Thabo Mbeki Foundation denies claims of opposing National Dialogue
Image: Boxer Ngwenya / Independent Newspapers
The Thabo Mbeki Foundations has denied claims that they were planning to create a parallel structure to oppose the National Dialogue, a two-day event that concluded on Saturday at the University of South Africa (Unisa).
The foundation, along with other prominent legacy foundations, withdrew from the National Dialogue process a week before it started, citing concerns over its implementation and rushed timelines.
Several organizations, including the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party), Freedom Front Plus, ActionSA, FW De Klerk Foundation, Solidarity, and Afrikaner Leierskapsnetwerk (Afrikaner Leadership Network, ALN), also withdrew from the National Dialogue, questioning its legitimacy, transparency and effectiveness.
The MK Party specifically raised concerns about the financing of the event, while others accused the ANC of using the dialogue to polish its image ahead of the 2026 local government elections.
However on Sunday the Mbeki Foundation said there was no plan to start a parallel structure saying the foundations were in constant talks and it was not anything new.
Former President Thabo Mbeki just before the event kicked off declined an invitation to attend the national dialogue's first convention and in a letter dated August 12 from Mbeki Foundation chairperson Geraldine Fraser-Moleketi to Nedlac executive director Makhukhu Mampuru, fueled allegations of a parallel structure.
Fraser-Moleketi also disputed the characterisation of the upcoming Unisa convention as the "first," stating that the preparatory task team (PTT), operational for 13 months, convenes all public meetings and national conventions of the dialogue.
The national dialogue is a result of an agreement among the parties forming the Government of National Unity. While considered Mbeki's brainchild, the process has exposed strained relations between him and President Cyril Ramaphosa.
The National Dialogue aimed to engage all South Africans in a countrywide discussion on challenges facing the country and forge a new vision.
However, the event revealed a clear disconnect between government officials and ordinary citizens with delegates expressing frustration at being left out of the process, saying they only learned about the convention through the media.
Discussions during the proceedings were frequently intense, centered on immediate concerns such as crime, corruption, educational disparities, and the perceived inadequacies of the justice system.
In a breakout session on "Crime and Corruption," delegates shared personal stories and emphasised the need for tougher law enforcement, community policing, and quicker legal action.
Qophumlando Dlangamandla, a teacher from North West, reportedly said, "I dream of a South Africa where education matters, where rural children are given the same tools as those in Gauteng."
Bonginkosi Zwane reportedly spoke emotionally about his young grandson, a victim of rape, and called for the return of the Scorpions, saying, "All that I dream of is the return of Scorpions. Back then, we saw real and swift action against criminals."
Tensions came to a head in the main plenary, where President Cyril Ramaphosa was present.
Activist Sihle Lubisi addressed the hall directly, criticising the ANC and the organisation of the National Dialogue.
"We are the foot soldiers. We know what's happening on the ground. All of you here have bodyguards and we don't. You say it's a National Dialogue, but you shut us down!
"You are here because the 2026 elections are coming. You're trying to buy our silence," Lubisi said.
The National Dialogue concluded with a call for diverse methods of dialogue, crafted in communities using local knowledge and expertise. Delegates emphasised the importance of inclusivity and citizen-led discussions.
Lindiwe Mazibuko, Co-Deputy Chairperson of the Eminent Persons Group closed the event.
"We have come together from all walks of life, engaged in respectful dialogue, and dared to envision a more inclusive, citizen-led future for South Africa."
The process to establish a representative Steering Committee was extended by two weeks to accommodate more diversity and ensure nobody is left behind.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
‘No different to an EFF rally or Joy of Jazz' – iPhupho L'ka Biko leader after National Dialogue performance
iPhupho L'ka Biko's Ngqaqu doesn't see a difference between the national dialogue and Codesa in the 1990s. Music collective iPhupho L'ka Biko performed on the first day of the National Dialogue at Unisa, despite some critics labelling the dialogue as a PR exercise. 'It was not a difficult decision to make because as iPhupho, we've always made it clear that wherever black people are, we shall be found there,' band founder and leader Nhlanhla Ngqaqu told The Citizen. 'Ultimately [we want] to have a united Africa and an Africa that is completely liberated. That's our end-goal.' On Friday, President Cyril Ramaphosa officially opened the first convention that will lead to the rollout of the National Dialogue to communities. ALSO READ: 'They will find themselves like the PAC': Ramaphosa takes aim at National Dialogue boycotters Another gig for iPhupho 'If we are to choose our gigs based on principles, based on values, ethics, ideology… we would then find ourselves not performing anywhere. So, performing at the National Dialogue is no different to performing at the EFF rally or at the Standard Bank Joy of Jazz,' said Ngqaqu. In 2023, iPhupho L'ka Biko was one of the performers at the EFF's 10th anniversary at the FNB Stadium. He said the band draws the line where there is victimisation of black lives. 'We'd never take a gig, for example, that says Africans are foreigners in our own continent,' shared Ngqaqu. 'We'd never take that stance to go support Operation Dudula, for example. Anything that is anti-black, we wouldn't support to that extent.' ALSO READ: 'It was a black story rather than a political one'- iPhupho L'ka Biko on performing at EFF rally National Dialogue criticism Some political parties, civil society organisations and high-profile foundations chose to boycott the first National Dialogue convention. Former president Thabo Mbeki was the first to float the idea of a National Dialogue; however, before it started, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation pulled out. Other foundations that opted not to be involved include the FW de Klerk Foundation, Kgalema Motlanthe Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation, and Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation. The DA, FF Plus, ActionSA and uMkhonto weSizwe Party are some of the political parties that didn't participate. 'What I found interesting with this entire criticism, if you listen to most politicians when they're responding to this thing, in their disgruntlement or disappointment, at the core of this issue is money, the budget,' said Ngqaqu. 'For other entities to withdraw, most of the civil society groups they withdraw because the budget was cut. A lot of the noise is not a question of principle or the importance, but it's about who is it serving.' 'Where are these people when we're addressing issues of quality education, this year funny enough is 10 years of Fees Must Fall,' Ngqaqu noted. The first song that iPhupho performed was Sixole Kanjani, a song that speaks to the murder of Chris Hani and Mgcineni 'Mambush' Noki and late mineworkers who were shot by police in Marikana. M A R I K A N A nithi sixole kanjani?#marikanamassacre#OurNationOurDialogue …malifezeke… iPhupho L'ka Biko — iPhupho L'ka Biko (@IphuphoLikaBiko) August 16, 2025 'Essentially, we played that song to say that if we're gonna have a dialogue and a genuine one, we can never forget the slain of Marikana and we cannot forget the likes of Chris Hani. We also did uThixo Ukhona, which is also still consistent with our ethos as a band in how we are rooted in spirituality and consciousness. 'We have so much hope in black people… Despite the flaws that our government has, we still have faith. So it was not a difficult decision to make.' ALSO READ: iPhupho L'ka Biko: Unshackling alcohol's grip on society through Amanzi Sessions No 'practical commitment' Ngqaqu also said he doesn't see a difference between the national dialogue and the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (Codesa) in the 1990s. 'It has no practical commitment or outcome. For me it would be more effective if whatever the public has raised, it should be implemented and must be binding. So now at this stage, it's just a conversation, I don't see any practical commitment,' he said. Making an example of an area like Bram Fischer, where there have been issues of electricity for several years, he said the government should first address those issues before engaging in dialogues. 'There is nothing to be spoken about that. You must just give people electricity, give people water… there is a lot of work to be done,' Ngqaqu noted. 'If we are to have a dialogue, it should begin after a substantial work has been done. A dialogue should be had when black people have dignified living conditions. What dialogue are you gonna have with a person that is hungry?' asked the musician.
eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
SME sector called to help shape SA's future
JOHANNESBURG - Small Business Development Minister, Stella Ndabeni, encourages co-operatives and small businesses to play an active role in the National Dialogue. She says the dialogue provides an opportunity for entrepreneurs to use their expertise to shape the National Dialogue agenda and influence the country's policy direction.
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
National Dialogue gains inclusion as activists step in after foundations exit
(Graphic: John McCann) Despite hurdles, including several legacy foundations and political parties boycotting last week's convention to initiate the National Dialogue on resolving South Africa's problems, organisers and participants insist the initiative remains on track. Last week, President Cyril Ramaphosa said the National Dialogue was a credible programme that would 'launch a million conversations' across South Africa, where people would 'meet to talk about what worries them, what gives them hope and how they think their lives and our country can be better'. On Monday, convention committee spokesperson Zwoitwaho Nevhutalu described the discussions during last week's forum as 'vibrant', saying the He noted how delegates had resisted moves that might exclude citizens unable to attend the two-day convention, telling the Mail & Guardian : 'It was actually humbling how activists did not want to use their privilege at being at the convention to usurp leadership.' The National Dialogue is part of Ramaphosa's attempt to forge a new social compact after his ANC lost its electoral majority in the 2024 general elections, forcing it into a coalition government with nine other political parties, including the Democratic Alliance (DA). The DA is boycotting the dialogue, describing it as an Nevhutalu said the willingness of activists to hold space for excluded voices was a key marker of the convention's spirit. 'What we picked up from the dialogue is that South Africans are very stressed and it is an opportune moment for leaders to engage in discussions,' he said, pushing back against what he called the 'misrepresentation' of the process by those opposed to it. 'All we will do is collate the information and make sure it arrives at the highest level, which is the second convention.' Civil society organisations appear to be stepping into the gaps left by the foundations' withdrawal. Member of the convention committee Nonkululeko Mntambo said the exits opened more space for citizens and grassroots networks. 'When the foundations left the leadership of the subcommittees, the social mobilisation and trauma and healing fell to the grassroots people who were already mobilised,' Mntambo said. 'Many experts have since been discovered who would otherwise not have been in the forefront.' But she stressed that the process is not without risks. 'The dialogue has to address security issues and ensure participants are well trained, for a citizen-led process to be successful. We are dialoguing with people who have very different values and backgrounds.' The trust deficit between the government and citizens, created by years of unmet promises, complicates efforts to build consensus, Mntambo said, adding that the convention showed spatial, gender and racial divides which the dialogue seeks to address. 'Getting people to the convention was difficult as some were coming from different parts of South Africa — from townships and villages,' she noted. Bongani Kupe, the special project manager at the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, said the legacy movements were talking to civil society about how to take the project back from the government and political parties. 'We didn't participate in [last week's] gathering but we cannot leave this important project to people who don't understand its meaning and impact in the citizenry defining the South Africa we want,' Kupe said. He said South Africans had lost faith in democracy, pointing to the declining number of voters who cast ballots in the 2024 elections. 'Our aim is to deal with all aspects affecting the country and there are no holy cows. The dialogue should cover even the most uncomfortable topics that will shape the future of this country.'
