Kashmir calm, but fear is palpable among the locals
Follow 'Operation Sindoor' LIVE
Traffic was thin in Srinagar despite it being a weekday. Though schools and colleges in the Kashmir Valley are open most parents kept their wards at home. Only institutions along the border and airport are closed.
People have been tracking news on mobile phones since the wee hours and there is a palpable sense of fear among Valley residents.
'We pray the situation does not spiral out of hand. It's Kashmir that always pays the cost of a war. Let sanity prevail and peace follow,' Nazeer Ahmad, 47, a shopkeeper in the old city, said. Locals were also seen stockpiling eatables, buying medicines and filling cars with fuel. Kashmir University has postponed all examinations scheduled for this week.
Also read | Amit Shah asks border States to stock up on essential goods
Let peace prevail
'All examinations of the University of Kashmir scheduled to be held up to and including May 10 stand postponed. Fresh dates for the postponed papers shall be notified separately,' a statement of the KU said.
According to the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir, all schools, colleges and educational institutions in Baramulla, Kupwara and Gurez will remain closed tomorrow (May 08). 'The schools around Awantipora and Srinagar Airport shall also remain closed tomorrow. The directive is issued as a precautionary measure,' an official order said.
Meanwhile, the authorities have established a 24x7 joint control room in Srinagar. 'The Joint Control Room shall operate round-the-clock (24x7) and will serve as a centralised hub to facilitate interdepartmental coordination, monitor ongoing developments, and ensure timely dissemination of information,' officials said.
Meanwhile, the J&K government has directed that 'no leave is to be sanctioned (government officials) except in exceptional cases.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cong's Brijendra hits out at Centre over pruning of voters' list in Bihar
Hisar: Congress leader and former Lok Sabha member from Hisar Brijendra Singh on Sunday claimed that deletion of over 65 lakh votes by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in Bihar was an attack on the Constitution, which the country had held for 75 years. Brijendra Singh, during a meeting of the party workers from the nine assembly constituencies of Hisar, termed the ECI move an unprecedented instance where a constitutional institution was used to undermine the spirit of Constitution. Citing Bihar's 243 assembly constituencies, Singh noted that it translated to an average removal of 27,000 votes per constituency, adding that the margin of defeat in many constituencies ranged between just 1,000-3,000 votes. Former Union minister Chaudhary Birendra Singh was the chief guest at the meeting. "Previously, it was the duty of the Election Commission to ensure that every citizen above 18 years of age was enrolled to vote. However, the current stance of the Commission — questioning why someone should be enrolled — is a grave threat to democracy," said Brijendra Singh. He also pointed out the disparity between the states, highlighting: "In Maharashtra, where the population growth rate is low, 40,000 new votes were added, whereas in Bihar, where the population growth rate is significantly higher, a large number of votes were removed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Even a blind person can see the govt's intention behind this manipulation." On the criticism of India's first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, Singh questioned why the context of his rise to leadership was never discussed. Responding to questions about the release of 93,000 Pakistani prisoners of war following the 1971 Indo-Pak war, Singh redirected attention towards 'Operation Sindoor' and the ceasefire declared just four days after it began. He accused the govt of acting in favour of corporate interests, saying: "The objective, which the govt claims was achieved, was already fulfilled by Aug 6." He further said as a result of the govt's foreign policy decisions, countries like the USA and China were now favouring Pakistan, while Russia remained neutral, a situation few could have foreseen. Singh also claimed that following Operation Sindoor, Pakistan had no need to send delegations abroad, as even Muslim countries now question India's human rights record. "Members of the Indian delegation reported being confronted with allegations of genocide in India, even as they attempted to talk about terrorism," he said. He further criticised the central govt's claim of India being the world's fifth-largest economy, noting the contradiction in providing free ration to 80 crore people while making such claims. Push to gain strength (BOX) Former Union minister Chaudhary Birendra Singh on Sunday said their primary objective was to reorganise the Haryana Congress and bring the party back to power. He also announced plans for five regional meetings covering 15 assembly constituencies, including nine from the Hisar Lok Sabha segment and six from Jind, Kalayat, and Fatehabad. These meetings will be held in Jind, Hansi, Kalayat, Barwala, and Adampur. Each meeting will also serve as a training session for the party workers from three respective constituencies. The first such meeting is scheduled in Jind on Aug 20 – birth anniversary of former PM late Rajiv Gandhi. Congress workers from Jind, Julana, and Safidon will participate in it. Intellectuals and senior Congress leaders will be invited to these meetings to articulate the ideological differences between the Congress and the RSS, Singh added. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
India.com
39 minutes ago
- India.com
When India Considered Giving Poonch To Pakistan: New Delhi's Secret Offer To Islamabad Revealed After Decades
New Delhi: Old papers never age. Some gather dust; some resurface with the weight of unsaid history. On July 29, during a three-day debate on Operation Sindoor in Parliament, Prime Minister Narendra Modi opened up a forgotten chapter of India's past again. He walked down the memory lane and highlighted how the Government of India, led by the then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, once considered handing over parts of Jammu and Kashmir (Poonch, Uri, Neelam Valley and Kishanganga) to Pakistan. The year was 1955. Conversations between Nehru and then Pakistani leaders Mohammad Ali and Interior Minister Iskander Mirza turned uncomfortably real. Documents and transcripts preserved in India-Pakistan Relations 1947–2007, edited by Avtar Singh Bhasin, now confirm what many never imagined. Serious proposals were once on the table, involving territorial adjustments in Jammu and Kashmir. Some involved potential transfers. Some suggested joint control. All unfolded behind closed doors. Inside the Nehru-Mirza Talks It was mid-May, and New Delhi was warm. Leaders from both nations sat across each other from May 15, 16 and 17. Among them were then Union Education Minister Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Home Minister Govind Ballabh Pant. On May 15, Iskander Mirza floated the idea of common defence. He warned of the Persian Gulf falling under the grip of a hostile power. He believed India and Pakistan needed to face that risk together. Nehru listened. He disagreed. 'Presumably against the Soviet Union… I could not conceive of the Soviet Union attacking Pakistan or India,' Nehru said. He did not see a threat in the Gulf justifying such defence pacts. 'The major theatres of war would be Europe and the Far East,' he explained. Then came the real crux. He acknowledged Pakistan's past proposal from the then Governor General Ghulam Mohammad. That idea had called for control of the Kashmir valley by a joint Indo-Pakistani military and for large swathes of Jammu (north of the Chenab) to be handed to Pakistan. Nehru stood firm. 'Completely impractical. No one on our side could possibly think of this,' he said. He feared chaos, migrations and deep unrest. However, he did not walk away. 'It might be possible to consider the transfer of a certain part of the Poonch area,' he offered. But there was no definite lines, no commitments. It was only a hint. The reasoning was strategic. 'Poonch was a major recruiting ground for the Pakistan Army,' Nehru pointed out. Giving it up, though painful, might offer a path to resolution. He estimated that nearly 50,000 people could be affected by such a transfer. More Maps, More Shock On May 16, earlier suggestions resurfaced. Pakistan had previously pushed for parts of Jammu (Poonch, Reasi and Udhampur) to be given to them. In return, they were willing to let go of Skardu. There was even talk of attaching Kargil to Kashmir and leaving its fate to a future plebiscite. Nehru was blunt. 'Quite impossible for us to transfer these large areas. No government in India could do it,' he said. He rejected the idea of joint control too. 'Unthinkable. Such a thing had not happened anywhere before with success,' he said. A Narrow Offer on the Table By May 17, Maulana Azad introduced a more specific suggestion, which was a part of Poonch or maybe even a bit of Mirpur. He said it would cause a marginal shift on the map and turn out to be a gesture toward peace. There was some confusion. Nehru admitted he had discussed Mirpur with Azad and Pant but had not brought it up with the Pakistanis. 'This had not been previously referred to by the United Nations either,' he said. Still, he was ready to include it in the conversation, but only if it meant a final settlement. The two sides tried to make sense of each other's positions. Maps were pulled out, and boundaries were traced. Talks remained open but nothing moved. A formal joint statement followed on May 18, 1955. It said that the Kashmir problem had been 'discussed fully in all its aspects' and that the talks would continue at a 'later stage'. The Map Talks Resurface Years passed, but the wounds did not. In February 1963, the two sides met again. This time, a meeting between India's Swaran Singh and Pakistan's Zulfikar Ali Bhutto was held in Karachi. The discussion moved to maps. Singh offered slices of land in forest-rich regions near the Kishanganga. Bhutto's counteroffer for India was Kathua district. The rest of the area, including Kashmir, Ladakh and Jammu, would belong to Pakistan. Singh called it absurd. Bhutto refused to move unless the Valley itself was put on the table. The back-and-forth dragged on, but there was no breakthrough. Nehru's Final Word in Parliament Months later, on August 13, 1963, Nehru addressed Parliament. He said India had shown 'great patience and restraint' and had 'offered generous concessions' to win friendship and cooperation. He did not hide his disappointment. 'There is little possibility of a settlement so long as Pakistan persists in its irrational animus against India,' he said. A Forgotten Moment The documents have always been there, buried in volumes and shelved away from public memory. But in those three days in May and again in the winter of 1963, the future of Jammu and Kashmir dangled on a knife's edge. Offers were made, maps were drawn and names like Poonch and Mirpur floated in the silence of diplomatic rooms. However, none of it led to a final deal. Once so real, the possibility remains one of the most overlooked turning points in the story of Kashmir.
Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Gaurav Gogoi at Idea Exchange: ‘Victims want to hear an honest admission of government's responsibility… Nehru is not to blame for Pahalgam'
Gaurav Gogoi, Deputy Leader of the Congress in Lok Sabha and Assam Congress President, on holding the government accountable in Parliament and their challenges in Assam's Assembly elections. The session was moderated by Manoj CG, Chief of National Political Bureau. Manoj CG: In Parliament, we saw the debate in both Houses on Operation Sindoor. What are the answers you didn't get from the government? Simple, who is responsible for Pahalgam? And, does this government have a sense of responsibility? We have not seen any form of responsibility — be it an apology to the people of India for failing them or a resignation, not even in the form of an admission. The kind of statement that the L-G Manoj Sinha made, what the Home Minister said in his one-hour speech and the Prime Minister in his two-hour speech about Pandit Nehru — Pandit Nehru did not cause Pahalgam. The UPA certainly did not cause Pahalgam and neither did the late Dr Manmohan Singh or Sonia ji. What people of India, the victims of Pahalgam and Poonch, needed to hear from their government was an honest admission of failure, an honest introspection on their responsibility and accountability which, I think, BJP in its hubris totally brushed over. Secondly, the military operation was different compared to the Balakot air strike. Here, as per our top military generals, we faced the Pakistani Air Force backed by Chinese technology and Turkish military technology. Therefore, the rules of engagement had changed between Balakot and Operation Sindoor. There has been admission by top military generals in various Indian public fora for the need for modernisation, for upgradation. Normally, we would have had this discussion in the previous budget session. When we'd asked for a discussion on the demand for grants for defence, it was denied. The government and the defence minister could have been far clearer on this. They are only preaching to their own hardcore base and blaming the decisions of past prime ministers for their failures in the present. Manoj CG: The LOP Rahul Gandhi asking the PM to show courage and call President Donald Trump a liar, comes at a time when India is negotiating a tough trade deal with the US. It's a complex process. Don't you think the Opposition should also factor that in and give the government that diplomatic space? What has the government achieved by adopting its present negotiating stance? They have not achieved condemnation from the international community on Pakistan. If you look at the 26/11 reactions from the world condemned and linked terrorism with Pakistan. But this time, you got a condemnation of terror from the world but nobody linked terror and Pakistan. Everybody asked India and Pakistan to exercise restraint. In a way, we got hyphenated again. Something that we managed to escape in the last two decades, that India and Pakistan are not on the same plane. Please de-hyphenate us, but the world hyphenated us. And talking about bilateral investment and trade with the US, the President (Trump) is hosting the brain behind Pakistan state-sponsored terrorism, which is the Pakistani armed forces. And the kind of language that the President is using is increasingly hostile. They said that they might invest in the crude oil production of Pakistan. So, what has this diplomacy achieved? What we are telling the government is to grow a spine. If you really want to practise the 56-inch diplomacy that you boast of, back up your hubris. The Opposition since the beginning has been supportive of the government on Pakistan and we are also telling them to stand up to President Trump, for the kind of insult to our Indian Air Forces. Manoj CG: A couple of days ago, the US President said the Indian economy is dead. Do you agree with this? We are in the middle of a bubble right now. I am in the Finance Standing Committee and I look at numbers closely, be it investment numbers, consumption, saving or purchasing numbers. And if it were not for the government, investing in highways where there is not enough traffic, investing in airports where flights cost Rs 15,000 – Rs16,000, for the government borrowing and spending, then our economy would not be firing at all. Our farmers are not productive, neither are small businesses or entrepreneurs. What the government has managed to do is give us new slogans and new milestones. Whatever happened to doubling farmers' income by 2022, what happened to the five trillion economy? All that they are doing is shifting the goal post. We must do a lot more. I mean, look at how many income taxpayers there are. A country of 140 crore, as close to 1.5 crore of income tax payers and 80 crore of people need subsidised ration. That's the state of the average Indian. The economy is not working for the average person, it is working for three-four companies who, by sharing proximity to the Prime Minister, are doing well. Manoj CG: In Assam, Congress had back-to-back defeats in 2016 and in 2021. Your party fared poorly in Lok Sabha and faced a resounding defeat in the recent Panchayat election. So how big is the challenge to revive the Congress? See, any election is a challenge, whether you are incumbent or in Opposition. It's a challenge for many reasons. First of all, the electoral system today is not fair. The Election Commission (EC) does not provide a level playing field. In 2023, we saw how biased and partisan the EC was in Assam, in the way it undertook delimitation. It completely obliterated the principles of delimitation where roughly each seat should have the same demography, same size of voters, they created some mega seats and created some very small seats. All of which to suit the voting pattern of the BJP. Now, the EC makes it so hard to even verify voter lists. In my case, as a new state president, we have eight months left. Our past election record has not been optimal, but do I sense that people are ready for a change? Absolutely yes, and it's up to us on how hard and smart we work. On Indo-US diplomacy | The kind of language that President Trump is using is increasingly hostile and combative. So, what has this diplomacy achieved? We are telling the government to grow a spine Rahul Sabharwal: In Assam, your chief minister has linked demolitions to demography. There hasn't been a pushback from the Congress, at least not in assembly debates. There is this sentiment that there is this massive demographic change that needs to be curbed. How do you counter that? And my second question is that while we have seen Mamata Banerjee being very vocal about migrants being targeted, Congress hasn't responded to that. So, two things. What the chief minister and the BJP are doing currently in Assam is politics. Thankfully, the people of Assam and India are wiser than Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. They made many promises to secure the rights of indigenous Assamese, not one has been fulfilled. The NRC (National Register of Citizens) was supposed to be the answer to their politics. That is incomplete. Clause 6 of the Assam Accord was supposed to be the answer to their fear mongering. They created a report which the Centre has not accepted even though Home Minister Amit Shah thumped his hand on the table saying 'Humne woh kiya jo Rajiv Gandhi nahi kar paaye'. Delimitation was the answer. But they keep talking about the same old things. If they really cared about forests, then they would have protected the forests from the various mafias that operate there. The stone mafia, the coal mafia, illegal quarries. People understand that this is a desperate attempt of a chief minister to cling to power because the minute the Congress party comes into power, he will have to face investigations. What people expect from us is that if we come to power, how are we going to work with local industries, with local entrepreneurs? How are we going to build up local artisans? How are we going to preserve and promote the culture of the various ethnic groups and tribal communities? That's what we are focusing on. As for the second question, which is linked to how people are being forced out. Remember, this time in 2021, what did Amit Shah say? He was teaching us chronology, NRC's chronology, CAA chronology. Come election, it's the same BJP rhetoric. Congress is trying hard to live up to people's expectations and continues to reinvent itself. But the BJP is still feeding voters the same diet of fear and hate. Vikas Pathak: The 2024 Lok Sabha elections were a big boost to the Congress. But after that, Haryana was a surprise, then Maharashtra and Delhi. What is the internal learning of the Congress from this? What we're doing right now is continuing to be disciplined to our goal of bringing about social justice. This was started early last year during the Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra. We were talking about social reform through the caste census, through the Constitution being a living document and preserving its soul. We are also looking at the rights of people to vote fairly, to have their names on the voters list. No doubt the losses in Haryana and Maharashtra are a setback. If the time from 2014 to 2024 has taught us anything it is that we have faced these kinds of setbacks before and we know how to overcome them and move forward. In Parliament, we are demanding the updating of voter lists. People in Bihar have been forced to cough up money to get photocopies of birth certificates. The fundamental nature of elections is at stake. We are doing something important and hope that others also join in, this should be a project of the nation. Vikas Pathak: As a party that was the main vehicle of the freedom struggle, the Indian National Congress had leaders like Nehru, Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi. Now, Narendra Modi, it seems, has successfully become the mainstream embodiment of Indian nationalism. Somehow, Congress is not being able to claw back. Can you reflect on that? Well, I disagree with your conclusion because then Mr Modi would have come back to power in 2024 with a thumping majority. They were projecting 'Char sau paar' and could not reach a majority on their own. I don't see Prime Minister Modi holding the same space, both inside Parliament and outside Parliament, in election rallies, the way he did in his first five years. Post-Covid, Indian thinking has changed. Prime Minister Modi is on a declining trend. I don't see him as the sole factor in Haryana or Maharashtra. I feel the Congress is really speaking to young voters right now. Rahul Gandhi, in his T-shirt and sandal avatar, the kind of content he is producing on social media and the kind of authenticity that he is presenting are far more relatable than the overt hubris of PM Modi. BJP's rhetoric is now stagnant and Congress is more vibrant. Priyanka ji brings another layer of freshness. Her speech in Parliament was so powerful because it spoke to the victims. It just shows how far removed Home Minister Amit Shah and Prime Minister Modi are. They didn't even mention the victims. They didn't even have the heart to say sorry that we failed, there was just no heart left. Asad Rehman: The government says there will be no discussion on the SIR (Special Intensive Revision) in Parliament. What is the Opposition's strategy going forward? To be fair to the government, they have not said that reason on the record officially. Asad Rehman: Kiren Rijiju said it (on August 1). Then, that's a clerical reason. The way voters in Bihar have to show up with various papers to get their name registered on the voters list, Mr Rijiju is just citing various historical papers to say that there can't be a discussion. It's absolutely false and he's misleading the public. Have we not discussed electoral bonds in Parliament? Have we not discussed the EC? There are many formats within the Parliament to have a discussion on an important topic without it being held under the ambit of a particular ministry. So if you want, if you have the courage, if you feel that sense of responsibility to the voter, to the right of the average voter, to know what's happening with their democracy, then Parliament allows you that space. On Operation Sindoor | Priyanka ji's speech in Parliament was powerful because it spoke to the victims (of Pahalgam). It shows how far-removed Amit Shah and Modi are, they didn't even say sorry that we failed Damini Nath: Does Assam have a problem of foreigners on the electoral roll? If not the SIR, is there a need to clean the electoral roll? We are all elected on the basis of this electoral roll. Prime Minister Modi is prime minister because of this. But by doing it in this manner, there are a lot of questions, the legitimacy of the exercise and its political timing. There are genuine concerns but laws exist for you to identify a Bangladeshi. You are in charge of the borders. All the laws are there, provided you want to fix the problem. If you don't want to fix the problem, then you will always come up with some new rhetoric. Deeptiman Tiwary: Your CM has been making certain allegations against you and your family. How do you respond to this? Even the home minister said so in the Parliament that I have been to Pakistan several times. Somebody has briefed him wrongly. I have been there once, before Modi ji had gone there to eat biryani, before Modi ji called (Nawaz) Sharif for his oath ceremony. This is at least 10-15 years ago. As I said, people are smarter. They think by targeting my wife, they will have some luck. They will soon realise that my wife is stronger than me. Lalmani Verma: Two days ago when there was a resolution in Parliament to extend the President's rule in Manipur, the Opposition asked for a fresh mandate. Do you think the ground situation is conducive to conducting fresh elections? This issue has several aspects. The first is the home minister's failure. He has been unsuccessful in safeguarding the country. He didn't do it in Uri, in Pulwama, Pahalgam or Manipur. This is his job, maintaining our internal security and he has been consistently unsuccessful. And he has never apologised for that. Second, in the Northeast particularly, through politics, we have been successful in maintaining harmony among different communities. Whether it is the insurgents or underground or communities who had taken up arms, we managed to bring peace through politics. But, this is what saddens me. The politics that was responsible for bringing peace at a crucial time is now dividing a state into two. The tension between two communities is so deep, the wounds are so deep, that it will take at least years to heal. But does that mean we can't have a stable government there? Does that mean there can't be elections there? Not at all. Didn't we have the Lok Sabha elections there? Everything is possible if you have the right political will. From how many states will you snatch away the rights? Ladakh is UT, J&K is UT and here too there isn't a government elected by people. So there are several legitimate questions related to Manipur. Manipur is a big blot on PM Modi's career.
