logo
Russian Harvard researcher detained for months charged with smuggling

Russian Harvard researcher detained for months charged with smuggling

Yahoo15-05-2025
May 14 (UPI) -- A Russian Harvard University Medical School researcher held in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody since February has been arrested and charged with smuggling biological material into the United States.
The one count of smuggling goods into the United States was announced by the Justice Department on Wednesday, marking a dramatic escalation in the case that has garnered attention from academics.
According to the affidavit in support of the criminal complaint -- which was dated Monday but made public Wednesday -- Kseniia Petrova had frog embryos and embryonic samples in her possession when entering the country that she did not declare to immigration authorities.
The document states she arrived at Boston's Logan International Airport from Paris on Feb. 16. A Customs and Border Protection canine alerted its handler to Petrova's bag, which was removed and brought to an agricultural secondary inspection area for further screening where biological items were found.
When questioned about it, she allegedly denied carrying any biological material, but a search of a plastic bag she was carrying revealed additional biological material.
Under oath, she admitted that the items were biological material and said she was not sure if she was supposed to declare them on her arrival, the document states, adding that a search of her found text messages to the contrary.
"[I]f you bring samples or antibody back, make sure you get the permission," one text message she received from an unidentified person said.
"What is your plan to pass the American ... Customs with samples? This is the most delicate place of the trajectory," another text message read.
A third message to Petrova's phone had asked: "what is your plan for getting through customs with samples?"
"No plan yet," Petrova allegedly replied, according to excerpts of the messages included in the court document. "I won't be able to swallow them."
If convicted, Petrova could face up to 20 years in prison, five years of supervised release and a fine of up to $250,000.
"The rule of law does not have a carve out for educated individuals with pedigree," U.S. Attorney Leah Foley said in a recorded statement.
The affidavit states her visa was canceled at the airport.
"The U.S. visa that Ms. Petrova was given -- which was revoked by customs officials as a result of her conduct -- is a privilege, not a right."
Her lawyer, Gregory Romanovsky, told The New York Times that Petrova's J-1 visa was canceled and that deportation proceedings were initiated.
He said normally, a case like this would be treated as a minor infraction, and that filing the criminal charge three months after the alleged violation, "is clearly intended to make Kseniia look like a criminal to justify their efforts to deport her."
Romanovsky also added that a Vermont hearing held earlier Wednesday had essentially established that his client was detained unlawfully and that the complaint had "blindsided" them, and Petrova's transfer from immigration to criminal custody was "suspect" as it occurred right after a judge set a bail hearing, signaling she could be released.
During the Vermont hearing, U.S. District Judge Christina Reiss had questioned the government over the legality of its actions.
"Where does a Customs and Border Patrol officer have the authority on his or her own to revoke a visa?" Reiss asked, NBC News reported.
"You cannot be found inadmissible because of the customs violation."
According to the affidavit, Petrova told customs that she is fearful of going back to Russia.
"She claimed she had protested the Russian Federation," the affidavit states. "She provided no other details."
In an opinion piece she wrote for The New York Times -- and which was published Tuesday -- Petrova states she had left Russia after being arrested for protesting its war in Ukraine.
The charge was filed as the Trump administration has been conducting a crackdown on immigration, including targeting foreign-born academics, particularly over their support for Palestine amid Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza.
Some of those detained students have been released by judges who have ruled against the Trump administration's use of immigration enforcement to seek to deport them.
Last week, White House senior adviser Stephen Miller said they are "actively looking at" suspending the writ of habeas corpus, which is the right to challenge the legality of a person's detention by the government.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Video: Russia Says Ukraine Drone Struck Rostov Apartment Building
Video: Russia Says Ukraine Drone Struck Rostov Apartment Building

Newsweek

time10 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Video: Russia Says Ukraine Drone Struck Rostov Apartment Building

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Video footage shared by Russian Telegram channels showed the moment a Ukrainian drone struck an apartment building in Rostov-on-Don, which the local governor said left at least thirteen people injured, two of them seriously. The drone can be seen flying slowly over buildings in the southern Russian city before descending towards the top of one and exploding on impact. WILD FOOTAGE 🔴 Video shows a Ukrainian drone slowly flying and striking a building in Rostov, southern Russia. — Open Source Intel (@Osint613) August 14, 2025 Rostov's Acting Governor Yury Slyusar said several apartment buildings were damaged in the "drone attack" and those hurt were taken to the hospital for treatment. Russia and Ukraine continue to attack each other ahead of an Alaska summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin at which the two leaders will discuss a potential peace deal. Ukraine and its European allies are hoping Trump emerges from the meeting with Russia agreeing to a ceasefire. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

It's not just DC: Republicans seem happy to let Trump do whatever he wants
It's not just DC: Republicans seem happy to let Trump do whatever he wants

USA Today

time39 minutes ago

  • USA Today

It's not just DC: Republicans seem happy to let Trump do whatever he wants

For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about President Trump's invasion of an American city. I'm starting to wonder when our government's checks and balances will kick in – or if they will at all. On Monday, Aug. 11, President Donald Trump announced he would be deploying the National Guard in Washington, DC, and taking over the city's police force "to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' The troops began showing up on Tuesday evening. According to Trump, violent crime is up in the nation's capital, and he's the only one who can rescue the city from societal collapse. It's a convenient narrative, one that feeds into MAGA's perception of him. For the rest of us, it's a terrifying move that shows he is willing to test the limits of presidential oversight. But while Trump's hostile takeover of DC public safety is concerning on its own, it's more alarming that Republicans in Congress are letting him do this with seemingly no regard for what is ethical. Even if this deployment is legal, there are certain lines that presidents should not cross. This is one of them. And I have to ask. Would Republicans be sitting on their hands if a Democratic president were doing everything that Trump is doing? I would hope not, but here we are. Of course, Trump is lying about crime in DC Trump seems to have called in the military after an assault on a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) staffer on Aug. 3. While it's horrible that a government employee was attacked, Trump's declaration that Washington is crime-infested and dangerous doesn't align with reality. According to the Metropolitan Police Department, violent crime is down 26% compared with last year. In fact, 2024 marked a 30-year low for violent crime in Washington, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Per a New York Times analysis, the homicide rate in 2023 was 40.4 per 100,000 people, the highest rate in 20 years. But that rate declined in 2024, down to 26.6 per 100,000 people. And homicides in the city continue to decline in 2025. While Trump is correct in saying this rate is higher than those of Mexico City and Bogotá, Colombia, it doesn't paint the full picture. A federal takeover is an extreme reaction. It doesn't matter, of course, that violent crime in the city is down overall this year. That wouldn't fit in with the Trumpian narrative, the one where he's the hero saving tourists and locals alike from violent crime. Are you worried about crime? Do you feel safe where you live? Tell us. | Opinion Forum Who even asked for this? It wasn't DC Mayor Muriel Bowser. All of this is happening to the dismay of Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who noted on the Aug. 12 edition of 'The Breakfast Club' that the militarization of the city will instill fear in its residents. '(Trump) wants to send the message to cities that if he can get away with this in Los Angeles, if he can get away with this in DC, he can get away with it in New York, or Baltimore or Chicago, or any other place where millions of people live, work and are doing everything the right way,' Bowser said on the radio show. Bowser is right, this is an escalation. It's Trump's way of showing everyone in Democratic parts of the country that he has the final say and that he isn't afraid to use the military to his advantage. Trump is a bully. He's using the National Guard to conquer DC as a test run. | Opinion Will Republicans hold Trump accountable for anything? For a party that claims to care about federal overreach, GOP leaders certainly have been quiet about Trump's invasion of an American city. In fact, it seems that many are supportive of the move. If a Democratic president were to try to do this, the Republican Party would decry authoritarianism's arrival in the United States. But because it's Trump, there has been zero pushback. Just like his tariff plan that's costing everyday Americans, the failed Elon Musk overhaul of the federal government, the deployment of soldiers against citizens in Los Angeles and his ruthless immigration agenda that includes trying to erase due process, the GOP is letting him get away with all of it. Republicans may even be happy about it. Imagine if Joe Biden did any of that? The Republican pearl-clutching would be generational. But this is fine because it's their king. Trump is considering extending the troop deployment beyond 30 days, something he will need congressional approval for. This seems entirely plausible, even likely, because of the Republican majorities in both chambers of Congress. I'm hesitant to throw the F-word – fascism – around, but if the Trump administration continues down this path, I worry that the rights we have as Americans will slip away. Who's stopping the president from deploying troops to other cities in the United States? It certainly isn't going to be Congress. There's some hope for the Supreme Court, but it has a 6-3 conservative majority. All of this is happening within the first year of Trump's return to the White House. There's no telling what the next three years will bring if this is how he's starting out. There should be firm lines that presidents do not cross – there are some things that are not appropriate or reasonable for a president to do. Yet that line keeps getting moved by Republicans, who don't seem to care as long as their conservative agenda is being implemented. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter: @sara__pequeno

Failed GOP candidate gets 80 yrs for shooting at political adversaries
Failed GOP candidate gets 80 yrs for shooting at political adversaries

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Failed GOP candidate gets 80 yrs for shooting at political adversaries

Aug. 14 (UPI) -- A failed GOP candidate in New Mexico has been sentenced to 80 years behind bars for orchestrating a shooting spree targeting his perceived political adversaries following his defeat in the 2022 midterm elections, which he believed was rigged against him. Solomon Pena, 42, was sentenced Wednesday, to 960 months in prison, a fine of $250,000 and three years of supervised release, the Justice Department said in a statement. "Violence and intimidation have no place in our elections," U.S. Attorney Ryan Ellison said. "This sentence shows that through the tireless work of our agents and prosecutors, we will protect our democracy and bring offenders to justice." A federal jury convicted Pena in March of one count of conspiracy, four counts of intimidation and interference with federally protected activities and several firearms charges, as well as three counts of solicitation to commit a crime of violence. Pena ran as a Republican for the District 14 seat in the New Mexico House of Representatives in the 2022 midterm elections, and was handily defeated by Democrat Miguel Garcia, who secured 74% of the vote. "I never conceded my HD 14 race," he said in a statement published to what was then called Twitter, now X, following the election, with a picture of himself wearing a red "Make America Great Again" sweatshirt and flags supporting Donald Trump's 2024 re-election campaign. "Now researching my options," he said. Following the election, the failed political candidate cried foul and was accused of pressuring members of the Bernalillo County Board of Commissioners not to certify the results. Authorities said he had visited several of their homes to lodge complaints over voter fraud and election rigging. When they did not acquiesce to his demands, Pena turned violent. Shortly after he visited the commissioners, several of their homes were shot at between Dec. 4, 2022, and Jan. 3, 2023 -- specifically, the home of Bernalillo County Commissioner Adriann Barboa on Dec. 4, New Mexico House Speaker Javier Martinez on Dec. 8, former Bernalillo County Commissioner Debbie O'Malley on Dec. 11 and State Sen. Linda Lopez on Jan. 3. Pena was arrested mid-January 2023 amid a hunt for a suspect. Inside his vehicle, authorities found two guns, 800 fentanyl pills and cash. Federal prosecutors said the shootings were the product of a conspiracy involving four men Pena paid to shoot up their houses. The prosecutors also said that while in jail, he tried to solicit inmates to murder witnesses to prevent their testimony during his trial. Two co-conspirators -- Jose Trujillo and Demetrio Trujillo -- previously pleaded guilty to their involvement in the crime, with the former being sentenced to 37 months in prison and the latter, 180 months.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store