EPA staffers are trying to get people to adopt lab rats as Trump team shuts down research projects
EPA staff at a research office in North Carolina have launched an adoption campaign for their lab rats and zebrafish in response to cuts to its research projects introduced by the Donald Trump administration, according to the Wall Street Journal.
A research and development official at the EPA said that scientists were having a difficult time obtaining supplies for even basic testing, which led to an oversupply of lab animals.
The EPA has about 20,000 animals in its labs, including rabbits, mice, and rats. The animals are generally used to gauge the safety of environmental pollutants.
For those interested in having their own rat or zebrafish, the animals are available at the EPA's Research Triangle complex in North Carolina, according to a report by the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.
The EPA is in the process of shuttering its Office of Research and Development, and will instead replace it with a much smaller office called the Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions. It will use the acronym OASES.
The new office will focus on shorter-term projects that are "statutorily required functions" rather than long-term research, like the effects of potentially harmful chemicals, according to a fact sheet that was emailed to the office's employees.
The plan will result in the elimination of more than 1,000 science positions, which accounts for three quarters of the total office's staff. The reductions are currently on hold pending a preliminary federal court injunction challenging the cuts.
PEER Science Policy Director Kyla Bennett, a scientist and attorney formally with EPA, said the cuts amounted to the EPA "abandoning its status as a premier scientific organization."
'Scientific research is vital to EPA's core mission of protecting public health and the environment, but that mission is quickly eroding," she said in a PEER press statement.
PEER warned that the cuts would make the EPA more dependent on research from chemical companies, which may be incentivized to hide the harmful effects of certain chemicals, and will force the agency to abandon ongoing research that relies on lab animals.
Lee Zeldin, Trump's administrator of the EPA, told the Wall Street Journal that changes at the agency reflect the priorities that Trump campaigned on and that voters supported. He described the changes as eliminating waste and "fraud" that the Biden administration allegedly tolerated.
A group of approximately 400 EPA employees signed a public letter sent to Zeldin on Monday claiming that the Trump administration is ignoring science for the benefit of corporate polluters. Amelia Hertzberg, an environmental protection specialist at the EPA who signed the letter told the Wall Street Journal that Zeldin under Trump is "fundamentally changing the mission of the EPA when he focuses on industry needs above human health and the environment."
An EPA spokeswoman told the paper that the agency was "bound by laws established by Congress — not what some would like the laws to say."
Bennett said the EPA is "undergoing an ill-advised scientific self-lobotomy."
'Instead of developing a strategic plan for meeting its scientific needs, Trump's EPA has decided to largely abandon scientific research except when it is specifically mandated by law, thus embracing some short-term savings to its long-term detriment.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Coin Geek
27 minutes ago
- Coin Geek
Illinois sets new rules as governor blasts Trump, 'crypto bros'
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... The governor of the U.S. state of Illinois, JB Pritzker, signed two bills on Monday aimed at creating 'first-of-their-kind safeguards in the Midwest for cryptocurrency and other digital assets.' The leading Democrat also took the opportunity to criticize President Donald Trump for allowing 'crypto bros' to guide policy. The two bills in question were the Digital Assets and Consumer Protection Act (SB1797), which establishes regulatory oversight of digital assets by granting the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (IDFPR) authority to oversee digital asset exchanges and businesses, and the Digital Asset Kiosk Act (SB2319), which creates specific protections against scams and fraud for consumers who utilize digital asset kiosks. According to the governor's press release, 'both measures are needed to protect consumers in Illinois, as more people are falling victim to scams involving cryptocurrency.' The new legislation is, in part, a response to a recent Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Crime Report that revealed Illinois consumers lost $272 million to cryptocurrency fraud in 2024, the most common type of financial fraud in the past year. While announcing the two bills, Pritzker, who has been touted by some as a potential presidential candidate, took the opportunity to have a dig at the current occupant of the White House. 'While the Trump Administration is letting crypto bros write federal policy, Illinois is implementing common-sense protections for investors and consumers,' said Prtizker, who has been a vocal critic of President Trump. 'At a time when fraudsters continue to evolve and consumer protections are being eroded at the federal level, Illinois is sending a clear message that we won't tolerate taking advantage of our people and their hard-earned assets.' The bills The Digital Assets and Consumer Protection Act was introduced by State Senator Mark Walker (Democrat) in February and was passed by the Illinois Senate in April. It aims to curb digital asset fraud and protect investors from scams. 'It aims to keep bad actors out of the market and ensure that Illinois remains a leader in high-tech innovation,' said Walker. 'By protecting consumers, we will also help foster growth for these entrepreneurs by building public confidence in the legitimacy of cryptocurrencies.' As well as granting the Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation (IDFPR) authority to regulate and supervise digital asset firms, the legislation creates strong customer protections in line with those that currently apply to traditional financial services, including ensuring plans and procedures for addressing critical risks related to cybersecurity, fraud, and money laundering. Companies engaging in digital asset business with Illinois residents must be registered with the state's financial regulator, must offer full disclosure of user fees and charges, maintain adequate financial resources, implement cybersecurity and anti-fraud measures, provide investment disclosures and comply with customer service standards. 'A person shall not engage in digital asset business activity, or hold itself out as being able to engage in digital asset business activity, with or on behalf of a resident unless the person is registered in this State by the Department under this Article,' reads the bill. IDFPR Secretary Mario Treto, Jr. described the legislation as 'a monumental victory that prioritizes the safety and security of the people of Illinois, while also paving the way for a more transparent and accessible marketplace.' He added that 'these initiatives modernize consumer protection and implement safeguards for all Illinoisans who choose digital asset services.' The second piece of legislation signed into law by Pritzker this week was the Digital Asset Kiosk Act, which places new requirements on digital asset kiosk operators. Now, operators must register with the IDFPR, provide reports detailing all kiosk locations, and offer full refunds to new customers who are victims of kiosk scams. The law also caps kiosks' transaction fees at 18% and imposes a daily transaction limit of $2,500 for new customers. The measures are not dissimilar to those proposed in a federal bill introduced by Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) in February, the Crypto ATM Fraud Prevention Act. Critique of Trump Governor Pritzker's press release announcing the signing of the two Illinois bills summed up the intention as 'rooted in protecting consumers from harmful practices and bankruptcies seen in the digital asset industry.' However, it was keen to also note its support for market innovation, adding that the legislation 'puts consumers first, while allowing responsible businesses to continue to operate in Illinois and offer innovative financial products with clear guardrails.' This 'commonsense' approach was contrasted with the actions of the Trump administration, with the governor's office criticizing the president for having 'actively deregulated the crypto industry at a time when consumers are increasingly at risk of fraud.' By way of example, it pointed to Trump signing into law, in April, a bill to overturn a revised rule from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that expanded the definition of a broker to include decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges, otherwise known as the 'DeFi Broker Rule.' The DeFi Broker Rule, which required self-custodial digital asset wallet providers and other developers of noncustodial software to submit information reports to the IRS, was finalized at the end of 2024. It was much criticized by digital asset sector proponents, thus reversing it was high on Trump's to-do list after taking office again in January. According to Pritzker, removing this rule stripped the IRS of its ability to regulate decentralized digital asset brokers. 'Federal legislation on digital assets has largely been driven by industry lobbying efforts and prioritizes industry preferences for limited regulatory oversight over consumer protections and prohibitions against conflicts of interest in the industry,' said the governor's press release. It argued that the two bills signed into law by Pritzker on Monday represented a more responsible approach that puts consumers first. This was echoed by Illinoisan State Senator Laura Ellman (another Democrat), who said on Monday that the legislation 'addresses areas in the virtual currency market vulnerable to fraud and empowers Illinois consumers to make informed investments.' Watch: Breaking down solutions to blockchain regulation hurdles title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nexstar Media Group buying Tegna in deal worth $6.2 billion
Nexstar Media Group is buying broadcast rival Tegna for $6.2 billion, bringing together two major players in U.S. television and the country's local news landscape. If the transaction is approved, Nexstar will pay $22 in cash for each share of Tegna's outstanding stock. And the regulatory greenlight could be likely under President Donald Trump 's administration, which has long-advocated for loosening industry restrictions. Announcing the proposed merger Tuesday, Nexstar CEO Perry Sook pointed directly to actions being pursued by the Trump administration, which he said 'offer local broadcasters the opportunity to expand reach, level the playing field, and compete more effectively with the Big Tech and legacy Big Media companies that have unchecked reach and vast financial resources.' He added that 'Tegna represents the best option for Nexstar to act on this opportunity.' Nexstar oversees more than 200 owned and partner stations in 116 markets nationwide today and also runs networks like The CW and NewsNation. Meanwhile, Tegna owns 64 news stations across 51 markets. Consolidation would mean pooling together all of these resources — and that typically includes cutting any 'redundancies' identified in the process, explained Paul Hardart, director of the entertainment, media and technology program at New York University's Stern School of Business. 'The good news for Nexstar is that makes it run at a lower cost rate, which they need to do because there's all these headwinds on the revenue side,' Hardart said. But for local communities that rely on the company's stations, the bad news is that 'there will be a homogenization of content," he added. Other experts note that previous consolidation in the industry has already shown this. Nexstar, founded in 1996, has itself grow substantially with acquisitions over the latest two decades, becoming the biggest operator of local TV stations in the U.S. after it purchased Tribune Media back in 2019. And Danilo Yanich, professor of public policy at the University of Delaware, says the company is the 'biggest duplicator' of news content today — pointing to recent research he worked on that looked at how often local TV news used the exact same words in at least 50% on their broadcasts. Nexstar's size gives it the most opportunity to syndicate information in this way, Yanich noted, and further duplication seems all but likely as the company looks to "achieve economies of scale," he added. Nexstar on Tuesday maintained that the deal will also help it give advertisers a bigger variety of local and national broadcast and digital advertising options. The potential purchase also arrives amid wider regulatory shifts. Brendan Carr, the Trump-appointed chairman the Federal Communications Commission, which will need to give the transaction the green light, has long advocated for loosening industry restrictions. On Aug. 7, the FCC announced that it would be repealing 98 broadcast rules and requirements that it identified as 'obsolete, outdated, or unnecessary.' Some of those rules date back nearly 50 years, the FCC said, and apply to 'old technology that is no longer used." Carr maintained that such provisions no longer serve public interest. In late July, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit also vacated the FCC's 'top four' rule, which has long prohibited ownership of more than one of the top four stations in a single market. The ruling is still subject to a monthslong assessment by the FCC, but could significantly clear the way for future mergers in the industry. In company earnings calls held in early August, before Tegna and Nexstar publicly confirmed merger talks, both Tegna CEO Michael Steib and Nexstar's Sook pointed directly to this ruling, and applauded Carr's deregulation agenda as a whole. 'We believe that deregulation is necessary, important and coming,' Steib said in Tegna's Aug. 7 call, noting that local broadcasters are 'up against big tech competitors who have absolutely no encumbrances in how they compete." Beyond their core broadcast TV businesses, both Nexstar and Tegna also boast digital news, mobile app and streaming offerings, all of which have played key roles for the industry as consumers change the way they consume news and other entertainment. Broadcast TV has been hit particularly hard by 'cord-cutting,' with more and more households trading their cable or satellite subscriptions into content they can get via the internet. 'The challenge has been recently of 'cord cutters' — but the bigger concern is the 'cord nevers,' of people who grew up never watching television, or linear television,' said Hardart, noting that most consumers, particularly young people, have just about all the content they want on social media or their phone. Despite these shifting landscapes, experts like Yanich say the suggestion that tech players 'could do what local journalism does simply doesn't hold up," pointing to the difference in content and reach. Still, he notes that other broadcasters could soon follow Nexstar and Tegna's footsteps, consolidating the industry even further. Nexstar's proposed purchase of Tegna is expected to close by the second half of 2026. Beyond the regulatory greenlight, it still needs approval from Tegna shareholders.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
American students face new phone bans in school – not everyone is happy about it
Jamel Bishop is seeing a big change in his classrooms as he begins his senior year at Doss High School in Louisville, Kentucky, where cellphones are now banned during instructional time. In previous years, students often weren't paying attention and wasted class time by repeating questions, the teenager said. Now, teachers can provide 'more one-on-one time for the students who actually need it.' Kentucky is one of 17 states and the District of Columbia starting this school year with new restrictions, bringing the total to 35 states with laws or rules limiting phones and other electronic devices in school. This change has come remarkably quickly: Florida became the first state to pass such a law in 2023. Both Democrats and Republicans have taken up the cause, reflecting a growing consensus that phones are bad for kids' mental health and take their focus away from learning, even as some researchers say the issue is less clear-cut. 'Anytime you have a bill that's passed in California and Florida, you know you're probably onto something that's pretty popular," Georgia state Rep. Scott Hilton, a Republican, told a forum on cellphone use last week in Atlanta. Phones are banned throughout the school day in 18 of the states and the District of Columbia, although Georgia and Florida impose such 'bell-to-bell' bans only from kindergarten through eighth grade. Another seven states ban them during class time, but not between classes or during lunch. Still others, particularly those with traditions of local school control, mandate only a cellphone policy, believing districts will take the hint and sharply restrict phone access. For students, the rules add new school-day rituals, like putting phones in magnetic pouches or special lockers. Students have been locking up their phones during class at McNair High School in suburban Atlanta since last year. Audreanna Johnson, a junior, said 'most of them did not want to turn in their phones' at first, because students would use them to gossip, texting 'their other friends in other classes to see what's the tea and what's going on around the building.' That resentment is 'starting to ease down' now, she said. "More students are willing to give up their phones and not get distracted.' But there are drawbacks — like not being able to listen to music when working independently in class. 'I'm kind of 50-50 on the situation because me, I use headphones to do my schoolwork. I listen to music to help focus,' she said. In a survey of 125 Georgia school districts by Emory University researchers, parental resistance was cited as the top obstacle to regulating student use of social and digital media. Johnson's mother, Audrena Johnson, said she worries most about knowing her children are safe from violence at school. School messages about threats can be delayed and incomplete, she said, like when someone who wasn't a McNair student got into a fight on school property, which she learned about when her daughter texted her during the school day. 'My child having her phone is very important to me, because if something were to happen, I know instantly,' Johnson said. Many parents echo this — generally supporting restrictions but wanting a say in the policymaking and better communication, particularly about safety — and they have a real need to coordinate schedules with their children and to know about any problems their children may encounter, said Jason Allen, the national director of partnerships for the National Parents Union. 'We just changed the cell phone policy, but aren't meeting the parents' needs in regards to safety and really training teachers to work with students on social emotional development,' Allen said. Some researchers say it's not yet clear what types of social media may cause harm, and whether restrictions have benefits, but teachers 'love the policy,' according to Julie Gazmararian, a professor of public health at Emory University who does surveys and focus groups to research the effects of a phone ban in middle school grades in the Marietta school district near Atlanta. 'They could focus more on teaching,' Gazmararian said. 'There were just not the disruptions.' Another benefit: More positive interactions among students. 'They were saying that kids are talking to each other in the hallways and in the cafeteria,' she said. 'And in the classroom, there is a noticeably lower amount of discipline referrals.' Gazmararian is still compiling numbers on grades and discipline, and cautioned that her work may not be able to answer whether bullying has been reduced or mental health improved. Social media use clearly correlates with poor mental health, but research can't yet prove it causes it, according to Munmun De Choudhury, a Georgia Tech professor who studies this issue. 'We need to be able to quantify what types of social media use are causing harm, what types of social media use can be beneficial,' De Choudhury said. Some state legislatures are bucking the momentum. Wyoming 's Senate in January rejected requiring districts to create some kind of a cellphone policy after opponents argued that teachers and parents need to be responsible. And in the Michigan House in July, a Republican-sponsored bill directing schools to ban phones bell-to-bell in grades K-8 and during high school instruction time was defeated in July after Democrats insisted on upholding local control. Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, among multiple governors who made restricting phones in schools a priority this year, is still calling for a bill to come to her desk.
