
Will Rural America give up on Trump? These small-town activists think so.
Dom Holmes, 28, has learned something important in 10 years of organizing progressives in rural Pennsylvania: You can't just show up when you need people to turn out to vote. You have to sit and listen to them.
In recent weeks, when he's stopped to listen, he's gotten an earful about the tax and spending bill the Republican-led Congress passed in July.
'Folks are especially worried about how that's going to impact them at the local level,' he said. They're particularly "outraged," he said, about cuts to food stamps and Medicaid and the likely damage to rural hospitals. 'Folks should be aware of what the impact ‒ immediate and not ‒ will be on them and they should know who brought that impact to their community; who brought it home to them."
His message is being echoed by rural organizers across the country who told USA TODAY that now is the time to talk with rural voters about the cuts in the GOP's landmark law ‒ and who voted for them.
Rural Democrats see implementation of the GOP tax and spending law, combined with other changes from the Trump administration that they say will directly harm rural communities, as a moment Democrats can use to rebuild their brand in what has been MAGA country for a decade.
And while national Democrats have their own plans for wading into these communities, the locals say they know these places and their neighbors best. They aren't sitting around, hoping a national group will swoop in.
'I'm a rural Democrat. We don't really tend to wait around. There's already just a ton of stuff happening,' said Matt Hildreth, Executive Director of RuralOrganizing.org. 'The energy is already happening on the ground.'
More: When would Trump's tax and spending bill go into effect?
'The frustration with Republicans is palpable'
Republicans control the House by a voting margin of 219 to 212 with four seats currently vacant. Democrats need to win four seats next year to take over the Senate. Gaining control of either chamber would allow Democrats to freeze many of President Donald Trump's policy proposals with two years left in his term.
Both parties expect the new spending law, and how voters think about it, to become one of the top issues in the midterm campaigns.
There is a frustration growing in rural America and a willingness to be identified as a Democrat that they haven't seen in years, several progressive and Democratic organizing groups told USA TODAY. Building relationships and setting the narrative now is key, they said.
'The frustration with Republicans is palpable,' Hildreth said. 'Maybe we never get the MAGA voters ‒ we probably never will ‒ but there's a ton of independents out there looking at this and just saying, 'man, this isn't what I voted for.''
Hildreth's group is already operating in congressional battleground districts in Iowa, Ohio and Pennsylvania, with a focus on getting people to talk about Medicaid.
'Our whole strategy is built around locals, just the idea that the local messenger is most effective,' he said. 'We need to rebuild the Democratic footprint from the ground up, starting with those vocal locals and localizing the Democratic brand.'
The frustration he's hearing from rural communities is about how many of the changes brought by the Trump administration are hitting at once.
Rural economies are more likely to rely on a single industry that have a strong connection to federal funding like farming, colleges or health care; all of which have seen changes in the last eight months. They've seen a freeze on farm subsidies as well as an end to public land revenue and clean energy subsidies.
'When you put tariffs on top of Medicaid cuts and you put SNAP on top … and you put the rural services that are being defunded on top of everything else, it's just not sustainable.' Hildreth said. 'It's everything all at once and I honestly don't think anybody in the White House realizes that.'
National Democrats and Republicans are busy during Congress' summer break
The Democratic National Committee has invested in rural voter engagement for months, including billboard ads near rural hospitals that are likely to close because of the law, and contributed $22,500 a month to Democratic parties in red states and town halls in Republican held districts.
"Donald Trump has been disastrous for our rural communities and the DNC will continue to show rural voters exactly how Trump and Republicans have betrayed them at every turn," DNC Deputy Executive Director Libby Schneider said in a statement.
Republicans are spending the break talking up the tax and spending law, trying to combat Democrat's attempts to set the narrative that the bill is a tax cut for the rich that hurts the poor and middle class.
'Democrats have cemented their image as snobby, out of touch, and indifferent to the struggles of everyday Americans. They've abandoned rural America by voting against tax cuts, border security, and small businesses. While Democrats recycle fear and slogans, Republicans are delivering real results for working families," said NRCC Spokesman Mike Marinella in a statement.
A NRCC memo to House Republicans obtained by Politico tells members that 'the best defense is a good offense,' and says that "this is a critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering.'
It highlights that Republican voters support work requirements and removing ineligible recipients from Medicaid insurance coverage, but the five-page memo doesn't explain how the GOP members of Congress should address the bill's expected hit to rural hospitals.
Building on the momentum of protests
Stephanie Porta, campaign manager of Battleground Alliance PAC, said progressive advocates in rural areas need to capitalize on the protests that millions of Americans have attended this spring and summer ‒ not just in big cities, but in rural towns.
Her organization, a coalition of over 30 national labor, community, and advocacy organizations, has pledged $50 million to try to flip more than 35 vulnerable Republican-held districts in 2026.
They want to build on the protests and lean on local organizers to tailor education campaigns to their districts, some of which don't even have a Democratic candidate yet.
"They're putting together plans based on what their district looks like and what their member of Congress has done to make sure that the public is educated and aware and that those members of Congress know that the public is unhappy with what they have done,' she said.
They've already planned for backpack giveaways as school begins, mock welcome home parties at airports for the members of Congress and canvassing to inform voters about the impacts of the bill.
'There are protests, and then the next step after protest is building the awesome momentum to reach even more people,' Porta said.
Proposed cuts are 'motivating folks to speak up'
Lily Franklin often drives 10 minutes between houses when she knocks on doors in the Appalachian district where she is running to become a delegate to the Virginia House. She says people are worried about the future of rural health care access and Medicaid.
'There are a lot of hospitals that are at threat in this district, in this region. Folks are already driving an hour to an hour-and-a-half just to seek care,' she said. 'All of these proposed cuts are going to disproportionately hit southwest Virginia and it is motivating folks to speak up and say, hey this isn't what we wanted.'
When she knocks on doors, she spends most of the time listening, she said. She grew up in the area and her family has been there for generations.
'They just haven't had anybody show up for them and meet them where they are at, and so half of the battle is talking to voters at their doors, hearing their stories and listening to them,' she said. 'People just want to be heard.'
Even though she is running for the state general assembly, people want to talk about how worried they are about the future of rural health care access and Medicaid, she said.
They are also worried about other aspects of the new law, like cuts to food benefits and energy assistance, which states will have to help pay for, she said.
Franklin outperformed both President Joe Biden in 2020 and Vice President Harris in 2024. She lost her bid to represent the largely rural district that includes Blacksburg and Virginia Tech by just 183 votes.
Franklin said several national groups have contacted her 2025 campaign because of how closely she came to flipping such a competitive seat in a rural area. She said Democrats can't swoop in with their messaging and expect it to resonate in every district.
'We've often tried to come up with a message that's hyper-tested in a lab somewhere, but realistically people just want to be heard. That's the secret sauce,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump renews threats to "federalize" D.C. Here's what to know.
An attempted carjacking that injured a DOGE staff member in Washington, D.C., prompted President Trump to once again push for a federal takeover of the city's government. "If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City," Mr. Trump said in a Truth Social post. "I am going to exert my powers, and FEDERALIZE this City." The episode reignited Mr. Trump's long-running call to take control of the city, citing violent crime and what he described as incompetent leadership. He made the case in February and July of this year, as well as on the campaign trail. "We have to run D.C.," Mr. Trump said Wednesday. "This has to be the best run place in the country, not the worst." However, the president alone does not have the authority to federalize the district. It would require an act of Congress to overturn the 1973 Home Rule Act, which gave D.C. residents the power to elect the council members and mayor who pass and implement their local laws. Congress retains the authority to amend or block D.C. laws, and did so in 2023 when it nullified a crime bill that would have eliminated most mandatory minimum sentences. Before the Home Rule Act, the president could appoint D.C. leaders. Some Republican members of Congress have introduced legislation that could restore that power, but any repeal would require the support of Senate Democrats, which is unlikely. Mr. Trump also floated other options on Wednesday, including taking over the D.C. police or bringing in the National Guard. Under the Home Rule Act, the president can take over D.C.'s police department for a period of time if "special conditions of an emergency nature exist which require the use of the Metropolitan Police force for Federal purposes." But legal experts have said such a move could face court challenges without clear justification. Mr. Trump also commands the D.C. National Guard — the only unit of all 54 states and territories which reports only to the president. Crime is down in the capital Mr. Trump continues to cite public safety to justify intervention, calling crime in the district "totally out of control." "And what a shame, the rate of crime, the rate of muggings, killings and everything else," Mr. Trump said Wednesday. Data from the D.C. police shows there have been 186 carjacking incidents so far this year, but that's down 37% from this time in 2024. Violent crime has also been declining for the last year and a half after spiking in 2023, when the nation's capitol was among the deadliest of the large metro areas in the country. So far in 2025, robberies have dropped by 29%, homicides are down 12%, and overall violent crime is down 26% as of August 6. That follows declines in 2024, when violent crime in D.C. hit a 30-year low, mirroring a broader nationwide drop in violent crime last year. Crime is not the only local issue Mr. Trump took issue with on Wednesday. The president also said he wanted to improve the "cleanliness" of the district. This comes after the president signed an executive order in March, establishing a task force to address what the administration called "quality of life" issues in D.C., including homelessness and graffiti. Trump's history with D.C. officials D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has not commented on Mr. Trump's latest remarks. During his first term, the president clashed with the Democratic mayor over the handling of protests and public safety. In 2020, Bowser ordered the painting of a Black Lives Matter mural on a street a few blocks from the White House, as Mr. Trump faced backlash for his response to protests over the murder of George Floyd by police. Earlier this year, Bowser approved plans to remove the mural. Mayor Bowser and other Democrats have long pushed for statehood to give D.C.'s 700,000 residents congressional representation — something that would require legislative and presidential approval. Efforts to make D.C. the 51st state have faced Republican opposition and failed in Congress. For decades, D.C. has overwhelmingly voted for Democrats in presidential elections, including in the 2024 election when over 90% of voters there supported Vice President Kamala Harris over Mr. Trump. Sneak peek: The Strange Shooting of Alex Pennig Neil deGrasse Tyson weighs in on plans for a moon-based nuclear reactor Texas attorney general investigating Beto O'Rourke PAC over funding of Democrats
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump ordered a new census that doesn't count undocumented immigrants. Will it really happen — and what would be the impact?
States with large undocumented populations like California and Texas would see their political power diminished if people in the U.S. illegally were omitted. President Trump said Thursday that he is ordering his administration to begin work on a new census that excludes undocumented immigrants from the national tally of people living in the United States. 'People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS,' he wrote in a post on Truth Social. It's unclear from his post whether Trump intends to have the change in place for the next official census, which won't be conducted until 2030, or a different count completed sooner. Leaving undocumented immigrants out of the census would run directly against language in the Constitution that orders the government to count 'the whole number of persons in each State.' The Constitution also gives Congress, not the president, control of the census. During his first term, Trump attempted to have a question added to the census that asked respondents about their citizenship status. After a long legal battle, the Supreme Court ultimately blocked the move. Researchers have found that a citizenship question would likely lead to an inaccurate record of the U.S. population, with Latinos especially being undercounted. The Supreme Court has not formally ruled on whether undocumented immigrants can be left out of the census entirely. The justices were given an opportunity to weigh in on that question in the final months of Trump's first term, but chose not to. Why does the census matter? Census data is crucially important. It is by far the most accurate and comprehensive way we have to know how many people live in the U.S., what their backgrounds are and what their lives look like. It also plays a big role in who controls Congress. Census numbers are used to decide how many members each state gets in the House of Representatives. Every 10 years, certain states gain extra seats in Congress while others lose them after the census provides an updated view of population flows across the country. The census affects presidential elections as well, because each state's Electoral College votes are based on the size of its congressional delegation. The census also helps Congress decide where trillions of dollars in federal spending go every year. The distribution of federal funding for education, transportation, law enforcement, public health and much more is all informed by the population figures that the census provides. What would it mean if undocumented people weren't included? There are an estimated 11 million people living in the U.S. illegally, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Leaving them out of the census would lower the total U.S. population by about 3%. The impact would be especially pronounced in the states that have the most undocumented residents. California has by far the largest undocumented population, 2.6 million people as of 2022, according to DHS data. Next is Texas with 2 million, followed by Florida (590,000), New Jersey (490,000) and Illinois (420,000). The House of Representatives has one member for roughly every 760,000 people in the U.S., based on 2020 population figures. Removing undocumented people from the census could be enough on its own to shift multiple House seats out of California and Texas to other states. It would also lower the number of Electoral College votes in those states, which could make a huge difference in an extremely tight presidential race in the future. States and cities with a lot of undocumented immigrants would likely receive less funding from the federal government because official tallies of their populations wouldn't include all of the people who actually live there. What happens next? So far, there has been no follow-up from the Trump administration on how it might carry out the president's call for a new census. Any formal effort to alter the census or complete one outside of the normal 10-year cycle would almost certainly be challenged in court. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of Trump's staunchest allies in the House, introduced a bill last month that would go even further than the president's order. Her Making American Elections Great Again Act would lead to a new census that only counts American citizens and reapportion House seats based on those new numbers. The prospects of that bill making it through Congress appear to be slim, and it would inevitably face constitutional challenges if it did somehow pass. Trump's census call comes in the midst of a heated partisan fight over redistricting, prompted by Texas Republicans' move to redraw the state's congressional lines outside of the typical cycle to secure the GOP as many as five additional seats in the House in next year's midterms. Blue state Democrats have pledged to carry out their own redistricting if Texas installs its proposed new maps. GOP leadership has reportedly been pressuring Republicans elsewhere in the country to follow Texas's lead.


NBC News
10 minutes ago
- NBC News
Gerrymandering is the ‘rot at the core' of politics, Texas Democrat says
Texas State Rep. James Talarico (D) joins Meet the Press NOW and says he and his colleagues will remain out of state as long as needed to block Texas Republicans from redrawing the state's congressional 7, 2025