Human rights committee blames Guatemala for forcing girl who was raped to carry out her pregnancy
A former director of a government-run daycare facility she had attended as a child raped her on multiple occasions beginning in 2009 when she was 13 and no longer attended the center, but she was denied access to abortion, forced to carry out the birth and care for the child, treatment the committee compared to torture.
'No girl should be forced to carry the child of her rapist. Doing so robs her of her dignity, her future, and her most basic rights,' Committee member Hélène Tigroudja said in a statement, adding that 'This is not just a violation of reproductive autonomy — it is a profound act of cruelty.'
The committee monitors countries' adherence to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
When the girl's mother found out about the abuse she reported it to authorities. The man and his wife tried to bribe and threaten the girl's family into withdrawing the report. The case wound on in Guatemala's justice system for nine years, but the man was never punished.
'Guatemala did not properly investigate the rape, nor did it take effective action to prosecute the perpetrator,' the committee said.
'Guatemala is one of the Latin American countries with the highest rates of both forced motherhood and systematic impunity for sexual violence,' the committee's statement said. 'Although the Guatemalan Criminal Code allows abortion in specific situations to avoid a threat to the life of the mother, access to legal abortion is almost impossible in practice.'
The committee called on Guatemala to establish a system to record and monitor such cases. In the case of the girl, it said the state should support her to complete higher education and attain her goals.
Catalina Martínez, vice president for Latin America and the Caribbean for the Center of Reproductive Rights, one of the groups that brought the girl's case forward, said there is agreement in society that the protection of girls is a priority.
'But that promise is broken when we don't provide access to all health services, including abortion, and we obligate them to assume motherhood that they don't want and for which they are not prepared,' she said.
Perez D. writes for the Associated Press.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
30 minutes ago
- USA Today
Shooter who killed 10 Black people in Buffalo NY says grand jury was too white
A white supremacist who shot and killed 10 Black people at a supermarket in Buffalo, New York, asked a judge to dismiss his federal case because not enough Black and Hispanic people were on the grand jury that indicted him, a motion filed by his attorneys on Aug. 14 said. Lawyers for Payton Gendron, the gunman who is serving 11 life sentences on state charges in connection with the 2022 massacre, said Black and Hispanic people are "systematically" underrepresented in the Southern District of New York's jury pools, violating the constitutional rights of defendants, the motion said. In response, the U.S. Attorney's Office said Gendron's lawyers failed to prove there is a systematic underrepresentation in the jury pool and urged the judge to reject the motion. The judge has not filed a decision as of Friday, Aug. 15. The back-and-forth comes as Gendron is expected to go on trial next year for federal hate crime charges that carry the possibility of the death penalty, which federal prosecutors vowed to pursue. New York state, where Gendron pleaded guilty to 15 state charges, including multiple counts of murder, abolished capital punishment in 2004. On May 14, 2022, Gendron traveled to Buffalo and opened fire in a busy supermarket, killing 10 people and wounding three others. The victims ranged in age from 32 to 86 and included a church deacon, the grocery store's security guard, a man shopping for a birthday cake and a grandmother of nine. Gendron, who was 18 when he carried out the attack, wrote in documents posted online that he picked the grocery store because it was in a predominantly Black neighborhood. What was the makeup of the grand jury? In their filing, Gendron's attorneys say the grand jury that indicted their client was drawn from a pool that was missing "one third of the Black persons expected and one third of the Hispanic/Latino persons expected." The filing did not include the exact makeup of the grand jury, but the judge said at a hearing this week that the addition of two more Black people on the 60-person grand jury would have balanced the panel, according to the Associated Press. Gendron's attorneys also said that the district largely delegates the process of jury sourcing to an outside vendor that failed to properly document its procedures. The U.S. attorney's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment about its jury pool. Diversity in jury pools have been longstanding issues plaguing the criminal justice system. Advocates have called for changes to the jury pool selection processes on local, state and federal levels, such reducing a reliance on voter rolls, which experts say can exclude some racial groups. Gendron previously asked that his trial be moved, citing jury concerns This week's motion was not the first time Gendron's attorneys raised concerns over the demographic makeup of those weighing his federal case. In April, his attorneys filed a motion requesting that his trial be moved from Buffalo to New York City so it could be decided by an impartial, racially diverse jury. His attorneys also requested that the judge take the death penalty off the table, taking issue with the jury selection process. U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence Vilardo rejected the motion to remove the death penalty, but has not decided on whether to move the trial to New York City. Gendron's federal trial is currently scheduled for June 2026. Cotnributing: N'dea Yancey-Bragg
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Is Ready to Invade U.S. Ally If It Doesn't Cave to His Demands
The White House has authorized the Pentagon to use military force against Latin American drug cartels—but the sweeping directive also appears to violate the sovereignty of America's southern neighbor. Sources working in or with the Trump administration told Rolling Stone Thursday that the president is serious about attacking Mexico unless the nation gives Donald Trump 'what he wants.' U.S. government officials just had one stipulation: don't refer to the intimidation campaign as an 'invasion.' 'It's not a negotiating tactic,' a senior administration official told the magazine. 'It's not Art of the Deal. The president has been clear that a strike … is coming unless we see some big, major changes.' Trump and Republican leaders have long embraced the idea of invading Mexico, citing rising fentanyl rates and drug trafficking as sound reasons to put American boots on the ground. In January, Trump told reporters that the possibility of sending U.S. special ops across the border 'could happen.' Mexico's compliance with Trump's agenda has been complicated. Last week, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum rejected the Trump administration's attempt to send troops across the border, though days later, the Mexican government extradited 26 alleged cartel members, including leaders from major gangs, to the U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi hailed it as 'historic efforts to dismantle cartels and foreign terrorist organizations.' Cartel monitors that spoke with Rolling Stone claimed that Mexico's compliance is an effort to 'stave off' U.S. military intervention and 'preserve ongoing trade negotiations.' Mexico has not finalized its trade deal with the Trump administration. Late last month, Trump and Sheinbaum agreed to postpone a potential 30 percent tariff rate for another 90 days, but just how long it will take for the two countries to reach an agreement remains to be seen. Historically, it takes U.S. officials roughly 18 months to negotiate a new trade agreement with another country. That boils down to exhaustive reviews of the country's prior trade, sorting through thousands of line items of products, and analyzing the complex minutiae of local import and export laws.
Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
American accused of faking death, fleeing US found guilty of raping former girlfriend
A man accused of faking his death and fleeing the country to avoid facing sexual assault charges was convicted Wednesday of first-degree felony rape. The verdict in the 2008 rape case came after a three-day trial in which the accuser and her parents testified. Nicholas Rossi, who refused to testify on his own behalf, is set to be sentenced Oct. 20 and faces five years to life in prison under Utah law. He is also slated to stand trial in September for a Utah County rape. "We are grateful to the survivor in this case for her willingness to come forward, years after this attack took place," said Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill. "We appreciate her patience as we worked to bring the defendant back to Salt Lake County so that this trial could take place and she could get justice. It took courage and bravery to take the stand and confront her attacker to hold him accountable." Authorities identified Rossi from a decade-old DNA rape kit in 2018, according to the Associated Press. He was charged as Utah was working to clear its rape kit backlog. Rossi, who is from Rhode Island, returned to his home state before fleeing the U.S. While in Rhode Island, Rossi told reporters he had late-stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Later, an online obituary stated that Rossi had died in February 2020, though several people close to him cast doubt on his death. He was arrested in Scotland in 2021 when hospital staff recognized his tattoos from an Interpol notice. However, Rossi claimed he was an Irish orphan named Arthur Knight who had never been to the U.S. This was one of many aliases investigators say Rossi used. He was extradited to Utah in January 2024. The victim said she met Rossi — whose legal name is Nicholas Alahverdian — as she was recovering from a traumatic brain injury. The Associated Press reported that the victim answered a personal ad Rossi posted on Craigslist. The relationship progressed quickly, and they were engaged just two weeks after meeting, according to the Associated Press. "He was very charming and seemed very interested in school and politics and music, and he was just very nice to me," the victim told the jury, according to Fox 13 Salt Lake City. The victim recalled being asked to pay for dates, Rossi's car repairs, and even their engagement rings. She also said she had to lend Rossi $1,000 so he wouldn't be evicted from his apartment. Rossi's lawyers apparently tried to paint the victim as being resentful and seeking revenge for being put in this financial position. Rossi later raped the victim in his bedroom one night after the victim drove him home, according to her testimony. She cited her parents' dismissive response as the reason she did not come forward at the time. Her father — from whom she is estranged, allegedly for reasons unrelated to Rossi — said that if his daughter told him she had been raped, he didn't hear it, according to Fox 13 Salt Lake City. The victim said she decided to come forward years later after seeing a news report stating that Rossi was accused of another rape. Rossi is accused of raping another former girlfriend at his apartment in September 2008 when she came to his apartment to get money she claimed he stole from her to buy a computer. Though Rossi will not stand trial in this case until next month, the victim testified Tuesday in the Salt Lake City case about her experience with the now-convicted rapist. The Utah County victim went to police at the time of the alleged rape to report Rossi, who later claimed in an interview with authorities that she had raped him and threatened to have him killed. It remains to be seen how this will play out in court next month.
