Ex-cotton grower sentenced for $8.7 million irrigation fraud
John Douglas Norman appeared before the court after he was remanded in custody at his last appearance in June 2025.
Norman, who entered a plea of guilty on April 28 to six counts of fraud adding up to a value of around $8.7 million, was given a head sentence of 9.5 years by Judge Bernard Porter KC, and will have to spend at least three of those years in custody before he will be eligible for parole.
Judge Porter said he had "no doubt Mr Norman will not commit another offence like this".
"I have no doubt that he regrets what he did," he said.
During the June 25 sentencing hearing, Norman's defence barrister Jeffrey Hunter KC spoke to the nature of Norman's offending and stated it was not "a particularly elaborate scheme".
"The record keeping, such if there was any, was utterly shambolic," Mr Hunter said.
"Even after the event, it was not possible for the defendant to identify which invoices related to the Healthy Headwaters work."
When delivering the sentence, Judge Porter did not accept Mr Norman's ADHD diagnosis was an excuse for his fraudulent offending.
He also noted that the case was "nothing like a Ponzi scheme or an insurance fraud case".
Judge Porter sentenced Norman to 9.5 years on each count of fraud, to be served concurrently, with 21 days of pre-sentence custody to be observed.
He will be eligible for parole on June 24, 2028.
Norman, who has a wife and four children aged between 15 and 21, was supported in court by a contingent of family and friends.
Norman was initially charged in 2018 with six fraud charges, as well as six other charges related to the falsification of records, which have since been discontinued.
He had been accused of committing fraud to a value of $12 million, but in April 2025, the amount was reduced to $8.7 million and Norman entered his guilty plea, about three weeks before he was due to face trial.
Norman's chief financial officer, Stephen Evans, was also charged with four similar fraud counts for allegedly helping to lodge the claims after he started working for Mr Norman's business in 2013.
Evans received a head sentence of four years and six months, suspended after serving nine months.
It was alleged that Norman submitted fraudulent claims to six projects managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy between 2010 and 2017.
The claims related to the Healthy Headwaters Water Use Efficiency project, which helped Queensland's Murray-Darling Basin irrigation communities deal with climate change and reduced water availability.
Under the program, irrigators were granted funds to undertake on-farm infrastructure projects to increase water use efficiency, such as improving water storage.
A former southern Queensland cotton grower has been told how long he will remain behind bars after he was sentenced for multiple fraud offences in a Brisbane court on July 16.
John Douglas Norman appeared before the court after he was remanded in custody at his last appearance in June 2025.
Norman, who entered a plea of guilty on April 28 to six counts of fraud adding up to a value of around $8.7 million, was given a head sentence of 9.5 years by Judge Bernard Porter KC, and will have to spend at least three of those years in custody before he will be eligible for parole.
Judge Porter said he had "no doubt Mr Norman will not commit another offence like this".
"I have no doubt that he regrets what he did," he said.
During the June 25 sentencing hearing, Norman's defence barrister Jeffrey Hunter KC spoke to the nature of Norman's offending and stated it was not "a particularly elaborate scheme".
"The record keeping, such if there was any, was utterly shambolic," Mr Hunter said.
"Even after the event, it was not possible for the defendant to identify which invoices related to the Healthy Headwaters work."
When delivering the sentence, Judge Porter did not accept Mr Norman's ADHD diagnosis was an excuse for his fraudulent offending.
He also noted that the case was "nothing like a Ponzi scheme or an insurance fraud case".
Judge Porter sentenced Norman to 9.5 years on each count of fraud, to be served concurrently, with 21 days of pre-sentence custody to be observed.
He will be eligible for parole on June 24, 2028.
Norman, who has a wife and four children aged between 15 and 21, was supported in court by a contingent of family and friends.
Norman was initially charged in 2018 with six fraud charges, as well as six other charges related to the falsification of records, which have since been discontinued.
He had been accused of committing fraud to a value of $12 million, but in April 2025, the amount was reduced to $8.7 million and Norman entered his guilty plea, about three weeks before he was due to face trial.
Norman's chief financial officer, Stephen Evans, was also charged with four similar fraud counts for allegedly helping to lodge the claims after he started working for Mr Norman's business in 2013.
Evans received a head sentence of four years and six months, suspended after serving nine months.
It was alleged that Norman submitted fraudulent claims to six projects managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy between 2010 and 2017.
The claims related to the Healthy Headwaters Water Use Efficiency project, which helped Queensland's Murray-Darling Basin irrigation communities deal with climate change and reduced water availability.
Under the program, irrigators were granted funds to undertake on-farm infrastructure projects to increase water use efficiency, such as improving water storage.
A former southern Queensland cotton grower has been told how long he will remain behind bars after he was sentenced for multiple fraud offences in a Brisbane court on July 16.
John Douglas Norman appeared before the court after he was remanded in custody at his last appearance in June 2025.
Norman, who entered a plea of guilty on April 28 to six counts of fraud adding up to a value of around $8.7 million, was given a head sentence of 9.5 years by Judge Bernard Porter KC, and will have to spend at least three of those years in custody before he will be eligible for parole.
Judge Porter said he had "no doubt Mr Norman will not commit another offence like this".
"I have no doubt that he regrets what he did," he said.
During the June 25 sentencing hearing, Norman's defence barrister Jeffrey Hunter KC spoke to the nature of Norman's offending and stated it was not "a particularly elaborate scheme".
"The record keeping, such if there was any, was utterly shambolic," Mr Hunter said.
"Even after the event, it was not possible for the defendant to identify which invoices related to the Healthy Headwaters work."
When delivering the sentence, Judge Porter did not accept Mr Norman's ADHD diagnosis was an excuse for his fraudulent offending.
He also noted that the case was "nothing like a Ponzi scheme or an insurance fraud case".
Judge Porter sentenced Norman to 9.5 years on each count of fraud, to be served concurrently, with 21 days of pre-sentence custody to be observed.
He will be eligible for parole on June 24, 2028.
Norman, who has a wife and four children aged between 15 and 21, was supported in court by a contingent of family and friends.
Norman was initially charged in 2018 with six fraud charges, as well as six other charges related to the falsification of records, which have since been discontinued.
He had been accused of committing fraud to a value of $12 million, but in April 2025, the amount was reduced to $8.7 million and Norman entered his guilty plea, about three weeks before he was due to face trial.
Norman's chief financial officer, Stephen Evans, was also charged with four similar fraud counts for allegedly helping to lodge the claims after he started working for Mr Norman's business in 2013.
Evans received a head sentence of four years and six months, suspended after serving nine months.
It was alleged that Norman submitted fraudulent claims to six projects managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy between 2010 and 2017.
The claims related to the Healthy Headwaters Water Use Efficiency project, which helped Queensland's Murray-Darling Basin irrigation communities deal with climate change and reduced water availability.
Under the program, irrigators were granted funds to undertake on-farm infrastructure projects to increase water use efficiency, such as improving water storage.
A former southern Queensland cotton grower has been told how long he will remain behind bars after he was sentenced for multiple fraud offences in a Brisbane court on July 16.
John Douglas Norman appeared before the court after he was remanded in custody at his last appearance in June 2025.
Norman, who entered a plea of guilty on April 28 to six counts of fraud adding up to a value of around $8.7 million, was given a head sentence of 9.5 years by Judge Bernard Porter KC, and will have to spend at least three of those years in custody before he will be eligible for parole.
Judge Porter said he had "no doubt Mr Norman will not commit another offence like this".
"I have no doubt that he regrets what he did," he said.
During the June 25 sentencing hearing, Norman's defence barrister Jeffrey Hunter KC spoke to the nature of Norman's offending and stated it was not "a particularly elaborate scheme".
"The record keeping, such if there was any, was utterly shambolic," Mr Hunter said.
"Even after the event, it was not possible for the defendant to identify which invoices related to the Healthy Headwaters work."
When delivering the sentence, Judge Porter did not accept Mr Norman's ADHD diagnosis was an excuse for his fraudulent offending.
He also noted that the case was "nothing like a Ponzi scheme or an insurance fraud case".
Judge Porter sentenced Norman to 9.5 years on each count of fraud, to be served concurrently, with 21 days of pre-sentence custody to be observed.
He will be eligible for parole on June 24, 2028.
Norman, who has a wife and four children aged between 15 and 21, was supported in court by a contingent of family and friends.
Norman was initially charged in 2018 with six fraud charges, as well as six other charges related to the falsification of records, which have since been discontinued.
He had been accused of committing fraud to a value of $12 million, but in April 2025, the amount was reduced to $8.7 million and Norman entered his guilty plea, about three weeks before he was due to face trial.
Norman's chief financial officer, Stephen Evans, was also charged with four similar fraud counts for allegedly helping to lodge the claims after he started working for Mr Norman's business in 2013.
Evans received a head sentence of four years and six months, suspended after serving nine months.
It was alleged that Norman submitted fraudulent claims to six projects managed by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy between 2010 and 2017.
The claims related to the Healthy Headwaters Water Use Efficiency project, which helped Queensland's Murray-Darling Basin irrigation communities deal with climate change and reduced water availability.
Under the program, irrigators were granted funds to undertake on-farm infrastructure projects to increase water use efficiency, such as improving water storage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
17 hours ago
- Sky News AU
National law firm investigating potential class action against First Guardian Master Fund and Shield Master Fund after accusations of operating Ponzi scheme as more than $1bn on the line
Lawyers from Slater and Gordon are investigating a potential class action on behalf of investors against two collapsed superfunds - First Guardian Master Fund and Shield Master Fund - as they face accusations of running a Ponzi scheme. The national law firm has advised not only are 12,000 Australians expected to be affected by the alleged scheme, but more than $1b is at stake of being lost to the collapsed funds. Keystone Asset Management, the responsible entity for the Shield Master Fund, and Falcon Capital, the manager of the First Guardian Master Fund, have both entered into liquidation with ASIC understood to be carrying out a range of investigations against all parties involved. Previously ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court said ASIC's investigations are looking at the entire chain, including conduct of the lead generators, the financial advisers, the superannuation platforms, 'who we think have a real role here', and the research houses that 'listed these funds as investable'. Slater and Gordon principal lawyer in class actions Andy Wei confirmed the firm is investigating claims that investors were advised to roll their superannuation assets into largely unreliable funds, which has now caused great uncertainty amongst investors on how much of their funds would be recoverable. 'What we're seeing here is potentially deliberate misleading of investors, many of whom are everyday Australians looking to secure their nest eggs,' Mr Wei said. 'They were repeatedly assured that their superannuation would flow into diversified portfolios with steady returns.' He said despite this assurance, 'recent information shows that these funds were largely illiquid with their values grossly overstated.' Mr Wei added illiquid assets such as real estate, retirement accounts, collectibles and private equity could be harder to recover without 'significant loss of value'. He affirmed there is a chance that more than 12,000 Australians could be left out of pocket, with more than $1bn in superannuation 'potentially wiped out'. 'These are people's savings, and they deserve far better than this,' he said. 'Superannuation is meant to be tightly regulated, and many investors likely believed their money was safely managed by trusted, blue-chip superannuation companies.' A Slater and Gordon spokesman highlighted conduct issues at First Guardian 'observed' by FTI Consulting liquidators and accused the superfund of operating a Ponzi scheme with thousands of Australian's superannuation. 'Slater and Gordon understand that the liquidators of First Guardian have observed issues arising from co-mingling of investor funds, such that investors' monies were mixed up and used to pay for other investors' redemptions, or investment commitments and management fees, when ordinarily those redemptions, commitments, and fees should have come from income generated through investment activities,' they told NewsWire. 'Conduct of this kind is common to that seen in Ponzi schemes, and how this was allowed to occur forms a part of our investigation.' Mr Wei has urged investors who have been affected to come forward and contact the firm to help shaped the best path forward for recovery of their funds.
Perth Now
21 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘$1bn wiped': New claims in super collapse
Lawyers are investigating a potential class action on behalf of investors in First Guardian Master Fund and Shield Master Fund, alleging they operated a Ponzi scheme with thousands of Australians' superannuation savings. Slater and Gordon Lawyers say more than 12,000 Australians could be affected, with fears Aussies could lose more than $1bn to the collapsed funds. Slater and Gordon are investigating a possible class action lawsuit against two super funds. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia Slater and Gordon principal lawyer in class actions Andy Wei alleged investors were advised to put their savings into 'largely unreliable funds'. 'What we're seeing here is potentially deliberate misleading of investors, many of whom are everyday Australians looking to secure their nest eggs,' Mr Wei said. 'They were repeatedly assured that their superannuation would flow into diversified portfolios with steady returns.'He said despite this assurance, 'recent information shows that these funds were largely illiquid with their values grossly overstated'. Slater and Gordon's Andy Wei said more than $1bn could be 'potentially wiped out'. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire Illiquid assets are investments that cannot be converted into cash or easily sold without significant loss in value. This includes property developments, private loans or unlisted securities. Mr Wei said there was a chance that more than 12,000 Australians could be left out of pocket, with more than $1bn in superannuation 'potentially wiped out'. 'These are people's savings, and they deserve far better than this,' he said. 'Superannuation is meant to be tightly regulated, and many investors likely believed their money was safely managed by trusted, blue-chip superannuation companies.' More than 12,000 Australians could be out of pocket, Mr Wei said. NewsWire / Simon Bullard. Credit: News Corp Australia A Slater and Gordon spokesman alleged the investment funds were operating a Ponzi scheme with thousands of Australians' superannuation, based on conduct issues 'observed' by FTI Consulting liquidators. 'Slater and Gordon understand that the liquidators of First Guardian have observed issues arising from co-mingling of investor funds, such that investors' monies were mixed up and used to pay for other investors' redemptions, or investment commitments and management fees, when ordinarily those redemptions, commitments and fees should have come from income generated through investment activities,' they told NewsWire. 'Conduct of this kind is common to that seen in Ponzi schemes, and how this was allowed to occur forms a part of our investigation.' Mr Wei said he was particularly concerned for those who invested in the First Guardian fund, as the FTI Consulting liquidators had now confirmed they expected 'a substantial shortfall of recoverable assets'. He encouraged investors who had been affected to come forward and contact the Slater and Gordon firm, saying more information would help them assess the 'best path for recovery', including whether a class action is viable. The liquidators said it would take more than 12 months for their investigation to be completed. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire First Guardian Master Fund collapsed earlier this year, leaving thousands of customers in the lurch and unsure if they will ever see their funds again. FTI Consulting liquidators Paul Harlond and Ross Blakely, who released their preliminary report into the fund, said they 'intend to undertake further investigations'. These included the determination of 'whether any breaches of the Corporations Act or any other laws have occurred by any party … or any other circumstances exist, which may give rise to a potential claim by investors'. In the report, the liquidators said they were 'seeking compensation on behalf of members of the fund for losses suffered', which could be as much as $446m. FTI Consulting's assessment found the overall recoverable value of the investments was likely to be 'considerably less than their combined book value', and a 'substantial shortfall of recoverable assets to outstanding investor funds' was therefore likely arise in the liquidation. The liquidators said it would take more than a year to complete their investigation and wind up the business due to the 'complexity and number of outstanding matters' in the liquidation. 'The liquidators consider that the liquidation and the winding up of the funds will continue for and take some time to complete,' the report read. ASIC has launched an investigation into First Guardian and Falcon, the entity responsible for the scheme. NewsWire / Luis Enrique Ascui Credit: News Corp Australia Corporate watchdog Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) launched an investigation into the failed management investment scheme and Falcon Capital Limited, the entity responsible for the scheme. An ASIC spokesman said its 'first priority has been to preserve any remaining assets of the scheme so they can be recovered for investors'. 'Following concerns raised by ASIC, the Federal Court appointed liquidators to Falcon Capital and ordered the wind-up of First Guardian and its related funds in April,' they said. 'The court also restrained David Anderson, a director of Falcon, from dealing with his assets and appointed a receiver to his personal property. 'ASIC's investigation suggests that potential consumers were called and referred to personal financial advice providers who advised consumers to roll their superannuation assets into a retail choice superannuation fund, and then to invest part or all of their superannuation into First Guardian. 'While ASIC's investigation is ongoing, the Federal Court has made interim travel restraint orders against Falcon Capital director David Anderson on ASIC's application. 'The Court also made interim orders freezing the assets of another Falcon director, Simon Selimaj and restraining his travel.' Those orders are in place until February 27, 2026.
News.com.au
21 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘$1bn wiped out': First Guardian Master Fund, Shield Master Fund accused of operating Ponzi scheme
Lawyers are investigating a potential class action on behalf of investors in First Guardian Master Fund and Shield Master Fund, alleging they operated a Ponzi scheme with thousands of Australians' superannuation savings. Slater and Gordon Lawyers say more than 12,000 Australians could be affected, with fears Aussies could lose more than $1bn to the collapsed funds. Slater and Gordon principal lawyer in class actions Andy Wei alleged investors were advised to put their savings into 'largely unreliable funds'. 'What we're seeing here is potentially deliberate misleading of investors, many of whom are everyday Australians looking to secure their nest eggs,' Mr Wei said. 'They were repeatedly assured that their superannuation would flow into diversified portfolios with steady returns.' He said despite this assurance, 'recent information shows that these funds were largely illiquid with their values grossly overstated'. Illiquid assets are investments that cannot be converted into cash or easily sold without significant loss in value. This includes property developments, private loans or unlisted securities. Mr Wei said there was a chance that more than 12,000 Australians could be left out of pocket, with more than $1bn in superannuation 'potentially wiped out'. 'These are people's savings, and they deserve far better than this,' he said. 'Superannuation is meant to be tightly regulated, and many investors likely believed their money was safely managed by trusted, blue-chip superannuation companies.' A Slater and Gordon spokesman alleged the investment funds were operating a Ponzi scheme with thousands of Australians' superannuation, based on conduct issues 'observed' by FTI Consulting liquidators. 'Slater and Gordon understand that the liquidators of First Guardian have observed issues arising from co-mingling of investor funds, such that investors' monies were mixed up and used to pay for other investors' redemptions, or investment commitments and management fees, when ordinarily those redemptions, commitments and fees should have come from income generated through investment activities,' they told NewsWire. 'Conduct of this kind is common to that seen in Ponzi schemes, and how this was allowed to occur forms a part of our investigation.' Mr Wei said he was particularly concerned for those who invested in the First Guardian fund, as the FTI Consulting liquidators had now confirmed they expected 'a substantial shortfall of recoverable assets'. He encouraged investors who had been affected to come forward and contact the Slater and Gordon firm, saying more information would help them assess the 'best path for recovery', including whether a class action is viable. First Guardian Master Fund collapsed earlier this year, leaving thousands of customers in the lurch and unsure if they will ever see their funds again. FTI Consulting liquidators Paul Harlond and Ross Blakely, who released their preliminary report into the fund, said they 'intend to undertake further investigations'. These included the determination of 'whether any breaches of the Corporations Act or any other laws have occurred by any party … or any other circumstances exist, which may give rise to a potential claim by investors'. In the report, the liquidators said they were 'seeking compensation on behalf of members of the fund for losses suffered', which could be as much as $446m. FTI Consulting's assessment found the overall recoverable value of the investments was likely to be 'considerably less than their combined book value', and a 'substantial shortfall of recoverable assets to outstanding investor funds' was therefore likely arise in the liquidation. The liquidators said it would take more than a year to complete their investigation and wind up the business due to the 'complexity and number of outstanding matters' in the liquidation. 'The liquidators consider that the liquidation and the winding up of the funds will continue for and take some time to complete,' the report read. Corporate watchdog Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) launched an investigation into the failed management investment scheme and Falcon Capital Limited, the entity responsible for the scheme. An ASIC spokesman said its 'first priority has been to preserve any remaining assets of the scheme so they can be recovered for investors'. 'Following concerns raised by ASIC, the Federal Court appointed liquidators to Falcon Capital and ordered the wind-up of First Guardian and its related funds in April,' they said. 'The court also restrained David Anderson, a director of Falcon, from dealing with his assets and appointed a receiver to his personal property. 'ASIC's investigation suggests that potential consumers were called and referred to personal financial advice providers who advised consumers to roll their superannuation assets into a retail choice superannuation fund, and then to invest part or all of their superannuation into First Guardian. 'While ASIC's investigation is ongoing, the Federal Court has made interim travel restraint orders against Falcon Capital director David Anderson on ASIC's application. 'The Court also made interim orders freezing the assets of another Falcon director, Simon Selimaj and restraining his travel.' Those orders are in place until February 27, 2026.
