Nicholas Kent sworn in as US Under Secretary of Education: A closer look at his academic and policy trajectory
Nicholas Kent has officially assumed office as the US Under Secretary of Education, following Senate confirmation and a formal swearing-in ceremony. The role places him at the center of federal policymaking on postsecondary education, student aid, and workforce alignment at a time of renewed debate over the future of American higher education.
Kent's elevation to the Department of Education's third-highest post marks a critical appointment by the Trump administration as it looks to reassert conservative priorities in education policy. He is expected to take a leading role in overseeing initiatives related to career pathways, short-term credential programmes, and institutional accountability.
Known for his work on regulatory reform and workforce alignment, Kent has built a reputation as a pragmatic policy strategist with experience spanning both federal and state education systems.
Education and early academic foundations
A first-generation college graduate, Nicholas Kent holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from West Virginia Wesleyan College. He later earned a Master of Arts in Education and Human Development from The George Washington University, a programme that emphasizes policy design, data use, and systemic school improvement. His academic path helped lay the foundation for his interest in bridging education with labor market outcomes.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Discover the AI-powered language app that's changing how everyone learns
Talkpal AI
Undo
Kent has often spoken about the importance of access and equity in postsecondary education, themes that have underpinned much of his policy work.
A career rooted in education reform
Before joining the Department of Education, Kent served as Virginia's Deputy Secretary of Education under Governor Glenn Youngkin. In that role, he was responsible for advancing K–12 and higher education reforms across the state, with a focus on career-connected learning and outcome-driven funding models.
His earlier tenure as Chief Policy Officer at Career Education Colleges and Universities (CECU) placed him at the intersection of federal policy and institutional practice. While at CECU, Kent advocated for regulatory frameworks that support alternative education providers and workforce-focused credentials. He also held a senior post at the District of Columbia's Office of the State Superintendent of Education, where he managed data systems and research initiatives tied to student performance and accountability.
What lies ahead
As Under Secretary, Kent will be tasked with steering federal efforts around student financial aid, accreditation, and the interface between higher education and employment. He joins the Department at a time of significant political attention to cost transparency, institutional effectiveness, and the value of postsecondary credentials.
With a blend of academic training and policy experience, Kent's leadership is likely to shape how the federal government addresses questions of quality, access, and return on investment in higher education.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump tariffs : Will stick to our red lines on US trade deal, says official
NEW DELHI: The govt is likely to hold firm on its stand with the US, drawing a red line in sensitive areas such as dairy and agricultural products, including genetically modified food, while keeping the interests of Indian consumers paramount when it comes to oil purchases. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "We will stick to our red lines," said a senior government functionary immediately after Trump announced his latest trade fatwa. While negotiators are looking to engage in further talks with their US counterparts, a breakthrough looks tough given that both sides have dug in their heels. A team of American trade negotiators is scheduled to be in the capital later this month for the sixth round of talks for a bilateral trade agreement. For the govt, lowering tariffs on farm products, such as corn and soybean, is not just politically sensitive given that it will expose small Indian farmers, many of whom are subsistence farmers, to competition from large growers in the US, who have farms spread across hundreds of acres and are subsidised by their govt. The same is true for dairy too and Indian negotiators have consistently conveyed the govt's sensitivities. GM food is another no-go area with some discussion with US earlier focusing on certification and export of processed maize as ethanol and soya oil. But Trump administration, at the political level, has been insisting on an across the board opening up. While the US is demanding zero duty access for all its products into India, there is no reciprocity in the proposed agreements, with Trump levying additional tariffs - 10%-20% - on all other countries which he has clinched deals. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Govt had suggested some duty cuts to allow market access for American products into the rapidly growing market, the largest in world, and also increase purchase of oil, fertilizer and defence equipment to reduce the trade surplus that India enjoys. But the Trump administration dismissed them as inadequate. In any case, US has been unwilling to offer any concessions on sectoral tariffs such as 50% in the case of steel, aluminium and copper and 25% for automobiles & auto parts. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays.
The Hindu
38 minutes ago
- The Hindu
From The Hindu, August 7, 1975: Hitch delays flight of plane with Gunmen
Kuala Lumpur, August 6: Five terrorists who held 52 hostages in the U.S. Consulate for two days boarded a plane at Kuala Lumpur airport to-day and officials said they would leave for Libya at 8 a.m. local time (6 a.m. IST) to-morrow. The five still held 15 of their hostages aboard the plane, including the U.S. Consul, Mr. R. Stebbins and the Swedish Charge d' Affaires Mr. Bergenstrahle. Officials said they were to be released in exchange for two Malaysian and two Japanese Government officials who would accompany the terrorists to Libya as substitute hostages. The two Malaysians were named as Mr. Ramli Omar, Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Communications and Mr. Osman Cassim, Secretary-General of the Home Ministry. According to American officials here, the Libyan Government had agreed to accept the guerillas. Meanwhile, the five Japanese radicals who were released from Japanese prisons and flown to Kuala Lumpur as demanded by the terrorists, were waiting in an airport building to board the plane for the flight. After exhausting negotiations, the gunmen agreed this morning to leave the American International Assurance building which houses the U.S. and other embassies in downtown Kuala Lumpur and join their five comrades at the airport. Masked, wearing gloves and carrying automatic revolvers and hand grenades, they marched their 15 hostages along with them and made the 22 km drive to the airport in a large bus.
Economic Times
38 minutes ago
- Economic Times
100% tariff on chips and semiconductors? Trump plans big tech crackdown as firms race to build in U.S.
100% tariff on chips and semiconductors — that's the bold step Trump just proposed, targeting imported semiconductors to push companies to build in the U.S. This isn't just a policy shift—it's a potential shake-up for the entire tech world. The plan would slap a massive tariff on chips unless companies are already manufacturing or committing to build facilities in America. While some giants like Apple are moving fast with U.S. investments, others might face huge costs. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why is the U.S. targeting chip imports with a 100% tariff? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Which companies could be impacted the most? Popular in International How will the tariff affect electronics and consumer prices? Is this a game changer for the U.S. chip industry? What does this mean for the global tech economy? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs: President Donald Trump has announced a 100% tariff on all imported chips and semiconductors. This dramatic move is aimed at pressuring tech companies to bring semiconductor manufacturing back to the United States. With global tensions high and supply chains under strain, this policy marks a turning point not just for the U.S. economy—but for the entire global tech to trade data, the U.S. imported approximately $46.3 billion worth of semiconductors in 2024, making up nearly 1% of the country's total $3.35 trillion in goods imports. These numbers highlight just how critical imported chips are to the American economy—and how bold this new policy really new 100% semiconductor tariff is more than just a trade policy—it's a clear message. Trump wants to reduce America's dependency on foreign-made chips, especially those coming from Asia. Over 70% of the world's chips are currently produced in Taiwan, South Korea, and China, leaving the U.S. exposed to global disruptions and geopolitical tariff is designed to flip the script. Instead of relying on global factories, Trump wants companies to build chip facilities on American soil. It's a direct attempt to bring tech manufacturing back home—and it's happening giants like, andrely heavily on imported chips to power everything from iPhones to electric cars. But Trump has made one thing clear: companies that are already building or committing to build semiconductor plants in the U.S. will be exempt from the 100% for example, has already pledged a $100 billion investment in U.S.-based chip and component manufacturing—a strategic move to sidestep the penalty and strengthen its domestic supply chain. Others are expected to follow suit, fast-tracking plans to expand U.S. operations and avoid the steep immediate concern for consumers is price. Since most electronics—phones, laptops, TVs, cars—depend on chips, this tariff could quickly translate intoIf companies fail to localize chip production, they'll likely pass theonto customers. That means we could see price hikes in smartphones, EVs, gaming devices, and even home appliances. Industry analysts warn this couldin consumer tech fast. Unlike earlier policies like the CHIPS Act under Biden, which focused on incentives and subsidies, Trump's approach is based on pressure. It forces companies to act—not just say the 100% chip import tariff could accelerate billions in U.S. tech infrastructure, boost job creation in semiconductor hubs, and shift global supply chain priorities. However, some fear retaliation from trade partners or a rise in global tech isn't just a U.S. story—it's a global one. Countries that dominate chip exports—like Taiwan, South Korea, and China—may respond with their own measures. The tariff could intensify trade tensions, impact global production timelines, and force tech companies to diversify sourcing at a massive the U.S. market being one of the most lucrative for tech, no brand can afford to ignore this shift. We're already seeing a surge in factory announcements, investment deals, and reshoring plans, and it's just the has proposed a 100% tariff on all imported semiconductors unless companies are building or operating facilities in the companies manufacturing or committing to manufacture chips in the U.S. will be exempt from the new tariff.
