‘Common sense reform': Victorian opposition vows to axe stamp duty for first home buyers in major housing policy announcement
Stamp duty on properties worth up to $1 million will be scrapped for first home buyers in Victoria if the Coalition wins next year's state election.
The state opposition announced the plan ahead of Tuesday's budget reply speech, setting the stage for housing to be a major election battleground.
The stamp duty exemption will exist for all first home buyers purchasing properties up to $1 million.
According to the Parliamentary Budget Office, the plan will benefit up to 17,000 Victorians, with savings of up to $55,000.
Victorian Opposition Leader Brad Battin said the Coalition's housing policy was the 'circuit-breaker Victoria desperately needs.'
'This is a bold, common-sense reform that backs aspiration, rewards hard work, and helps young Victorians break into the housing market,' Mr Battin said.
Shadow treasurer James Newbury said the policy would remove one of the biggest barriers to young people getting on the housing ladder.
'For too many young Victorians, the first home dream has become a nightmare,' Mr Newbury said.
'This policy is about giving aspirational first home buyers the final leg up they need.
'It's about giving young Victorians a fair go.'
A first home buyer stamp duty exemption exists for properties worth up to $600,000, with concessional rates for properties up to $750,000.
Owner occupiers whose properties are valued at less than $550,000 are also eligible for reduced stamp duty fees.
Earlier this month, the Allan government announced a 12-month extension to its temporary stamp duty savings scheme for apartments, units and townhouses that are bought off the plan.
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Premier Jacinta Allan said the opposition's policy was a "cut and paste" of the government's existing policy.
"What we've seen is a bit of a cut and paste from the Liberal Party of arrangements that we already have in place here in Victoria," Premier Allan said.
"There are more first home buyers in Victoria than any other state in the nation, because we have existing arrangements in place that support them, and because we are building and completing more homes than any other state."
The Premier also asked how the Coalition would pay for its commitment.
"There's a big, giant question mark over this announcement today... because they have not come clean with Victorians on how they intend to pay for this announcement today," Ms Allan said.
"What frontline services will they cut? What schools? What hospital services will they cut to pay for this commitment?
"You just can't announce part of the policy... they have to explain the full arrangements.
"It just demonstrates again that young Victorians know you can't trust the Liberal Party when it comes to helping them buy their first home, and Victorians more broadly know you can't trust the Liberal Party, because when it comes to these sorts of decisions they will cut into those frontline services that families rely on."
The Victorian Property Council backed the Coalition's housing announcement on Tuesday, with Executive Director Cath Evans describing stamp duty as the 'worst property tax of the lot'.
'Stamp duty acts as a tax on people's aspirations, and current stamp duty exemption thresholds have not kept pace with the increase in average housing property prices,' Ms Evans said.
'This would remove a key obstacle to people's ability to enter the housing market and sends a shot of confidence to the industry when it's much needed.'
The Property Council boss said taxes and charges account for up to 43 per cent of the cost of a new home, a situation she described as 'unsustainable'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Herald Sun
an hour ago
- Herald Sun
What a downgraded credit rating would mean for Victoria
Victoria has been repeatedly warned its credit rating is at risk of a further downgrade amid a ballooning debt pile on track to hit $194bn. Treasurer Jaclyn Symes flew to New York on Wednesday to meet with the heads of major ratings agencies to defend the state's AA rating — already the lowest in the nation. But what is a credit rating and, more importantly, what does it mean for you and me if it is again downgraded. What is a credit rating? A credit rating assesses the creditworthiness of a borrower, such as the Victorian government or a company. This credit grade is expressed as a letter. The three main ratings agencies, Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch, operate a scale running from AAA — the highest grade dubbed 'prime' — all the way down to C for Standard & Poor's and Moody's, and D for Fitch. The grade indicates a borrower's ability to repay debt and helps investors evaluate the risk of lending money to a government — by buying bonds which show up as government debt — or a company. What is Victoria's current rating? Victoria holds a AA rating from Standard & Poor's. It was downgraded by two notches from AAA in December 2020, falling to AA+ and then AA, in December 2020 due to ballooning debt. Moody's stripped Victoria of its AAA status in February 2021, before downgrading it from AA1 to AA2 in 2022. The state holds a AA+ from Fitch. None of these rating are prime but are 'high grade' and represent a 'stable outlook'. That said, Victoria's credit rating is lower than any other state in the nation. Why does the rating matter? Credit ratings affect the government's borrowing costs — governments with a AAA rating can issue bonds with the lowest interest rate possible. As a rating falls, the interest payments investors will demand in order to buy Victorian bonds rise as the bonds are viewed as being of higher risk. Those interest payments are an expense to the Victorian government and paid by every taxpayer. So a lower credit rating means a higher interest expense bill on the state's debt for Victorian taxpayers. What does it mean if it falls below a certain rating? Another downgrade would be a massive hit to the Victorian government. Victoria's net debt is tracking to weigh in at $194b by 2028-29, during which the state will be spending close to 10c of every dollar in taxation revenue on servicing it. The government can ill afford to be paying more on its debt, especially as it looks to raise funds to plough into its Big Build agenda and its signature pet project, the $34.5b Suburban Rail Loop. A further downgrade would heap pressure on Victoria's ability to finance major projects, a well as on the government to maintain services. What have the credit rating agencies said? The two main rating agencies have both warned the Allan-government over the handling of the state's finances. Standard & Poor's has said: 'Reining in growth in public spending, including the government's wages bill, and achieving promised operating savings are key to strengthening the financial outcomes. 'However, these goals have proven to be difficult to achieve in recent years. Fiscal discipline is important, especially in the lead-up to the 2026 state election, because we have seen many Australian state governments lose control of their budget in the lead-up to an election.' Moody's has said: 'Should the risks materialise, or reform momentum weakens, or both, the potential for higher-than-expected debt and interest burdens would further weigh on Victoria's credit profile.' What has the government said? Treasurer Jaclyn Symes has defended the state's finances, arguing the 'major credit rating agencies continue to project a stable outlook for Victoria's credit rating'. 'Those that want to talk down the state will choose to do so,' she has said. 'I will continue to talk up the Victorian economy.' On Tuesday it emerged Victorian treasury officials have done no modelling on the impact of a credit downgrade on the state's economy. 'The five step fiscal strategy is aimed at retaining the current credit rating and improving it over time,' Department of Treasury and Finance secretary Chris Barrett told a Public Accounts and Estimates Committee hearing.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Northland machete brawlers should be kicked out of school, government says
Two boys allegedly involved in last month's machete brawl at Northland shopping centre should be expelled from school using upcoming expanded principal powers, the Victorian government has said. Education Minister Ben Carroll said he would expect the two school-aged boys accused of participating in the brawl that terrified Sunday-afternoon shoppers at the popular retail centre to suffer serious consequences from their schools. Carroll announced the upgraded powers for state schools to punish off-campus behaviour that puts students or teachers at serious risk – such as online bullying – on Wednesday morning, saying the change had been introduced successfully in other states. But principals warned the government to 'proceed with caution' before granting the new powers from next month. Loading The principals' peak body told the Department of Education that parents would expect school leaders to act like law enforcement officials when they are granted the expanded powers, aimed predominantly at online misconduct that has an adverse affect in the classroom or playground. Australian Principals Federation president Tina King said the profession had been blindsided on Wednesday morning when Carroll announced the changes. A school community in Melbourne's west was left reeling last week when footage was widely circulated online showing students allegedly attacking other children with a machete in the toilets of a local McDonald's. It is unclear if the new powers for principals would apply in those circumstances. Carroll says the new powers are based on similar arrangements in NSW and South Australia, where principals can suspend or expel students for out-of-school conduct.
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Northland machete brawlers should be kicked out of school, government says
Two boys allegedly involved in last month's machete brawl at Northland shopping centre should be expelled from school using upcoming expanded principal powers, the Victorian government has said. Education Minister Ben Carroll said he would expect the two school-aged boys accused of participating in the brawl that terrified Sunday-afternoon shoppers at the popular retail centre to suffer serious consequences from their schools. Carroll announced the upgraded powers for state schools to punish off-campus behaviour that puts students or teachers at serious risk – such as online bullying – on Wednesday morning, saying the change had been introduced successfully in other states. But principals warned the government to 'proceed with caution' before granting the new powers from next month. Loading The principals' peak body told the Department of Education that parents would expect school leaders to act like law enforcement officials when they are granted the expanded powers, aimed predominantly at online misconduct that has an adverse affect in the classroom or playground. Australian Principals Federation president Tina King said the profession had been blindsided on Wednesday morning when Carroll announced the changes. A school community in Melbourne's west was left reeling last week when footage was widely circulated online showing students allegedly attacking other children with a machete in the toilets of a local McDonald's. It is unclear if the new powers for principals would apply in those circumstances. Carroll says the new powers are based on similar arrangements in NSW and South Australia, where principals can suspend or expel students for out-of-school conduct.
