
NGOs caught between juntas and militants in turbulent Sahel
In the world terror epicenter, nearly 30 million people rely on humanitarian aid provided by non-governmental organizations and international bodies.
'The need is mostly concentrated in the central Sahel' in junta-led Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger where assistance is critical to nearly 15 million people, according to the United Nations humanitarian agency, OCHA.
Since seizing power, the juntas have made sovereignty and the fight against militants their priority, leaving NGOs and organizations that receive funding from abroad under increased pressure.
In Burkina Faso, 21 NGOs had their permits to operate in the country revoked in the space of just one month between June and July, for what the authorities said were administrative reasons.
Ten other associations were suspended for three months.
'It's a tough blow but we are working to comply with legal requirements. For now, our activities are suspended,' a member of one of the associations said.
In neighboring Mali, NGOs financed or supported by former colonial power France, with whom the junta has cut ties, have been suspended since 2022.
The military-led authorities also plan to impose a 10-percent levy on funding for NGOs and associations to use for Mali's 'economic, social, environmental and cultural development,' according to a draft law seen by AFP.
Niger's junta has ordered NGOs to align their activities with its priorities, which it says are bolstering security, developing production centers to boost the economy and promoting good governance.
In November, it withdrew the operating licenses for French aid group Acted and a local association, Action for Wellbeing (ABPE).
Interior Minister General Mohamed Toumba declared two months later that 'many NGOs' in Niger were carrying out 'subversion missions' through 'support they often provide to terrorists.'
Then in February, the International Committee of the Red Cross was ordered to leave the west African country, where it had worked since 1990, accused of 'collusion with terrorists.'
As they come under pressure from the juntas, NGOs must also contend with attacks by militant groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda or the Daesh group, who see them as a threat to their power and ideology.
The Sahel region was the epicenter of global 'terrorism' for the second straight year in 2024, accounting for more than half of deaths put down to terror attacks worldwide, according to the Global Terrorism Index.
At least 26 humanitarian workers were killed in the Sahel last year and many more wounded and kidnapped in 116 security incidents, OCHA said.
'Our operations are now limited to a few cities. To transport staff or supplies, for example, we prefer air transport, which generates extra costs at a time when we are struggling to mobilize resources,' a Burkinabe humanitarian worker, speaking on condition of anonymity due to security concerns, said.
'Many NGOs are now present on the ground thanks to their local staff, which minimizes risks,' a Nigerien NGO worker said.
In October, Doctors Without Borders (MSF) stopped working in the large northern Burkinabe town of Djibo, which is surrounded by militants, following attacks targeting its health centers and offices.
A few years earlier the medical charity had been forced to leave the southeast Nigerien town of Maine Soroa near the border with Nigeria due to raids by Boko Haram militants in August 2020.
'NGOs are targeted because extremist groups are seeking to establish themselves as legitimate alternative authorities,' said Charlie Werb, an analyst at risk advisory company Alert:24.
'They want to supplant the state, which means not only pushing out the state itself from territory, but also organizations deemed to be providing services on its behalf,' he said.
The Group for the Support of Islam and Muslims, known by its Arabic initials JNIM, an Islamist outfit affiliated with Al-Qaeda that is active in Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso, 'has stated that it will only allow NGOs to operate in areas under its control so long as they don't carry out activity that goes against their religious principles,' Werb said.
NGOs have had armed escorts imposed on them by the juntas purportedly to ensure their safety, but humanitarian workers believe the move is mostly designed to keep track of their activities.
'Conducting our activities under military escort can hinder our actions and expose us to one of the belligerents,' the Burkinabe aid worker said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Israel detects missile launch from Yemen, working to intercept it
The Israeli military said early on Tuesday it identified the launch of a missile from Yemen toward Israel with aerial defense systems operating to intercept the threat.


Arab News
6 hours ago
- Arab News
Canada says it delivered additional humanitarian assistance to Gaza
The Canadian government said on Monday it delivered additional humanitarian assistance to Gaza, which has been under a devastating Israeli military assault for almost 22 months after the deadly October 2023 Hamas attack. 'The (Canadian Armed Forces) employed a CC-130J Hercules aircraft to conduct an airdrop of critical humanitarian aid in support of Global Affairs Canada into the Gaza Strip. The air drop consisted of 21,600 pounds of aid,' the Canadian government said in a statement. Canada said last week it plans to recognize the State of Palestine at a meeting of the United Nations in September, ratcheting up pressure on Israel as starvation spreads in Gaza.


Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
Saudi Arabia, Jordan and UAE choose action over apathy
In times of profound geopolitical upheaval, and moral testing, the true character of nations and their leadership is revealed — not through slogans, but through action. As the Arab region continues to witness one of the gravest humanitarian catastrophes in its modern history — the brutal and prolonged assault on Gaza — the disparity between rhetoric and reality grows ever starker. Since the beginning of the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip in October 2023, the world has watched in horror as entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, children buried under debris, and hospitals transformed into graveyards. The death toll has become a number, numbingly rising with each passing day. Yet amid this unbearable human suffering, the Arab and Islamic world's response has been mixed. Outrage has been loud, but tangible solidarity has been scarce. In this paradox, we see the stark division between those who choose to act and those who are content to comment. What is deeply alarming is that those who act are often the very targets of baseless criticism. Take, for instance, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the UAE — three Arab states that have taken concrete, coordinated steps to deliver lifesaving humanitarian aid to Gaza. These efforts include air-dropped medical supplies, land convoys of food and flour, field hospitals, and even diplomatic pressure to facilitate humanitarian corridors. Rather than being acknowledged, these efforts are often derided or dismissed outright. Just days ago, Jordanian trucks were seen crossing into Gaza, laden with flour, medicine, and essentials. This came after months of famine and humanitarian blockade. Similar aid from Saudi Arabia and the UAE has been dispatched repeatedly through Egyptian and Jordanian crossings. Yet what did this spark? An avalanche of online criticism, accusations of normalization, and claims of political theater. Some denied the images and videos altogether; others accused us of coordinating with the Israeli occupation, as if helping the wounded and starving somehow equates to betrayal. This intellectual and moral duplicity not only undermines Jordan's efforts but also exposes a deeper rot — an obsession with ideological purity over practical compassion. Critics, often ensconced in digital echo chambers and hotel lobbies, prefer slogans over solutions. They vilify aid because it is not coupled with revolution, and they attack those who do something, however small, because it is not everything. Every child saved today is a future voice for Palestine. Hani Hazaimeh Let us be clear: Jordan's support for Palestine is neither cosmetic nor contingent. It is rooted in history, blood, and political principle. From the 1948 Nakba to the ongoing siege of Gaza, Jordan has carried a disproportionate burden of the Palestinian tragedy — hosting millions of refugees, advocating at every international forum, and absorbing the political and economic consequences of standing by Palestine. What Jordan has done, and continues to do, is a reflection of state policy grounded in pan-Arab nationalism and a moral worldview. And Jordan has not stood alone. Saudi Arabia has played a critical diplomatic and financial role, pressing international actors to ceasefire negotiations and providing major aid packages. The UAE, too, has dispatched multiple aid convoys and field hospitals, particularly to northern Gaza. These efforts represent a concerted Arab move to alleviate suffering — not because it is easy, but because it is right. Do these efforts resolve the core issue of occupation? No. But are they futile? Absolutely not. In a time when Gaza is being starved into submission, every truck, every plane, and every pill becomes an act of resistance — a rejection of death, a declaration of life. Unfortunately, the loudest critics rarely offer alternatives. Instead of mobilizing support, they mobilize hashtags. Instead of donating, they denounce. Their worldview is binary: either full liberation or full betrayal. This maximalist logic has paralyzed Arab action for decades and helped no one, least of all the Palestinians. More dangerous still is the normalization of nihilism. To claim that no effort matters unless it achieves complete liberation is to ignore the complexity of political struggle. It is to surrender the realm of the possible in favor of performative purity. It is to forget that while the dream of a free Palestine is sacred, it must be pursued through all available means — diplomatic, humanitarian, and, yes, pragmatic. We in Jordan do not claim sainthood. We acknowledge that Gaza's needs exceed our capacity. But it is unjust to scapegoat Jordan while wealthier, more capable actors do far less. Our commitment stems not from opportunism but from obligation. And it continues in the face of political backlash, security risks, and logistical nightmares. We understand the frustration of Palestinians in Gaza — the parents burying children, the doctors working without anesthetics, the displaced living without hope. They have every right to be angry. But let their anger be directed toward those who bomb, besiege, and occupy — not those who rush to offer help. To our critics, we say: What have you done? Did you sponsor a child? Did you send food or medicine? Did you speak to your governments or write to your lawmakers? Or did you merely tweet your indignation from a cafe, then move on? The real betrayal is silence. The real complicity is inaction. In this region's darkest hour, lighting even a single candle — be it a truck, a medical tent, or a public statement — is infinitely more valuable than screaming into the void. Because in Gaza today, a loaf of bread can mean survival. A dose of insulin can mean life. A warm blanket can mean dignity. Let us not romanticize suffering. Let us not fetishize resistance while ignoring the bleeding wound. Every child saved today is a future voice for Palestine. Every family helped is a shield against despair. And every Arab government that chooses action over apathy is keeping the cause alive — not in museum speeches but in lived reality. Jordan will continue to act. Not because it is easy. Not because it is popular. But because it is right. Our moral compass does not waver with the winds of public opinion. And we remain convinced that Palestine is not a seasonal cause or a trending topic, but a permanent moral obligation. In the end, we do not seek applause. We seek results. We seek to feed the hungry, heal the wounded, and preserve a flicker of hope in a sea of darkness. The path to liberation is long, and it passes through many roads — some political, some humanitarian, some military. But none of these roads are paved by cynicism alone. So let the critics shout. Let the cynics scoff. We will continue lighting candles — because Gaza needs light, not lectures. And when history writes this chapter, it will remember neither the tweets nor the tirades, but the trucks that arrived, the hands that helped, and the hearts that stood firm. • Hani Hazaimeh is a senior editor based in Amman. X: @hanihazaimeh