blue Jays brought in new faces in the offseason, trading for Andrés Giménez and signing Anthony Santander and Max Scherzer, among others. Those additions may soon help, but they haven't been the real difference for this 2025 squad. The change has been in mentality, Schneider said. The 2024 Jays played great defence and leaned on veteran starting pitching. This year's team wanted to be known for more — a collective approach. 'You don't want to go through a year like that,' Schneider said. 'But if you're not learning from things, I think you're just standing in place.' With Toronto's struggles last season, it was hard not to prioritize the individual and personal stats, starter Chris Bassitt said. Winning certainly helps get everyone on the same page, but each player on the roster is now focused solely on the outcome of the game, Bassitt said. The stats naturally follow. Advertisement The 2024 Blue Jays had two regular players hit over .265. This year's squad has seven. The 2024 team had 17 different pitchers earn a win. The 2025 Jays have 14 winning pitchers with 94 games to play. This year's Blue Jays are better on both sides of the ball. Toronto's overall ERA has dropped from 4.29 to 4.06. Runs per game has ticked up from 4.14 to 4.35. There's still a long way to go before scoreboard watching and postseason hoping become real. But Toronto's first challenge of 2025 was to prove things were different — there would be no repeat. So far, with the help of this five-series streak, they've done it. 'It's just playing a very unselfish brand of baseball,' Bassitt said, 'where guys are moving runners over. We're trying to pass the baton when it comes to pitching. It's very refreshing when you're on a team that's truly caring about the person behind you. Yeah, I'm blessed to be here.'
New York Times
6 hours ago
- New York Times
Prosecutor calls Michael McLeod the architect of Hockey Canada sexual assault
LONDON, Ont. – The prosecution described Michael McLeod as the 'architect' of the 'group sexual activity' at the center of the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial and said he told 'outright lies' to portray the complainant as the aggressor in the sexual interactions of the night and advance a 'false narrative.' Advertisement Attorney Meaghan Cunningham provided Justice Maria Carroccia an outline of the Crown's argument, showing a power point in a closing submission on Wednesday that she said will demonstrate E.M. did not voluntarily agree to the charged sexual acts of the night. Cunningham began that presentation by telling Carroccia that she intended to prove E.M. did not want to engage in group sex and that McLeod repeatedly lied about his role as the orchestrator of the alleged incident. McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote are all charged with sexual assault after an alleged incident in June 2018 in which a 20-year-old woman — known as E.M., whose identity is protected by a publication ban — has said she was sexually assaulted over the span of several hours in a London, Ont., hotel room. The players were in town for a Hockey Canada event celebrating their 2018 World Junior Championship victory. McLeod is also facing a second charge for 'being a party to the offense' for what the Crown has asserted was his role 'assisting and encouraging his teammates to engage sexually' with E.M. All five players have pleaded not guilty. Cunningham highlighted that a key factual difference between the Crown and defense cases is what prompted McLeod's teammates to come to his hotel room after he and E.M. had consensual sex. She said that the factual issue will 'shape how the evidence is viewed.' The defense has asserted E.M. encouraged McLeod to invite his teammates in seeking what McLeod's attorney David Humphrey described as a 'wild night.' E.M. said that she did not know McLeod was inviting others and was 'surprised' when other men showed up in the room. Cunningham said there was no evidence to suggest that E.M. encouraged McLeod to invite teammates back to his room and laid out five elements to demonstrate why Carroccia should accept E.M.'s version of events – that she did not want group sex and was surprised by men entering the room. She pointed to 1) McLeod's 2018 police interview, 2) the June 20 text exchange between McLeod and E.M., 3) E.M.'s testimony, 4) the witness testimony of Taylor Raddysh and Boris Katchouk, and 5) McLeod's actions in 'recruiting' others to his room. Advertisement Cunningham said that McLeod was well prepared for his November 2018 interview with London Police, which took place under negotiated terms in Toronto with his attorney in the room, and yet did not make any mention of E.M. encouraging him to text his teammates. He also did not disclose the text messages he sent to a 19-person group chat and to Raddysh in the early-morning hours of June 19, 2018. He texted the group chat 'Who wants a 3 way quick' with a follow-up message providing his hotel room number. He also texted Raddysh separately to ask if he wanted a 'gummer,' which is slang for oral sex. Cunningham asked why McLeod would omit these messages in his interview with Detective Steve Newton and why, if it was true that E.M. was the initiator, he wouldn't disclose that in the interview, considering that would bolster his narrative. 'There is no logical or plausible reason why he wouldn't if it was a true fact,' Cunningham said. 'McLeod lies repeatedly to Detective Newton in that interview but it's the Crown's position that he's doing that in furtherance of a false narrative about what happened. The false narrative that Mr. McLeod is trying to craft is that he and his friends are completely innocent and that (E.M) was the instigator and the one demanding sexual activity.' In the interview, McLeod initially told Newton he didn't know why guys 'kept showing up in his room.' When asked directly whether he texted teammates, McLeod acknowledged he texted teammates he was ordering food and had a girl in his room. Cunningham said that if E.M. was the instigator of the group sexual activity, McLeod also would not have expressed the surprise and shock he conveyed to Newton in his interview about what he said was her sexually aggressive nature. 'It's not just that he forgot, it's not just that he didn't mention that he sent those texts. He outright lies to Detective Newton,' Cunningham said. 'He lies to Detective Newton repeatedly but in particular he lies to Detective Newton about the text message he sent or didn't send that night.' Advertisement Cunningham showed Carroccia the text exchange between McLeod and E.M. from June 20, 2018. In that exchange, in which McLeod asks E.M. if she went to the police, E.M. tells him she was OK going home with him but that she didn't expect others to come to the hotel room. She said she felt the players were making fun of and taking advantage of her. McLeod responded, Cunningham said, by re-framing what she said and responding that he was 'sorry that she was embarrassed' but warned about the serious 'implications' if the police matter moved forward. Cunningham said that if E.M. wasn't the instigator, as multiple players had testified, McLeod should have expressed surprise that she was upset about the other players joining them in the hotel room. Cunningham said E.M. was pressed repeatedly on the suggestion that she had prompted McLeod to invite others back to the hotel in pursuit of a 'wild night' but 'never wavered' in her testimony that she was surprised when players arrived in the room. 'Time and again she is pushed on this very same issue and her evidence is always the same, that she was surprised when other people started coming into the room and she does not think she would have ever asked for him to invite other people,' Cunningham said. Cunningham said that Raddysh and Katchouk both testified about E.M.'s behavior that was consistent with the Crown's assertion that E.M. was not seeking group sex. Both players said that they observed E.M. in bed, with the covers up to her shoulders and neck, and that she did not participate in any conversation beyond asking Katchouk for a bite of pizza. She said this was behavior consistent with someone who felt uncomfortable, not someone who was looking to engage others sexually. She said that if the defense theory was true that she was asking McLeod to ask his teammates to come over for group sex — and wanting to engage in group sex — Raddysh and Katchouk's testimony defies logic. Advertisement 'It would make no sense she would make absolutely no effort to engage or attempt to engage with Mr. Katchouk or Mr. Raddysh, not a single offer,' Cunningham said. Cunningham also pointed out that the testimony of both Raddysh and Katchouk differed significantly from other witnesses about E.M.'s behavior that night. Crown witnesses Tyler Steenbergen, Brett Howden and defense witness Carter Hart all testified that E.M. was the aggressor, asking players to have sex with her and insulting them when they declined. When Carroccia pointed out this divergence in stories, Cunningham replied: 'I agree these things are irreconcilable and someone's not telling the truth,' Cunningham said. She noted that Raddysh and Katchouk's description 'is completely at odds' with the testimony of the players who were on the June 26, 2018, group chat. In that group chat, players strategized how to handle the impending Hockey Canada investigation and discussed what to tell investigators. Cunningham said that they were the only two players who saw E.M. in Room 209 that night who were not on that June 26, 2018, group text chain. Cunningham pointed to McLeod's actions from the night to make the case that he was the instigator instead, and facilitated a group sexual encounter unbeknownst to E.M. Cunningham used a visual display of the '3 way quick' and 'gummer' text messages, sent at 2:10 and 2:15 a.m. respectively. She said McLeod made no efforts to vet who came to the room or took any efforts to get people to leave, but instead was 'trying to drum up more business' and 'recruit more people.' Cunningham cited McLeod's phone call to Hart, his recruitment of Katchouk from the hallway and his knocking on Raddysh's door as evidence of this. '(E.M.) was doing nothing either verbally or through her actions to communicate that she was at all interested in engaging in sexual activity with them,' Cunningham said. 'But the evidence does establish that someone was offering sex to Mr. McLeod's teammates in Room 209 and it wasn't (E.M.).' Advertisement Cunningham ended with the fact that by McLeod's own admissions, he said he was consistently checking in on her throughout the night, telling Detective Newton in his 2018 interview that he and his teammates had a 'no phones' policy and that at one point he 'calmed her down' because he said she was upset no one was having sex with her. Cunningham said McLeod was intervening to 'take some responsibility for managing the room' while all the events were unfolding. 'The reason he is doing that is because this was his idea to begin with,' Cunningham said. 'He set this up.' Earlier in the day, the defense teams finished their closing arguments. Julianna Greenspan, who represents Foote, said that her client performed the splits over E.M. as a 'party trick' that was both 'non-threatening,' not sexual and a 'momentary interaction.' Foote is accused of doing the splits over E.M. while she was lying on her back, grazing his genitals over her face. Greenspan said that E.M. was seeking sexual encounters and attention and that Hart's testimony that she was laughing was 'consistent with her performative behavior in the room generally.' 'In plain language, Mr. Hart's evidence was, this was in a playful manner, this was a playful trick, and (E.M.) was absolutely in on it,' Greenspan said. Greenspan spent significant time returning to the issue of E.M. referring to the players as 'men' throughout her testimony, painting the decision as intentional. Greenspan hammered this point repeatedly in cross-examination, but reinforced on Wednesday that E.M. had 'an axe to grind.' Greenspan undermined the credibility of Crown witnesses Brett Howden and Tyler Steenbergen, both of whom said Foote asked in a phone call to leave his name out of what happened in the hotel room prior to the players' participation in the Hockey Canada investigation. Advertisement Greenspan said Howden was in 'protect Howden mode' and suggested that Steenbergen was influenced by Henein Hutchison investigator Danielle Robitaille in his 2022 interview with Hockey Canada; she described that as 'an investigation intended to support and corroborate the complainant's civil lawsuit, one that Hockey Canada had just settled.' Greenspan ended her closing argument by suggesting that the intense level of publicity and interest in the case has compromised the presumption of innocence and subjected the players, their families and their legal teams to unfair treatment, such as bullying and taunting. Lisa Carnelos, attorney for Dubé, finished her closing submissions on Wednesday by arguing that her client did not engage in any collusion via the group chat he participated in with teammates on June 26, 2018 — 'This is the most lame attempt at collusion I've ever seen in my life,' she said — or in either of the phone calls he had with Tyler Steenbergen and Brett Howden. She explained the group chat as 'the banter of young men' who were 'confused' and 'expressing nervousness and shock.' Carnelos described the phone calls Dube had with both Howden and Steenbergen prior to the Hockey Canada investigation — asking them to leave his name out of interviews with Hockey Canada about the incident — as 'innocuous,' and 'context specific.' (Steenbergen testified that Dube asked him not to mention what Dube did in the room to investigators, adding that he wanted to speak for himself. Howden previously told investigators that Dube made the same request of him.) Carnelos suggested it was 'reasonable' that the call was about Dubé's desire to call Hockey Canada staff member Shawn Bullock to tell Bullock himself about what happened. Carnelos also suggested that the Hockey Canada and London Police reopened their investigations as a result of a 'media frenzy' and described the situation as a 'political hot potato.' — The Athletic's Dan Robson contributed reporting remotely from Toronto. (Courtroom sketch of Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham and Justice Maria Carroccia from earlier in the trial by Alexandra Newbould / The Canadian Press via AP)
