AI fakes duel over Sara Duterte impeachment in Philippines
Days after the Philippine Senate declined to launch the impeachment trial of the country's vice president, two interviews with Filipinos arguing for and against the move went viral.
Neither were real.
The schoolboys and elderly woman making their cases were AI creations, examples of increasingly sophisticated fakes possible with even basic online tools.
"Why single out the VP?", a digitally created boy in a white school uniform asks, arguing that the case was politically motivated.
The House of Representatives impeached Sara Duterte in early February on charges of graft, corruption and an alleged assassination plot against former ally and running mate president Ferdinand Marcos.
Live Events
A guilty verdict in the Senate would result in her removal from office and a lifetime ban from Philippine politics.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
But after convening as an impeachment court on June 10, the senior body immediately sent the case back to the House, questioning its constitutionality.
Duterte ally Senator Ronald dela Rosa shared the video of the schoolboys -- since viewed millions of times -- praising the youths for having a "better understanding of what's happening" than their adult counterparts.
The vice president's younger brother Sebastian, mayor of family stronghold Davao, said the clip proved "liberals" did not have the support of the younger generation.
When the schoolboys were exposed as
digital creations
, the vice president and her supporters were unfazed.
"There's no problem with sharing an AI video in support of me. As long as it's not being turned into a business," Duterte told reporters.
"Even if it's AI... I agree with the point," said Dela Rosa, the one-time enforcer of ex-president Rodrigo Duterte's drug war.
Five minutes' work
The video making the case for impeachment -- also with millions of views -- depicts an elderly woman peddling fish and calling out the Senate for failing to hold a trial.
"You 18 senators, when it's the poor who steal, you want them locked up immediately, no questions asked. But if it's the vice president who stole millions, you protect her fiercely," she says in Tagalog.
Both clips bore a barely discernible watermark for the
Google
video-generation platform Veo.
AFP fact-checkers also identified visual inconsistencies, such as overly smooth hair and teeth and storefronts with garbled signage.
The man who created the fish peddler video, Bernard Senocip, 34, told AFP it took about five minutes to produce the eight-second clip.
Reached via his Facebook page, Senocip defended his work in a video call, saying AI characters allowed people to express their opinions while avoiding the "harsh criticism" frequent on social media.
"As long as you know your limitations and you're not misleading your viewers, I think it's fine," he said, noting that -- unlike the Facebook version -- he had placed a "created by AI" tag on the video's TikTok upload.
While AFP has previously reported on websites using hot-button Philippine issues to generate cash, Senocip said his work was simply a way of expressing his political opinions.
The schoolboy video's creator, the anonymous administrator of popular Facebook page Ay Grabe, declined to be interviewed but said his AI creations' opinions had been taken from real-life students.
AFP, along with other media outlets, is paid by some platforms including Meta, Google and TikTok for work tackling disinformation.
'Grey area'
Using AI to push viewpoints via seemingly ordinary people can make beliefs seem "more popular than they actually are", said Jose Mari Lanuza of Sigla Research Center, a non-profit organisation that studies disinformation.
"In the case of the impeachment, this content fosters distrust not only towards particular lawmakers but towards the impeachment process."
While some AI firms have developed measures to protect public figures, Jose Miguelito Enriquez, an associate research fellow at Nanyang Technological University, said the recent Philippine videos were a different animal.
"Some AI companies like OpenAI previously committed to prevent users from generating deepfakes of 'real people', including political candidates," he said.
"But... these man-on-the-street interviews represent a grey area because technically they are not using the likeness of an actual living person."
Crafting realistic "humans" was also getting easier, said Dominic Ligot, founder of Data and AI Ethics PH.
"Veo is only the latest in a string of rapidly evolving tools for AI media generation," he said, adding the newest version produced "smoother, more realistic motion and depth compared to earlier AI video models".
Google did not reply when AFP asked if they had developed safeguards to prevent Veo from being used to push misinformation.
For Ligot, guardrails around the swiftly evolving technology are a must, warning AI was increasingly being used to "influence how real people feel, pressure decision-makers and distort democratic discourse".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Terms of trade: West Asia isn't the Empire's Achilles' heel anymore
This column is being written on a day when US President Donald Trump seems to have, or claims to have engineered a cease fire between Iran and Israel despite the US having helped the latter with its bombing of Iran's underground nuclear installations. The cease fire followed what seems like token missile attacks by Iran on US military bases in Qatar. The developments so far have turned all doomsday predictions of experts from various ideological standpoints -- they include MAGA's fears of the US entering yet another long-drawn war in West Asia, liberal voices fearing an uncontrolled escalation using even non-conventional means and market watchers fearing a large geopolitical disruption to the global economy and trade or energy flows -- gross overestimates. So, are seemingly knowledgeable people getting worked up about nothing? Or is Trump really a master of brokering deals, and most of the commentariat is unable to see this quality because of its prejudice towards him? There is another way to look at this question. It is best approached by quoting from the Wall Street Journal's 23 June Hard on the Street column. The cease fire followed what seems like token missile attacks by Iran on US military bases in Qatar. (AFP) 'Back in 1977, just before the Iranian Revolution began and planted the seeds of the Second Oil Crisis, the US had net imports of about 3.1 billion barrels of petroleum and refined products, or 14 barrels per person. That per-capita number was unchanged as recently as 2003 at the time of the Iraq war. The US also was a significant importer of natural gas in both of those years. Today, because of hydraulic fracturing, the US has net exports of about 2.5 barrels per capita and is also the world's largest seller of liquefied natural gas. The technology isn't new, but improvements in the past 15 years have been transformational,' it says. The US's military involvement in West Asia, especially in the post-WWII period has had a deep relationship with the petroleum economy. But things have changed in the last decade or so. The US is no longer an energy importer and therefore much more immune from any energy shocks coming from a disruption in this region. To be sure, a lot of friendly oil exporting countries in West Asia continue to be important for the US, more importantly the current US president. The legacy of this energy economy via the petrodollars means that these countries have a lot of money to invest/spend in the rest of the world and both Trump and the US would like a large part of this. But all the US had to do to keep this gravy train going was to derail the transition from fossil fuel use, which Trump has already done by killing the climate deal. If energy security is not really a concern, then why is Trump risking an involvement with Israel's military aggression in the region, one might ask then. The simplest answer to this question is that being seen as not standing with Israel would put the Trump administration in a position which would force a rupture with the neoconservative and Zionist lobby in US's domestic politics. This will have severe financial and ideological consequences. The pro-Israel lobby still controls a lot of purse strings for political finance in the US. Not standing with Israel at the current moment would also be seen as playing into the hands of a pro-Palestinian voice which does not stand against things such as Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran's other violent proxies. Also Read:India welcomes Iran-Israel truce, reiterates concern about stability in region However, Trump is shrewd enough to ensure that it is him and not Benjamin Netanyahu who is seen as the boss in the ongoing chain of events. His outburst including using expletives on Tuesday while referring to both Iran and Israel on Tuesday was meant to send exactly this message. The only other US president who is said to have used an expletive after having met Netanyahu is Bill Clinton, who was frustrated that it was the Israeli and not the American who got away with playing the superpower in that meeting held in 1996. The West Asian or Middle East (as the Americans and Europeans call it) contradiction for the US has lost its economic criticality significantly compared to what it used to be in the 20th century because of the US's self-sufficiency in energy. However, the Israeli aggression in the region – it is only expected to become worse – is creating a deep super-structural fault line in the West, US included, as the Muslim population rises in these countries and they assume a growing role in domestic politics. But it is the non-right-wing parties such as the Democratic Party in the US and Labour in the UK which are facing most of the growing strain because of this cleavage. Does this mean Trump can keep going from one deal or chutzpah to another? Not necessarily. A politics of schadenfreude – best seen in things such as Trump penalising Harvard University for refusing to crack down on alleged antisemitic behaviour on campus – can keep Trump's working class conservative base animated for some time. But it can do precious little to solve the economic contradiction which drove this lot to Trump's fold in the first place. This contradiction is best described as America's success in keeping down inflation by importing from the Global South, most importantly China, but which also entailed unleashing a deindustrialisation and destruction of blue-collared jobs in its domestic economy. Trump's knee jerk response to this problem, his reciprocal tariffs, which he himself put in abeyance, and even a crackdown on illegal migration will likely create more problems for his working-class base than bring back the glory days of the Golden Age of Capitalism. Trump's, or for that matter, all of the neo-right's political legacy will depend on what they can do to solve this primary contradiction rather than running away from it by seeking gratification from periodic acts of schadenfreude or chutzpah. We are very far from the final act in this larger political economy tension in the advanced capitalist world. Also Read: Iran Israel's fragile ceasefire in place - What's next? Explained History, if one were to make a provocative statement to end this column, is still moving at a pace when it changes in decades rather than weeks. an obsessive tracking of flashpoints in the past few weeks seems to have convinced many people that we are living in times where the latter is true. Roshan Kishore, HT's Data and Political Economy Editor, writes a weekly column on the state of the country's economy and its political fall out, and vice-versa
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump reiterates 'destroying' Iran's nuclear programme as Israel says its 'too early' to asses damages
Speaking at the Nato Summit in The Hague, Trump reiterated his claims that the US strike on Iran's nuclear sites 'was a devastating attack' which 'knocked them for a loop' read more US President Donald Trump looks on next to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte (not pictured) at the NATO summit of heads of state and government in The Hague on June 25, 2025. AFP The Israel Defense Force has now joined the tune of others, saying that it is 'too early' to assess the damages caused by Israeli and US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites. The development comes after US media reports cited Pentagon intelligence saying that US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities did not 'destroy' them but set them back by a few months. 'We met all the objectives of the operation as defined for us, even better than we thought. But it is still too early to determine, we are investigating the results of the strikes on the different sections of the nuclear program," IDF spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He also maintained that it is more likely that the strikes set Iran's nuclear programme back by years rather than completely destroying it, as US President Donald Trump claims. US media have cited people familiar with the Defence Intelligence Agency findings as saying the weekend strikes did not fully eliminate Iran's centrifuges or stockpile of enriched uranium. 'Went through hell' Meanwhile, the president has slammed media reports , saying that outlets like CNN and the New York Times are spreading 'fake' news. When asked about what kind of setback Iran's nuclear sites faced following the strikes, Trump said, 'I think basically decades. I think they've had it, they just went through hell… the last thing they want to do is enrich.' Trump was speaking at the Nato Summit in The Hague. Here, he reiterated his claims that the US strike on Iran's nuclear sites 'was a devastating attack' which 'knocked them for a loop'. Secretary of State Marco Rubio responded to the leaked intelligence report, emphasising that it was based on a leaker 'telling you what the intelligence says' and characterising it as part of 'a game these people play.' He also stated that the 'conversion facility' required to produce nuclear weapons was taken out and cannot be seen anymore, though he did not disclose the location of the site. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD UN atomic watchdog wants officials back in Iran The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, has urged inspectors to head back to Iran and re-engage with its leadership. When asked about reports on Iran's nuclear facilities post US and Israel strikes, Grossi said, 'I don't like this hourglass approach, it's in the eye of the beholder. In any case, the technological knowledge is there, the industrial capacity is there, that no one can deny.' He added, 'There's a chance for a diplomatic solution, an opening. We shouldn't miss that opportunity. It is not important whether it's two months or three months, we need a solution that will stand the test of time.'
Deccan Herald
18 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
India going through undeclared Emergency now: Kerala CM Vijayan
Vijayan made the allegation in a Facebook post, in which he described the Emergency declared by the then-Indira Gandhi government in 1975 as 'the darkest chapter in the history of Indian democracy.' The CPI(M) veteran noted that this dark chapter has completed half a century.
