logo
Five terrifying ways enemies would hit Britain if it goes to war laid bare in official report

Five terrifying ways enemies would hit Britain if it goes to war laid bare in official report

The Sun02-06-2025
BRITAIN would get blitzed with long-range drones, ballistic and cruise missiles if it had to fight a war this year.
A landmark Strategic Defence Review set out five 'methods of attack' the UK should expect if it was forced into state-on-state conflict.
11
11
11
Bases, ports and airfields in Britain and around the world be the first to get bombarded.
And everything from oil rigs and subsea cables to satellites and merchant ships would also face cyber attacks and sabotage.
The dossier warned: 'Based on the current way of war, if the UK were to fight a state-on-state war as part of Nato in 2025, it could expect to be subject to some or all of the following methods of attack:
'Attacks on the armed forces in the UK and overseas bases."
Strategic Defence Review: Five Key Defence Pledges
Up to 12 new nuclear-powered submarines to be built under the Aukust pact
£15bn investment in the UK's nuclear warhead programme to maintain and modernise the deterrent
New Cyber Command to be established, with £1 billion invested in digital warfare capabilities
Up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons to be purchased, supporting 800 defence jobs
More than £1.5bn in extra funding to repair and renew armed forces housing
Major bases would include the Navy's three main ports at Portsmouth, Plymouth and Clyde as well as outposts around the world, such as the Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean and RAF Akoritiri in Cyprus.
The report also warned of: 'Air and missile attack from long-rage drones, cruise and ballistic missiles, targeting military infrastructure and critical national infrastructure in the UK.'
The UK has no land based missile defence systems and relies on its six Royal Navy destroyers to intercept ballistic or hypersonic missile which Russia has used to blitz Ukraine.
But the government has pledged to invest £1bn in a new Iron Dome-style defence system to 'protect the homeland'.
Other attacks in an all out war would include 'increased sabotage and cyber-attacks affecting on and offshore critical national infrastructure.'
11
11
11
The report warns Britain is already 'under daily attack' in the so-called grey zone, which includes cyber hacks and sabotage 'beneath the threshold of war'.
It also warned the citizens to expect 'attempts to disrupt the UK economy, especially the industry that supports the armed forces, including through cyber attack, the interdiction of maritime trade, and attacks on space-based critical national infrastructure'.
Finally, it warned the UK would face a massive propaganda blitz designed 'to manipulate information and undermine social cohesion and political will.'
The review sets out plans to grow the Army, renew Britain's nukes and recruit up to 250,000 cadets to get the country ready for 'whole of society approach' to defence and resilience.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer warned that, 'a step change in the threats we face demands a step-change in British defence to meet them'.
He added: 'We need to see the biggest shift in mindset in my lifetime to put security and defence front and centre – to make it the fundamental organising principle of government.'
Vital War Chest
AFTER years of Whitehall deciding that defending the nation didn't matter, the Government is right to now increase spending as part of today's Strategic Defence Review.
Given massive global uncertainty, the UK should be on a war footing.
Yet there are concerns that the review doesn't go far enough.
There is still doubt over whether or when Labour will spend three per cent of GDP on defence.
Planned submarines and weapons factories are also still decades away.
Then there's Britain's appalling record on procurement which has wasted
billions on dud kit.
There is still a great deal more for this Government to do.
11
11
11
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's at stake when Zelensky meets Trump at the White House with Starmer and EU allies in tow
What's at stake when Zelensky meets Trump at the White House with Starmer and EU allies in tow

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

What's at stake when Zelensky meets Trump at the White House with Starmer and EU allies in tow

European leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, will join Volodymyr Zelensky for a high-stakes meeting with Donald Trump at the White House on Monday. The prime minister will travel to Washington alongside several European leaders in a show of solidarity with the Ukrainian president, whose last visit to the Oval Office ended in a disastrous clash with Mr Trump. The summit comes just days after the US president met Vladimir Putin in Alaska, in which it is understood that the Russian president demanded that Ukraine cede the Donetsk and Luhansk regions as a condition for ending the war. Mr Trump is said to have privately endorsed the proposal, a move that Kyiv has strongly resisted. Ukraine's leader has warned that Russia 's refusal to halt hostilities before agreeing to a settlement would complicate any attempt at securing lasting peace. Speaking ahead of his trip, Mr Zelensky said: 'Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war.' Downing Street said Sir Keir and other leaders 'stand ready to support this next phase of talks' and will stress that their backing for Ukraine will continue 'as long as it takes.' Who is going to Washington? European leaders confirmed to be attending include: Sir Keir Starmer, UK prime minister Emmanuel Macron, French president Friedrich Merz, German Chancellor Alexander Stubb, President of Finland Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission Mark Rutte, Nato Secretary General Giorgia Meloni, Italy's prime minister The Ukrainian president will travel with a strong backing after participating in a coalition call on Sunday afternoon, hosted by the UK, France, and Germany. The so-called 'coalition of the willing' aims to provide security guarantees, including policing any future peace deal with troops on the ground in Ukraine. What will be discussed on Monday? The talks are expected to cover territorial questions, including Russia's demand for Ukraine to cede Donetsk and Luhansk. They are also expected to address security guarantees for Ukraine, which could be backed by US air power. The role of Nato and European allies in enforcing a settlement is likely to be discussed, alongside sanction pressures on Russia. European leaders want to also ensure Ukraine is at the table for all negotiations. Speaking alongside Mr Zelensky in Brussels, Ms von der Leyen said: 'With regards to any territorial questions in Ukraine, our position is clear: international borders cannot be changed by force. 'These are decisions to be made by Ukraine and Ukraine alone, and these decisions cannot be taken without Ukraine at the table.' European powers also want to help set up a trilateral meeting between Mr Trump, Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky to make sure Ukraine has a seat at the table to shape its future. What are Russia's demands? At the Alaska summit, Mr Putin reportedly insisted Ukraine must surrender Donetsk and Luhansk in full, abandon its Nato aspirations and declare neutrality. He offered to freeze the front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, sources close to the meeting told The Independent. Around 88 per cent of the Donbas is under Russian control. This includes almost all of the Luhansk region and 75 per cent of the Donetsk region. Russia controls nearly 44,600 square miles or 19 per cent of Ukraine in total, including the Crimean peninsula, according to open-source maps of the battlefield. Mr Zelensky has rejected the idea of handing over territory, insisting talks must be based on current front lines and begin with a ceasefire. Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said Mr Putin agreed to allow the US and its European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee at his meeting with the US president on Friday. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato," Mr Witkoff told CNN. He added that it 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that' and called them 'game-changing.' Article 5, at the heart of the 32-member military alliance, states that an armed attack against one or more of the members shall be considered an attack against all members. Sir Keir commended Mr Trump's commitment to providing security guarantees to Ukraine, following a meeting of the coalition of the willing on Sunday afternoon. What happened the last time Zelensky met Trump? Their previous Oval Office meeting in February ended in a dramatic confrontation. A planned mineral deal signing ceremony collapsed as Mr Trump and Vice President JD Vance accused Mr Zelensky of being 'ungrateful' and 'gambling with World War III'. Mr Zelensky pushed back, insisting there could be 'no compromises with a killer' – a reference to Mr Putin. The meeting was cut short, the joint press conference cancelled, and Mr Trump declared afterwards that Zelensky could 'come back when he is ready for peace', and temporarily suspended aid to Ukraine.

Sadiq Khan responds to Donals Trump's ‘nasty person' jibe
Sadiq Khan responds to Donals Trump's ‘nasty person' jibe

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

Sadiq Khan responds to Donals Trump's ‘nasty person' jibe

London Mayor Sadiq Khan expressed a willingness to meet Donald Trump, despite past criticisms, to discuss diversity and challenge misconceptions. Khan criticised Trump, asserting he is "not a force for good" and could be "inadvertently radicalising people" through his views on various minority groups. Trump had previously labelled Khan "a nasty person" who has "done a terrible job," remarks Khan largely dismissed as "water off a duck's back." Khan defended London's diversity as a strength, accusing Trump of using the capital as a "political football" for a "culture war." The Mayor noted an increase in Americans applying for British citizenship since Trump's second term, humorously suggesting they have "good taste."

London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan says Donald Trump is ‘not a force for good'
London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan says Donald Trump is ‘not a force for good'

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan says Donald Trump is ‘not a force for good'

London Mayor Sadiq Khan has expressed a willingness to meet Donald Trump, even as he warned that the US President could be "inadvertently radicalising people" and is "not a force for good". The Labour politician dismissed the US President's recent jibes, made during a visit to Scotland, where Trump labelled him "a nasty person" who has "done a terrible job". Sir Sadiq stated such remarks were "water off a duck's back". However, speaking at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, he admitted that the exchanges sometimes made him feel like he was "nine years old again" and "in the school playground". But Sir Sadiq, speaking at the Political Party show with comedian Matt Forde, hit back at the US President, saying: 'Somebody who has views like he does about black people, about women, about gays, about Muslims, about Mexicans, thinks I'm nasty. 'Really. He is the leader of the free world, arguably the most powerful man in the world, and really.' He spoke out as he said that records showed since the middle of January this year – when Mr Trump began his second term in the White House – and July 'there have never been more Americans applying to British citizenship and living in London'. The Mayor said: 'So I think Americans have got good taste by and large.' He added that he hoped the President would come to London during his state visit to the UK next month, with Sir Sadiq stressing the 'diversity' of the capital was a 'strength, not a weakness'. Speaking about this diversity, he insisted: 'I think it makes us stronger not weaker, richer not poorer. 'And when President Trump says some of the things he does, it brings from the periphery to the mainstream, views that are potentially dangerous. 'He inadvertently – I'm not going to suggest he does it deliberately – he inadvertently could be radicalising people with views that could lead to them doing things that are dangerous.' He spoke out about fears that minorities 'could be treated less favourably because of the views of the President of the USA' as he accused Mr Trump of 'using London and our diversity as a political football, as a proxy for a culture war'. The London Mayor continued: 'On a personal level, it is water off a duck's back, but we can't run away from the fact that there are some really serious challenges we face as a western society and President Trump, in my view, I speak generally, isn't a force for good.' However he insisted that he would be 'more than happy to meet President Trump' saying he would seek to show him that it is 'possible to be proud to be a westerner and a proud to be Muslim, that it is possible to be British, and proud to be British, and be of Pakistani origin and be a law abiding citizen and we aren't three headed monsters'. The Labour politician said: 'I suspect President Trump may have formed a view of Muslims because of the actions of a small minority of really bad people who are terrorists and use Islam in a perverted way. 'What I would want President Trump to know is that is a very small fraction of Muslims across the globe. 'So if there was an opportunity to meet President Trump, I would be more than happy to do so.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store