France calls on EU to pressure Israel to move on Palestinian two-state solution
'The European Commission, on behalf of the EU, has to express its expectations and show the means that we can incentivise the Israeli government to hear this appeal,' he said.
Mr Barrot spoke on the first day of a high-level UN meeting on a two-state solution to the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is being co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia.
The unoccupied US delegation seat at the United Nations General Assembly on Monday (Richard Drew/AP)
The conference, which was postponed from June and downgraded to the ministerial level, is taking place in New York as international condemnation of Israel's handling of the war in Gaza reaches a fever pitch.
Both Israel and its closest ally, the United States, refused to participate in the meeting, which Mr Barrot said is being attended by representatives of 125 countries, including 50 ministers.
The aim of the conference, Mr Barrot said, is 'to reverse the trend of what is happening in the region – mainly the erasure of the two-state solution, which has been for a long time the only solution that can bring peace and security in the region.'
He urged the European Commission to call on Israel to lift a financial blockade on two billion euros he says the Israeli government owes the Palestinian Authority; stop settlement building in the West Bank, which threatens the territorial integrity of a future Palestinian state; and end the 'militarised' food delivery system in Gaza by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has resulted in hundreds of killings.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds.
The US has echoed its sentiment and on Monday called the conference 'unproductive and ill-timed'.
'The United States will not participate in this insult but will continue to lead real-world efforts to end the fighting and deliver a permanent peace,' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a statement.
'Our focus remains on serious diplomacy: not stage-managed conferences designed to manufacture the appearance of relevance.'
Ahead of the meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would recognise Palestine as a state at the annual gathering of world leaders at the UN General Assembly in September. The bold but mostly symbolic move is aimed at adding diplomatic pressure on Israel.
France is now the biggest Western power and the only member of the Group of Seven major industrialised nations to recognise the state of Palestine, and the move could pave the way for other countries to do the same.
More than 140 countries recognise a Palestinian state, including more than a dozen in Europe.
At the conference opening, Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa called for all countries who have not yet recognised Palestine as a state to do so 'without delay'.
'The path to peace begins by recognising the state of Palestine and preserving it from destruction,' he said.
The other issue being discussed at the conference is normalisation between Israel and the Arab states in the region. Prince Faisal bin Farhan, the Saudi foreign minister, stressed that normalisation of relations with Israel 'can only come through the establishment of a Palestinian state'.
With global anger rising over desperately hungry people in Gaza starting to die from starvation, US President Donald Trump on Monday called for increasing aid to Palestinians, a rare glimpse of daylight between him and Mr Netanyahu, who has said there is no starvation.
Both Mr Barrot and Mr Farhan said on Monday that the US is an essential actor in the region and that it was the president in January who secured the only ceasefire in the 21-month war.
'I am firmly in the belief that Trump's engagement can be a catalyst for an end to the immediate crisis in Gaza and potentially a resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the long term,' Mr Farhan said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
UN investigator says US sanctions over her criticism of Israel will seriously impact her life
An independent U.N. investigator and outspoken critic of Israel's policies in Gaza says that the sanctions recently imposed on her by the Trump administration will have serious impacts on her life and work. Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza, is a member of a group of experts chosen by the 47-member U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva. She is tasked with probing human rights abuses in the Palestinian territories and has been vocal about what she has described as the 'genocide' by Israel against Palestinians in Gaza. Both Israel and the United States, which provides military support to its close ally, have strongly denied that accusation. Washington has decried what it called a 'campaign of political and economic warfare' against the U.S. and Israel, and earlier this month imposed sanctions on Albanese, following an unsuccessful U.S. pressure campaign to force the international body to remove her from her post. 'It's very serious to be on the list of the people sanctioned by the U.S.,' Albanese told The Associated Press in Rome on Tuesday, adding that individuals sanctioned by the U.S. cannot have financial interactions or credit cards with any American bank. When used in 'a political way," she said the sanctions 'are harmful, dangerous.' 'My daughter is American. I've been living in the U.S. and I have some assets there. So of course, it's going to harm me,' Albanese said. 'What can I do? I did everything I did in good faith, and knowing that, my commitment to justice is more important than personal interests.' The sanctions have not dissuaded Albanese from her work — or her viewpoints — and in July, she published a new report, focused on what she defines as 'Israel's genocidal economy' in Palestinian territories. 'There's an entire ecosystem that has allowed Israel's occupation to thrive. And then it has also morphed into an economy of genocide,' she said. In the conclusion of the report, Albanese calls for sanctions against Israel and prosecution of 'architects, executors and profiteers of this genocide.' Albanese noted a recent shift in perceptions in Europe and around the world following an outcry over images of emaciated children in Gaza and reports of dozens of hunger-related deaths after nearly 22 months of war. 'It's shocking," she said. "I don't think that there are words left to describe what's happening to the Palestinian people.' The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel and killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 people captive. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed over 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not differentiate between combatants and civilians but says more than half the dead are women and children. Nearly 21 months into the conflict that displaced the vast majority of Gaza's 2.3 million people, the United Nations says hunger is rampant after a lengthy Israeli blockade on food entering the territory and medical care is extremely limited.
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
I went out to challenge the law used to ban Palestine Action. Would I be arrested too?
I packed a toothbrush, books and a notepad in a small rucksack, took my laptop from the house and hid it, gave my phone to a friend to look after and put a 'bust card' (lawyers' details and legal advice) in my back pocket. I wasn't certain I would be arrested, but I wanted to be ready. Then I stepped, with other, much braver people into a legal labyrinth. So broad are sections 12 and 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000, and so madly oppressive is the government's order applying it to the proscribed protest group Palestine Action that it is difficult, when contesting it, to tell which side of the law you might be on, and what the response of the authorities might be. When people who oppose all forms of violence, who are trying to stop war and terrorism, are arrested on terrorism charges, nothing makes sense any more. In some places, the police have gone berserk. South Wales police, for example, arrested, among others, two women of 75 and 80 who were sitting peacefully in Cardiff, holding signs the officers alleged were supportive of Palestine Action. They used the extended detention powers the act permits, denied one of them essential medicines, broke open the doors of their homes, seized not only electronic devices but also books about Palestine and a Palestinian flag and appeared to test the food in their kitchens for radiation. Obviously, if someone has been arrested under the Terrorism Act they must be planning an atrocity, perhaps cooking up a dirty bomb (doubtless a vegan one, to boot). West Yorkshire police arrested a man in Leeds for holding a cartoon from Private Eye satirising the government's ban. Armed police in Kent threatened to arrest a woman for holding a Palestinian flag, claiming that this, too, contravened the Terrorism Act. An officer told her: 'Mentioning freedom of Gaza, Israel, genocide, all of that all come under proscribed groups, which are terror groups that have been dictated by the government.' At least he got the dictated bit right. Other forces seem to have decided they had better things to do. Or maybe, just maybe, they've determined that our freedom of expression, enshrined in the Human Rights Act, overrides the ban on free expression applied through the Terrorism Act. The two are in direct conflict, leaving the police as confused as we are. On such judgments the future course of your life might hang: you can receive a 14-year sentence for expressing 'an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation', if you are 'reckless as to whether a person to whom the expression is directed will be encouraged to support' the group. Where the boundaries of this remarkably vague law lie is anyone's guess. Our local force, Devon and Cornwall, arrested eight people in Truro for holding signs they suspected to be supportive of Palestine Action. So when we informed the deputy chief constable and our local police station that we were planning to stage a similar protest, we had reason to expect arrests. It might sound crazy to invite the police to your protest when the stakes are so high, but there is a long tradition of such accountable actions. Protest is effective when other people can see you mean it: that you are prepared to stand for your principles – all the way to prison, if necessary. The most powerful response to an oppressive and unjust law, which limits freedom of speech, is to challenge it, openly and without fear. Around the country, many brave people have done so. Some belong to a remarkable breed of older dissidents. The woman I sat beside while we held our signs in the marketplace is an 80-year-old retired nurse called Mary Light. She is a gentle soul with a steely determination to see good done that puts me to shame. Rather than enjoying an easy retirement, she has been arrested 11 times for environmental and Palestinian causes. She has stepped up to oppose genocide while the UK government's contribution to international law consists of approving the sale of lethal weapons to Israel and fighting in court for this sale to continue. All while issuing meaningless homilies about maybe not using those weapons to kill quite so many unarmed civilians, if you would be ever so kind? My own placard sought to test the free speech implications of the law. It stated 'Palestine Action are protestors, not terrorists'. As I see it, this is simply an expression of opinion: a critique of an illiberal and draconian order. How the police and courts might see it is another matter. One person's legitimate expression of opinion can, it now seems, be another person's support for terrorism. Similar opinions have been expressed by the UN human rights commissioner, Volker Türk, and by MPs in parliament. In fact, when she was in opposition, the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, author of the ban on Palestine Action, chastised the Tories for doing what she has now done. She told them, 'the government are extending powers that we would normally make available just for serious violence and terrorism to peaceful protest'. She argued that the Tories' proposed legislation did not respect 'historic freedoms to protest'. Could we be arrested for making the same point? Two police officers arrived, loitered without intent, then dispersed before causing a public nuisance. I remain free, but aware that next time the outcome might be different. People calling for peace risk arrest and prosecution under the Terrorism Act, while the state terrorists murdering civilians every day are protected from our free speech. Misquoting Voltaire, people have often noted that 'those who believe absurdities commit atrocities'. But it is also true that those who facilitate atrocities become absurd. You do not need to support Palestine Action to note that they were seeking to uphold international law by trying to stop weapons from being supplied to a state committing genocide. Some were acquitted on this basis. Why has the UK government decreed they are terrorists? Perhaps because, by supplying weapons, it is complicit in that genocide. If you can turn the moral dial 180 degrees, maybe you can keep believing you are the good guys. The order the police are struggling to interpret is as ridiculous as it is oppressive. Oppression and absurdity are never far apart. George Monbiot is a Guardian columnist On Tuesday 16 September, join George Monbiot, Mikaela Loach and other special guests at the Guardian's climate assembly, live at the Barbican in London and livestreamed globally. Book tickets here or at
Times
22 minutes ago
- Times
Israel condemns Keir Starmer over plan to recognise Palestine
Sir Keir Starmer has announced that Britain will join France in formally recognising a Palestinian state in September, unless Israel takes action to end the 'appalling' situation in Gaza. The announcement was met with criticism by Israel. Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, said that the decision 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims'. Starmer gave Israel an ultimatum on Tuesday afternoon as he said that the catastrophic failure to supply aid to Gaza meant that 'we see starving babies, children too weak to stand — images that will stay with us for a lifetime'. He said the UK would recognise Palestine unless Israel reached a ceasefire, committed itself to a two-state solution and made clear that it would not annex the occupied West Bank. Given Israel's opposition to these terms, this means that recognition of a Palestinian state is almost inevitable. The United States has also criticised the announcement. President Trump, who was flying back from Scotland, said it was 'rewarding Hamas'. Netanyahu said on X: 'A jihadist state on Israel's border TODAY will threaten Britain TOMORROW. Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails. It will fail you too. It will not happen.' Israel said the decision 'harms efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza'. Starmer now hopes to galvanise other world leaders into recognising a Palestinian state at the UN general assembly in September. He is now expected to embark on a diplomatic blitz to 'maximise' pressure on Israel. The prime minister made the announcement under mounting pressure from his own party. A third of his cabinet had been pressing for recognition, and more than 130 Labour MPs signed a letter pressing him to act. Starmer said 'this is the moment to act' and that the situation in Gaza meant the imperative to recognise a Palestinian state was 'under pressure like never before'. He said: 'I've always said we will recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process, at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution. 'With that solution now under threat, this is the moment to act. So today — as part of this process towards peace — I can confirm the UK will recognise the state of Palestine by the United Nations general assembly in September unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution. 'This includes allowing the UN to restart the supply of aid, and making clear there will be no annexations in the West Bank. Meanwhile, our message to the terrorists of Hamas is unchanged and unequivocal.' Melanie Ward, a Labour MP and former chief executive of Medical Aid for Palestinians which has been pushing for action, said Starmer's move was a 'huge shift in the UK's position'. She said the government was using it 'to put conditions on Israel that would drive desperately-needed, real change in the lives of Palestinians at this most horrific of times. It is the right thing to do.' Speaking from Downing Street, the prime minister said that aid must be allowed in to Gaza. 'The Palestinian people have endured terrible suffering. Now, in Gaza because of a catastrophic failure of aid, we see starving babies, children too weak to stand: Images that will stay with us for a lifetime. 'The suffering must end. Yesterday I discussed this with President Trump and we are mounting a major effort to get humanitarian supplies back in. 'By air — and UK aid has been air dropped into Gaza today — and, crucially, by land we need to see at least 500 trucks entering Gaza every day. But ultimately the only way to bring this humanitarian crisis to an end is through a long-term settlement.' Trump said that he and Starmer had not discussed formally recognising Palestine during their meeting on Monday. He initially said 'we have no view on that' then added: 'You could make the case that you're rewarding Hamas if you do that. I don't think they should be rewarded. So I'm not in that camp, to be honest.' Trump was asked whether his reaction to Starmer's announcement differed from his dismissive view of President Macron when Macron said that France would recognise the Palestinian state. 'I guess Starmer is doing the same as Macron, right?' Trump said. 'He's basically, is he saying the same thing? I think so. Essentially, they're saying the same thing, and that's OK. You know, it doesn't mean I have to agree.' The Israeli foreign ministry said: 'The shift in the British government's position at this time, following the French move and internal political pressures, constitutes a reward for Hamas and harms efforts to achieve a ceasefire in Gaza and a framework for the release of hostages.' David Lammy, the foreign secretary, said that Israel's actions in Gaza had 'horrified the world'. In an impassioned speech to a conference in New York, Lammy said 'the two-state solution is in peril' and that recognising a Palestinian state was the best way to save it. Britain 'bears a special burden of responsibility' for ensuring a two-state solution as a result of the 1917 Balfour declaration that laid the foundations for a Jewish state in the Middle East, Lammy said. Palestinians had suffered a 'historical injustice' in having their rights ignored after Britain promised to protect them, he added. 'The devastation in Gaza is heartbreaking. Children are starving and Israel's drip feeding of aid has horrified the world,' Lammy said. 'The Netanyahu government's rejection of a two-state solution is wrong — it's wrong morally and it's wrong strategically. It harms the interests of the Israeli people, closing off the only path to a just and lasting peace. And that is why we are determined to protect the viability of a two-state solution.'
