Did Norway evacuate a student from Harvard ahead of commencement? What we know
Just ahead of Harvard's commencement on Thursday, a rumor spread on social media about Norway evacuating a student from the university due to 'safety concerns'. The claim went viral, but was soon debunked. This comes after an X user shared a screenshot of a Threads post making the allegation, calling it 'hauntingly symbolic'.
'Meanwhile at Harvard…Norway has evacuated a student from Harvard,' one person wrote on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. The X post had amassed more than 800,000 views as of this writing.
Read More: Who is Francesca Gino? Harvard fires star professor with $1 million salary after data fraud allegations
"Norway just evacuated a student from Harvard—not a war zone, but an American university. As someone who now resides in Sweden, I find it hauntingly symbolic. The "land of the free" was never truly free—just expertly packaged. When Nordic countries start extracting their citizens from Ivy League campuses for safety, it's not just a red flag. It's a siren," the post on Threads read.
The rumor began with a May 23, 2025, report by Khrono, a Norwegian higher education news outlet, stating that the Aker Scholarship, a foundation sponsoring Norwegian students for advanced degrees abroad, had called one of its students from Harvard.
The unidentified student, as per the report, arrived in Oslo on May 23, 2025. Bjørn Blindheim, CEO of Aker Scholarship, cited concerns over the student's visa status after DHS Secretary Kristi Noem announced on May 22, 2025, that Harvard's SEVP certification was terminated.
Read More: Harvard to urge judge to extend block on Trump's effort to bar foreign students
The evacuation was a preemptive action by Aker Scholarship due to visa uncertainties, not safety threats. Blindheim told Khrono he called an emergency meeting on May 22, fearing the student could face detention or legal issues if Harvard's SEVP status wasn't restored.
The DHS directive, announced without prior notice, advised international students to transfer or face visa revocation. Aker opted to fly the student back immediately, landing in Oslo on May 23, 2025.
Blindheim expressed worry that the situation 'could get out of control,' referring to legal risks, not campus safety.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Taxing the money immigrants send home would hurt economies here and abroad
A proposed new tax from the Trump administration would slow the flow of money that U.S. immigrants send home to their families, and that has economic implications at home and abroad. Remittances from the U.S. to Latin America totaled an estimated $160.9 billion in 2024, according to the latest research from the Inter-American Development Bank Migration Unit. Those remittances not only generate transaction fees for the largely American financial institutions that execute the payments, but they also make up between roughly 20% to 30% of gross domestic product growth in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica and Nicaragua. President Donald Trump's budget, which recently passed the House of Representatives, included a 3.5% tax on all remittance transfers made by noncitizens to accounts outside the country. That would be a double tax on many immigrants who have already paid income tax on the funds they send to family and friends abroad. 'Remittance growth from the United States could fall to half of what it was in 2024," estimates Manuel Orozco, director of the migration, remittances and development program at the Inter-American Dialogue, a think tank that aims to boost democratic resilience and shared prosperity in the Americas. In addition to the proposed remittance tax, the U.S. is experiencing slowing migration and increased deportations. Both trends could reduce the number of foreign-born individuals in the U.S., thereby also diminishing the population sending remittances home. The slowing migration trends in effect since 2023 are expected to continue this year. Morgan Stanley economists estimate that immigration will slow to 800,000 this year, down from 1 million new arrivals in 2024. That is expected to drop to just 500,000 in 2026. Deportations are also set to rise. The Department of Homeland Security reported 152,000 deportations during the first hundred days of the Trump administration. And the Supreme Court ruled last week that the Trump administration could end temporary status granted by the Biden administration to 532,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. Remittances are a key form of support for many countries. Honduras, for example, received $9.8 billion in remittances from the U.S. in 2024, according to Orozco. The country was on track to experience 7% growth in remittances in 2025, but with the proposed tax and the projected declines in immigration, Orozco expects that the country will actually see a 9% decline instead. El Salvador is projected to experience an 8% decline, while remittances to Guatemala and Nicaragua could be down by 7%. Haiti is expected to see a 3% drop. A drop in remittances could lead to lower domestic incomes and consumer spending, as well as potentially expanding deficits, writes William Jackson, chief emerging markets economist at Capital Economics. The reduction in consumer spending could occur in the U.S. as well. Migrants typically send 15% of their remittances abroad, but that means about 85% of their incomes remain in the U.S. Last year, immigrant households held $1.7 trillion in spending power, according to data from the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit that aims to shape immigration policies. Undocumented immigrants, specifically, had about $299 billion in spending power. But if the cost of remittances increases, generally the income spent in-country tends to shrink as well, says Ananya Kumar, deputy director for future of money at the GeoEconomics Center. So this issue does affect consumer spending levels in the U.S. as well. Even countries with large economies could feel the impact of lower payment flows. U.S. remittances to Mexico—which Mastercard's research has found to be the 'single largest remittance pipeline in the world"—totaled $67.7 billion last year, according to BBVA research. India and the Philippines also rank high in remittance flows. The remittance tax would be on top of the high transaction fees that already exist when sending money across borders. Last year, the average cost of sending money from the U.S. was 6.03% during the third quarter, according to the World Bank's quarterly report. It can be challenging to determine the effects of a tax on remittances because many times these payments go underground if taxed. That makes this a 'slippery tax space," says Alan Cole, senior economist with Tax Foundation's Center for Federal Tax Policy. That could make it more difficult to administer and collect the projected tax revenues, but could also increase cartels' power as payment brokers. 'There's a U.S. national security interest in wanting to not create more friction from remittance payments," Kumar says. Americans need to stop viewing remittances as a 'burden" on the U.S. economy, but instead, should start viewing it as something that accrues advantages abroad, she adds. Write to Megan Leonhardt at
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Would be delighted for India to produce a wide range of products: Lutnick
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Monday said the United States is looking to shift a broad array of industries to India, calling the country a key manufacturing partner in a potential new trade relationship. 'There are an enormous number of product categories that we are going to be delighted for India to produce,' Lutnick said at the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) Leadership Summit 2025, inviting Indian businesses to take part in America's advanced manufacturing push. 'While some manufacturing will be reshored to the US, India could benefit from a unique trade relationship.' Trump warns Apple, Tesla over India expansion These comments follow US President Donald Trump's criticism of major American companies, particularly Apple and Tesla, over their expansion in India. Trump took aim at Apple's increasing iPhone exports from India to the US, which rose by 76 per cent to three million devices in April 2025. He argued that such moves could undermine domestic manufacturing and threatened a 25 per cent tariff on iPhones not made in the US. Despite this, Apple supplier Foxconn has continued with its $1.5 billion investment in a new component factory near Chennai. Regarding Tesla, Trump described the company's plans to set up a factory in India as 'very unfair' to the US. He said that while building a factory in India might be acceptable, it would disadvantage American manufacturers. Trump also cited India's high import tariffs as a barrier to Tesla's success in the country and warned of reciprocal tariffs on Indian goods if the imbalance continues. Despite Tesla's entry into India, reports suggest Elon Musk may not expand manufacturing in the country anytime soon. Bilateral trade agreement in focus The commerce secretary's remarks come as both nations step up efforts to finalise a bilateral trade agreement. Lutnick confirmed that a deal is 'absolutely on the table' and could be concluded in the 'not-too-distant future.' A US delegation is currently in India to advance discussions. 'Earlier countries get a better deal. That's the way it is. I think India is trying hard to be one of the earlier countries, which I appreciate,' said Lutnick. 'These kind of deals used to take two or three years and we're trying to get them done in a month, which is just not the ordinary DNA of trading relationships between countries.' High tariffs a sticking point in talks One of the main sticking points remains India's high import tariffs, an issue repeatedly raised by President Trump and US officials. 'India has very high tariffs. When we ask them why that is, they don't know why,' Lutnick said. 'Bringing them down to a reasonable level is something we are actively working on.' He said the US is seeking fair market access for its businesses and a reduced trade deficit with India, while acknowledging that New Delhi wants 'special access' to American and allied markets. 'Let's find a proper place in the middle,' he urged. 'I will treat you incredibly kindly on things that are important to you, and you bring down your tariffs and give us market access.' Tech and talent: US proposes AI cooperation and 'gold visa' On the tech and AI front, Lutnick said the US is open to supporting India's ambitions in data infrastructure and artificial intelligence. 'We're willing to responsibly sell our best chips to allies,' he said, proposing a 'Gold Card' visa programme that would allow top global talent, including from India, to work seamlessly across both economies. He also praised India's regulatory reforms in capital markets, saying they could help attract more foreign listings. 'If your regulators are hard, your books are beautiful, and India can attract, they will want to go public there,' Lutnick said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
US pushes countries for best offers by June 4 as tariff deadline looms
In the draft, the US is asking countries to list their best proposals in a number of key areas, including tariff and quota offers for purchase of US industrial and agricultural products Reuters The Trump administration wants countries to provide their best offer on trade negotiations by Wednesday as officials seek to accelerate talks with multiple partners ahead of a self-imposed deadline in just five weeks, according to a draft letter to negotiating partners seen by Reuters. The draft, from the office of the United States Trade Representative, provides a window into how President Donald Trump plans to bring to a close unwieldy negotiations with dozens of countries that kicked off on April 9 when he paused his "Liberation Day" tariffs for 90 days until July 8 after stock, bond and currency markets revolted over the sweeping nature of the levies. The document suggests an urgency within the administration to complete deals against its own tight deadline. While officials such as White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett have repeatedly promised that several agreements were nearing completion, so far only one agreement has been reached with a major US trading partner: Britain. Even that limited pact was more akin to a framework for ongoing talks than a final deal. In the draft, the US is asking countries to list their best proposals in a number of key areas, including tariff and quota offers for purchase of US industrial and agricultural products and plans to remedy any non-tariff barriers. Other requested items include any commitments on digital trade and economic security, along with country-specific commitments, according to the letter. The US will evaluate the responses within days and offer "a possible landing zone" that could include a reciprocal tariff rate, according to the letter. It was unclear which countries would receive the letter, but it was directed at those with active negotiations that included meetings and exchanges of documents. Washington has been engaged in such talks with the European Union, Japan, Vietnam and India, among others. A USTR official said trade talks were ongoing. "Productive negotiations with many key trading partners continue at a rapid pace. It is in all parties' interest to take stock of progress and assess any next steps". 'REGARDLESS OF ONGOING LITIGATION' Tiffany Smith, vice president of global trade policy at the National Foreign Trade Council, welcomed the USTR moves. "We are encouraged that USTR is moving negotiations ahead as quickly as they can," she told Reuters, adding that trade deals that removed barriers for US companies abroad and lowered US tariffs would be "a win-win if they are done in a way that returns predictability and stability to trade relationships." Trump's ambitious - and often frenetic - tariff policy is a pillar of his "America First" economic agenda as he seeks to reshape US trade relationships, reduce trade deficits and protect American industries. Republican lawmakers are also banking on tariffs to add to federal revenue and offset the cost of the tax cut legislation now working its way through Congress. Trump's tariff policies have taken investors on a rollercoaster ride. In May, US stocks held their biggest rally of any month since November 2023, but that was after global indexes had cratered under the barrage of Trump's tariff announcements through February, March and early April. Stocks were little changed on Monday afternoon after Trump announced a surprise doubling of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports on Friday at an event in Pittsburgh. Meanwhile, the legality of the approach used for imposing the most sweeping of his tariffs has been cast into doubt. Last Wednesday, the Court of International Trade ruled that Trump had overstepped his authority with tariffs devised under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, including the "Liberation Day" levies and earlier ones imposed on goods from Canada, Mexico and China related to Trump's accusations that the three countries have facilitated the flow of fentanyl into the US Less than 24 hours later, an appeals court temporarily paused that decision. The tariffs at the center of the legal dispute are expected to remain in effect as the case plays out. The draft letter to trading partners warns them not to believe the tariffs will be sidelined if the court rules against Trump's use of the IEEPA. "Regardless of ongoing litigation concerning the President's reciprocal tariff action in US courts, the President intends to continue this tariff program pursuant to other robust legal authorities if necessary, so it is important that we continue our discussions on these matters," the draft says. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.) Editing by Dan Burns and Matthew Lewis)
