Granderson: Eliminating national holidays is a promising idea. Start with the racist ones
Great news for French people, bad news for their pensions.
Because people are living longer, the math to fund pensions in France is no longer mathing, and now the country's debt is nearly 114% of its GDP. Remember it was just a couple of years ago when protesters set parts of Paris on fire because President Emmanuel Macron proposed raising the age of legal retirement from 62 to 64. Well, now Prime Minister Francois Bayrou has proposed eliminating two national holidays, in an attempt to address the country's debt.
Read more: Granderson: Where's the music that meets this moment? Black artists are stepping up
In 2023, before Paris was burning, roughly 50,000 people in Denmark gathered outside of Parliament to express their anger over ditching one of the country's national holidays. The roots of Great Prayer Day date all the way back to the 1600s. Eliminating it — with the hopes of increasing production and tax revenue — brought together the unions, opposing political parties and churches in a rare trifecta. That explains why a number of schools and businesses closed for the holiday in 2024 in defiance of the official change.
This week, Bayrou proposed eliminating France's Easter Monday and Victory Day holidays, the latter marking the defeat of Nazi Germany. In a Reuters poll, 70% of respondents didn't like the idea, so we'll see if Paris starts burning again. Or maybe citizens will take a cue from the Danes and just not work on those days, even if the government decides to continue business as usual.
Here at home, President Trump has also floated the idea of eliminating one of the national holidays. However, because he floated the idea on Juneteenth — via a social media post about 'too many non-working holidays' — I'm going to assume tax revenue wasn't the sole motivation for his comments that day. You know, given his crusade against corporate and government diversity efforts; his refusal to apologize for calling for the death penalty for five innocent boys of color; and his approval of Alligator Alcatraz. However, while I find myself at odds with the president's 2025 remarks about the holiday, I do agree with what he said about Juneteenth when he was president in 2020: 'It's actually an important event, an important time.'
Indeed.
While the institution of slavery enabled this country to quickly become a global power, studies show the largest economic gains in the history of the country came from slavery's ending — otherwise known as Juneteenth. Two economists have found that the economic payoff from freeing enslaved people was 'bigger than the introduction of railroads, by some estimates, and worth 7 to 60 years of technological innovation in the latter half of the 19th century,' according to the University of Chicago. Why? Because the final calculations revealed the cost to enslave people for centuries was far greater than the economic benefit of their freedom.
In 1492, when Christopher Columbus 'discovered America,' civilizations had been thriving on this land for millennia. The colonizers introduced slavery to these shores two years before the first 'Thanksgiving' in 1621. That was more than 50 years before King Louis XIV started France's first pension; 60 years before King Christian V approved Great Prayer Day; and 157 years before the 13 colonies declared independence from Britain on July 4, 1776.
Of all the national holidays around the Western world, it would appear Juneteenth is among the most significant historically. Yet it gained federal recognition just four years ago, and it remains vulnerable. The transatlantic slave trade transformed the global economy, but the numbers show it was Juneteenth that lifted America to the top. Which tells you the president's hint at its elimination has little to do with our greatness and everything to do with the worldview of an elected official who was endorsed by the newspaper of the Ku Klux Klan.
If it does get to the point where we — like France and Denmark — end up seriously considering cutting a holiday, my vote is for Thanksgiving. The retail industry treats it like a speed bump between Halloween and Christmas, and when history retells its origins, it's not a holiday worth protesting to keep.
YouTube: @LZGrandersonShow
If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Zelensky backtracks on corruption reform in attempt to end protests
Volodymyr Zelensky has appeared to backtrack on his controversial corruption reform in an attempt to end protests in Ukraine. The president said he had 'heard what people are saying' and decided to propose a new bill in parliament in two weeks' time. 'Very importantly, all norms for the independence of anti-corruption institutions will be included,' he said. Despite the apparent climbdown, thousands still descended onto the streets of Kyiv for a large-scale protest on Wednesday night shortly after the president made the statement. Some protesters said they did not believe the president's attempt to address criticism of the reform went far enough. Olena, 19, a student from Sumy, told The Telegraph she was demonstrating because 'I want in my country not corruption, not usurpation of the government'. She said she wanted Ukraine to embrace 'European values' adding that Ukraine's corruption watchdogs should be independent. Mr Zelensky has faced unprecedented pushback from the public, serving soldiers and Ukraine's western partners over his move on Tuesday to strip the country's two key anti-corruption agencies of their autonomy. AntAC, an anti-corruption NGO, said it remained to be seen how far the president would go in restoring the free operation of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (Nabu) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (Sapo). Tetiana Shevchuk, the head of international relations at AntAC, said: 'We haven't seen the text of this new bill. And two weeks is a long time. 'If parliament was able to adopt the law in 24 hours, they should be able to rectify their mistake in the same time frame. 'I'm happy that Zelensky has the wisdom not to escalate with the public, but we will have to see if it is done properly.' The law, passed on Tuesday, handed control of the agencies over to the prosecutor general, a position directly appointed by the president. The bill raised fears that Mr Zelensky could prevent the bodies pursuing cases against his close allies, such as Oleksiy Chernyshov, the former deputy prime minister, who was recently charged with accepting bribes. Earlier on Wednesday, Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, 'conveyed her strong concerns' over the law, her spokesman said. Brussels chiefs warned Mr Zelensky's original legislation endangered both supplies of aid and Ukraine's eventual entry into the European Union. Europe has become Ukraine's most influential partner, filling the gulf left by the almost complete cessation of US supplies of money and weaponry since the start of the year. Protesters took to the streets across the cities of Kyiv, Dnipro, Lviv and Odesa on Tuesday night, and further demonstrations were due to be held on Wednesday. Credit: Igor Zakharenko The armed forces also spoke out against the measures, accusing the president of undermining morale at the front and handing a victory to Russia. Vitalii Umanets, one Ukrainian soldier, said: 'Whoever isn't in the military, please go out to the protest for me, because without independent anti-corruption bodies, there's no point at all in our current struggle, in our future victory. Mykhailo Lavrovskyi, a soldier in the 1st Azov Corps of the Ukrainian National Guard, wrote on X: 'You can argue for a long time about the effectiveness of anti-corruption bodies in Ukraine, but pulling off such bulls--- while fully aware that people will be against it is a deliberate provocation playing into Moscow's hands.' One Ukrainian officer, speaking on condition of anonymity, told The Telegraph that the reform was 'definitely going to impact the morale of the soldiers, even simply by diverting attention from the fight'. In ambiguous comments that could have been directed at the president's office or the protesters, Ukraine's spy chief warned that the country could be 'torn apart' by the crisis and called for 'open dialogue'. Kyrylo Budanov said: 'Ukrainian history has taught us that a nation loses if it is torn apart by internal contradictions.' Credit:Bohdan Ben Opponents characterised the original legislation as a power-grab by an increasingly authoritarian leader, panicked by the launch of investigations into his own inner circle. Mr Zelensky had attempted to justify the law, on Wednesday morning, saying he had met with the Nabu and Sapo leaders and agreed to produce a joint action plan in two weeks to ensure the country had a 'strong enough… anti-corruption system'. 'In our opinion, Zelensky acted [at first] because anti-corruption agencies got closer to his close allies,' Ms Shevchuk said. 'Zelensky is not against the fight against corruption, but it's not comfortable when it strikes so close… he feels it's going out of control.' Mr Chernyshov was charged, along with his associates, of accepting bribes to give the go-ahead to an apartment block development. The charges, which he denied before being sacked in a reshuffle, allege that he accepted an apartment in exchange for the approval. 'This is the first big political protest in three and a half years, which is a lot,' Ms Shevchuk said. 'We don't like the pictures in foreign media, because we understand the war is going on.' But corruption in defence procurement, for example, posed 'sometimes even a greater risk' to Ukraine than the fluctuating level of Western support. 'The resolution is very simple,' Ms Shevchuk added. 'Scrap the law and say this was a mistake. Otherwise it looks like a high-level attempt to protect corruption.' On Wednesday night, Russian and Ukrainian negotiators met in Istanbul for the third round of peace talks, with both sides expressing some openness to further dialogue. A Ukrainian spokesman emphasised that securing a meeting between Mr Zelensky and Vladimir Putin remained a top priority, saying that big issues like a ceasefire can only be resolved at the highest level. Ukraine offered face-to-face talks between the two leaders before the end of August, which it said would suit the deadline Donald Trump gave Putin this month to end the war within 50 days or face 'very severe tariffs'. Solve the daily Crossword
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Russia and Ukraine Are No Closer to Peace After Trump's Threats
ISTANBUL—President Trump's ultimatum for Russian President Vladimir Putin is showing no signs of bringing Russia and Ukraine any closer to peace. The third round of direct talks between Ukrainian and Russian officials, held Wednesday in Istanbul, yielded few results. The two sides met for less than an hour.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Thursday Briefing: Your Russia Questions Answered
By Katrin Bennhold Good morning. Today, Anton Troianovski, our Moscow bureau chief, answers your questions about Russia and the war in Ukraine. Plus, the other great Kurosawa. Ask a Correspondent: Moscow Bureau Chief edition It's our first edition of Ask a Correspondent, and we'll be answering some of the questions you sent for Anton Troianovski, our Moscow bureau chief. Thank you for all the thoughtful messages. You sent in so many great questions, it was hard to choose! You'll have more chances to grill Times journalists soon. Anton was born in Moscow, but left what was then the Soviet Union when he was four and grew up mostly in the U.S. He has become a trusted guide to Russia's war in Ukraine, but he's also a lot of fun (read his account of snacking on frozen reindeer blood and this story on taking a crude oil bath at a spa in Azerbaijan.) I was lucky enough to briefly share an office with him: In 2022, when I was Berlin bureau chief, the Times moved Anton and much of his team to Germany when the war began. Today he leads a group of journalists reporting from inside and outside of Russia. Now, we'll turn it over to Anton. What's the biggest challenge that you face when trying to write a story and not being based in Moscow? It must be a challenge not meeting people face to face. — Daniel Heaslip, Ireland Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
