logo
#SHOWBIZ: What to look out for at the Cannes film festival

#SHOWBIZ: What to look out for at the Cannes film festival

The glitz and glamour of the Cannes film festival returns to the French Riviera this week.
Here is AFP's selection of the issues, stars and films likely to dominate on and off the red carpet during the May 13 to 24 extravaganza:
More MeToo
He's never been a mainstay of the festival and hasn't made a film in three years, but French cinema legend Gerard Depardieu is likely to be one of the biggest talking points on Day 1 of the festival — for all the wrong reasons.
A judge is Paris is set to hand down a verdict in the first of two criminal trials involving the 'Cyrano de Bergerac' star over sexual assault allegations.
The problem of sexual violence in the film industry was the subject of a highly critical parliamentary inquiry into the industry that published its findings last month.
Trump
As for almost every public event nowadays, from elections to art exhibitions, it's hard to miss the outsized shadow of Donald Trump as he cranks up his "Make America Great Again" revolution.
The cinema industry is still reeling from Trump's weekend announcement of 100-per cent tariffs on foreign-made films, casting uncertainty over the future of overseas productions.
Will the big American stars at the festival dare to speak out? And will European filmmakers demand the same protections from US-made films, which still dominate the box office in many countries?
Hollywood stardust
Tom Cruise, who will attend the premiere of the last instalment of 'Mission: Impossible', and Robert De Niro, who will receive an honorary Palme d'Or, will be two of the biggest Hollywood stars in town.
Cruise has made a point of avoiding politics throughout his career, and De Niro struggles to find words harsh enough to describe Trump who he has branded "evil", a "pig" and a "dog" in the past.
Other American actors in attendance are Joaquin Phoenix, Denzel Washington, Emma Stone and Jennifer Lawrence, while Jeremy Strong and Halle Berry are on the jury.
Stars-turned-directors
As well as appearing in Wes Anderson's latest film 'The Phoenician Scheme', Scarlett Johansson is set to present her directorial debut 'Eleanor the Great' in the secondary Un Certain Regard competition.
She will be up against fellow American actress-turned-director Kristen Stewart, who will also showcase her first film behind the camera, 'The Chronology of Water', in the same category.
Harris Dickinson, 28, who recently appeared as Nicole Kidman's lover in 'Babygirl', completes a trio of stars-turned-directors at Cannes with his film 'Urchin'.
Gaza
A day after Cannes announced that a documentary about Gaza photojournalist Fatima Hassouna was set to be screened at the parallel ACID festival, her home was bombed by the Israeli army, killing her and 10 relatives.
The outrage over her death has increased interest in the film, 'Put Your Soul on Your Hand and Walk' by Iranian director Sepideh Farsi, which reveals Hassouna as a luminous but increasingly fraught figure.
Palestinian twins Tarzan and Arab Nasser will showcase their latest film 'Once Upon a Time In Gaza', a tale of murder and friendship set in the war-torn territory, in the Un Certain Regard section.
Main competition
More than 20 films are competing for the coveted Palme d'Or for best film in a selection that includes some Cannes stalwarts, as well as a new generation of directors.
Perennial favourites Jean-Pierre and Luc Dardenne, who have two Palme d'Ors already, return with their latest film 'Young Mothers' about five young women in a maternity home in their native Belgium.
Motherhood looks set to be a recurring theme in Cannes, and the AIDS epidemic of the 1980s is the backdrop for two in-competition films, 'Alpha' by Julia Ducournau and 'Romeria' by Carla Simon.
British actor Josh O'Connor will head up the red carpet in two contenders, 'The History of Sound' by South Africa's Oliver Hermanus and 'The Mastermind' by Kelly Reichardt.
Two Iranian films, 'A Simple Accident' by Jafar Panahi and 'Mother and Child' by Saeed Roustaee, will also be closely scrutinised — in Cannes and by Iran's censors.
Both filmmakers have faced legal problems and prison terms over their past work.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Smaller families still in favour
Smaller families still in favour

The Star

time19 minutes ago

  • The Star

Smaller families still in favour

Good boy: A grandfather talking to his grandchild inside a kindergarten in Hanoi. — AFP After the country removed its two-child limit, pharmacy worker Nguyen Thi Nguyet Nga says she still has no plans to have more kids, since she barely has time to see her daughters or the money to provide them a good life. The country's communist government on Wednesday lifted a long-standing ban on families having more than two children, as it battles to reverse a declining birth rate and ease the burden of an ageing population. But rising living costs and changing societal values mean the adjusted law may not bring the baby boom the government hopes for. First introduced in 1988, the law has been loosely enforced in recent years, and despite its abolishment, 31-year-old Nga said she worries about the costs of having a third child. It would mean seeing her two girls – aged seven and 12 – even less than she does or skimping on their education, she said. 'My parents-in-law really want us to have a boy... However, I will definitely not have more kids,' Nga said. She earns around US$300 (RM1,268) a month working in a pharmacy in the main town of northern Tuyen Quang province, while her children live with their grandparents 40km away. 'I don't earn enough for the two girls to have a good life. I don't have a chance to live with them every day,' she said. 'Mostly we talk on video chat and only see them once or twice a month, so why would I have another child?' Vietnam has experienced historically low birth rates in the last three years, with the total fertility rate dropping to 1.91 children per woman in 2024, below replacement level. No preschool blues: A mother taking her child to kindergarten in Hanoi. — AFP Although the trend is most pronounced in major cities, such as the capital Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City, Nga says she and her friends in the countryside feel no more inclined to have larger families. 'It's better to have two grow up well than having three or four kids who don't have a good education or good life,' she said. 'Time for myself' University student Nguyen Thi Kim Chi, 18, shared Nga's scepticism about having a big family, explaining that in an increasingly developed Vietnam, young people believed there are more options than devoting themselves entirely to raising children. 'My plan is to get married and have children once I have a stable career and financial security,' said Chi, who studies dance performance in Hanoi. 'I intend to have one or two kids because I want to balance work, childcare, and also have time to take care of myself.' Like in many countries, the soaring cost of living has become a drag on birth rates in Vietnam. Housing, utilities, healthcare and education costs are rising across the country, and those living in cities in particular say salaries no longer meet their needs. Baby's day out: A grandmother taking her grandchild for a stroll on a street in Hanoi. — AFP The United Nations Population Fund said it welcomed the country's policy shift but warned that it needed to invest in policies that help people balance family and professional life, including expanding access to quality childcare and promoting gender equality in the workplace. Tran Thi Thu Trang, who had a third child unexpectedly and now has two boys and a girl under seven, admitted life got much more difficult after the birth of her youngest. As an office worker in the port city of Haiphong, the 30-year-old is lucky to be able to afford a nanny. 'But salaries need to rise,' she said. 'We need help with kids' tuition fees and more support on healthcare.' Following the removal of the two-child limit, 'I think it will take 5-10 years (for people to change their views)', she added. 'But only if the government makes this a priority.' — AFP

Trump deploys National Guard over LA immigration protests
Trump deploys National Guard over LA immigration protests

New Straits Times

time21 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Trump deploys National Guard over LA immigration protests

LOS ANGELES, United States: US President Donald Trump deployed 2,000 troops on Saturday to handle escalating protests against immigration enforcement raids in the Los Angeles area, a move the state's governor termed "purposefully inflammatory." Federal agents clashed with angry crowds in a Los Angeles suburb as protests stretched into a second night Saturday, shooting flash-bang grenades and shutting part of a motorway amid raids on undocumented migrants, reports said. The standoff took place in Paramount, where demonstrators had gathered near a Home Depot that was being used as a staging area by federal immigration officials, the Fox 11 news outlet reported. They were met by federal agents in gas masks, who lobbed flash-bang grenades and tear gas at the crowd, according to news reports and social media posts. Since taking office in January, Republican Trump has delivered on a promise to crack down hard on the entry and presence of undocumented migrants – whom he has likened to "monsters" and "animals." Late Saturday, Trump signed a memo deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen "to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. "The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behaviour and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs." About an hour before the White House confirmed the deployment, California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, said he opposed the move. "That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions," he said on social media platform X. "We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need." The protests came a day after masked and armed immigration agents carried out high-profile workplace raids in separate parts of Los Angeles, attracting angry crowds and setting off hours-long standoffs. LA Mayor Karen Bass acknowledged that some city residents were "feeling fear" following the federal immigration enforcement actions. "Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable," she said on X. FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said multiple arrests had been made following Friday's clashes. "You bring chaos, and we'll bring handcuffs. Law and order will prevail," he said on X. On Saturday, amid chants for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to get out, some protestors waved Mexican flags while others set a US flag on fire, the Los Angeles Times reported. Cement blocks and overturned shopping trolleys served as crude roadblocks. A crowd swarmed a US Marshals Service bus exiting a nearby motorway, with authorities later closing on and off ramps to keep protestors from taking over the highway and to stop new people from flowing in. The White House has taken a hard line against the protests, with deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller calling them "an insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States." Los Angeles, the second-most populous city in the United States, is one of the most diverse metropolises in the country. The suburb of Paramount, home to about 50,000 people, is 82 per cent Hispanic or Latino, according to US Census data.

Opinion: Tim Cook should have known Trump would eventually sour on him and Apple
Opinion: Tim Cook should have known Trump would eventually sour on him and Apple

The Star

timean hour ago

  • The Star

Opinion: Tim Cook should have known Trump would eventually sour on him and Apple

Tim Cook tried. He tried really hard. Tried deftly to stay on Donald Trump's good side, such as it is. Tried to avoid the glare of a president who'll gut you if you dare disagree. Who'll sic the Department of his justice on you if you don't waltz to his whims or nod approvingly at his nuttiness. Tried to dodge the crosshairs of Trump's tariff two-step with China, which would significantly impact the world's most valuable company's bottom line – likely jacking up the cost of your next iToy. In January, the soft-spoken, Alabama-born Apple CEO sat discreetly among the numerous business moguls who attended the president's indoor inauguration. Understandably so, whether he wanted to be there or not. Indeed, Cook was occasionally captured with the expression of someone who'd just gulped down a tablespoon of Castor Oil. Back in the day, that nasty stuff cured all. At least for a time. And for a time, Cook succeeded. During Trump's first term five years ago, he called Cook a 'great executive' (mainly because Cook called him when many other business leaders didn't) and was persuaded to offer Apple at least a temporary exemption from any tariff against Chinese-made imports. In February, Trump giddily praised the CEO when Apple announced it would invest US$500bil (RM2.1 trillion) in the US over the next four years. Plans included hiring people and expanding facilities in nine states, as well as building a new AI server production factory in Texas and a training academy in Detroit. 'THANK YOU TIM COOK AND APPLE!!!' the president all-capped on Truth Social. One sceptical Wall Street analyst – is there any other kind? – touted Cook's delicate navigation of Trump's mindfield of tariff irrationality, yet poked the CEO just a tad, calling him '10% politician, 90% CEO.' Indeed, a day later, Cook tiptoed along the Trump tightrope after Apple shareholders overwhelmingly voted (97% overwhelmingly) to fully retain the company's policies and commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion – those dirty words Trump is trying to soap-scrub from our lips. The president fumed over the vote on Truth Social: 'Apple should get rid of DEI rules, not just make amendments to them. DEI was a hoax that has been very bad for our country. DEI is gone!' Cook affirmed to shareholders: 'We'll continue to work together to create a culture of belonging where everyone can do their best work.' Yet he also acknowledged that Apple might have to tweak its policies under the weight of legal challenges. He really tried. But he should have known. Heck, he had to have known. I'm not just saying so because Trump's petty proclivities are as transparent as cheap tissues, but because I've twice been able to sit down with Cook during his visits to Alabama. Been able to look him in the eye and talk about the value of education, about his appreciation of Rev. Martin Luther King, about Alabama. He's deep-thinking and approachable. In 2018, he told me: 'How do we as a state – I'm not a resident any longer but an 'interested outsider' – how do we give everyone equal access to a quality education so that everyone can realise the American Dream?' And he meant everyone. Two years later, Cook was in Birmingham to celebrate Apple's investment in transforming a historic downtown building into a coding incubator called Ed Farm. 'It's important that people know the art of the possible,' Cook told me that day, 'and the way to do that is to learn to code, even if you have no desire to code' He likely knew. Knew that only a slight slight – even a perceived slight – could cause his standing with Trump to slip and land on its iTush. Never mind that Cook may have had better things to do last month than board the presidential party plane for Trump's CashApp-me tour of the Middle East. To watch him be fawned over and open gifts like a birthday kid, including the used US$400mil (RM1.7bil) Boeing 'gift' from Trump's new besties in Qatar. An aircraft at least one expert believes might be a security risk. Possible listening devices on the plane, said Richard Aboulafia, managing director of AeroDynamic Advisory and an aviation analyst to NPR, could compromise all of us. Air Force One (the real one) is built for 'basically surviving a worst-case scenario like a nuclear war, or to avoid an aggressive pursuer,' he said. '(It is) more survivable and far more capable than a traditional passenger jet.' Even a US$400mil one. Cook missed the trip, and suddenly he's the bully's bullseye. Top dogs at Nvidia, BlackRock, OpenAI, Citigroup and the semiconductor company AMD scanned their boarding passes and tagged along. They knew. Cook should have known. At one event in Riyadh, Trump turned to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and said, 'I mean, Tim Cook isn't here, but you are.' It was over, right then. Cook was cooked. We all should have ordered every iThing right then because it was coming. It came. Last week, after Apple side-stepped the China tariff by deciding to build more iPhones in India, the president slapped a 25% tariff on Apple products. Period. Not on an industry. Not on a category of products. On your next iPhone. Between that and da plane (homage to late actor Herve Villechaize, who made the phrase famous at the start of each episode of the cult-fav TV show Fantasy Island ), Cook should have known. This may be Cook's only saving grace (beyond continued silence): Trump recently earned the moniker TACO from folks at the Wall Street Journal : Trump Always Chickens Out on tariffs. So Trump could flip on Cook, re-embrace the Apple CEO – and spare us beleaguered iPhone users. Until then, Tim, here's another acronym: TABU – Trump Always Betrays You. You should have seen it coming. – News Service

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store