logo
A5 upgrade won't jeopardise net zero goals, court told

A5 upgrade won't jeopardise net zero goals, court told

BBC News20-03-2025
Authorising the £1.2bn A5 road upgrade will not jeopardise Northern Ireland's net zero climate change goals, government lawyers have told the High Court.Counsel representing the Department for Infrastructure rejected claims it acted irrationally by approving the dual carriageway scheme without a proper action plan to ensure carbon emission targets are met.The 53-mile project on the main corridor between Londonderry and Aughnacloy in County Tyrone was given the go-ahead by Stormont ministers in October last year.With more than 50 deaths recorded on the A5 since 2006, campaigners have been pressing for the improvements to be carried out.
The upgrade, which forms part of a proposed key cross-border business route linking Dublin and the north west, has already been held up by previous legal actions.A group of local residents, landowners and farmers are now mounting a fresh challenge against the decision to begin construction work.The umbrella group, known as the Alternative A5 Alliance, contend it will breach legislative targets set out in the Climate Change (Northern Ireland) Act 2022 to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.Part of the case centres on Planning Appeals Commission recommendations against proceeding with the scheme unless the department was satisfied it would not undermine those goals.
'Thorough climate analysis'
No reasonable authority could have concluded there was enough information to demonstrate the targets would still be met if the scheme was approved, according to the Alliance's case.But responding for the department, Paul McLaughlin, KC, confirmed that none of the allegations were accepted."The obligation on the department was to act consistently with the climate targets," he said."In this case, the department did satisfy itself through thorough analysis that the authorisation of this project was consistent with the achievement of those targets."Mr McLaughlin added: "At the very least, the authorisation of the scheme would not prejudice achievement of those targets."The result is that the department did not act irrationally, it had ample information through which to satisfy itself and it therefore did not act in breach of (the act)."The hearing continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Repairs to Greatham Creek's 'poor' flood defences planned
Repairs to Greatham Creek's 'poor' flood defences planned

BBC News

time6 hours ago

  • BBC News

Repairs to Greatham Creek's 'poor' flood defences planned

Proposals to repair "poor" flood defences to protect a town and combat coastal erosion have been lodged as part of a multimillion-pound defences at Greatham Creek and Greenabella Marsh, off Tees Road, near Hartlepool, had been badly damaged since they were built in the late 19th Century, the Environment Agency creek flooded in 2014 and has been damaged by drought, erosion and a rise in sea plans submitted to Hartlepool Borough Council said the repairs would "increase adaptability and resilience to climate change", as well as create a new habitat that would enrich biodiversity. Greatham Creek is home to various wildlife, including a seal colony and several species of bird. The Environment Agency's work, as part of their tidal flood risk management strategy, would include the breaching and re-alignment of Greenabella embankment and the reprofiling of the existing Greatham Creek embankment, including increasing the crest would also see excavation works at Marsh House Farm to provide the clay material for the construction of new and repaired EA report said the defences protected major chemical and petrochemical plants and infrastructure that were "important economically on a national scale". Hartlepool MP Jonathan Brash stressed the importance of the scheme and lobbied ministers over the issue in the House of Commons in said while the defences had been maintained over the years, their age meant they could fail, putting "communities at severe risk".In a letter to Secretary of State for Environment Steve Reed, he said: "Without dedicated funding for the repair and future-proofing of the Greatham Creek flood defences, we risk undermining broader flood mitigation efforts in the area."The government said it was investing £2.65bn over two years to improve flood resilience. A decision is expected to be made on the proposals by Hartlepool Borough Council in November. Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

Emma Little-Pengelly defends taxpayer-paid trip to attend Wimbledon royal box
Emma Little-Pengelly defends taxpayer-paid trip to attend Wimbledon royal box

BreakingNews.ie

time9 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Emma Little-Pengelly defends taxpayer-paid trip to attend Wimbledon royal box

The deputy First Minister has said she was representing Northern Ireland when she attended Wimbledon last month. It was reported that almost £1,000 in public funds was spent on flights and accommodation for Emma Little-Pengelly and her husband, Education Authority chief executive Richard Pengelly, to attend the tournament. Advertisement The deputy First Minister told reporters on Tuesday that she attends many events of significance throughout the year. Asked about the matter following a meeting with British finance minister Rachel Reeves, she said: 'You will see that throughout the week, throughout every month, we have many different roles. 'Part of that is advocacy – that's what we're doing today in terms of emphasising to the Chancellor the needs of the people of Northern Ireland and to ask for that support for that economic growth. 'But there's also a representative role. I count it as a huge privilege to be in this role. Advertisement 'And of course, if anybody follows my social media, you will see that I am out and about on a weekly basis, representing and attending hundreds of events – most of them local community events. 'But of course, those national events and events of sport and significance as well throughout the year.' It is the biggest honour of my life to serve in this role as your deputy First Minister, with responsibility of jointly leading the Executive. In my role, I lead from the front and I lead from the heart ❤️. I have worked tirelessly to champion Northern Ireland at every… — Emma Little-Pengelly BL (@little_pengelly) August 8, 2025 Ms Little-Pengelly said she had little to add to social media posts she made on Friday. In those posts, she said: 'It is the biggest honour of my life to serve in this role as your deputy First Minister, with responsibility of jointly leading the Executive. Advertisement 'In my role, I lead from the front and I lead from the heart. I have worked tirelessly to champion Northern Ireland at every opportunity. I will always do so.' She added: 'I count it a huge honour to have been invited as deputy First Minister to attend the Royal Box at Wimbledon at the invitation of the chair of the club. 'The organisers invite a mix of political, Government, investors, business along with the world of sport and entertainment, and of course royalty, as part of the official aspect of the tournament in the Royal Box. 'It is hugely positive that Northern Ireland is invited to be represented at this significant UK British national sporting event, of huge global impact. Advertisement 'Wimbledon generates over £200 million for the UK economy. I was hugely honoured to be asked to support the event and to represent officially as deputy First Minister.'

Majority of Brits support stripping Prince Andrew of his remaining royal titles - amid speculation future King William will look to cut him out
Majority of Brits support stripping Prince Andrew of his remaining royal titles - amid speculation future King William will look to cut him out

Daily Mail​

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Majority of Brits support stripping Prince Andrew of his remaining royal titles - amid speculation future King William will look to cut him out

Two thirds of Britons support stripping Prince Andrew of his remaining royal titles, new research has shown. According to YouGov polling, 67 per cent of the population would back a move by the Royal Family to remove any remaining vestiges of his former position. The most well known title held by the late Queen's second son is the Duke of York, a title given to him on his wedding day to Sarah Ferguson in 1986. According to tradition, however, he was also given the titles of Earl of Inverness and Baron Killyleagh, relating to Scotland and Northern Ireland, although they are rarely used. All three regions have seen local campaigns demanding the titles be disassociated from the prince, who remains overshadowed by a web of private and public scandals including his association with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Prince Andrew's scandalous and faux pas-ridden life - from the scores of alleged sexual conquests to his boorish and vulgar character - has been outlined in extracts from a new book serialised in the Mail. Andrew Lownie's book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York - also recounts the Duke's seeming infidelity and suggestions he abused his Foreign Office role to boost his own wealth on taxpayer-funded trips. The excruciating revelations have prompted fresh questions over whether the Duke should retain his titles - but his brother, King Charles III, is unlikely to deviate from his mother's famous stance of 'never complain, never explain'. Charles is thought to have sought to address the 'Andrew question' early in his reign - but his cancer diagnosis saw his priorities change. As well as his connections with the Epstein, the Duke was forced to deny ever sharing information with an alleged Chinese spy who served as a close advisor on his business ventures. His relationship with Yang Tengbo caught the attention of British intelligence services, who had to contact the Duke to warn him off amid fears Mr Tengbo was seeking to use his royal connection to his advantage. The King has withdrawn his brother's allowance even while appearing to surrender in the war over the Royal Lodge residence. Andrew must now keep the 30-room estate in Windsor Great Park maintained at his own expense - which he appears to be capable of despite a bill thought to run into the millions. Despite his troublesome reputation, Andrew remains eighth in line to the throne and a Counsellor of State who can theoretically deputise for the King should he become incapacitated, although in reality this is unlikely to ever happen as there are other working royals who also occupy the position. The shamed royal, who retains his HRH status but is unable to use it publicly, also remains a member of the Order of the Garter, the nation's most ancient and prestigious order of chivalry. He also holds various Royal Victorian Orders, given to him by the late Queen, as well as other foreign and Commonwealth titles, as well as being an honorary Vice Admiral. Andrew has disappeared from the public eye, having withdrawn from royal duties - making any future action by William an effective confirmation of his informal severance (pictured 2011) The Duke has seen largely excused himself from all but the most occasional of public outings - joining the family on their Christmas walk at Sandringham and attending St George's Chapel for the Easter Sunday service. Andrew's Order of the Garter, Britain's highest order of chivalry could also be stripped away after he was granted it by Elizabeth II in 2006. It is removed from those guilty of charges such as heresy or treason. The Duke of York has not taken part in the annual public Garter Day parade since 2019, following his fall from grace. His Dukedom could be struck off by way of Parliament. A Private Members' Bill sponsored by MP Rachael Maskell in 2022 sought to grant the Monarch 'powers to remove titles'. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Ms Maskell is the MP for York Central. Nine in 10 local people wanted to see Andrew stripped of his title in 2022, loathing his ongoing connection with the city. He has already been stripped of the Freedom of York. His princedom and HRH title - the latter already informally withdrawn with Andrew's agreement - could be revoked by way of Letters Patent, documents signed by the monarch that grant rights and titles (and can equally take them away). The new polling says that only 13 per cent of those asked would object to him being stripped of his remaining royal titles. A further 21 per cent said they didn't know. The 67 per cent who said they would back any move is spread fairly evenly across gender, ages groups and even political affiliation. A sample 2294 adults across Great Britain were quizzed between August 6 and 7 this year, following the Daily Mail's devastating serialisation of the explosive new biography of the Duke and his wife, Sarah, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, which made a series of damaging claims about his private and public activities. A separate YouGov survey found that Andrew continues to languish at the bottom of the royal favourability tables, with his five per cent of Britons having a positive view of him.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store