
Court finds Selangor land office negligent, orders RM1.1mil award for land fraud victim
Judicial Commissioner Indra Nehru Savandiah ruled in favour of Ng Kin Song @ Ng Thian Song, finding that negligence and statutory breaches by the Selangor Land and Mines Department and the Klang Land Office had enabled the fraudulent transaction.
According to court documents, Ng unknowingly purchased a parcel of land in the Klang district in 2016 from an individual impersonating the rightful owner, Yeoh Ah Guan.
The actual Yeoh only discovered the fraud when he visited the Klang Land Office on Aug 30, 2018, to pay quit rent and found that the land had been transferred to Ng's name. He lodged a private caveat on Sept 5 of the same year.
On Sept 14, 2018, Ng was informed by the police that he had unknowingly purchased the land from an impostor, and that the real Yeoh was never involved in the transaction.
Ng later filed a lawsuit naming, among others, the Selangor Land and Mines Department, the Klang Land Office, and the state government as defendants, claiming they had breached their statutory duties under the National Land Code 1965 and acted negligently by issuing the computerised title document (DHKK title) on May 8, 2017.
The defendants denied the plaintiff's allegations, arguing that their role was purely administrative and that there was no evidence to show they had acted in bad faith.
They further contended that it would be unfair to hold them liable for negligence over the fraudulent transaction involving the 13th defendant's land, as they were not directly involved in any fraudulent conduct.
The court, however, disagreed with the defendants on the grounds that the state authorities failed in their legal and procedural duties, resulting in two concurrent titles being issued for the same piece of land.
"It is an undisputed fact that the land office failed to follow its standard operating procedure by issuing a computerised DHKK title without retrieving the manual title from the Yeoh.
"Yeoh was never informed to surrender his original manual title to the land office. Schedules 14 and 16 of the National Land Code 1965 have been compromised by the land office.
"The land office did not explain why they failed to notify Yeoh to surrender his manual title in exchange for the computerised DHKK title," Indra said in her judgment dated April 30 this year.
The court said Ng's purchase of the land in 2016 was made in good faith, based on standard legal procedures, including a land search, but was later found to be based on false documentation submitted by the impersonator.
The court further took issue with the land office's refusal to disclose the identities of staff members who had processed the fraudulent transaction.
"It is important to note that the Klang Land Office's refusal to disclose their personnel's names to the plaintiff constitutes bad faith conduct."
Indra said the defendants could not rely on statutory immunity to escape liability for their mismanagement and failure to act on red flags.
"They cannot rely on Section 22 of the National Land Code 1965 to avoid the consequences of the mess they have caused, which ultimately resulted in an innocent man losing ownership of his land and another elderly man losing his money over a fraudulent transaction involving the same land.
"The simple failure to follow the statutory requirements under the National Land Code 1965 to keep accurate records constitutes a breach of the common law duty of care," she added.
The court awarded Ng RM1,188,631 in special damages, with general, aggravated, and exemplary damages to be assessed.
The defendants were also ordered to pay RM30,000 in costs and five per cent annual interest until full settlement.
Yeoh's counterclaim to be declared the rightful owner of the land was also allowed.
The defendants have since filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal against the High Court's decision.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
45-year-old KL hall now deemed illegal
THE management of a 45-year-old community hall in Jalan 1, Kampung Baru Salak Selatan, Kuala Lumpur, is now caught in limbo after the Federal Territories Land and Mines Office (PTGWP) deemed the structure illegal and issued a notice for its demolition. The hall, managed by Persatuan Kebajikan Kampung Baru Salak Selatan, an umbrella body of over seven non-governmental organisations (NGOs), has been used for decades to host community activities, including running a kindergarten. It is learnt that PTGWP officers issued the notice two weeks ago, instructing the management to vacate the site at Lot 7985 by July 15. The officers returned today and pasted red notices all over the premises. According to the notice, the occupiers have illegally taken up government land and must vacate and demolish all structures immediately, or face legal action under Section 425(1) of the National Land Code 1965. Enforcement action may be taken at any time. Failure to comply could result in a fine of up to RM500,000 or a jail term not exceeding five years, or both. When contacted, association chairman Banie Chin questioned the sudden move by the authorities. 'Why now? 'This is an old community hall. When it caught fire in 1981, we rebuilt it with help from the then-mayor, the late Tan Sri Elyas Omar. 'We raised funds, and Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) also contributed funds for the hall. "No one ever said the hall was illegal. If it is, come talk to us, we are willing to discuss,' he said. Chin, who is also Salak South Village MCA branch deputy chairman, said the NGOs had planned a series of events to be held at the hall and will appeal for more time to secure an alternative venue. 'We can't just cancel the kindergarten. Events are lined up until the Chinese New Year next year. "This whole thing has been handled in poor taste,' he said, adding that it had appointed a lawyer to look into the matter. In a Facebook post, Bukit Bintang MP Fong Kui Lun confirmed that PTGWP, along with DBKL, would be carrying out enforcement action on the site. 'Investigations revealed that the hall has been operated without any valid approval from the authorities. "This constitutes trespass and cannot be allowed to continue. 'As an MP, I respect and support the enforcement action, as it is carried out in accordance with the law,' Fong said. He stressed that the issue was not racial or political, but about safeguarding public property and upholding the law. 'No one is entitled to occupy or build on government land without formal approval. "A reasonable grace period has already been given for the parties involved to move out,' he added. Fong also urged all parties to respect the legal process and not twist the issue. 'Community halls should be used legally, transparently and fairly for the benefit of all residents, and not monopolised or occupied by any individual or group,' he said.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Seven foreigners charged with kidnapping Bangladeshi businessman in KL
KUALA LUMPUR: Seven foreign men were charged in court today for allegedly kidnapping a Bangladeshi businessman last month. The group, consisting of two Bangladeshi and five Myanmar nationals, appeared before Magistrate Noorelynna Hanim Abd Halim. The accused are Sohel Rana, 40, and Sahajahan, 37, both from Bangladesh, along with Myanmar nationals Abdul Majid Abdul Malik, 25; Soforodin Fozol Korim, 25; Mokhtar Huson Zaher Huson, 26; Mohammad Ismail Azita Rahman, 23; and Mohammad Arafat Hussein Jamal Mustafa, 24. They allegedly abducted a 47-year-old Bangladeshi man near a mosque in Sentul on June 26, intending to demand ransom. The charge was read under Section 3(1) of the Kidnapping Act 1961, which carries a prison term of 30 to 40 years and caning if convicted. No plea was recorded as the case falls under High Court jurisdiction. The court set October 2 for the next mention. Deputy public prosecutor Iman Nurhidayah Ezani prosecuted, while lawyer K Komagan represented Sohel Rana. The other six accused had no legal representation. - Bernama

Barnama
2 hours ago
- Barnama
Police Retiree Ordered To Enter Defence On Drug Trafficking Charge
SEREMBAN, July 30 (Bernama) -- The High Court today ordered a retired policeman with the rank of Sergeant Major to enter his defence on a charge of trafficking in 573.6 grammes of cannabis three years ago. Judge Datuk Rohani Ismail made the ruling after the prosecution succeeded in establishing a prima facie case against Aminuddin Amir, 66, at the end of the prosecution stage. 'The prosecution has proven the element of drug possession by the accused under Section 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, while the element of trafficking was established based on the definition in Section 39B(2) of the same Act, namely storing and possessing the drugs,' she said during proceedings here today.