Man accused of storming Israeli restaurant in CBD makes second bid for freedom
Antwany Arnold, 55, appeared in the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Wednesday to make his second application for bail this month, after police alleged he hurled a chair at a diner at Miznon restaurant in Hardware Lane shortly after 8pm on July 4.
Arnold has been charged with several offences, including throwing a missile and behaving in a riotous manner.
Police allege food, glasses and chairs were thrown at staff and patrons during the incident, which involved a group of 20 or 30 people who had splintered off from an earlier demonstration about police presence at protests.
A lawyer acting for police described Arnold's conduct as disgraceful and highly offensive.
Arnold's lawyer, Tim Hutton, told the court his alleged actions, some of which had been captured on CCTV and shown to the court, were not driven by antisemitism, prejudice or hate.
'It [was] a compassionate condemnation of an organisation, the IDF, the Israel Defence Forces ... it is condemnation of the atrocities and crimes ... committed,' he said. 'It is in no way any reflection on Jewish people or thoughts or feelings towards Jewish people.'
Magistrate Michelle Mykytowycz interjected, saying that regardless of whether the incident was to do with political or humanitarian issues, her role was to consider allegations put to her about Arnold's conduct and whether he posed a danger to community safety.
The court heard Arnold was on bail over another incident which occurred on April 14, at the corner of Swanston and Bourke streets just after 3pm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canberra Times
5 hours ago
- Canberra Times
Aid lorries enter Gaza as Israel takes 'tactical pause'
UN emergency relief coordinator Tom Fletcher welcomed the announcement by the Israeli military. "In contact with our teams on the ground who will do all we can to reach as many starving people as we can in this window," he wrote on X.
Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The moral test for Labor has shifted on Gaza: Words are not enough
Just two months ago, the UN warned: 'Every single one of the 2.1 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip face the risk of famine. One in five faces starvation.' And we know many have been shot by Israeli soldiers while trying to get food. On the weekend, Israel announced it would take steps to restore aid. Sadly, by this stage it is difficult to know with what level of credulity to treat its government's assertions. Israel has long blamed Hamas for looting aid; on Sunday, The New York Times carried a report based on conversations with Israeli military officials: 'the Israeli military never found proof that the Palestinian militant group had systematically stolen aid from the United Nations … In fact, the Israeli military officials said, the UN aid delivery system, which Israel derided and undermined, was largely effective in providing food to Gaza's desperate and hungry population.' This backed reports of a recent American analysis with similar findings. The starvation of the people of Gaza, then, is not an accident; it is not a tragic byproduct of other actions. As de Waal wrote years ago, 'starve' should not be seen as a passive verb. It is something someone does to someone else. And, it follows, something that others permit to be done. Almost a year ago, one Israeli minister, Bezalel Smotrich, said: 'No one will allow us to starve 2 million people, even though that might be just and moral until they return the hostages.' He was wrong. Loading Wong's early call for restraint in Gaza tells us several things. It shows it was possible, at the very beginning, to glimpse some of what was coming. At the same time, Wong's early defensiveness shows how easily participants in public debate – including leading politicians – are able to be knocked off course by efforts to make certain statements unsayable. The conservative press is significant in these efforts; but the rest of the political class, politicians and media, are the ones who allow themselves to be cowed. Israel has achieved as much as it ever will from this war. In the doing, thousands more Palestinians have been killed. Together, these two facts mean that more things are now able to be said. But the moral and practical test for those with influence has shifted. Loading Of course, it's true that Australia can't by itself end the fighting. And it is hard to know what will make Netanyahu listen – or make America behave differently. And it is true, too, that statements can have some effect. The last time famine threatened in Gaza, international pressure led to an increase in aid. Obviously, though, this was only temporary. And that is why it is important to recognise that other options are available to Australia. The UK has now announced it is working with Jordan to deliver aid and will medically evacuate children. France has said it will recognise Palestine as a state, something former Labor ministers Gareth Evans, Bob Carr and Ed Husic are calling for here. On Sunday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese made clear that Israel has breached international law. This was a welcome injection of clarity. Still, the test at this late stage is no longer whether politicians can issue damning statements. The only meaningful test left is whether our leaders will do everything they can to stop Netanyahu's Israel from killing any more Palestinians.
The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
A target of Latham's disparaging messages, Abigail Boyd is directing her anger elsewhere
'This was a private message that he [Latham] didn't actually intend for me to see, so I have accepted his apology.' Instead, her anger is reserved for the premier. After passing the lower house with support from progressive crossbench MPs including Alex Greenwich after he moved amendments, Labor's bill has been blocked in the upper house thanks to a voting bloc comprising Coalition, progressive crossbenchers including the Greens and Animal Justice Party, and Latham. While this masthead previously reported the government had worked hard to lobby Latham to support its workers' compensation bill, Labor has sought to capitalise on the accusations against him by focusing on the Coalition for working with the former One Nation MP on amendments to the legislation. The amendments include changes to the definition of sexual harassment to include whether a perpetrator knew 'or should reasonably know' their actions were sexual harassment. Minns has urged the Coalition to 'cut that string', while Treasurer Daniel Mookhey has said the change to the definition of sexual harassment would mean a victim would have to 'prove their perpetrator deliberately wanted to hurt them'. Loading That, said Boyd, is an example of 'stunning hypocrisy' because it is Labor's bill that creates definitions of sexual harassment, bullying and racial discrimination that injured workers would have to meet. The bill has also been criticised by unions, in part because of what they say will be the disproportionate impact on female-dominated industries such as nursing from changes that would make it harder for people with psychological injury to receive workers' compensation. In a statement, a spokesman for Minns said the government 'totally rejects' the assertion its criticisms of the Coalition and Greens were hypocritical, and it was a 'belated political response from the Greens and Abigail Boyd after months of the government calling out Greens-Latham co-operation'. Minns' repeated attacks on the Coalition have raised eyebrows among MPs because of Labor's willingness to lobby Latham on bills and, in some cases, work with him on specific amendments to legislation. His description of Latham last month as a 'shameful bigot' following remarks made against anti-domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty, independent MP Alex Greenwich and the Jewish community also came after the MP opposed the workers' compensation reform. 'I sat there and watched them trying to win over Mark Latham to supporting their bill,' she said. 'This idea that they won't work with him is laughable. If they had his vote, or if they needed it, we would not be hearing any of the criticism we are at the moment.' Boyd, who has long had an antagonistic relationship with Latham over her push for changes to the culture inside NSW parliament, met Minns in February last year to raise the issue of Labor's 'track record on dealing with sexism in the parliament' after becoming fed up with the 'permissiveness' of some MPs, including Latham. That included, she said, voting against a motion she moved to have parliamentary standing orders updated 'to require respectful behaviour in both Houses'. Labor subsequently supported the referral.
