Indo US BTA: A strategic crossroad for services sector of both economies
Yet, as both nations work towards a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), the path forward is strewn with strategic opportunities and emerging policy challenges.
Synergies in Digital Services between India and USA
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Thanh Pho Ho Chi Minh: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You)
Unsold Furniture | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
India's total services exports rose by 13.6% to $387.5 billion in FY 2024-25, out of which, exports to the U.S. reached $33.2 billion; led by IT-enabled services ($20 billion), professional services ($10 billion), and BFSI (banking, financial services, and insurance) exports ($2 billion). Conversely, the U.S. exported $25.9 billion in services to India with a surplus of $102 million, primarily from exports in finance and consulting.
The digital services sector in particular reflects a symbiotic relationship between the two countries. India today is the third largest start-up hub and one of the leading countries in global SaaS businesses. There is a deep organic relation between Indian and US tech businesses, with 60% of total investments in Indian start-ups in 2020 coming from US investors. Overall, US investors were part of 75% of the deals, followed by Singapore based investors (15%) and Japanese investors (10%). Moreover, major global US tech businesses like Alphabet and Meta have increased their presence in India, making it their second base (or base for their Asia operations) for much of their product development and marketing activities.
Live Events
Friction Points: Tariffs, Taxes, and Technological Tensions
Unfortunately, it has not been smooth sailing for the BTA as2025 has brought fresh headwinds. In April, the U.S. introduced a reciprocal 26% tariff aimed at select sectors—primarily tech and electronics. India's recent decision to remove its 6% equalization levy (digital services tax) was seen as a conciliatory gesture in support of the BTA process, but teething problems still remain.
For instance, fundamental differences in data protection frameworks—India's more state-centered model vs. the U.S.' consumer and market-driven approach— are roadblocks.Reportedly, bilateral e-commerce trade reached $15 billion in 2024, but DPDPA compliance costs $500 million yearly for IT exporters. Alignment could boost trade by 15% ($2.25 billion) by 2030.
Visa policy is another sore point. Current visa caps cost $800 million in losses and BFSI exports face U.S. regulatory barriers. A WTO study suggests negotiating a 20% increase in
H-1B visa quotas
could grow India's $10 billion Mode 4 exports by $5 billion, while reciprocal BFSI market access could triple India's $2 billion BFSI exports by 2030.
Addressing the dragon in the room
Much of these hurdles exist because historically India and USA have often perceived each other as competitors in digital technology and services. However, the BTA finds utility when both countries face a bigger challenge in the form of China.
The National Strategy for Critical and Emerging Technologies (2020) by USA recognises China as a major threat in the field of technology. The US is actively seeking to de-couple from China on all fronts; from manufacturing to new technologies.
Much of the initial phase of the Indian tech start-up ecosystem was developed by investments from Chinese sources such as Alibaba, Tencent or Didi Chuxing. However, over time there has been a conscious shift by the Indian Government to decouple from Chinese influence which also involved banning certain Chinese service providers.
Chinese technology firms are aggressively expanding into Latin America and Africa, offering bundled solutions, low-cost hardware, and subsidized services. China is also fast emerging as a major tech innovator in the new-age technologies such as AI. These developments threaten business interests of both India and USA.
India and USA signed a critical treaty under the previous US Administration in the form of United States–India Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET), that sought to leverage complementarities between the two countries in the fields of AI, quantum computing, semiconductors and wireless telecommunications. This initiative, which is critical for both countries to counter the Chinese developments, now needs to be fostered by a BTA that helps realise the stated objectives.
Fresh Perspective for the BTA: from competitors to allies
The Indo US BTA between the global leaders in the services is no more about turf war between competitors. It is now more about geofencing out the competition from China. Businesses are presently more allied to the idea (as is evident from the degrees of integration); the authorities need to foster it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
5 minutes ago
- India.com
Explained: Why Trump Is Holding Out A Surprise Trade Deal With India Despite Agriculture Deadlock
New Delhi: With the clock ticking toward the August 1 deadline, India and the United States remain divided on key issues holding up a trade agreement. Agriculture and automotive components continue to block the finalisation of the deal, despite multiple rounds of negotiation between the two sides. The Indian negotiation team has returned from Washington after presenting its offer. According to sources close to the talks, New Delhi has placed its terms on the table and is now waiting. Agriculture, particularly the issue of opening the Indian market to U.S. farm imports, remains the core of the disagreement. India has cited concerns over the impact on domestic farmers and food security. The United States has expressed interest in securing agricultural concessions, especially as the outcome with India could set a model for its upcoming negotiations with Japan and the European Union. Officials involved in the process have not dismissed the possibility of a sudden move by President Donald Trump, who has previously unveiled trade agreements with Indonesia and Vietnam that diverged from what negotiators had initially discussed. These deals, which followed direct conversations between Trump and the respective heads of state, have made Indian officials cautious. India has shifted focus toward a broader Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), targeting a resolution by September or October. However, with President Trump's unpredictable approach, a last-minute announcement for a mini-deal remains on the table. Both sides are aware of the political weight Trump places on trade announcements and their potential electoral appeal. From India's end, agriculture and dairy continue to be areas where New Delhi has shown little room for compromise. From the U.S. side, resistance to reducing import tariffs on automotive components has been flagged as a sticking point. Officials have indicated that no agreement will be signed without addressing these core issues. Meanwhile, in a separate but related development, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, speaking on July 21, said that the Trump administration is prioritising the quality of trade agreements over meeting specific timelines. 'We are not going to rush for the sake of doing deals,' he told CNBC. When asked about the August 1 deadline, he stated that any decision to extend it would come from President Trump. Bessent also suggested that in the absence of agreements, higher tariffs could be reintroduced to increase pressure on negotiating countries. 'If we somehow boomerang back to the August 1 tariff, I would think that a higher tariff level will put more pressure on those countries to come with better agreements,' he said. He confirmed upcoming trade discussions with China, highlighting American concerns over Beijing's continued purchase of sanctioned Iranian and Russian oil. Bessent said there are broader economic imbalances that need to be addressed in future talks with Beijing. On Japan, he said the administration's focus remains on the trade outcome, not the country's internal political factors. He also indicated that the United States may push European countries to align with American positions, particularly if Washington proceeds with secondary sanctions on Russia. As of now, all eyes remain on President Trump. Whether he chooses to push through a trade deal with India before the deadline or hold out for further leverage remains to be seen. Indian officials have made clear that their side has submitted its final position and will wait for Washington's next move.
Deccan Herald
5 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Naturally coloured cotton revival hit by funding crunch
India's naturally coloured cotton, which thrived commercially in the 1940s, is struggling to stage a comeback despite rising global demand for sustainable textiles and decades of government's efforts in research. The specialty crop is currently grown on just 200 acres across Karnataka, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh, fetching Rs 240 per kg, 50 per cent more than regular cotton at Rs 160 per kg. However, farmers are hesitant to expand cultivation due to significantly lower yields. "The productivity of light brown cotton is very low at 1.5-2 quintals per acre, compared to 6-7 quintals per acre for normal cotton. This discourages farmers from expanding the area under this crop," Ashok Kumar, Principal Scientist at ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology (CIRCOT), told PTI. Annual production from these limited acres stands at merely 330 quintals, underscoring the challenge facing this specialty crop that could potentially transform India's textile sustainability profile. ICAR-CIRCOT is currently focusing on light brown coloured cotton. Coloured cotton has ancient roots in Indian agriculture, with cultivation dating back to 2500 BC. Before independence, red, khaki and brown varieties of Cocanada 1 and 2 were grown commercially in Rayalseema, Andhra Pradesh, with exports to Japan. Traditional varieties were also cultivated in Assam and Karnataka's Kumta region. Green Revolution The Green Revolution's emphasis on high-yielding white cotton varieties pushed coloured cotton to the sidelines. The crop's inherent limitations - fewer bolls, lower weight, poor fibre strength, short staple length and colour variations - made it economically unviable for large-scale cultivation. Indian agricultural institutions have developed improved varieties, including DDCC-1, DDB-12, DMB-225, and DGC-78 by the University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. The Central Institute for Cotton Research, Nagpur, created Vaidehi-95, considered the most prominent among 4-5 available varieties. Between 2015-19, ICAR-CIRCOT processed 17 quintals in demonstration batches, producing 9,000 metres of fabric, over 2,000 jackets and 3,000 handkerchiefs, proving commercial viability. The environmental benefits are significant. Traditional cotton dyeing requires approximately 150 litres of water per metre of fabric, while naturally coloured cotton eliminates this requirement, potentially reducing toxic waste disposal costs by up to 50 per cent.
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
Urban climate funding: Indian cities need $2.4 trillion by 2050 to withstand floods, heatwaves
This is an AI-generated image, used for representational purposes only. NEW DELHI: Indian cities will require over $2.4 trillion in investments by 2050 to build resilient and low-carbon infrastructure, as they become increasingly vulnerable to heatwaves, urban flooding, and other climate-related risks, according to a new World Bank report released Tuesday. The report, 'Towards Resilient and Prosperous Cities in India', prepared in partnership with the ministry of housing and urban affairs, warns that economic losses from climate events are set to rise dramatically if cities fail to act urgently. 'Annual economic losses from rain-related flooding are currently estimated at $4 billion. These are projected to rise to $5 billion by 2030 and could surge to between $14 billion and $30 billion by 2070 if no remedial action is taken,' the report says. Among the worst-affected cities are Delhi, Chennai, Surat and Lucknow, which the report identifies as being most exposed to urban heat island effects and flood risks, largely due to rapid, unregulated expansion into ecologically vulnerable zones. In Delhi, heat stress is expected to intensify significantly. Between 1983 and 2016, exposure to dangerous heat levels in India's 10 largest cities increased by 71%, rising from 4.3 billion to 10.1 billion person-hours per year. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Redefine Your Future with a Top Online MBA JAIN Online Learn More Undo "If emissions continue at current levels, annual heat-related deaths may rise from 1,44,000 to over 3,28,000 by 2050. Around 20% of working hours in major Indian cities could be lost due to high heat stress conditions," the report says, as per news agency PTI. The World Bank estimates that an investment of $150 billion over the next 15 years could help 60% of existing Indian cities implement effective flood mitigation measures. Heat mitigation alone, it adds, could increase India's GDP by up to 0.4% and save as many as 130,000 lives annually by 2050. Calling for urgent fiscal recalibration, the report warns that current urban infrastructure spending, at just 0.7% of GDP, is 'much lower than other countries' and must increase substantially. Between 2011 and 2018, India's average annual spending stood at $10.6 billion, a fraction of what will be needed in the decades ahead. "This is both a challenge and an opportunity," said Auguste Tano Kouame, World Bank Country Director for India, as quoted by PTI. "Without timely action, climate risks such as flooding and extreme heat will become much more severe." The report also notes that India's urban population stood at 480 million in 2020 and is expected to double to over 1.1 billion by 2070. "More than 144 million new urban homes will be required, doubling the current housing stock,' it states. Hence, to mitigate these risks, the World Bank estimates that India will need to invest $2.4 trillion by 2050 and $10.9 trillion by 2070 across sectors such as housing, public transport, solid waste management, and municipal services. To close the massive infrastructure gap, the report urges tapping into private capital through mechanisms such as green bonds, blended finance, and access to international climate funds. It also calls for greater financial autonomy for urban local bodies and improved project planning capacities to attract such investments. The findings come just months before COP30, the global climate summit, where countries are expected to present updated national climate action plans, known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). As per PTI, while only 25 nations, representing just 20% of global emissions, have submitted their NDCs so far, India's plan will be key to testing its climate leadership and sustaining the goals of the Paris Agreement.
