Aussie is praised for booing at UK comedian after 'deeply sickening' joke sparks heated back and forth in front of audience: 'That was extremely insensitive'
An Aussie disability campaigner has been praised after furiously hitting out at an English comedian over a 'deeply sickening' joke about diabetes.
Carmen Azzopardi, a type 1 diabetic, was appalled when Paul Foot launched into a ten minute skit on diabetes sufferers during his show at the Moth Club in Hackney, east London, last Wednesday.
Ms Azzopardi called out the comedian on stage but Foot hit back and said he disagreed his comments were 'insensitive'.
In the ten minute skit, Ms Azzopardi claimed Foot 'made fun of people' who wear continuous glucose monitors - a device diabetics use to keep track of their blood glucose levels.
He then mimicked a diabetic having a hypoglycaemic episode by shaking on stage, before suggesting they die after suffering a heart attack.
In footage shared on TikTok by Ms Azzopardi, she could be heard booing and calling out the comedian following the skit.
'That was a s*** joke. I have type 1 diabetes, that was extremely insensitive and mis-informative,' she said.
Foot hit back and said he didn't believe he was being insensitive as he attempted to continue his set.
'I don't think it's up to you to decide if it's insensitive or not,' Ms Azzopardi said.
The pair continued to clash in a tense exchange as the comedian argued 'comedy is subjective' while the audience could be heard nervously laughing intermittently.
Foot went on to blame her for the show's 'awkward' ending.
'Due to the failure of you to grasp that simple intellectual point, cause you fail to grasp the difference between these issues, cause of that it's ending in an awkward way,' he said.
Ms Azzopardi said her friends urged her to leave the gig, but she wanted to stand her ground and avoid the comedian making fun of her once she had left.
Foot then called out Ms Azzopardi for talking while he was finishing up his set and said they would never agree over his comments as he was sharing 'an intellectual argument' while she was on 'the emotional side'.
The disability campaigner explained why she was angered by Foot's comments in a video following the exchange.
'All in all, deeply embarrassing for him, deeply deeply sickening to witness as someone who is living with that disease,' Ms Azzopardi said.
'It's probably one of the most blatant acts of ableism that I have ever personally experienced since being diagnosed with this illness, because that's what it is, it's an illness, not a punch line to a joke.'
Social media users overwhelmingly agreed with Ms Azzopardi.
'Is the joke in the room with us? I don't understand which part is meant to be funny. Well done for calling him out!' one said.
'This is so weird? Did someone with diabetes break up with him? This is such a random gripe to have,' another wrote.
'Why were people laughing? Not a single thing in this clip was funny,' a third added.
'I have type 1 diabetes and I used to do stand up and there is a way to make tasteful jokes about YOUR own illness and experience but this ain't it,' a third said.
However, disagreeing with the campaigner, one wrote: 'God forbid a comedian tells a joke.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Fiddler on the Roof: The glorious revival moves indoors, and loses the wow factor
Fresh from winning three Olivier awards, Jordan Fein's superb Regent's Park revival of Fiddler on the Roof has been transplanted to form the big summer musical offering at the Barbican. Jerry Bock, Sheldon Harnick and Joseph Stein's instant 1964 Broadway classic about a toiling shtetl milkman contending with five daughters and a world in transition at the turn of the 20th century always does a roaring trade, but this loving iteration merits packed houses. Even so, I was also left wishing I'd caught the production at Regent's Park Open Air theatre last August. The alfresco setting clearly augmented the portrait of a Jewish community not snugly self-contained but vulnerable to the elements as well as brutish Russians. The dominant image of Tom Scutt's design is of wheat fields; indeed the evening memorably opens not with a fiddler on a roof but a fiddler (the talented, spectral Raphael Papo) atop a rising cross-section of burgeoning wheat field that forms an ominous canopy. That exquisite number late in Act One – Sunrise, Sunset – in which the locals gather to celebrate the marriage of Tzeitel (the milkman Tevye's eldest daughter) to the diffident tailor Motel, last year magically coincided with nightfall itself. Presented here amid candlelit gloom, the song still carries a spine-tingling charge. The pair have broken with tradition in seeking a love match (the days are hence numbered for Beverley Klein's tireless matchmaker Yente). The wistful ritualistic mood around them affirms vast cycles of nature. So even if the earthiness for which this incarnation was celebrated is less in evidence now, that's no reason to kvetch about the experience overall. Compared with his co-directing work on the recent stripped-back Oklahoma!, Fein privileges emotional truth over experimentation, the imperishable score rendered with musical heft and folksy simplicity, the lighting beautiful without being self-advertising. Julia Cheng's choreography, particularly in the famous bottle-balancing dance sequence, replete with precise, angular, sweeping leg moves, is a joy. Adam Dannheisser's commanding performance as Tevye is of a piece with this confident restraint. No actor can eclipse the ebullient memory of Zero Mostel or Topol and this American actor gives us instead a figure of grounded ordinariness and even surprising level-headedness. He has comic value, but he doesn't aim it at the gallery; when he sings If I Were a Rich Man, the village looks on, half amused, half sharing the dream too. He's an everyday father repeatedly tested by demands for independence by his daughters. (Natasha Jules Bernard, Hannah Bristow and Georgia Bruce are contrastingly spirited as the main three, Tzeitel, Chava and Hodel). Of course, there is a grim frisson – and a topical one – to the vision of collective displacement in the second half, but what resonates most is Tevye's agonised attempt to reconcile his paternal care with his devotion to his people, and his stern God. At a time of cultural upheaval, of daily concerns about what we must fight for, and discard, that hits home.
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Folly of funny money deals: A market solution would be best for Thames Water, says ALEX BRUMMER
As a long-standing critic of private equity pillage, I should be cheering from the rooftops at the decision by KKR to pull out of its proposed rescue of Thames Water. Yet given the ghastly legacy of financial ownership and the hopelessness of the Starmer Government on commercial decisions, KKR almost looked like a white knight. The pledge by the global investment firm to inject £4billion of equity to stabilise the balance sheet of Britain's biggest water utility, and to return the company to the stock exchange in ten years, was as good an option as this ill-fated company was likely to receive. For KKR to get the deal done it required various forces to be aligned. The management of Thames, the existing creditors, the regulator Ofwat, the Government and the political background. Each time a pact with one party looked attainable, another problem arose. Down the decades, KKR deservedly has taken political punishment for its alleged profiteering at the expense of shareholders, customers, and other stakeholders. The original 'Barbarians at the Gate', dating from its deal for RJR Nabisco back in 1988, it has a history of plunder. Its ownership of Toys R Us ended in the bankruptcy courts. In more recent times, the Wall Street group has focused on long-term investment through infrastructure. This was the mechanism proposed by Thames Water. When the proposition was put to KKR's global investment committee by its British and European principals, it received the thumbs down. Fear of the opprobrium, which came recently from the Commons when MPs tore into potential bonus arrangements and sewage discharges, played a role in the decision to pull out. It was serendipity that KKR's decision emerged on the day that former Bank of England deputy-governor Sir Jon Cunliffe produced his report on the water industry. He found 'deep-rooted systemic' problems and argued for a 'fundamental reset'. Of all the regulators designed to patrol key utilities post privatisation, Ofwat has been the most useless. None of the water utilities deserve credit for their record on keeping the nation's beaches and waterways free of sewage and industrial waste. There are clear differences between the performance of providers such as United Utilities and Severn Trent, which have remained listed companies, and those which were sold to rapacious financiers. Thames and Southern Water are the most notorious examples. In both cases, equity finance was largely replaced by leverage, borrowing and debts, and the lifeblood was sucked out of the enterprises by interest payments and dividends. These often were paid to entities in offshore tax havens. Putting water to one side for a moment, that is what is so frustrating about the recent sale of the Royal Mail-owner International Distribution Services to a financial buyer, Daniel Kretinsky. The only hope for that deal is Ofcom, which has a far better reputation as a regulator. Nevertheless, one suspects the Universal Service Obligation, and a reasonably priced first-class post, are not the priorities of the buyer. The Labour Government was played by Kretinsky in much the same way as it was forced into an expensive rescue of Chinese-owned British Steel. Any notion that Thames Water would be better run as a nationalised industry needs to be disabused. It took 17 years for the Treasury to free itself from ownership of NatWest. A market solution must be the best approach. Otherwise, a bloated government balance sheet will be burdened with this spoilt asset for decades. Red card The love affair of US entrepreneurs, private equity and showbiz for Premier League football is not simply admiration for the beautiful game. The American tax code allows owners of professional teams to write off the entire value of players as 'intangible assets' against tax. If the House of Representatives' tax plan eventually receives assent, future owners (who are taxed on worldwide income) will lose this advantage. The impact on the value of sports franchises, on both sides of the Atlantic, could potentially be catastrophic.
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
KKR abandons £4bn rescue of Thames Water: Nationalisation now looms for debt-ridden firm
Thames Water's future is in doubt after a US private equity giant abandoned a £4billion rescue plan. KKR walked away from the investment deal, partly due to growing concerns over political interference from the Labour Government. The decision is a major setback for the debt-riddled utility firm's scramble to avoid nationalisation. Environment Secretary Steve Reed said the Government was 'keeping a close eye' on the situation and is ready for 'any eventuality', which could include a taxpayer-funded bailout. But Thames Water – which is struggling under £20billion of debt – refused to confirm whether it would scrap executive bonuses despite the fresh financial hurdles. Only last week, industry regulator Ofwat fined the firm a record £123million for sewage spills and paying 'undeserved' dividends to shareholders. New York-based KKR had been chosen as the UK's biggest water supplier's so-called preferred partner in March. Bosses last year launched a search for a buyer after its former owners, including pension and sovereign wealth funds, said the company was 'uninvestable' – plunging the debt-laden firm into crisis. But after completing due diligence checks, KKR said it 'will not be in a position to proceed' with the takeover. The buyout firm was worried about potential future policy changes that could impact the running of the company. Tough government rhetoric over the water industry also spooked the firm, reports said. Thames Water yesterday stated it will hold talks with Ofwat and other stakeholders over a backup turnaround plan devised by its senior creditors. Chairman Sir Adrian Montague said KKR's decision was 'disappointing'. He added: 'We continue to believe that a sustainable recapitalisation of the company is in the best interests of all stakeholders and continue to work with our creditors and stakeholders to achieve that.' However, it fuelled fears that the Government may be forced to take control of Thames Water, which serves 16m households in London and the South East. Reed told LBC Radio yesterday that 'Thames itself remains stable'. But MPs on the Environment Select Committee, which last month grilled the utility's bosses over plans to pay themselves huge bonuses, sounded the alarm over the future of Thames Water. Chairman Alistair Carmichael said: 'In May we raised concerns that Thames had only pursued one bidder at an early stage for its takeover bid, against the wishes of Ofwat, and highlighted the risks this could pose if KKR chose not to proceed. Unfortunately our concerns have been realised, putting Thames in a perilous position.' A company spokesman refused to confirm whether the payout proposals would be scrapped entirely after the KKR deal collapsed. South West Water owner plunges South West Water's owner reported widening losses following a parasite outbreak in Devon – while hiking water bills this year would help fund its £3.2billion investment plans. Pennon reported a pre-tax loss of £72.7million for the year to the end of March, widening from the £9.1million loss reported last year. Last year's incident in Brixham cost it about £21million, pushing it deeper into an annual loss, a spokesman said. An outbreak of cryptosporidium – a parasite that causes infection – in the water supply left some in hospital. More than 100 others reported symptoms including diarrhoea. Bills for South West Water customers rose by 28 per cent on average from April. Pennon said the rise would help fund around a third of its investments.
